Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben fa48b5825e The bundle and the mesh stop removing each other
04-ISSUES/010. The store now records where each resource came from -- carried,
or declared -- and each origin removes only its own. A declaration removes what
the mesh previously declared and never what the bundle raised.

State written before the field existed reads as carried, because everything a
host had applied by then came from its bundle: there was no other way to tell
it anything. Guessing the other way would have the first upgrade remove the
substrate, which is this fault arriving through the change that fixes it.

Verified on the scenario that caused it, and on the property that had to
survive it: a later declaration dropping a resource still removes that
resource, so removal by omission still means what it meant.

Also stops swallowing a publish failure. A node that applied a declaration and
could not tell the mesh looked exactly like one that had -- the mesh believing
it never answered, the node believing it did, and nothing anywhere saying so.
Reports are published mandatory now, so anything the broker cannot route comes
back and is said out loud rather than dropped in silence.
2026-08-29 16:43:46 +02:00
jschoubben a488c76b5e A node holds its link open, and applies what the mesh signs
The loop the whole thing exists for: told, apply, report.

`run` holds one outbound connection open and consumes the node's own queue.
Every declaration is verified against the control plane's signing key before a
byte of it is read as an instruction -- not once at connect, every time. The
transport being pinned is a different question from the instruction being
genuine, and pinning only the first would make the second transitive: a
compromised broker could forge declarations, and this host applies whatever the
link delivers.

Malformed and forged are reported differently, because ADR 0004 requires a host
to tell "this is not from the mesh I joined" from "this is broken". One means
somebody is trying and the other means something needs fixing.

A node now keeps what it needs to come back on its own: the broker's address
and fingerprint, the signing key it believes, and its own broker password --
which the mesh issues at enrolment to replace the token's secret, so the
one-time thing stays one-time and the credential it holds for years is not the
one that was pasted into a terminal.

Verified in the lab end to end. The node enrolled, held its link, received a
signed declaration and applied it -- the file is on the machine with the right
contents, and the host's own record lists both resources.

That run also found issue 010, which is recorded in novox/hq: the declaration
removed every container on the machine, including the control plane that sent
it. Correct reconciliation, shared store, and the first thing that happens.
2026-08-29 16:23:27 +02:00