Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben b6c174a324 A consumer beside a held provider is told what it serves without the names it does not compose, never their placeholders (issue 1921, milestone 47/G)
The provider held on its machine is composed apart, so no module of the composed set serves the provision; its
manifest's served values reached the consumer's binding raw and the binding refused the consumer for a
${bound:route:name-web} it does not require (the group check of 8a80e8e86858 on novox, mesh-build-node beside a held
gitea). Each such key is now left out and said on the need, as a provider elsewhere leaves it out (ADR 0346).

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfFSnn24M3GcqttoU7i
2026-11-07 07:19:58 +01:00
jschoubben d68e241724 Take the catalogue's composition rules into the node-engine
ADR 0593 §7: the composer with its refusals leaves mesh-sdk, so mesh-sdk
carries no composition rule. The catalogue functions only the
node-engine's composition reaches (Resolve, Resolution's Compose,
Declaration, DataItems, LeftOut, Rules and the rest, the settings,
placeholder and template refusals, the rendering helpers) are copied
with their tests into internal/compose/resolution; a method of a
mesh-sdk shape becomes a function taking it first. The composition
calls its own copies, and the captured catalogue its tests read lives
here now, shared by mesh-compose's tests.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
2026-11-02 19:15:55 +01:00