One name per thing, per the HQ glossary: the module/container/image/binary/repo
becomes mesh-controller, the seat the-controller, and the store+broker pair the
foundation (embedded base bundles, default template and example lock renamed with
their go:embed directives). No behaviour change — a pure vocabulary rename.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
Every scenario that places a container runtime gives each of its machines
`egress: true` — a node that runs modules pulls images from the internet, which is what
a node does. The underlay-only scenarios (bootstrap-single, behind-nat,
segmented-and-unforwardable, the-ordinary-shape, two-on-a-segment) stay sealed on
purpose: an extra NIC would change the very reachability they are asserting about.
`images:` keeps only the mesh's own — 55 third-party entries leave whole-mesh-full
alone, and the machine fetches them itself by the digest its module.json already pins.
The whole-mesh beds also say per machine which of ours they get: novox the substrate
control plane and its own fifteen runtimes, ace its twenty-four, the two workstations
one each. That is not a lab economy. An operator's workstation holds the images its own
modules need, and giving these two the union would put some thirty gigabytes onto a
thirty-gigabyte disk.
bootstrap-with-registry.yml is deleted. It existed only to demonstrate the lab's
registry, nothing referenced it, and there is nothing left for it to demonstrate.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LrgweAeERJYBg88c5cKDzF
A lavinmq provider and an amqp-ping consumer ride laptop while the
substrate's own broker owns 5672 on anchor — the twin of two-node-db.
lavinmq is the mesh's control broker AND a user-facing capability, so a
provider must publish 5672 for its consumers and cannot share a node
with the control broker that already owns it; the split unblocks the
chain single-node.
The bed proves, layered: the run-once bootstrap computed the admin hash
and wrote the broker config before the broker started (ADR 0052); the
service and both runtimes are up and stable; each module got its scoped
broker account on the substrate broker; the provisioner created the
consumer's vhost AND user, both named for the derived login; and the
consumer connected to that vhost with the mesh-minted password and
round-tripped a message. The consumer uses ${bound:amqp:as} for user
and vhost both, and the provider's serves carries the port.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LrgweAeERJYBg88c5cKDzF
jschoubben