A catalogue module is a Go module of its own, so the prover runs a replay
in the directory its register entry names. R305 fails on the commit before
the fix and passes on it.
The lab's check ran in the TypeScript toolchain, which holds no Go compiler,
so the replays register was never compiled before a merge. merge-check.sh now
declares replays/merge-check.sh as its Go part, which the build seat runs in
the Go toolchain: gofmt, go vet and the register's own tests. Both new
replays are proved: each fails on the commit before its fix and passes on it.
Two of nineteen image checks read unhealthy while working in the mesh's hands;
adopted without proof they would have put back two good builds. The replays
every catalogue merge check runs now start each long-running container whose
declared check or image the change touches, alone, with what its module
declares and nothing of the mesh's, and require the check to see the program
within its grace: a program that stays up while its check does not see it
fails the change; one that does not stay up alone is said and left to the
first machine's gate; a check needing a provider must only reach the program.
R-studio replays the studio's false unhealthy — a server bound to HOSTNAME's
address and an image check asking localhost — failed on the bed, and proved
with HOSTNAME=0.0.0.0.
For eleven hours a web application's port was open and its program ran while
every request hung; liveness and a TCP check both say it fine. R145 raises a
web server whose application never answers, has the node-engine at its commit
look at it with the module's declared HTTP check, and the controller at its
commit raise the module's condition on the second look. Proved: it fails on
the trunk before Phase B and passes on it.
The agent server crash-looped about a hundred times behind every passing check.
R-crashloop raises a container whose program exits at start, has the node-engine
at its commit judge it through the runtime, and the controller at its commit
judge the gate from what the engine said — two repositories, each at its own
commit before the fix and on it.
Phase 5 is done when the replays of 236, 262, 263 and 266 fail on the commit before their fix and
pass after. The register names every replay with its issue and fix; the bus replay (266) runs a
consumer filtered like the controller's against a bus of a given release, the resolver replay (262)
renders the catalogue's machine list and asks every machine's name by getaddrinfo under musl and
glibc, and the prover runs each at both commits: all five (236, 262, 263, 266, 273) proved.
jochen
mesh-admin