Files
mesh-lab/scenarios/lavinmq-bed.yml
T
jschoubben 5d6e8fbe7a Rename mesh-control -> mesh-controller, substrate -> foundation
One name per thing, per the HQ glossary: the module/container/image/binary/repo
becomes mesh-controller, the seat the-controller, and the store+broker pair the
foundation (embedded base bundles, default template and example lock renamed with
their go:embed directives). No behaviour change — a pure vocabulary rename.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
2026-09-16 18:40:40 +02:00

59 lines
2.7 KiB
YAML

# Two machines: one is the foundation, the other carries a lavinmq PROVIDER and a consumer of it.
#
# lavinmq is the mesh's own control-plane broker (mesh-broker), and it is ALSO offered as a
# user-facing capability: a module that needs a message queue gets its OWN broker — a scoped vhost and
# user on a lavinmq PROVIDER — not an account on the control broker. That makes lavinmq the sharp
# two-node case, for the same reason two-node-db is: the foundation's broker publishes 5672 on the node
# it runs on, and a lavinmq provider must publish 5672 too for its consumers to reach it — so the two
# cannot share a machine. The moment a real amqp provider must own a node's 5672, it collides with the
# control broker already there, and the chain is blocked single-node.
#
# This is the split that unblocks it. `anchor` runs the foundation (store, broker, control) and NOTHING
# else. `laptop` runs the whole chain: the lavinmq PROVIDER and the amqp-ping CONSUMER that requires
# it. Provider and consumer are co-located on laptop, so the grant never crosses a node boundary; only
# enrolment crosses to anchor, over the underlay both machines share. And because the foundation broker
# is on the OTHER node, the provider owns laptop's 5672 uncontested.
#
# It needs a host binary and the foundation bundle:
#
# MESH_LAB_HOST_BINARY=.../mesh-host MESH_LAB_BUNDLE=.../examples/foundation-first-node.lock
#
# HELPER — stock the two runtimes into the local daemon before the run (some may already be there):
# scripts/build-module-runtime.sh lavinmq /tmp/lavinmq.tar
# scripts/build-module-runtime.sh amqp-ping /tmp/amqp-ping.tar
# The service image cloudamqp/lavinmq:latest must be in the local daemon too — it is already stocked as
# the foundation's own broker image; each node pulls what it runs from the internet, over its own
# uplink.
scenario: lavinmq-bed
segments:
hosting:
kind: public
cidr: [192.0.2.0/24]
machines:
anchor:
at: { segment: hosting, address: [192.0.2.10] }
egress: true
inbound: allow
memory: 3GiB
cpus: 2
laptop:
at: { segment: hosting, address: [192.0.2.11] }
egress: true
inbound: allow
memory: 3GiB
cpus: 2
images:
- mesh-controller:development
# The lavinmq provider's runtime (reused for its run-once bootstrap and its provisioner) and the
# amqp-ping consumer's runtime, both built by scripts/build-module-runtime.sh into the local daemon
# and loaded onto the machines, which hold them by their own image IDs.
# The lavinmq SERVICE image is cloudamqp/lavinmq:latest, already stocked above.
- mesh-runtime-lavinmq:development
- mesh-runtime-amqp-ping:development
place:
all: [host, runtime]