Files
mesh-lab/test/integration/mesh.test.ts
T
jschoubben 01ca02ad04 A machine works through its queue, and the wait allows for it
With caught-up finally an equality, the last red test turned out to be
telling the truth about something real: declarations queue, the machine
applies them one at a time at half a minute each, and by the twenty-
fifth test it is minutes behind the latest push. 240 seconds was not a
generous bound on one apply — it was an accidental bound on the whole
backlog.

Doubled rather than tuned, and the real remedy filed instead: a machine
asked to be five successive things should become the last one, which
is a decision about the link rather than about this timeout
(novox/hq 04-ISSUES/031).
2026-09-02 01:05:51 +02:00

2096 lines
115 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* A mesh, raised from nothing, joined by two machines, delivering a credential neither the mesh
* nor the broker can read.
*
* Everything before this proves a part. This proves the parts meet — which is the thing the
* project keeps saying cannot be checked any other way (novox/hq ADR 0001: every fault of
* 2026-08-22 was found in production because nothing could be stood up locally).
*
* It needs a host binary and the substrate bundle:
*
* MESH_LAB_HOST_BINARY=.../mesh-host
* MESH_LAB_BUNDLE=.../examples/substrate-first-node.lock
*
* The bundle's image references are rewritten to the ones this scenario's own registry serves.
* A digest belongs to whatever registry serves it, so a committed bundle names a registry that is
* not this one — rewriting is what makes it applicable rather than a placeholder to tidy away.
*/
import { test, before, after } from "node:test";
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
import { existsSync, readFileSync } from "node:fs";
import { loadScenario } from "../../src/declaration/parse.ts";
import { raise } from "../../src/lifecycle/raise.ts";
import { pinnedInto, stillUnpinned } from "../../src/pinning.ts";
import { destroy, exec } from "../../src/lifecycle/operate.ts";
import { hostBinaryPath, HOST_PATH } from "../../src/lifecycle/place.ts";
import { labIsUsable, destroyAll } from "./harness.ts";
import { incus } from "../../src/incus/client.ts";
import { machineName } from "../../src/lifecycle/names.ts";
import { ready, returnTo, keep, rememberStock, warmStock } from "../../src/warm.ts";
/** Whether this run keeps its mesh for the next one. Off unless asked for. */
const warming = process.env["MESH_LAB_WARM"] === "1";
const capability = await labIsUsable();
const binary = hostBinaryPath();
const bundle = process.env["MESH_LAB_BUNDLE"] ?? "";
const builder = process.env["MESH_LAB_BUILDER"] ?? "";
/** mesh-control's `examples/modules`, so the manifests proven here are the ones that ship. */
const moduleExamples = process.env["MESH_LAB_MODULES"] ?? "";
const skip = !capability.usable
? `lab not usable: ${capability.why}`
: !binary || !existsSync(binary)
? "MESH_LAB_HOST_BINARY is not set to a built mesh-host"
: !bundle || !existsSync(bundle)
? "MESH_LAB_BUNDLE is not set to a substrate bundle (mesh-host examples/)"
: false;
const SCENARIO = "two-nodes";
let instanceId = "";
/** The scenario's own registry, which serves the images a module may mirror. */
let registry = "";
/** What that registry actually serves, by repository. */
let stocked: string[] = [];
/**
* The pinned reference for one of the scenario's images.
*
* By digest, because the lab's registry drops tags when it stocks: `registry:2` is not there and
* asking for it fails with "not found", which reads like a missing image rather than a naming
* convention. A digest is also what a declaration pins, so this is the reference a module would
* really carry.
*/
function pinned(repository: string): string {
const found = stocked.find((r) => r.slice(r.indexOf("/") + 1, r.indexOf("@")) === repository);
assert.ok(found, `the scenario stocks no ${repository}; it serves ${stocked.join(", ")}`);
return found;
}
function quote(s: string): string {
return `'${s.replaceAll("'", `'\\''`)}'`;
}
async function on(machine: string, command: string, timeoutMs?: number): Promise<{ out: string; ok: boolean }> {
// Each part on its own line, and stderr redirected once for the whole script.
//
// It was `${command} 2>&1; echo ...` on a single line, which quietly broke every command
// containing a heredoc: the terminator line became `MARKER 2>&1; echo ...`, matched nothing, and
// the heredoc swallowed the rest of the script — including the echo. `exec 2>&1` needs no
// trailing text on the command's last line, so a heredoc terminates where it says it does.
const { stdout } = await exec(instanceId, machine, [
"sh", "-c", `exec 2>&1\n${command}\necho "__exit=$?"`,
], timeoutMs);
const marker = stdout.lastIndexOf("__exit=");
if (marker < 0) {
// **Never success.** `Number("")` is 0, so a missing marker used to read as exit 0 — a
// command whose output was swallowed reported that it worked, which is the one answer a test
// harness must never give.
return { out: stdout, ok: false };
}
const said = stdout.slice(marker + 7).trim();
return { out: stdout.slice(0, marker), ok: said === "0" };
}
async function must(machine: string, command: string, timeoutMs?: number): Promise<string> {
const { out, ok } = await on(machine, command, timeoutMs);
if (!ok) throw new Error(`${machine}: ${command}\n${out}`);
return out;
}
/** The control plane, which runs in a container on the first node. */
async function mesh(command: string, timeoutMs?: number): Promise<string> {
return must("anchor", `docker exec mesh-control /mesh-control ${command}`, timeoutMs);
}
/**
* Wait until a machine has actually applied what it was last sent.
*
* **`push` sends; it does not wait.** It prints "sent N resource(s)" and returns, and the machine
* applies afterwards. So asserting on what a machine is running immediately after a push is a race
* — and the one this fixes lost it silently: `status` still described the *previous* apply, so it
* reported nothing wrong while the containers from this declaration did not exist yet.
*
* Asked of the mesh rather than of the machine, and in its own terms. A node is settled when it is
* neither waiting for what it was sent nor wrong about what it applied — the same two questions
* `status` answers, read as JSON so a test is not parsing a report meant for a person.
*
* A machine that reports a failure ends this at once rather than on the timeout: it is not going
* to become right by being waited for, and a refusal read after two minutes of polling is the same
* refusal, later.
*/
async function settled(node: string, withinMs = 480_000): Promise<void> {
const until = Date.now() + withinMs;
let last = "";
while (Date.now() < until) {
// **Could not ask** and **asked, and the answer was bad** are different facts, and only the
// second is this machine's fault. The control plane is a container on the node being polled:
// while it applies a declaration, an exec into it can lose its fifo to containerd, and a poll
// loop that treats that as a verdict reports the mesh broken because the question missed.
// And a poll that *threw* — an exec timeout, a lost fifo — is also "could not ask", not a
// verdict. The distinction failed once as an IncusError surfacing at minute four of a wait
// whose machine was merely slow.
let state: {
wrong: { node: string; outcome: string; refused?: string;
failed?: { id: string; error: string }[] }[];
waiting: { node: string; never: boolean }[];
reported: { node: string; outcome: string; current: boolean }[];
} | undefined;
let said = "";
try {
const asked = await on("anchor",
`docker exec mesh-control /mesh-control status --json`);
said = asked.out;
// Parsed inside the try on purpose: a truncated answer from a struggling machine is the
// same fact as no answer, and the likeliest moment for one is exactly the machine this
// poll is watching.
if (asked.ok) state = JSON.parse(said);
} catch (err) {
said = (err as Error).message;
}
if (!state) {
last = said;
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 5000));
continue;
}
const bad = state.wrong.find((w) => w.node === node);
if (bad) {
const why = [bad.refused, ...(bad.failed ?? []).map((f) => `${f.id}: ${f.error}`)]
.filter(Boolean).join("\n ");
throw new Error(`${node} did not apply what it was sent (${bad.outcome}):\n ${why}`);
}
// Caught up is an equality, not an ordering. This compared timestamps once — report newer
// than send — and lost the race it invited: the previous test's closing apply reported
// after this test's push, newer and still about the old declaration. The report now names
// the declaration it applied, and the mesh says whether that is the one it last sent.
const word = state.reported.find((r) => r.node === node);
const acted = word?.outcome === "applied" && word.current;
if (!state.waiting.some((w) => w.node === node) && acted) return;
last = said;
// Unhurried on purpose: each poll is an exec into a container on the machine that is busy
// applying, and asking four times a minute rather than thirty is the difference between
// observing the apply and competing with it.
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 5000));
}
throw new Error(`${node} never caught up with what it was sent within ` +
`${Math.round(withinMs / 1000)}s. Last answer, or the reason there was none:\n${last}`);
}
/**
* The bundle, with every image reference pointed at this scenario's registry.
*
* Matched by repository rather than by the whole reference, because the address and the digest
* both differ from whatever the committed bundle names — and a bundle that names the wrong
* registry is not wrong, it is built for a different target.
*/
function bundleFor(images: string[]): string {
let text = readFileSync(bundle, "utf8");
for (const pinned of images) {
const repository = pinned.slice(pinned.indexOf("/") + 1, pinned.indexOf("@"));
const escaped = repository.replaceAll("/", "\\/").replaceAll(".", "\\.");
text = text.replaceAll(
new RegExp(`[A-Za-z0-9_.:-]+\\/${escaped}@sha256:[0-9a-f]+`, "g"),
pinned,
);
}
return text;
}
/** Take a token out of what `token issue` printed. It is the one base64url blob on its own line. */
function tokenFrom(said: string): string {
const found = said.split("\n").map((l) => l.trim()).find((l) => l.length > 100 && !l.includes(" "));
assert.ok(found, `no token in:\n${said}`);
return found;
}
before(async () => {
if (skip) return;
// A mesh kept between runs, when one is being kept and still counts.
//
// **Bootstrapping proves the same thing every time**, and the tests worth iterating on are the
// ones after it. Off by default: a run that is meant to mean something raises from nothing,
// because "it passes" must not come to mean "it passes against a mesh somebody bootstrapped
// last week".
if (warming) {
const said = await ready(SCENARIO);
if (said.use === "restore") {
instanceId = said.instanceId;
const seconds = await returnTo(instanceId);
stocked = warmStock(instanceId).images;
// **A snapshot captures disk, not memory.** Restoring reboots the machine, so everything
// this suite started by hand is gone — the host most of all. Without it the mesh looks
// perfectly healthy from the control plane's side: a module is assigned, a declaration is
// sent and recorded, and nothing on the machine is listening to apply it. That is exactly
// how this was first met, and it cost an hour to see.
//
// The real answer is a host started by init, which is what the design says it is anyway
// (novox/hq 05-the-node-host: a root service, installed as a package). Until the lab places
// it that way, the warm path restarts what it knows it started.
for (const machine of ["anchor", "laptop"]) {
await must(machine, `pgrep -x mesh-host >/dev/null || ` +
`(nohup ${HOST_PATH} run > /var/log/mesh-host.log 2>&1 & sleep 3)`);
}
const running = await on("anchor", `pgrep -x mesh-host >/dev/null && echo yes || echo no`);
assert.equal(running.out.trim(), "yes",
"the host did not come back after a restore, so nothing would apply anything");
console.log(`warm: returned ${instanceId} to its state in ${seconds.toFixed(1)}s, ` +
`and started the host again`);
return;
}
console.log(`warm: raising fresh — ${said.why}`);
}
// **Progress is printed, and that is not decoration** (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/024). A raise takes
// minutes and said nothing until it finished, so a stall and ordinary work were the same
// thing to look at — and the one time it mattered, thirty-five minutes of nothing was read as
// a slow test until somebody went and looked inside the machine.
const raised = await raise(loadScenario(`scenarios/${SCENARIO}.yml`), {
onProgress: (m) => console.log(`raise: ${m}`),
});
instanceId = raised.instanceId;
// The first node raises everything from a file rather than from a bundle built into the binary,
// because the digests are this registry's and are not known until it is up.
await must("anchor", `cat > /tmp/substrate.lock <<'MESHBUNDLE'\n${bundleFor(raised.images)}\nMESHBUNDLE`);
await must("anchor", `${HOST_PATH} apply /tmp/substrate.lock`);
stocked = raised.images;
const first = raised.images[0];
assert.ok(first, "the scenario stocked no images, so nothing can be mirrored");
registry = first.slice(0, first.indexOf("/"));
// A build machine, so anything here can ask the mesh to build something. Placed rather than
// assumed: nothing else in this scenario would start one.
if (builder) {
await incus([
"file", "push", builder, `${machineName(instanceId, "anchor")}/usr/local/bin/mesh-builder`,
"--mode", "0755",
], 180_000);
await must("anchor", `mkdir -p /var/lib/mesh-builder`);
await must("anchor",
`MESH_BROKER_AMQP='amqp://guest:guest@127.0.0.1:5672/' MESH_REGISTRY=${registry} ` +
`MESH_WORKSPACE=/var/lib/mesh-builder ` +
`nohup /usr/local/bin/mesh-builder > /var/log/mesh-builder.log 2>&1 & sleep 3`);
}
if (warming) {
// Snapshotted only now, with everything up: a state worth returning to is the one after the
// part nobody wants to repeat.
await rememberStock(instanceId, stocked);
const warm = await keep(SCENARIO, instanceId);
console.log(`warm: ${warm.instanceId} kept, against ` +
Object.entries(warm.against).map(([n, c]) => `${n} ${c}`).join(", "));
}
}, { timeout: 1_800_000 });
after(async () => {
// A kept instance survives on purpose, and `mesh-lab warm cool` is how it goes away. Everything
// else is destroyed, because an instance nobody meant to keep is one nobody will remember.
if (warming) return;
if (instanceId) await destroy(instanceId);
await destroyAll(`${SCENARIO}-`);
}, { timeout: 600_000 });
test("a bare machine becomes a mesh", { skip, timeout: 600_000 }, async () => {
const running = await must("anchor", `docker ps --format '{{.Names}}'`);
for (const container of ["mesh-store", "mesh-broker", "mesh-control"]) {
assert.match(running, new RegExp(container), `${container} is not running`);
}
// Answering, not merely up. A container that is running is not a control plane that replies —
// a distinction this project has already paid for once.
assert.ok((await mesh("status")).length > 0);
});
test("both machines join it, and the token is all they need", { skip, timeout: 900_000 }, async () => {
for (const [machine, node] of [["anchor", "anchor"], ["laptop", "laptop"]] as const) {
await mesh(`node add ${node}`);
const token = tokenFrom(await mesh(`token issue --node ${node}`));
// No --name. The token says what the mesh calls the machine, which is the fault this walk
// found the first time it was run.
const said = await must(machine, `${HOST_PATH} enrol --token ${quote(token)}`);
assert.match(said, new RegExp(`enrolled as ${node}`), said);
assert.match(said, /sealing key/, "no sealing key was generated");
}
const recorded = await must("anchor",
`docker exec mesh-store psql -U postgres -d inventory -qAt ` +
`-c "select name from node where sealing_key is not null order by name"`);
assert.equal(recorded.trim().split("\n").map((l) => l.trim()).sort().join(","), "anchor,laptop",
"the mesh did not record a sealing key for both machines");
});
test("a credential reaches both ends and the mesh holds neither", { skip, timeout: 900_000 }, async () => {
// The whole argument, on real machines: the two ends must hold the SAME password, and it must
// appear nowhere the mesh or the broker could read it.
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"postgres","version":"1",` +
`"provides":[{"name":"postgres-database","scope":"mesh"}],"serves":{"postgres-database":{"port":5432}},` +
`"grants":{"postgres-database":"/var/lib/mesh-host/grants"},` +
`"receives":{"postgres-database":"/var/lib/mesh-host/grants/mesh.json"},"resources":[]}' > /tmp/pg.json`);
// The consumer also writes a configuration file with a hole in it, which is how nearly every
// real program takes a credential: a sealed file is a password alone, and almost nothing reads
// one. The mesh cannot compose the document — it discarded the value — so the module supplies it
// with `${secret:...}` in it and the host, the only thing that sees both halves, fills it in.
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"meshboard","version":"1",` +
`"requires":["postgres-database"],"contributes":{"postgres-database":{"name":"meshboard"}},` +
`"binds":{"postgres-database":"/etc/meshboard/database.json"},` +
`"secrets":{"postgres-database":"/etc/meshboard/database.password"},` +
`"resources":[{"id":"env","type":"file","path":"/etc/meshboard/database.env","mode":"0600",` +
`"content":"PGHOST=$\{bound:postgres-database:at\}\\nPGPORT=$\{bound:postgres-database:port\}\\n` +
`PGUSER=$\{bound:postgres-database:as\}\\nPGPASSWORD=$\{secret:postgres-database\}\\n"}]}' ` +
`> /tmp/app.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/pg.json mesh-control:/pg.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/app.json mesh-control:/app.json`);
await mesh("module add /pg.json");
await mesh("module add /app.json");
await mesh("overlay place anchor --hub --endpoint 192.0.2.10:51820 --site lab");
await mesh("overlay place laptop --site lab");
for (const node of ["anchor", "laptop"]) await mesh(`assign ${node} networking`);
await mesh("assign anchor postgres");
await mesh("assign laptop meshboard");
for (const machine of ["anchor", "laptop"]) {
await must(machine, `nohup ${HOST_PATH} run > /var/log/mesh-host.log 2>&1 & sleep 3`);
}
await mesh("push");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 8000));
const onConsumer = (await must("laptop", `cat /etc/meshboard/database.password`)).trim();
// Named after the machine *and* the module, because a consumer is both (novox/hq
// 04-ISSUES/022) — a node routinely runs several modules wanting one database.
const onProvider = (await must("anchor",
`cat /var/lib/mesh-host/grants/laptop.meshboard.secret`)).trim();
assert.ok(onConsumer.length >= 40, `the consumer's credential is ${onConsumer.length} characters`);
assert.equal(onConsumer, onProvider,
"the two ends hold different passwords, so nothing could ever authenticate");
// Only the machine it is for may read it.
assert.match(await must("laptop", `stat -c %a /etc/meshboard/database.password`), /^600/);
// And the configuration with holes in it arrived filled. **This is the only place the two
// substitutions are proven against a real host**: the mesh fills what it knows in the clear
// before sending, the host opens the sealed value and fills the rest on the machine, and the
// two expressions that find the holes live in different repositories.
const filled = await must("laptop", `cat /etc/meshboard/database.env`);
assert.match(filled, /^PGPASSWORD=.+$/m, `the password was never put in:\n${filled}`);
assert.ok(filled.includes(`PGPASSWORD=${onConsumer}`),
`the file holds a different password from the credential file:\n${filled}`);
assert.match(filled, /^PGUSER=mesh_laptop_meshboard$/m,
`the consumer was not told what name to present:\n${filled}`);
assert.match(filled, /^PGPORT=5432$/m, `the port did not arrive as a port:\n${filled}`);
assert.doesNotMatch(filled, /\$\{/,
`a placeholder survived to the machine and would be read as a value:\n${filled}`);
assert.match(await must("laptop", `stat -c %a /etc/meshboard/database.env`), /^600/);
// The password is in that file and nowhere the mesh could read it — which is the whole point of
// filling the hole on the machine rather than composing the document in the control plane.
// And it is nowhere it could have been read on the way. The declaration crossed the broker; the
// database is the control plane's; the state is what the node reported back.
for (const [machine, where] of [
["laptop", "/var/lib/mesh-host/declared.json"],
["laptop", "/var/lib/mesh-host/state.json"],
["anchor", "/var/lib/mesh-host/declared.json"],
] as const) {
// **`--` first, or the password is read as options.** A generated credential is random, so
// one of them eventually begins with a dash — this one started `-S` and grep refused the
// whole invocation. The test then compared an error message against "0" and reported the
// password as leaked, which is the worst way for a search to fail: it says it found
// something.
const { out } = await on(machine, `grep -c -e ${quote(onConsumer)} -- ${where}`);
assert.equal(out.trim(), "0", `the password is in ${where} on ${machine}`);
}
const inTheMesh = await must("anchor",
`docker exec mesh-store psql -U postgres -d inventory -qAt ` +
`-c "select count(*) from secret where for_consumer like '%${onConsumer}%' ` +
`or for_provider like '%${onConsumer}%'"`);
assert.equal(inTheMesh.trim(), "0", "the control plane's database holds the password in the clear");
});
test("the consumer is also told where its database is", { skip, timeout: 300_000 }, async () => {
// A password with no address is not a connection. This is the readable half, which stays
// readable on purpose — it is the secret half that could not be composed, not this one.
const told = JSON.parse(await must("laptop", `cat /etc/meshboard/database.json`));
assert.equal(told.from, "anchor");
assert.equal(told.at, "anchor.internal");
assert.equal(told.serves.port, 5432);
// And the name it resolves to was written by the mesh as well, on this machine.
assert.match(await must("laptop", `grep anchor.internal /etc/hosts`), /10\.42\.0\.\d+/);
});
test("when a machine cannot do what it was told, the mesh says which and why", { skip, timeout: 900_000 }, async () => {
// Demonstrated with inserted rows first, which proves the query and not the path. This sends a
// real machine something it will genuinely fail at, and asks the mesh afterwards.
//
// A package that does not exist, because that is a failure of the ordinary kind: the host tries,
// the package manager says no, and some of the declaration is applied and some is not — which
// is the situation `status` exists to distinguish from a machine that refused everything.
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"impossible","version":"1","resources":[` +
`{"id":"nothing","type":"package","package":"a-package-that-does-not-exist"}]}' > /tmp/imp.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/imp.json mesh-control:/imp.json`);
await mesh("module add /imp.json");
await mesh("assign laptop impossible");
await mesh("push laptop");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 10_000));
const said = await mesh("status");
assert.match(said, /not doing what they were told/, said);
assert.match(said, /laptop/, said);
// The machine's own words about the resource that failed, not a summary written at this end.
assert.match(said, /impossible\.nothing/, `the failing resource is not named:\n${said}`);
// And the distinction survives: this machine FAILED, it did not refuse. Refused means it is
// exactly as it was; failed means it is in a state nobody declared, and they are fixed in
// different places.
assert.match(said, /laptop\s+failed/, said);
// The other machine is not implicated.
assert.doesNotMatch(said.split("not heard from")[0] ?? said, /anchor\s+(failed|refused)/,
"a machine that did as it was told is listed as wrong");
});
test("a declaration waits for a machine that is switched off", { skip, timeout: 900_000 }, async () => {
// A machine is disconnected as an ordinary situation, not an exception (novox/hq ADR 0004), so
// a push to one that is not listening must wait rather than vanish. The queue is durable and the
// message persistent, which ought to be enough — but a lost declaration is silent, and "ought to
// be" is not a property.
//
// The machine is not merely idle here: its host is stopped, so nothing is consuming its queue.
// Nothing this test asserts should depend on what another left behind. The machine still has a
// deliberately-impossible module from the test above, and while that is assigned the mesh never
// updates its account of what the machine holds — a partial report is not an account, on
// purpose (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/010).
await mesh("unassign laptop impossible");
// Stop listening, and prove it stopped — a test that pushed to a machine that was still running
// would pass having checked nothing.
//
// By process name, never by matching the command line: `pkill -f` matches the shell running it
// too, which kills the connection carrying the command and hangs the caller waiting for a reply
// that will never come. Cost an hour once, in this file.
await must("laptop", `pkill -x mesh-host || true; sleep 1`);
const listening = await on("laptop", `pgrep -x mesh-host`);
assert.equal(listening.ok, false, "the host is still running, so this proves nothing");
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"while-away","version":"1","resources":[` +
`{"id":"note","type":"file","path":"/etc/mesh-while-away","content":"waited"}]}' > /tmp/away.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/away.json mesh-control:/away.json`);
await mesh("module add /away.json");
await mesh("assign laptop while-away");
await mesh("push laptop");
// Nothing has happened on the machine, because nothing is there to do it.
const before = await on("laptop", `test -f /etc/mesh-while-away`);
assert.equal(before.ok, false, "a machine with no host applied a declaration");
// And now it listens again. No second push, and nobody says anything.
await must("laptop", `nohup ${HOST_PATH} run > /var/log/mesh-host.log 2>&1 & sleep 8`);
let arrived = false;
for (let i = 0; i < 20 && !arrived; i++) {
arrived = (await on("laptop", `test -f /etc/mesh-while-away`)).ok;
if (!arrived) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 2000));
}
if (!arrived) {
// Everything needed to tell "the message was never queued" from "the host never read it".
const log = await on("laptop", `tail -20 /var/log/mesh-host.log`);
const queues = await on("anchor",
`docker exec mesh-broker lavinmqctl list_queues name messages 2>&1 | head -10`);
const owned = await on("anchor",
`docker exec mesh-store psql -U postgres -d inventory -qAt -c "select name, outcome from node_report r join node n on n.id=r.node"`);
assert.fail(`a declaration sent to a switched-off machine was lost\n` +
`--- the host's log ---\n${log.out}\n--- the broker's queues ---\n${queues.out}\n` +
`--- what each machine last did ---\n${owned.out}`);
}
assert.equal((await must("laptop", `cat /etc/mesh-while-away`)).trim(), "waited");
// And the mesh's account of what that machine holds catches up too, or a later declaration
// would tell it to remove what it has just been given.
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 4000));
const owned = await must("anchor",
`docker exec mesh-store psql -U postgres -d inventory -qAt ` +
`-c "select owned from node where name = 'laptop'"`);
assert.match(owned, /while-away\.note/, `the mesh does not know the machine holds it: ${owned}`);
});
test("unassigning takes away exactly what it should", { skip, timeout: 900_000 }, async () => {
// Removal is the half nobody tests. The mesh takes away what IT declared and no longer declares,
// and never what the machine raised for itself from its bundle — which is the fault that
// destroyed a substrate once (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/010).
//
// Two modules, so the test can tell "removed the right one" from "removed everything".
for (const [name, path] of [["kept", "/etc/mesh-kept"], ["going", "/etc/mesh-going"]] as const) {
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"${name}","version":"1","resources":[` +
`{"id":"note","type":"file","path":"${path}","content":"${name}"}]}' > /tmp/${name}.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/${name}.json mesh-control:/${name}.json`);
await mesh(`module add /${name}.json`);
await mesh(`assign anchor ${name}`);
}
await mesh("push anchor");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 6000));
assert.ok((await on("anchor", `test -f /etc/mesh-kept`)).ok, "the first module did not arrive");
assert.ok((await on("anchor", `test -f /etc/mesh-going`)).ok, "the second module did not arrive");
await mesh("unassign anchor going");
await mesh("push anchor");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 6000));
assert.equal((await on("anchor", `test -f /etc/mesh-going`)).ok, false,
"an unassigned module's file is still there");
assert.ok((await on("anchor", `test -f /etc/mesh-kept`)).ok,
"unassigning one module took another one's file with it");
// And the substrate this machine raised from its own bundle is untouched. It was not declared by
// the mesh, so the mesh must never remove it — the machine would take its own control plane
// away, which is exactly what happened before origins existed.
const running = await must("anchor", `docker ps --format '{{.Names}}'`);
for (const container of ["mesh-store", "mesh-broker", "mesh-control"]) {
assert.match(running, new RegExp(container),
`${container} was removed by a declaration that never declared it`);
}
});
test("a machine keeps what it was given when the mesh says nothing about it", { skip, timeout: 600_000 }, async () => {
// The other direction of the same rule. A node that is sent a declaration mentioning none of its
// private network must not lose it: the network came from a module that is still assigned, and
// "not in this message" is not "no longer wanted".
assert.ok((await on("laptop", `test -f /etc/wireguard/mesh0.conf`)).ok,
"the private network's configuration is gone");
assert.ok((await on("laptop", `grep -q anchor.internal /etc/hosts`)).ok,
"the mesh's names are gone");
});
test("a machine that fell behind catches up without being named", { skip, timeout: 900_000 }, async () => {
// `status` says which machines are not doing what they were told; something has to act on it.
// `push --behind` is that something, and it is a command rather than a timer to begin with —
// a scheduler is then a scheduler over this, rather than a second path to the same act.
// Break one machine, in a way that is fixable: a package that does not exist yet.
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"fixable","version":"1","resources":[` +
`{"id":"pkg","type":"package","package":"a-package-that-does-not-exist-yet"},` +
`{"id":"note","type":"file","path":"/etc/mesh-fixable","content":"here"}]}' > /tmp/fix.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/fix.json mesh-control:/fix.json`);
await mesh("module add /fix.json");
await mesh("assign laptop fixable");
await mesh("push laptop");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 8000));
assert.match(await mesh("status"), /laptop\s+failed/, "the machine did not report a failure");
// And the resources that COULD be applied were — one broken thing no longer blocks the rest
// (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/011).
assert.ok((await on("laptop", `test -f /etc/mesh-fixable`)).ok,
"a resource after the failing one was never attempted");
// Nothing is behind on the other machine, so nothing is pushed to it.
const named = await mesh("push --behind");
assert.match(named, /laptop/, named);
assert.doesNotMatch(named, /sent anchor/, `a machine that was fine was pushed to:\n${named}`);
// Fix the cause, the way somebody would: the module stops asking for the impossible thing.
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"fixable","version":"1","resources":[` +
`{"id":"note","type":"file","path":"/etc/mesh-fixable","content":"here"}]}' > /tmp/fix.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/fix.json mesh-control:/fix.json`);
await mesh("module add /fix.json");
// And nobody names the machine.
await mesh("push --behind");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 8000));
const after = await mesh("status");
assert.doesNotMatch(after, /laptop\s+(failed|refused)/,
`the machine did not recover:\n${after}`);
// With nothing behind, it says so rather than doing nothing quietly.
assert.match(await mesh("push --behind"), /every machine is doing what it was told/);
});
test("the mesh runs its own artifact store", { skip, timeout: 900_000 }, async () => {
// Artifacts go to a registry, and the only registries that existed were raised by the lab or by
// the bootstrap bundle. A mesh had no way to run its own.
//
// **Named, not mirrored** (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/029). Mirroring publishes to the artifact store,
// and the builder will not start without one — so a module that provides the store and builds
// its own image asks the mesh to put an artifact into the thing that artifact is needed to
// create. It worked here only because the scenario's registry was already standing to receive
// the push, which is exactly why a real first mesh would have found this and the lab did not.
//
// So the image is named by digest, the way the bundle names the three a first node starts from.
// A registry is the one module that cannot be delivered by the mesh's own delivery.
await must("anchor", `mkdir -p /root/registry && printf %s '{"module":"registry","version":"1",` +
`"provides":[{"name":"artifact-store","scope":"mesh"}],` +
`"capabilities":["container-runtime"],` +
`"claims":[{"name":"the-artifact-store","scope":"node"}],` +
`"serves":{"artifact-store":{"port":5000}},` +
`"resources":[` +
`{"id":"state","type":"directory","path":"/var/lib/mesh/registry","mode":"0700"},` +
`{"id":"store","type":"container","name":"mesh-registry","image":"${pinned("registry")}",` +
`"ports":["5000:5000"],"volumes":["mesh-registry-data:/var/lib/registry"]}]}' ` +
`> /root/registry/module.json`);
// **Added, not built** — and this is the half that proves the fix. Building needs a builder,
// and a builder will not start without an artifact store to publish to, so a mesh that has just
// bootstrapped cannot build the module that gives it one. Adding the manifest directly is the
// path a real first mesh has to take, so it is the path this walks.
await must("anchor", `docker cp /root/registry/module.json mesh-control:/registry.json`);
await mesh("module add /registry.json");
await mesh("assign anchor registry");
await mesh("push anchor");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 12_000));
// Running, and answering — a container that is up is not a registry that replies.
assert.match(await must("anchor", `docker ps --format '{{.Names}}'`), /mesh-registry/);
let answers = false;
for (let i = 0; i < 20 && !answers; i++) {
answers = (await on("anchor", `curl -sf http://127.0.0.1:5000/v2/ -o /dev/null`)).ok;
if (!answers) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 2000));
}
assert.ok(answers, "the mesh's own registry is running and does not answer");
// And reachable from another machine over the private network, which is the whole point of an
// artifact store being a mesh-scoped provision.
assert.ok((await on("laptop", `curl -sf http://anchor.internal:5000/v2/ -o /dev/null`)).ok,
"the artifact store is not reachable from another machine, so nothing else can use it");
});
// Defends novox/hq ADR 0007: the mesh is its own certificate authority for internal names.
test("a machine serves its internal name with a certificate the mesh issued", {
skip, timeout: 900_000,
}, async () => {
// The mesh's own authority certifies names only the mesh knows (novox/hq 08-connectivity).
// Asserted with a real handshake: a certificate that parses and does not chain fails at the
// moment something connects, which is the worst place to find out.
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"served","version":"1",` +
`"certificate":{"into":"/etc/mesh/serving.crt","authority":"/etc/mesh/authority.crt"},` +
`"resources":[{"id":"dir","type":"directory","path":"/etc/mesh","mode":"0755"}]}' ` +
`> /tmp/served.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/served.json mesh-control:/served.json`);
await mesh("module add /served.json");
await mesh("assign anchor served");
await mesh("push anchor");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 8000));
assert.ok((await on("anchor", `test -s /etc/mesh/serving.crt`)).ok, "no certificate arrived");
assert.ok((await on("anchor", `test -s /etc/mesh/authority.crt`)).ok, "no authority arrived");
// The name it was issued for is the one the mesh gave this machine.
const named = await must("anchor",
`openssl x509 -in /etc/mesh/serving.crt -noout -ext subjectAltName 2>/dev/null || ` +
`docker run --rm -v /etc/mesh:/m ${pinned("registry")} sh -c ` +
`"apk add --no-cache openssl >/dev/null 2>&1; openssl x509 -in /m/serving.crt -noout -text" | grep -A1 'Alternative'`);
assert.match(named, /anchor\.internal/, `the certificate is not for this machine's name:\n${named}`);
// And a real handshake: the machine serves TLS with the key it generated, and another machine
// verifies it against the mesh's authority and nothing else.
await must("anchor", `openssl s_server -cert /etc/mesh/serving.crt ` +
`-key /var/lib/mesh-host/serving.key -accept 8443 -naccept 1 -quiet ` +
`> /var/log/tls.log 2>&1 & sleep 2`);
await must("laptop", `mkdir -p /etc/mesh`);
const authority = await must("anchor", `cat /etc/mesh/authority.crt`);
await must("laptop", `cat > /etc/mesh/authority.crt <<'MESHCA'\n${authority}\nMESHCA`);
const shook = await on("laptop",
`echo | openssl s_client -connect anchor.internal:8443 ` +
`-CAfile /etc/mesh/authority.crt -verify_return_error -brief 2>&1`);
assert.ok(shook.ok, `the handshake failed:\n${shook.out}\n` +
`what the server said:\n${(await on("anchor", `cat /var/log/tls.log`)).out}`);
assert.match(shook.out, /Verification: OK/, shook.out);
});
// Defends novox/hq ADR 0007: what a machine exposes is what its modules declared, and nothing
// arrives at a port nobody asked for.
test("a machine filters exactly what its modules declared, and nothing else", {
skip, timeout: 900_000,
}, async () => {
// The rule set is derived from what is assigned, not kept in step by hand — and the proof that
// matters is not that a file arrived but that packets are treated differently because of it.
// A rule nothing enforces is the fault this mechanism exists to remove (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/003).
//
// Note what the module cannot contain: an action. The link may not carry one (novox/hq ADR 0005),
// so the mesh writes the rule set and declares that a service must reflect it. `restart-on` is
// the shape that rule leaves, and this is the first thing to use it for its real purpose.
// A listener is written to a file rather than squeezed through three levels of shell quoting.
// The first attempt did the latter, never started, and the test failed on its own setup —
// which reads exactly like the firewall working.
await must("laptop", `cat > /root/listen.py <<'LISTENER'\n` +
`import socket, sys, threading\n` +
`def serve(port):\n` +
` s = socket.socket()\n` +
` s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1)\n` +
` s.bind(("0.0.0.0", port))\n` +
` s.listen(8)\n` +
` while True:\n` +
` c, _ = s.accept()\n` +
` c.send(str(port).encode())\n` +
` c.close()\n` +
`for p in (9101, 9102):\n` +
` threading.Thread(target=serve, args=(p,), daemon=True).start()\n` +
`threading.Event().wait()\n` +
`LISTENER`);
await must("laptop", `nohup python3 /root/listen.py > /var/log/listen.log 2>&1 & sleep 2`);
// Two paths to the same machine, which is what makes "from the mesh" testable at all: over the
// private network, and over the segment both machines happen to share. A rule that opens a port
// to the mesh must accept the first and refuse the second — and a test that only ever used one
// path could not tell "open to the mesh" from "open".
const reach = async (where: string, port: number) => {
const said = await on("anchor",
`timeout 5 python3 -c "import socket;s=socket.create_connection(('${where}',${port}),4);` +
`print(s.recv(32).decode());s.close()"`);
return said.ok;
};
const overlay = (port: number) => reach("laptop.internal", port);
const segment = (port: number) => reach("192.0.2.20", port);
// Reachable both ways before any rule set exists, so what changes afterwards is the rule set and
// not the listener. Without this the test would pass against a service that never started.
assert.ok(await overlay(9101), "the declared port never opened, so nothing below tests anything");
assert.ok(await overlay(9102), "the undeclared port never opened");
assert.ok(await segment(9101), "the declared port is not reachable off the private network yet, " +
"so closing it later would prove nothing");
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"talker","version":"1",` +
`"listens":[{"port":9101,"from":"mesh","why":"the thing this test is about"}],` +
`"resources":[]}' > /tmp/talker.json`);
// The rule set goes where this machine's nftables unit reads from, and the unit is declared to
// reflect it. No command anywhere.
// The module ships the unit that loads its rules, rather than using the one the distribution's
// nftables package provides. That unit is `Type=oneshot` with no `RemainAfterExit`, so it does
// its work and goes inactive — and a host asked for a service that is "running" reports, quite
// correctly, that it is stopped. There is no state in the vocabulary for "ran and exited having
// done its job", so a module that wants one brings a unit that stays.
//
// Which is also the right shape: how a machine enforces rules is a fact about the machine, and
// the mesh has no business depending on what a distribution happens to package.
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"firewall","version":"1",` +
`"capabilities":["firewall"],` +
`"filtering":{"into":"/etc/mesh/filter.nft"},` +
`"resources":[{"id":"nftables","type":"package","package":"nftables"},` +
`{"id":"dir","type":"directory","path":"/etc/mesh","mode":"0755"},` +
`{"id":"unit","type":"file","path":"/etc/systemd/system/mesh-filter.service",` +
`"mode":"0644","content":"[Unit]\\nDescription=What the mesh computed for this machine\\n` +
`[Service]\\nType=oneshot\\nRemainAfterExit=yes\\n` +
`ExecStart=/usr/bin/nft -f /etc/mesh/filter.nft\\n[Install]\\nWantedBy=multi-user.target\\n"},` +
`{"id":"filter","type":"service","unit":"mesh-filter.service","state":"running",` +
`"boot":"enabled","restart-on":["filtering"]}]}' > /tmp/firewall.json`);
for (const f of ["talker", "firewall"]) {
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/${f}.json mesh-control:/${f}.json`);
await mesh(`module add /${f}.json`);
}
await mesh("assign laptop talker");
await mesh("assign laptop firewall");
await mesh("push laptop");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 20_000));
const written = await must("laptop", `cat /etc/mesh/filter.nft`);
// A rule names its source. Not decoration: it is the only thing that answers "why is this open".
assert.match(written, /# talker . the thing this test is about/,
`the rule does not name what caused it:\n${written}`);
// The mesh's addresses are the ones on the private network, which is what "from the mesh"
// means — not the segment the machines happen to share.
assert.match(written, /ip saddr \{ [0-9., ]+ \} tcp dport 9101 accept/,
`"from the mesh" resolved to nothing:\n${written}`);
assert.doesNotMatch(written, /dport 9102/, `a port no module declared was opened:\n${written}`);
// Loaded, not merely written. The service was restarted because a file it reflects changed.
const table = await must("laptop", `nft list table inet mesh`);
assert.match(table, /dport 9101 accept/, `the rule set was never loaded:\n${table}`);
// And it filters. Three assertions, and the third is the one that makes "from the mesh" mean
// something rather than being a synonym for "open".
assert.ok(await overlay(9101),
"the declared port is closed on the private network, so the machine is filtering more than " +
"it was told to");
assert.ok(!(await overlay(9102)),
"a port no module declared is still reachable, so the rule set restricts nothing");
assert.ok(!(await segment(9101)),
"the declared port answers off the private network, so `from: mesh` restricted nothing");
// The machine did not lock itself out of the mesh: it is still taking declarations.
assert.doesNotMatch(await mesh("status"), /laptop\s+(failed|refused)/,
"the machine stopped doing what it was told after applying its own rule set");
// Removing the module that wanted the port closes it, with nobody editing a rule. This is the
// whole claim of a derived firewall, and it is also the second load — which must replace the
// table rather than add to it.
await mesh("unassign laptop talker");
await mesh("push laptop");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 20_000));
assert.ok(!(await overlay(9101)),
"the port stayed open after the module that wanted it was removed");
});
test("the builder is a module the mesh assigns, with a credential the mesh delivered", {
skip: skip || (!builder ? "set MESH_LAB_BUILDER to a built mesh-builder" : false),
timeout: 900_000,
}, async () => {
// Until this, the builder was a program somebody started on a machine with whatever credential
// they had to hand — in practice the broker's administrative one. A program documented as
// holding its own credential and given somebody else's is worse than one with no story at all.
//
// So: the mesh issues a scoped account, seals it to the machine, and delivers it with the
// declaration. Nobody types it and the mesh cannot read it back.
await must("anchor", `mkdir -p /root/builder && printf %s '{"module":"builder","version":"1",` +
`"requires":["artifact-store"],"capabilities":["container-runtime"],` +
`"claims":[{"name":"the-build-machine","scope":"node"}],` +
`"binds":{"artifact-store":"/var/lib/mesh/builder/artifact-store.json"},` +
`"own-secrets":{"broker":"/var/lib/mesh/builder/broker"},` +
`"build":{"artifacts":[{"name":"builder","kind":"upstream",` +
`"from":"${pinned("mesh-builder")}"}]},` +
`"resources":[` +
`{"id":"state","type":"directory","path":"/var/lib/mesh/builder","mode":"0700"},` +
`{"id":"workspace","type":"directory","path":"/var/lib/mesh/builder/workspace","mode":"0700"},` +
`{"id":"run","type":"container","name":"mesh-builder","artifact":"builder",` +
`"network":"host",` +
`"volumes":["/var/lib/mesh/builder:/var/lib/mesh/builder",` +
`"/var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock"],` +
`"env":{"MESH_BROKER_FILE":"/var/lib/mesh/builder/broker",` +
`"MESH_BINDING":"/var/lib/mesh/builder/artifact-store.json",` +
`"MESH_WORKSPACE":"/var/lib/mesh/builder/workspace"}}]}' > /root/builder/module.json`);
await must("anchor", `cd /root/builder && git init -q . && git add -A && ` +
`git -c user.email=lab -c user.name=lab commit -qm builder`);
// The builder's own image is built by the builder that is already running — the same
// chicken-and-egg as the registry, resolved the same way. The one started by hand does this
// last piece of work and is then replaced by the module it just built.
await mesh("build /root/builder --wait 300s", 420_000);
// The mesh makes the account and seals the URL to this machine. Nothing is printed that would
// work if it were pasted somewhere else.
const issued = await mesh("builder issue lab-builder --node anchor");
assert.match(issued, /sealed to anchor/, issued);
assert.doesNotMatch(issued, /amqps:\/\/lab-builder:/,
"the credential was printed, so the one copy that matters is on a terminal");
// Now the hand-started one goes, or two builders race for the same queue and whichever answers
// proves nothing. By process name: `pkill -f` matches the shell running it too, which kills the
// connection carrying the command and hangs the caller waiting for a reply that will never
// come. Cost an hour once, in this file.
await on("anchor", `pkill -x mesh-builder`);
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 2000));
assert.ok(!(await on("anchor", `pgrep -x mesh-builder`)).ok,
"the hand-started builder is still running, so this would test that one");
await mesh("assign anchor builder");
await mesh("push anchor");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 20_000));
const running = await must("anchor", `docker ps --format '{{.Names}}'`);
assert.match(running, /mesh-builder/,
`the builder was assigned and is not running:\n${running}\n` +
`${(await on("anchor", `tail -30 /var/log/mesh-host.log`)).out}`);
// Running is not connected. A builder that cannot reach the broker sits there, and every
// outward sign — the container is up, the credential is on disk — says it is working.
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 5000));
const said = await on("anchor", `docker logs mesh-builder 2>&1 | tail -20`);
assert.doesNotMatch(said.out, /cannot reach the broker/,
`the builder is running and cannot reach the broker:\n${said.out}`);
// The credential arrived, is readable only by the machine, and is the scoped account rather
// than the broker's own.
assert.match(await must("anchor", `stat -c %a /var/lib/mesh/builder/broker`), /^600/);
const credential = await must("anchor", `cat /var/lib/mesh/builder/broker`);
assert.match(credential, /"url":"amqps:\/\/lab-builder:/,
"the builder is using an account that is not its own");
assert.doesNotMatch(credential, /guest:guest/, "the builder holds the broker's own account");
// And what to check the broker against. A mesh's broker presents a certificate of the mesh's
// own, so a URL alone reaches only a broker some public authority vouches for — which is no
// mesh broker at all, and fails at TLS with an error about an unknown authority.
assert.match(credential, /"fingerprint":"(sha256:)?[0-9a-f]{64}"/,
`the builder was given nothing to verify the broker with:\n${credential}`);
// And it works: the mesh asks this builder to build something, and it does. Answering is the
// only proof that the delivered credential authenticates — a container that is up with a
// credential it cannot use looks identical from outside.
// Somewhere the builder can actually see. A builder that is a module runs in a container, so
// the machine's filesystem is not its own — a path like /root only works for a builder somebody
// started on the host, which is what the first build above used. In a real mesh a module is
// cloned from the forge over a URL; here it goes in the directory the module already mounts,
// which is the same fact wearing different clothes.
const repo = "/var/lib/mesh/builder/repositories/built";
await must("anchor", `mkdir -p ${repo} && printf %s '{"module":"built","version":"1",` +
`"resources":[{"id":"marker","type":"file","path":"/etc/built","content":"yes","mode":"0644"}]}' ` +
`> ${repo}/module.json`);
await must("anchor", `cd ${repo} && git init -q . && git add -A && ` +
`git -c user.email=lab -c user.name=lab commit -qm built`);
try {
await mesh(`build ${repo} --wait 300s`, 420_000);
} catch (why) {
// The builder's own account of itself. Without it the failure is "nothing consumed the
// queue", which names no cause and is the same sentence whether the credential was refused,
// the queue was never declared, or the process died three seconds in.
const said = (await on("anchor", `docker logs mesh-builder 2>&1 | tail -40`)).out;
throw new Error(`${(why as Error).message}\n\nwhat the builder said:\n${said}`);
}
// Naming the module, and not merely containing its name: `builds` says "nothing has been built
// yet" when there is nothing, and that sentence contains the word this was matching on.
const recorded = await mesh("builds built");
assert.doesNotMatch(recorded, /nothing has been built/,
`the build was accepted and no build was recorded against the module:\n${recorded}`);
assert.match(recorded, /built/, recorded);
});
test("rotating a credential moves both ends, and the old one stops working", {
skip, timeout: 900_000,
}, async () => {
// The invariant novox/hq ADR 0001 records as unowned, and it was measurably false in HAL: on
// 2026-08-22 a provision documented as never rotating minted a new password on every adoption
// and updated only the provider's row. Consumers on three nodes held dead credentials for two
// days while the mesh reported success.
//
// So this is checked against a real database with a real login, three times: the delivered
// credential works, the rotated one works, and the one that was rotated away does not. Two ends
// holding a matching string proves they agree; only an authentication proves they are right.
const store = "/var/lib/mesh/postgres";
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"realstore","version":"1",` +
`"provides":[{"name":"real-postgres-database","scope":"mesh"}],` +
`"capabilities":["container-runtime"],` +
`"serves":{"real-postgres-database":{"port":5433}},` +
`"own-secrets":{"superuser":"${store}/superuser"},` +
`"grants":{"real-postgres-database":"${store}/grants"},` +
// Both halves. `grants` is where each consumer's sealed password lands; `receives` is the
// manifest saying who asked and for what. Without the second the provisioner finds a
// directory of unexplained secrets and says nothing has been granted — which is true, and
// reads exactly like a credential that was never delivered.
`"receives":{"real-postgres-database":"${store}/grants/mesh.json"},` +
`"listens":[{"port":5433,"from":"mesh","why":"a database the mesh provisions"}],` +
`"resources":[` +
`{"id":"state","type":"directory","path":"${store}","mode":"0755"},` +
`{"id":"grants","type":"directory","path":"${store}/grants","mode":"0755"},` +
`{"id":"postgres-database","type":"container","name":"real-store",` +
`"image":"${pinned("postgres")}",` +
`"ports":["5433:5432"],` +
`"volumes":["${store}/superuser:/run/superuser:ro"],` +
`"env":{"POSTGRES_PASSWORD_FILE":"/run/superuser"}},` +
`{"id":"provisioner","type":"container","name":"real-provisioner",` +
`"image":"${pinned("mesh-provision-postgres")}","network":"host",` +
`"volumes":["${store}:${store}:ro"],` +
`"env":{"GRANTS":"${store}/grants",` +
`"MESH_PROVISION_PASSWORD_FILE":"${store}/superuser",` +
`"MESH_PROVISION_POSTGRES":"postgres://postgres@127.0.0.1:5433/postgres?sslmode=disable"}}]}' ` +
`> /tmp/realstore.json`);
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"realapp","version":"1",` +
`"requires":["real-postgres-database"],"contributes":{"real-postgres-database":{"name":"realapp"}},` +
`"binds":{"real-postgres-database":"/etc/realapp/where.json"},` +
`"secrets":{"real-postgres-database":"/etc/realapp/password"},` +
`"resources":[{"id":"dir","type":"directory","path":"/etc/realapp","mode":"0755"}]}' ` +
`> /tmp/realapp.json`);
for (const f of ["realstore", "realapp"]) {
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/${f}.json mesh-control:/${f}.json`);
await mesh(`module add /${f}.json`);
}
await mesh("assign anchor realstore");
await mesh("assign laptop realapp");
await mesh("push");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 30_000));
// A real login from the consumer's machine, over the private network — not over loopback, where
// pg_hba trusts anything and every password looks correct. That was done here once and the test
// passed for an afternoon while verifying nothing: a deliberately wrong password returned a row.
// As the role the provisioner made, into the database it made. The provisioner names a role
// after the machine and a database after what the module asked for — which is the contract, and
// getting it wrong here made the test fail against a provisioner that had done its job.
// By address, resolved on the machine.
//
// **This container is not the mesh's.** The mesh gives its names to the containers it declares,
// and this one is started by the test with `docker run` — nothing declared it, so nothing
// configured it. That boundary is the right one: a container somebody runs by hand is not the
// mesh's to configure, and reaching into every container on a machine is what a resolver in
// resolv.conf would be for.
//
// So the workaround stays here, and the proof that names work inside containers is its own
// test, against a container the mesh declared.
const where = (await must("laptop",
`getent hosts anchor.internal | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f1`)).trim();
assert.match(where, /^[0-9.]+$/, `the mesh's name for anchor does not resolve here: ${where}`);
const login = async (password: string) =>
await on("laptop", `docker run --rm -e PGPASSWORD=${quote(password)} ` +
// The role the provisioner made: mesh_<node>_<module>, because a consumer is a module on
// a machine (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/022).
`${pinned("postgres")} psql -h ${where} -p 5433 -U mesh_laptop_realapp ` +
`-d realapp -qAt -c "select 1"`, 120_000);
const diagnostics = async () =>
`provisioner:\n${(await on("anchor", `docker logs real-provisioner 2>&1 | tail -20`)).out}\n` +
`grants:\n${(await on("anchor", `ls -l ${store}/grants`)).out}`;
const first = (await must("laptop", `cat /etc/realapp/password`)).trim();
assert.ok(first.length >= 40, `the consumer's credential is ${first.length} characters`);
let works = false;
for (let i = 0; i < 20 && !works; i++) {
works = (await login(first)).ok;
if (!works) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 5000));
}
assert.ok(works, `the delivered credential does not authenticate:\n` +
`${(await login(first)).out}\n${await diagnostics()}`);
// Now rotate. One command: the record changes AND both ends are sent, because leaving the
// sending to a later command is the fault above, exactly.
const said = await mesh("rotate real-postgres-database", 180_000);
assert.match(said, /anchor/, `rotation did not touch the provider:\n${said}`);
assert.match(said, /laptop/, `rotation did not touch the consumer:\n${said}`);
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 25_000));
const second = (await must("laptop", `cat /etc/realapp/password`)).trim();
assert.notEqual(second, first, "the consumer was handed back the credential just rotated away");
// The new one authenticates — the only proof the provider was told the same thing the consumer
// was given. Two files agreeing proves they agree, not that either is right.
let now = false;
for (let i = 0; i < 20 && !now; i++) {
now = (await login(second)).ok;
if (!now) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 5000));
}
assert.ok(now, `after rotation the new credential does not authenticate, so the two ends ` +
`disagree — which is the fault this exists to make impossible:\n${await diagnostics()}`);
// And the old one does not. Without this the test passes against a provider that added a
// password without replacing one, which is a rotation that rotates nothing.
assert.ok(!(await login(first)).ok,
"the password that was rotated away still authenticates, so nothing was rotated");
});
test("a route is a grant: a workload is reached by the name it asked for", {
skip, timeout: 900_000,
}, async () => {
// novox/hq 08-connectivity §3. The mirror of a database grant: there the consumer supplies a
// name and receives credentials; here it supplies a target and receives a name. Nothing new in
// the vocabulary — a route is a provision like any other.
//
// The workload is the registry image, because it is an HTTP server this scenario already has.
// What is being tested is the mesh's arrangement, not the workload.
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"frontdoor","version":"1",` +
`"provides":[{"name":"route","scope":"mesh"}],` +
`"capabilities":["container-runtime"],` +
`"receives":{"route":"/etc/frontdoor/routes.json"},` +
`"serves":{"route":{"domain":"mesh.test"}},` +
`"listens":[{"port":8081,"from":"mesh","why":"the front door"}],` +
`"resources":[{"id":"dir","type":"directory","path":"/etc/frontdoor","mode":"0755"},` +
`{"id":"proxy","type":"container","name":"front-door",` +
`"image":"${pinned("mesh-route-proxy")}","network":"host",` +
`"volumes":["/etc/frontdoor:/etc/frontdoor:ro"],` +
`"env":{"ROUTES":"/etc/frontdoor/routes.json","LISTEN":":8081"}}]}' ` +
`> /tmp/frontdoor.json`);
// The workload declares the port it listens on as well as the route it wants. Both, because
// they are different questions: one says who may reach it, the other says by what name — and
// the earlier test left this machine filtering, so a module that asked for a route and not for
// the port would be unreachable by the proxy it just asked for.
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"storefront","version":"1",` +
`"requires":["route"],"capabilities":["container-runtime"],` +
`"contributes":{"route":{"name":"shop.mesh.test","port":8088}},` +
`"binds":{"route":"/etc/storefront/route.json"},` +
`"listens":[{"port":8088,"from":"mesh","why":"the proxy reaches it here"}],` +
`"resources":[{"id":"dir","type":"directory","path":"/etc/storefront","mode":"0755"},` +
`{"id":"app","type":"container","name":"storefront",` +
`"image":"${pinned("registry")}","ports":["8088:5000"]}]}' > /tmp/storefront.json`);
for (const f of ["frontdoor", "storefront"]) {
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/${f}.json mesh-control:/${f}.json`);
await mesh(`module add /${f}.json`);
}
await mesh("assign anchor frontdoor");
await mesh("assign laptop storefront");
await mesh("push");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 25_000));
// The provider was told who asked, and where that machine is — which it needs in order to
// reach back, and which it must not have to derive from a naming convention.
const routes = await must("anchor", `cat /etc/frontdoor/routes.json`);
assert.match(routes, /shop\.mesh\.test/, `the proxy was not told about the route:\n${routes}`);
assert.match(routes, /"at": *"laptop\.internal"/,
`the proxy was not told where the consumer is, so it cannot reach it:\n${routes}`);
// And the consumer was told what the provider serves, which is how it knows its own name.
const bound = await must("laptop", `cat /etc/storefront/route.json`);
assert.match(bound, /mesh\.test/, `the consumer was not told the public name:\n${bound}`);
// The whole point: a request for the name reaches the workload, across the private network.
let reached = false;
let said = "";
for (let i = 0; i < 20 && !reached; i++) {
const answer = await on("anchor",
`curl -sf -H 'Host: shop.mesh.test' http://127.0.0.1:8081/v2/ -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}'`);
said = answer.out;
reached = answer.ok && said.trim() === "200";
if (!reached) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 4000));
}
assert.ok(reached, `a request for the name did not reach the workload (${said}):\n` +
`${(await on("anchor", `docker logs front-door 2>&1 | tail -20`)).out}`);
// Withdrawal, which 08-connectivity lists as open: a stale public name pointing at nothing
// fails more visibly than a stale grant, so it must not survive the module leaving.
await mesh("unassign laptop storefront");
await mesh("push");
// **Waited for, not slept through.** The mesh withdrawing a route and the machine acting on it
// are different things, and a fixed sleep between them tests whichever the clock happened to
// land on — this assertion passed twice and failed once on nothing but timing.
//
// A machine that has not applied yet is also not a machine that failed, so `status` cannot
// stand in for this: "not yet" and "never" look identical there, and only one of them is worth
// failing over.
let after = "";
let withdrawn = false;
for (let i = 0; i < 20 && !withdrawn; i++) {
after = await must("anchor", `cat /etc/frontdoor/routes.json`);
withdrawn = !after.includes("shop.mesh.test");
if (!withdrawn) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 3000));
}
assert.ok(withdrawn,
`the route outlived the module that asked for it:\n${after}\n\n` +
`the machine did apply — this is what the mesh would send now:\n` +
`${(await on("anchor", `docker exec mesh-control /mesh-control plan anchor --files`)).out}`);
let gone = false;
for (let i = 0; i < 15 && !gone; i++) {
const answer = await on("anchor",
`curl -s -H 'Host: shop.mesh.test' http://127.0.0.1:8081/v2/ -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}'`);
gone = answer.out.trim() === "404";
if (!gone) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 3000));
}
assert.ok(gone, "the proxy still serves a name whose module was unassigned");
});
test("model access is answered by a record, and the key the mesh took is one it cannot read", {
skip, timeout: 900_000,
}, async () => {
// novox/hq ADR 0024. The first provision no machine answers: a hosted model is on nobody's
// node and is reached over the public internet, so the rule that refuses two ends sharing no
// private network must not apply to it.
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"assistant","version":"1",` +
`"requires":["model-access"],` +
`"binds":{"model-access":"/etc/assistant/model.json"},` +
`"secrets":{"model-access":"/etc/assistant/key"},` +
`"resources":[{"id":"dir","type":"directory","path":"/etc/assistant","mode":"0755"}]}' ` +
`> /tmp/assistant.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/assistant.json mesh-control:/assistant.json`);
await mesh("module add /assistant.json");
// The licences first. With none recorded at all the honest answer is that nothing provides
// model-access — correct, and a different refusal from the one being tested.
await mesh(`licence add anthropic personal --serves '{"model":"a-model"}'`);
await mesh(`licence add anthropic the-organisation --serves '{"model":"a-model"}'`);
// Refused at the earliest point somebody could meet it: assigning records the assignment and
// then says the machine's set cannot be applied. The refusal names both candidates and the
// command. ADR 0024 warns this will be felt — which is correct, and correct is not the same as
// usable.
const refused = await on("anchor", `docker exec mesh-control /mesh-control assign laptop assistant`);
assert.ok(!refused.ok,
`a consumer was given model access without anybody saying which:\n${refused.out}`);
for (const want of ["personal", "the-organisation", "licence use"]) {
assert.match(refused.out, new RegExp(want),
`the refusal does not name ${want}:\n${refused.out}`);
}
await mesh("licence use personal laptop assistant");
// Chosen, and still no key: the mesh has one thing to deliver and has not been given it.
const noKey = await on("anchor", `docker exec mesh-control /mesh-control plan laptop`);
assert.ok(!noKey.ok, `a module was planned with a licence that has no key:\n${noKey.out}`);
assert.match(noKey.out, /licence key personal/, noKey.out);
// The accept verb. Given on standard input rather than as an argument, because a key in a
// command line is a key in shell history and in every process listing taken while it ran.
const secret = "sk-test-" + "0123456789abcdef".repeat(2);
const accepted = await must("anchor",
`printf %s ${quote(secret)} | docker exec -i mesh-control /mesh-control licence key personal`);
assert.match(accepted, /sealed to 1 holder/, accepted);
assert.doesNotMatch(accepted, new RegExp(secret),
"the key was echoed back, so the one copy that matters is on a terminal");
await mesh("push laptop");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 15_000));
// What is public arrives, and says it is a record rather than leaving an empty address that a
// reader would take for something the mesh failed to fill in.
const bound = await must("laptop", `cat /etc/assistant/model.json`);
assert.match(bound, /personal/, `the consumer was not told which licence it is on:\n${bound}`);
assert.match(bound, /a-model/, `what the licence serves did not arrive:\n${bound}`);
assert.match(bound, /not a machine/, `the binding leaves an unexplained empty address:\n${bound}`);
// And the key arrives, readable only by this machine.
assert.equal((await must("laptop", `cat /etc/assistant/key`)).trim(), secret,
"the key that arrived is not the key that was given");
assert.match(await must("laptop", `stat -c %a /etc/assistant/key`), /^600/);
// The mesh cannot read it back. This is the whole argument: what is stored is unusable by
// whoever holds it, the control plane included.
const stored = await must("anchor",
`docker exec mesh-store psql -U postgres -d licences -qAt ` +
`-c "select coalesce(sealed,'') from licence_holder"`);
assert.ok(stored.trim().length > 0, "nothing was stored, so nothing was sealed");
assert.doesNotMatch(stored, new RegExp(secret),
"the key is in the control plane's own database in the open");
// Nor is it anywhere it could have been read on the way.
for (const where of ["/var/lib/mesh-host/declared.json", "/var/lib/mesh-host/state.json"]) {
// Whether grep found it, not how many times. `grep -c` prints 0 and exits non-zero when it
// finds nothing, so the obvious `|| echo 0` prints a second one and the count is never what
// it looks like.
const found = await on("laptop", `grep -q ${quote(secret)} ${where}`);
assert.ok(!found.ok, `the key is in the open in ${where}`);
}
});
test("a new commit reaches a machine that is already running the old one", {
skip: skip || (!builder ? "set MESH_LAB_BUILDER to a built mesh-builder" : false),
timeout: 900_000,
}, async () => {
// novox/hq ADR 0010 names the real risk of replacing a pipeline with a comparison: losing the
// question "did my change go out?". This is that question, end to end — a commit, a build, a
// catalogue, and a machine that ends up running what the source says.
const repo = "/var/lib/mesh/builder/repositories/delivered";
const write = async (what: string) =>
await must("anchor", `mkdir -p ${repo} && printf %s '{"module":"delivered","version":"1",` +
`"resources":[{"id":"marker","type":"file","path":"/etc/delivered",` +
`"content":"${what}","mode":"0644"}]}' > ${repo}/module.json`);
await write("first");
await must("anchor", `cd ${repo} && git init -q . && git add -A && ` +
`git -c user.email=lab -c user.name=lab commit -qm first`);
await mesh(`build ${repo} --wait 300s`, 420_000);
await mesh("assign laptop delivered");
await mesh("push laptop");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 15_000));
assert.equal((await must("laptop", `cat /etc/delivered`)).trim(), "first");
// Nothing has moved, so nothing is behind — and it says so rather than doing nothing quietly.
assert.match(await mesh("build --behind"), /every module the mesh holds is what its source last had/);
// Now the source moves.
await write("second");
await must("anchor", `cd ${repo} && git add -A && ` +
`git -c user.email=lab -c user.name=lab commit -qm second`);
const moved = (await must("anchor", `cd ${repo} && git rev-parse HEAD`)).trim();
await mesh(`module moved delivered ${moved}`);
// The mesh says which module is behind, and by how much, before anything is built.
const behind = await mesh("status");
assert.match(behind, /delivered/, `status does not name the module that moved:\n${behind}`);
assert.match(behind, /build --behind/, `status does not say how to catch up:\n${behind}`);
// The loop, in one command: everything behind its source is built and recorded.
const built = await mesh("build --behind --wait 300s", 420_000);
assert.match(built, /delivered/, built);
// The machine is still running the old one until it is told — the mesh changing its mind is
// not the same as a machine acting on it, and collapsing the two is how a mesh reports success
// for something that has not happened.
assert.equal((await must("laptop", `cat /etc/delivered`)).trim(), "first",
"the machine changed before anything was sent to it");
await mesh("push laptop");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 15_000));
assert.equal((await must("laptop", `cat /etc/delivered`)).trim(), "second",
"the machine is still running what the source no longer says");
// And it is no longer out of date, which is the half that makes the answer trustworthy: a
// status that says "behind" for ever is one nobody reads.
const after = await mesh("status");
assert.doesNotMatch(after, /delivered.*<.*[0-9a-f]{8}/,
`the module is still reported as behind after catching up:\n${after}`);
});
test("the board names the machine that is not doing what it was told", {
skip, timeout: 900_000,
}, async () => {
// novox/hq 03-DESIGN/01-to-be/11-a-board.md. The board being replaced reads every context's
// database directly; this one asks the same questions through the same functions the commands
// use, and holds nothing. So the check is that what it says matches what the mesh says, and
// that it says the thing a person opened it for.
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"board","version":"1",` +
`"listens":[{"port":8090,"from":"mesh","why":"the board"}],` +
`"resources":[]}' > /tmp/board.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/board.json mesh-control:/board.json`);
await mesh("module add /board.json");
// Served from the control plane's own container, reading the mesh on every request.
await must("anchor", `docker exec -d mesh-control /mesh-control board --listen 0.0.0.0:8090`);
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 3000));
const read = async (path: string) =>
await on("anchor", `curl -sf http://127.0.0.1:8090${path}`, 30_000);
let up = false;
let said = { out: "", ok: false };
for (let i = 0; i < 15 && !up; i++) {
said = await read("/");
up = said.ok;
if (!up) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 2000));
}
assert.ok(up, `the board does not answer:\n${said.out}`);
// Something a person opened it for: give a machine a declaration it cannot apply.
//
// A unit that does not exist, because the host says so immediately and in its own words. A file
// in a missing directory is not impossible — the host creates the parents, which is correct and
// made the first version of this test break nothing at all.
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"impossible","version":"1",` +
`"resources":[{"id":"nowhere","type":"service","unit":"nothing-like-this.service",` +
`"state":"running"}]}' > /tmp/impossible.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/impossible.json mesh-control:/impossible.json`);
await mesh("module add /impossible.json");
await mesh("assign laptop impossible");
await mesh("push laptop");
let named = false;
let page = "";
for (let i = 0; i < 20 && !named; i++) {
page = (await read("/")).out;
named = page.includes("laptop") && page.includes(">failed<");
if (!named) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 3000));
}
assert.ok(named, `the board does not name the machine that failed:\n${page}`);
// The host's own words, which say exactly what it could not do. A board that said only
// "failed" would make a person go and ask the thing they opened the board to avoid asking.
assert.match(page, /nowhere/, `the board does not say what failed:\n${page}`);
// It agrees with the command, because both read the same thing. Two answers to "which machine
// is broken" is worse than either alone.
const asJSON = JSON.parse((await read("/mesh.json")).out);
assert.equal(asJSON.wrong[0].node, "laptop", `the page and the JSON disagree: ${JSON.stringify(asJSON)}`);
assert.equal(asJSON.wrong[0].outcome, "failed");
const fromCommand = JSON.parse(await mesh("status --json"));
assert.deepEqual(asJSON.wrong, fromCommand.wrong,
"the board and the command disagree about which machine is broken");
// And it changes nothing: the mesh is exactly as it was after being read.
const before = await mesh("status");
await read("/");
assert.equal(await mesh("status"), before, "reading the board changed the mesh");
await mesh("unassign laptop impossible");
await mesh("push laptop");
});
// Defends novox/hq ADR 0007: filtering the hub must not cut the overlay it carries.
test("the hub can be filtered without severing the mesh", {
skip, timeout: 900_000,
}, async () => {
// The machine that most needs a firewall was the one that could not have one. A hub is dialled
// by every node at other sites; a machine that is not a hub dials out and needs nothing open.
// They are the same module, so a static `listens` cannot say it — and the machine it gets wrong
// is the one facing the public internet.
//
// The failure this guards against is not subtle and is very hard to recover from: a rule set
// that closes the hub's own port takes the private network down, and the mesh's way of fixing
// anything is to send a declaration over it.
// Its own directory. Another module on this machine already declares /etc/mesh, and the mesh
// refuses two modules declaring one path rather than letting the second quietly win — which it
// did here, correctly, the first time this ran.
const rules = "/etc/mesh-hub/filter.nft";
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"hubfilter","version":"1",` +
`"capabilities":["firewall"],` +
`"filtering":{"into":"${rules}"},` +
`"resources":[{"id":"nftables","type":"package","package":"nftables"},` +
`{"id":"dir","type":"directory","path":"/etc/mesh-hub","mode":"0755"},` +
`{"id":"unit","type":"file","path":"/etc/systemd/system/hub-filter.service",` +
`"mode":"0644","content":"[Unit]\\nDescription=What the mesh computed for the hub\\n` +
`[Service]\\nType=oneshot\\nRemainAfterExit=yes\\n` +
`ExecStart=/usr/bin/nft -f ${rules}\\n[Install]\\nWantedBy=multi-user.target\\n"},` +
`{"id":"filter","type":"service","unit":"hub-filter.service","state":"running",` +
`"boot":"enabled","restart-on":["filtering"]}]}' > /tmp/hubfilter.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/hubfilter.json mesh-control:/hubfilter.json`);
await mesh("module add /hubfilter.json");
await mesh("assign anchor hubfilter");
await mesh("push anchor");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 20_000));
// The hub's own way onto the private network is open, and derived — nothing in that manifest
// mentions a port.
const written = await must("anchor", `cat ${rules}`);
assert.match(written, /udp dport 51820 accept/,
`the hub's rule set closes the private network it is the way onto:\n${written}`);
// The module that provides the private network, not the requirement it answers: `networking`
// is the domain a module offers, and what caused a rule is the module itself.
assert.match(written, /# mesh-wireguard — the private network/,
`the rule does not name what caused it:\n${written}`);
// Loaded, and the mesh still works: a declaration reaches the other machine, which it cannot if
// the overlay is severed. This is the assertion that matters — a rule file that looks right and
// a mesh that has stopped are exactly what this is guarding against.
assert.match(await must("anchor", `nft list table inet mesh`), /dport 51820/);
await must("laptop", `rm -f /etc/mesh-still-works`);
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"stillworks","version":"1",` +
`"resources":[{"id":"marker","type":"file","path":"/etc/mesh-still-works",` +
`"content":"yes","mode":"0644"}]}' > /tmp/stillworks.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/stillworks.json mesh-control:/stillworks.json`);
await mesh("module add /stillworks.json");
await mesh("assign laptop stillworks");
await mesh("push laptop");
let arrived = false;
for (let i = 0; i < 20 && !arrived; i++) {
arrived = (await on("laptop", `test -f /etc/mesh-still-works`)).ok;
if (!arrived) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 3000));
}
assert.ok(arrived,
"the hub applied its own rule set and the mesh stopped reaching the other machine");
// And the other machine still reaches the hub over the private network, which is what the
// opened port is for.
assert.ok((await on("laptop", `ping -c 1 -W 5 anchor.internal`)).ok,
"the private network is down after the hub filtered itself");
await mesh("unassign anchor hubfilter");
await mesh("unassign laptop stillworks");
await mesh("push");
});
test("a container reaches another machine by the name the mesh gave it", {
skip, timeout: 900_000,
}, async () => {
// Internal names are written to the machine's hosts file, which serves the machine and not what
// the machine runs: a container gets its own hosts file holding only its own hostname. So every
// name the mesh wrote was invisible to the majority of things that need one.
//
// Checked from inside a container rather than on the machine, because on the machine it has
// always worked — and that is exactly what made this easy to miss.
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"resolves","version":"1",` +
`"capabilities":["container-runtime"],` +
`"resources":[{"id":"idle","type":"container","name":"resolves",` +
`"image":"${pinned("registry")}"}]}' > /tmp/resolves.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/resolves.json mesh-control:/resolves.json`);
await mesh("module add /resolves.json");
await mesh("assign laptop resolves");
await mesh("push laptop");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 15_000));
// The names are in the container's own hosts file, written by the runtime.
const inside = await must("laptop", `docker exec resolves cat /etc/hosts`);
assert.match(inside, /anchor\.internal/,
`the container cannot see the other machine's name:\n${inside}`);
assert.match(inside, /laptop\.internal/,
`the container cannot see its own machine's name:\n${inside}`);
// And the name actually reaches the machine, which is the part that matters: a hosts entry
// pointing at the wrong address resolves perfectly and connects to nothing.
const reached = await on("laptop",
`docker exec resolves sh -c 'getent hosts anchor.internal'`);
assert.ok(reached.ok, `the name does not resolve inside the container:\n${reached.out}`);
const address = reached.out.trim().split(/\s+/)[0];
const onTheMachine = (await must("laptop",
`getent hosts anchor.internal | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f1`)).trim();
assert.equal(address, onTheMachine,
"the container and its machine disagree about where the other machine is");
await mesh("unassign laptop resolves");
await mesh("push laptop");
});
// Defends novox/hq ADR 0007: a name under a machine is that machine, without the mesh being
// told each one.
test("every name under a machine resolves to that machine", {
skip, timeout: 900_000,
}, async () => {
// Services are named under the machine they run on — postgres.novox.internal,
// plex.ace.internal. The first label is the service and the rest is the node, so what must
// resolve is anything under a node's name. What routes it once it arrives is a proxy's, and
// stays separate.
//
// The mesh writes the data and runs no daemon: a resolver is third-party software, and the
// mesh has no business choosing one. So what is checked here is the mesh's half — that the
// data is right, complete, and follows the machines.
await mesh("assign anchor mesh-resolver");
await mesh("assign laptop mesh-resolver");
await mesh("push");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 15_000));
for (const machine of ["anchor", "laptop"]) {
const written = await must(machine, `cat /etc/mesh-resolver/nodes.conf`);
// A wildcard per machine, matching the name and everything under it. Both machines get the
// whole mesh: a node resolves every other node, and itself.
for (const node of ["anchor", "laptop"]) {
assert.match(written, new RegExp(`address=/${node}\\.internal/10\\.42\\.0\\.\\d+`),
`${machine} cannot resolve names under ${node}:\n${written}`);
}
// And the addresses agree with what the machine's own hosts file says. Two accounts of where
// a machine is, disagreeing, would be worse than either alone — and this is the one place
// they could drift, because they are generated separately.
const hosts = await must(machine, `getent hosts anchor.internal | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f1`);
assert.match(written, new RegExp(`address=/anchor\\.internal/${hosts.trim().replace(/\./g, "\\.")}`),
`the resolver data and the hosts file disagree about where anchor is:\n${written}`);
}
// It follows the machines. A node leaving the private network must stop being answered for,
// because a wildcard pointing at nothing resolves and then hangs — where an unresolvable name
// fails at once and says which name it was.
//
// Both, and that is not tidiness: `mesh-resolver` requires name resolution, which requires the
// network, so unassigning the domain module alone leaves the machine on the network — pulled
// back by its own requirement. The mesh was right and this test was wrong the first time.
await mesh("unassign laptop mesh-resolver");
await mesh("unassign laptop networking");
await mesh("push anchor");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 15_000));
const after = await must("anchor", `cat /etc/mesh-resolver/nodes.conf`);
assert.doesNotMatch(after, /address=\/laptop\.internal\//,
`a machine that left the private network is still answered for:\n${after}`);
assert.match(after, /address=\/anchor\.internal\//,
`the machine that stayed lost its own name:\n${after}`);
await mesh("assign laptop networking");
await mesh("unassign anchor mesh-resolver");
await mesh("push");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 15_000));
});
test("a service is reached by a name under the machine it runs on", {
skip: skip || (!moduleExamples ? "set MESH_LAB_MODULES to mesh-control's examples/modules" : false),
timeout: 900_000,
}, async () => {
// postgres.novox.internal, plex.ace.internal — the first label is the service and the rest is
// the node, so anything under a node's name must resolve to that node. What routes it once it
// arrives is a proxy's concern and stays separate.
//
// The mesh writes the data; a module runs the daemon. Both manifests are read from the
// repository rather than written here, so what is proven is what ships.
// `resolved-split-dns`, not `resolv-conf`: these machines run systemd-resolved, which owns
// /etc/resolv.conf. The two claim the same thing precisely so that assigning the wrong one is a
// refusal rather than a fight over the file — and picking the wrong one here would have been
// testing that fight.
for (const name of ["dnsmasq", "resolved-split-dns"]) {
const manifest = readFileSync(`${moduleExamples}/${name}.json`, "utf8");
await must("anchor", `cat > /tmp/${name}.json <<'MANIFEST'\n${manifest}\nMANIFEST`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /tmp/${name}.json mesh-control:/${name}.json`);
await mesh(`module add /${name}.json`);
}
// Both machines, because a node resolves from its own copy — the same rule as everything else
// it holds. A mesh where one machine answers for all of them stops resolving when that machine
// does, which is the arrangement this design refuses everywhere else.
for (const machine of ["anchor", "laptop"]) {
await mesh(`assign ${machine} dnsmasq`);
await mesh(`assign ${machine} resolved-split-dns`);
}
await mesh("push");
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 25_000));
// Everything this test could want to know, gathered in one place.
//
// Three times now a diagnostic has not run because the thing before it threw: `must` on a
// command that fails, and then a query that hangs long enough to take the harness's own timeout
// with it. A 30-second test costs fifteen minutes to re-run, so the evidence has to be gathered
// whether the failure is an assertion, an error, or a hang.
const diagnose = async (machine: string) =>
`--- ${machine}\n` +
`dnsmasq: ${(await on(machine, `systemctl is-active dnsmasq.service`)).out.trim()}\n` +
`${(await on(machine, `journalctl -u dnsmasq -n 12 --no-pager`)).out}\n` +
`resolved: ${(await on(machine, `resolvectl status | head -30`)).out}\n` +
`resolv.conf:\n${(await on(machine, `cat /etc/resolv.conf`)).out}\n` +
`what the mesh wrote:\n${(await on(machine, `cat /etc/mesh-resolver/nodes.conf`)).out}\n` +
`listening:\n${(await on(machine, `ss -lnup | grep :53 || echo none`)).out}\n` +
`asked directly:\n${(await on(machine,
`timeout 5 resolvectl query postgres.anchor.internal 2>&1 || echo "no answer"`)).out}`;
// `on`, not `must`: `is-active` exits non-zero for a unit that failed, so `must` would throw
// before the assertion below — taking every diagnostic with it. That happened, and the run said
// only "failed".
for (const machine of ["anchor", "laptop"]) {
const state = await on(machine, `systemctl is-active dnsmasq.service`);
if (state.out.trim() === "active") continue;
assert.fail(`the resolver is not running on ${machine} (${state.out.trim()}):\n\n` +
`its config:\n${(await on(machine, `cat /etc/dnsmasq.conf`)).out}\n` +
`${await diagnose(machine)}`);
}
// Through the machine's own resolver, by the path an application actually takes: nsswitch, then
// files, then DNS. `dig` would ask a server directly and prove less — the resolv.conf module is
// half of what is being tested, and only this path goes through it.
//
// Bounded on the machine rather than by the harness: a query that hangs is a result, and letting
// it run into the harness's own timeout turns it into an error with no evidence attached.
const resolves = async (machine: string, name: string) => {
const said = await on(machine,
`timeout 5 getent hosts ${name} | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f1`, 20_000);
return said.out.trim();
};
const addressOf = async (machine: string, node: string) =>
(await must(machine, `getent hosts ${node}.internal | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f1`)).trim();
const anchorAt = await addressOf("anchor", "anchor");
const laptopAt = await addressOf("anchor", "laptop");
// A name the mesh was never told about, under a machine it was — from both machines, because a
// node must answer for every machine and not only for itself.
for (const machine of ["anchor", "laptop"]) {
let got = "";
for (let i = 0; i < 15 && !got; i++) {
got = await resolves(machine, "postgres.anchor.internal");
if (!got) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 3000));
}
assert.equal(got, anchorAt,
`${machine} does not resolve a service named under anchor: ${got || "(nothing)"}\n\n` +
`${await diagnose(machine)}`);
}
// Any name at all, which is the whole point: the mesh was never told these exist.
for (const [name, expected] of [
["postgres-2.anchor.internal", anchorAt],
["keycloak.anchor.internal", anchorAt],
["plex.laptop.internal", laptopAt],
["radarr.laptop.internal", laptopAt],
] as const) {
assert.equal(await resolves("laptop", name), expected,
`${name} did not resolve to the machine it is named under\n\n${await diagnose("laptop")}`);
}
// The machine's own name still resolves, and to the same place. Two accounts of where a machine
// is, disagreeing, would be worse than either alone.
assert.equal(await resolves("laptop", "anchor.internal"), anchorAt);
// And what is not the mesh's is not answered by it. The resolver takes over the mesh's names
// and nothing else, which is what lets a machine keep whatever DNS it already had.
assert.equal(await resolves("anchor", "something.example.com"), "",
"the resolver answered for a name that is not the mesh's");
for (const machine of ["anchor", "laptop"]) {
await mesh(`unassign ${machine} resolved-split-dns`);
await mesh(`unassign ${machine} dnsmasq`);
}
await mesh("push");
});
// A real third-party workload, adopted the way the conversion will adopt one.
//
// **Everything before this used modules written to exercise the mesh.** This one is software
// nobody here wrote, taking its credentials the way such software does — from its environment —
// and needing two containers that reach each other by name. It is the first module that could not
// have been declared before today: it needs the `network` shape, and it needs a sealed value to
// reach a container's environment.
//
// Its database password is **accepted rather than generated**, which is the whole shape of an
// adoption: a service that already exists keeps the credential it already has, because minting a
// new one is how a running application stops being able to reach its own database.
test("a third-party workload is adopted, with the credential it already had", {
skip, timeout: 900_000,
}, async () => {
const password = "the-password-it-already-had";
await must("anchor", `printf %s ${quote(JSON.stringify({
module: "umami",
version: "1",
capabilities: ["container-runtime"],
"own-secrets": {
database: "/var/lib/umami/database.env",
app: "/var/lib/umami/app.env",
},
listens: [{ port: 1212, protocol: "tcp", from: "mesh", why: "the analytics page" }],
resources: [
{ id: "state", type: "directory", path: "/var/lib/umami", mode: "0700" },
// The two containers must reach each other by name, which is what this shape is for.
{ id: "net", type: "network", name: "umami" },
{
id: "db", type: "container", name: "umami-db",
image: pinned("postgres"),
network: "umami",
env: { POSTGRES_DB: "umami", POSTGRES_USER: "umami" },
"env-file": ["/var/lib/umami/database.env"],
},
{
id: "app", type: "container", name: "umami",
image: pinned("ghcr.io/umami-software/umami"),
network: "umami",
env: { DATABASE_TYPE: "postgresql" },
"env-file": ["/var/lib/umami/app.env"],
ports: ["1212:3000"],
},
],
}))} > /umami.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /umami.json mesh-control:/umami.json`);
await mesh("module add /umami.json");
// **Accepted, not generated.** The value is what the database already answers to; the mesh
// seals it and cannot read it again. Given whole, as the environment lines the containers read.
await must("anchor",
`printf %s ${quote(`POSTGRES_PASSWORD=${password}`)} | ` +
`docker exec -i mesh-control /mesh-control secret accept anchor umami database --from -`);
await must("anchor",
`printf %s ${quote(
`DATABASE_URL=postgresql://umami:${password}@umami-db:5432/umami`)} | ` +
`docker exec -i mesh-control /mesh-control secret accept anchor umami app --from -`);
await mesh("assign anchor umami");
await mesh("push anchor", 300_000);
// Both containers, and the network they share.
let up = false;
for (let i = 0; i < 60 && !up; i++) {
const running = await on("anchor", `docker ps --format '{{.Names}}'`);
up = running.out.includes("umami-db") && running.out.includes("umami");
if (!up) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 5000));
}
if (!up) {
// Everything that could say why, gathered before asserting. "It did not start" is the one
// thing already known; what is wanted is whether the mesh sent it, whether the host refused
// it, and what the runtime said when it tried.
const said = await mesh("status");
const containers = await on("anchor", `docker ps -a --format '{{.Names}} {{.Status}}'`);
const applied = await on("anchor",
`${HOST_PATH} owned 2>&1 | head -30 || echo "the host could not say what it owns"`);
const files = await on("anchor", `ls -la /var/lib/umami/ 2>&1; ` +
`for f in /var/lib/umami/*.env; do echo "-- $f"; wc -c "$f"; done 2>&1`);
const tried = await on("anchor",
`docker inspect umami-db --format '{{.State.Status}} {{.State.Error}}' 2>&1; ` +
`docker logs umami-db 2>&1 | tail -15`);
assert.fail(
`the workload never started.\n\n` +
`── what the mesh thinks:\n${said}\n` +
`── containers:\n${containers.out}\n` +
`── what the host owns:\n${applied.out}\n` +
`── what the mesh wrote:\n${files.out}\n` +
`── the database container:\n${tried.out}\n`);
}
// The environment file the mesh sealed is on the machine and readable only by root.
const mode = await must("anchor", `stat -c %a /var/lib/umami/database.env`);
assert.equal(mode.trim(), "600", "a file holding a credential is readable by more than root");
// **The assertion that matters: the credential works.** Not that a file arrived — that the
// database the mesh started answers to the password the mesh was given rather than one it made.
let connected = { out: "", ok: false };
for (let i = 0; i < 40 && !connected.ok; i++) {
connected = await on("anchor",
`docker exec umami-db psql -U umami -d umami -qAt -c 'select 1'`);
if (!connected.ok) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 3000));
}
assert.ok(connected.ok, `the database never came up:\n${connected.out}`);
const wrong = await on("anchor",
`docker run --rm --network umami -e PGPASSWORD=not-the-password ${pinned("postgres")} ` +
`psql -h umami-db -U umami -d umami -qAt -c 'select 1'`);
assert.ok(!wrong.ok,
"the database accepted a password nobody gave it, so this proves nothing about the one that was");
// And the two containers reach each other by name over the module's own network.
const reached = await must("anchor",
`docker run --rm --network umami ${pinned("postgres")} ` +
`sh -c 'getent hosts umami-db || echo unreachable'`);
assert.doesNotMatch(reached, /unreachable/,
"a container could not reach the other by name, so the module's network did nothing");
});
// The real modules, resolved together on one machine.
//
// **What this proves without pulling a gigabyte of images**: that five manifests written from the
// running system resolve as a graph — keycloak's requirement met by postgres's provision,
// capabilities checked, nothing claiming the same singular thing — and that the declaration the
// control plane composes is one the host accepts. `plan --json` exists for exactly this: it is
// the only way to know that what the control plane emits is what the host takes.
//
// Running them needs their images stocked and two provisioners built, which is a separate and
// larger job. This is the half that can be known now, and it is the half where a design fault
// would live.
test("the real modules resolve together, and compose a declaration a host accepts", {
skip, timeout: 300_000,
}, async (t) => {
// Everything the catalogue holds, except two whose names this mesh is already running under:
// `registry` is the artifact store the suite stood up, and `umami` is the adopted workload —
// adding the catalogue's manifests would replace the records of modules that are live and
// assigned, and the adopted umami would suddenly require a database it never asked for.
const modules = ["postgres", "keycloak", "gitea", "minio", "mailu",
"redis", "grafana", "nextcloud", "searxng", "influxdb", "verdaccio"];
const planned: string[] = [];
for (const name of modules) {
const raw = readFileSync(
`${process.env["MESH_LAB_MODULES"]}/${name}.json`, "utf8");
// Pointed at this scenario's registry before being added, exactly as the forge is.
//
// **Not cosmetic.** Some of these name an image the mesh builds, whose digest does not exist
// until it is built — so the file legitimately carries a placeholder, and composing a
// declaration from it is refused (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/025). Planning what could never run is
// what this test used to do.
const pinned = pinnedInto(raw, stocked);
// What this scenario does not serve cannot be redirected, and a module still naming a
// placeholder cannot be planned — the refusal is the point (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/025). Skipped
// and said, rather than silently dropped: a planning test quietly covering four modules
// instead of five is the false coverage this suite exists to prevent.
const left = stillUnpinned(pinned);
if (left.length > 0) {
console.log(`skipping ${name}: this scenario serves no ${left.join(", ")}`);
continue;
}
planned.push(name);
await must("anchor", `printf %s ${quote(pinned)} > /${name}.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /${name}.json mesh-control:/${name}.json`);
await mesh(`module add /${name}.json`);
}
// **Put the machine back whatever happens.** Tests here share one mesh, so what this one
// assigns is what the next one inherits. Written at the end of the body once, it was skipped
// the first time this test failed — and the next test's push was refused by a module this one
// had left behind, which reads as a fault in the test that was actually working.
t.after(async () => {
for (const name of planned) await mesh(`unassign anchor ${name}`).catch(() => {});
});
// Assigned one at a time, because assignment resolves the whole set and says so immediately.
// A refusal here is the graph rejecting something, which is the point of asking.
for (const name of planned) {
await mesh(`assign anchor ${name}`);
}
const plan = await mesh("plan anchor --json", 120_000);
const declaration = JSON.parse(plan.slice(plan.indexOf("{")));
const byId = new Map<string, any>(
(declaration.resources as any[]).map((r) => [r.id, r]));
const ids = [...byId.keys()];
// Every module's own network, which only exists because more than one container needs to reach
// another by name.
for (const id of ["postgres.net", "keycloak.net", "minio.net", "mailu.net"]) {
assert.ok(byId.has(id), `${id} is missing; ${ids.length} resources: ${ids.join(", ")}`);
assert.equal(byId.get(id).type, "network");
}
// The cross-module edge: keycloak asked for a database and was told where it is and given a
// credential. Neither file is anything keycloak's manifest could have written.
const bound = [...byId.values()].find((r) =>
r.type === "file" && r.path === "/var/lib/keycloak/database.json");
assert.ok(bound, `keycloak was never told where its database is: ${ids.join(", ")}`);
assert.match(JSON.stringify(bound), /postgres/,
"keycloak's binding does not name what answered its requirement");
// The password, alone in a file and sealed. It is a password and nothing else, so nothing reads
// it as configuration — novox/hq 04-ISSUES/023 and the playbook both turn on that distinction.
const credential = [...byId.values()].find((r) =>
r.type === "file" && r.path === "/var/lib/keycloak/database.secret");
assert.ok(credential, `keycloak was given no credential for its database: ${ids.join(", ")}`);
assert.ok(credential.sealed, "keycloak's credential is not sealed, so the mesh can read it");
assert.ok(!credential.content, "a credential arrived as content rather than sealed");
// And the connection itself, which keycloak could not have written: the address and port come
// from what the provider serves, and the user name from what the mesh decided both ends would
// call this consumer (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/023).
const connection = [...byId.values()].find((r) =>
r.type === "file" && r.path === "/var/lib/keycloak/database.env");
assert.ok(connection, "keycloak was given no database configuration");
assert.match(connection.content, /KC_DB_USERNAME=mesh_[a-z0-9_]+_keycloak/,
`keycloak was not told what name to present:\n${connection.content}`);
assert.doesNotMatch(connection.content, /\$\{bound:/,
`a placeholder reached the machine as a value:\n${connection.content}`);
// The password is the one hole left open, and the sealed value travels beside it. The mesh
// discarded the plaintext, so the host is the only thing that can close it.
assert.match(connection.content, /KC_DB_PASSWORD=\$\{secret:postgres-database\}/,
`the password was not left for the host to fill:\n${connection.content}`);
assert.ok(connection.secrets?.["postgres-database"],
"the sealed credential did not travel with the file that needs it");
assert.doesNotMatch(JSON.stringify(connection.content), /postgres-database":"[A-Za-z0-9+/]{24,}/,
"the credential was written into the configuration in the clear");
// And the provider was told who asked, which is what its provisioner reconciles against.
const grants = [...byId.values()].find((r) =>
r.type === "file" && String(r.path).startsWith("/var/lib/postgres/grants"));
assert.ok(grants, "postgres was never told which modules were granted a database");
assert.match(JSON.stringify(grants), /keycloak|gitea/,
"the grants file names neither module that asked for a database");
// Secrets reach containers as files, never as environment in the declaration.
const containers = [...byId.values()].filter((r) => r.type === "container");
assert.ok(containers.length >= 12,
`only ${containers.length} containers; mailu alone is nine`);
for (const c of containers) {
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(c.env ?? {})) {
// **An absolute path is a reference to a secret, not a secret**, and naming one is the
// whole design: the mesh delivers a credential as a file and a module says where.
//
// Excluded because `/` is in the base64 alphabet, so any path of 24 characters or more
// matched — `MESH_BROKER_FILE=/var/lib/mesh/builder/broker` was reported as a credential
// the broker would see. A check that fires on the right shape for the wrong reason is
// worse than none: it is the one that gets suppressed, and then it is not there when it
// is right.
if (String(value).startsWith("/")) continue;
assert.doesNotMatch(String(value), /^[A-Za-z0-9+/]{24,}={0,2}$/,
`${c.name} carries something secret-shaped in env.${key}, which the broker would see`);
}
}
});
// The first of the real module descriptions to actually run.
//
// **Everything before this stopped at composing a declaration.** That proves the control plane and
// the host agree, and proves nothing about whether the thing described works — which is how five
// modules sat pinned to images that did not exist, parsing and resolving perfectly
// (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/025).
//
// The forge is the one worth running first. It needs a database from another module, a password it
// did not choose, and a connection string it could not have written itself: the address and port
// come from what the database serves, and the user name from what the mesh decided both ends would
// call it (04-ISSUES/022 and 023). If any of that is wrong it cannot start, and nothing else in
// this file would notice.
test("the forge runs, on a database the mesh gave it", { skip, timeout: 900_000 }, async () => {
for (const name of ["postgres", "gitea"]) {
const raw = readFileSync(`${process.env["MESH_LAB_MODULES"]}/${name}.json`, "utf8");
// An image the mesh builds has no digest until it is built, and one it does not build belongs
// to whichever registry served it. Both are answered by this scenario's own registry.
const pinned = pinnedInto(raw, stocked);
assert.deepEqual(stillUnpinned(pinned), [],
`${name} still names an image nothing serves, so it could not start`);
await must("anchor", `printf %s ${quote(pinned)} > /run-${name}.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /run-${name}.json mesh-control:/run-${name}.json`);
await mesh(`module add /run-${name}.json`);
await mesh(`assign anchor ${name}`);
}
await mesh("push anchor", 300_000);
// **What the machine says it did, before asking what it produced.** This test pushed and then
// waited for a database role, so when the containers were never created at all it reported "no
// login was created" — true, and silent about the reason. A push that was accepted and an apply
// that worked are different facts, and the second is the one this depends on.
//
// And waited for, because `push` sends without waiting. Reading `status` the instant it returns
// describes the apply *before* this one, which is how this test came to report a missing
// container while insisting the machine was fine.
await settled("anchor");
const running = (await on("anchor", `docker ps -a --format '{{.Names}} {{.Status}}'`)).out;
// Named with what the mesh meant to send, not only with what the machine has. A container that
// is absent because the mesh never asked for it and one that is absent because the machine could
// not make it are the same sentence here and different faults entirely, and the plan is the only
// thing that tells them apart.
assert.match(running, /\bpostgres\b/,
`the database module was pushed and no container for it exists:\n${running}\n\n` +
`what the mesh would send anchor:\n${await mesh("plan anchor")}\n\n` +
`${(await on("anchor", `tail -30 /var/log/mesh-host.log`)).out}`);
// The database first: until the provisioner has made the login, the forge has nothing to
// connect to and its own start would prove only that it retries.
const psql = async (q: string) =>
(await on("anchor",
`docker exec postgres psql -U postgres -qAt -c ${quote(q)}`, 60_000)).out.trim();
// Both halves in one poll. The provisioner makes the role and then the database, and a test
// that waited for the first and checked the second once was racing the gap between two
// statements — it lost, once, eighteen seconds into a run.
let made = "";
for (let i = 0; i < 40 && made !== "t"; i++) {
made = await psql("select true from pg_roles where rolname = 'mesh_anchor_gitea'" +
" and exists (select from pg_database where datname = 'gitea')");
if (made !== "t") await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 3000));
}
assert.equal(made, "t",
`no login was created for the forge:\n${(await on("anchor", "docker logs mesh-provision-postgres 2>&1 | tail -20")).out}`);
// And the forge itself, answering. Not that its container exists — that it serves.
//
// On the port the mesh assigned, not the one the module declared (novox/hq ADR 0038): the
// module says 3000 and the machine publishes wherever the mesh put it. Read from the plan,
// because the plan is the same composition a push sends.
const planned = await mesh("plan anchor --json", 120_000);
const mapping = (JSON.parse(planned.slice(planned.indexOf("{"))).resources as any[])
.find((r) => r.id === "gitea.server")?.ports
?.map(String).find((p: string) => p.endsWith(":3000"));
assert.ok(mapping, "the plan does not say where the machine publishes the forge");
const at = mapping.split(":")[0];
let answered = false;
let said = { out: "", ok: false };
for (let i = 0; i < 60 && !answered; i++) {
said = await on("anchor", `curl -sf -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' --max-time 5 http://127.0.0.1:${at}/`, 30_000);
answered = said.out.trim().startsWith("2") || said.out.trim() === "303";
if (!answered) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 5000));
}
assert.ok(answered,
`the forge never answered (last: ${said.out.trim()}):\n` +
`${(await on("anchor", "docker logs gitea 2>&1 | tail -25")).out}`);
// **The credential actually worked.** A forge that started and could not reach its database
// would still answer on its port, so the log is where the difference lives.
const log = (await on("anchor", "docker logs gitea 2>&1 | tail -60")).out;
assert.doesNotMatch(log, /password authentication failed|connection refused|does not exist/i,
`the forge started and could not use the database it was given:\n${log}`);
await mesh("unassign anchor gitea");
await mesh("unassign anchor postgres");
await mesh("push anchor", 300_000);
});
test("a consumer's cache grant means exactly its own keys", { skip, timeout: 600_000 }, async (t) => {
// The third provision after a database and a bucket, and the first whose tenancy is enforced
// by the store's own ACL rather than by separate namespaces: every consumer shares one
// keyspace, so the grant is a pattern — and the test is that the pattern means what the
// manifest said, in both directions.
const raw = readFileSync(`${process.env["MESH_LAB_MODULES"]}/redis.json`, "utf8");
const pinned = pinnedInto(raw, stocked);
assert.deepEqual(stillUnpinned(pinned), [],
"redis still names an image nothing serves, so it could not start");
await must("anchor", `printf %s ${quote(pinned)} > /run-redis.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /run-redis.json mesh-control:/run-redis.json`);
await mesh("module add /run-redis.json");
// A consumer with no container: what is under test is the credential's reach, and files on the
// machine are enough to prove it — the same reduction the first credential test makes.
await must("anchor", `printf %s '{"module":"cachetest","version":"1",` +
`"requires":["redis-cache"],` +
`"contributes":{"redis-cache":{"prefix":"cachetest"}},` +
`"binds":{"redis-cache":"/var/lib/cachetest/cache.json"},` +
`"secrets":{"redis-cache":"/var/lib/cachetest/cache.secret"},` +
`"resources":[{"id":"state","type":"directory","path":"/var/lib/cachetest","mode":"0700"}]}' ` +
`> /cachetest.json`);
await must("anchor", `docker cp /cachetest.json mesh-control:/cachetest.json`);
await mesh("module add /cachetest.json");
await mesh("assign anchor redis");
await mesh("assign anchor cachetest");
await mesh("push anchor", 300_000);
await settled("anchor");
t.after(async () => {
for (const name of ["cachetest", "redis"]) {
await mesh(`unassign anchor ${name}`).catch(() => {});
}
await mesh("push anchor", 300_000).catch(() => {});
});
// What the mesh told each end. The consumer's user name comes from its binding; the user's
// password from the sealed file beside it — both written by the host, neither invented here.
const bound = JSON.parse(await must("anchor", `cat /var/lib/cachetest/cache.json`));
const user = bound.as;
assert.ok(user?.startsWith("mesh_"), `the binding does not carry a usable user: ${user}`);
const secret = (await must("anchor", `cat /var/lib/cachetest/cache.secret`)).trim();
// The provisioner has to have run before anything can authenticate. Waited for via the store
// itself: the user list, asked with the server's own password, which the conf file the host
// wrote holds on the machine.
const admin = (await must("anchor",
`awk '/^requirepass/ {print $2}' /var/lib/redis-module/redis.conf`)).trim();
let granted = false;
for (let i = 0; i < 40 && !granted; i++) {
const users = (await on("anchor",
`docker exec redis redis-cli --no-auth-warning -a ${quote(admin)} ACL USERS`)).out;
granted = users.includes(user);
if (!granted) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 3000));
}
assert.ok(granted, `no user was created for the consumer:
` +
`containers:\n${(await on("anchor", "docker ps -a --format '{{.Names}} {{.Status}}' | head -20")).out}\n` +
`the store:\n${(await on("anchor", "docker logs redis 2>&1 | tail -15")).out}\n` +
`the provisioner:\n${(await on("anchor", "docker logs mesh-provision-redis 2>&1 | tail -15")).out}`);
const asConsumer = (command: string) =>
on("anchor", `docker exec redis redis-cli --no-auth-warning ` +
`--user ${quote(user)} --pass ${quote(secret)} ${command}`);
// Its own keys: usable.
assert.match((await asConsumer("SET cachetest:proof yes")).out, /OK/,
"the consumer cannot write under the prefix it was granted");
assert.match((await asConsumer("GET cachetest:proof")).out, /yes/,
"the consumer cannot read back what it wrote");
// Anyone else's: refused by the store itself, which is the entire point of the grant.
assert.match((await asConsumer("SET other:proof no")).out, /NOPERM|no permissions/i,
"the consumer wrote outside its prefix — the grant means more than the manifest said");
assert.match((await asConsumer("FLUSHALL")).out, /NOPERM|no permissions/i,
"the consumer can flush the store, which no tenant may");
});