mesh/check failed: the composition: route-proxy is defined twice, in novox/mesh-controller and novox/mesh-networking | 759a7bff129b on fe0392e05f62 | …
The group's check failed at go mod verify: the build module's workspace carries one module, so the replace of
./contract named a go.mod it never placed; and ADR 0573 clause 1 refuses a path into another tree. Nothing outside
route-proxy imports the contract today; when one must, it moves into the networking domain's package (research 081).
Issue 1126.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
mesh/check failed: shanks: the check of novox/mesh-networking#1 failed: go mod verify in modules/route-proxy: go: git.novox.be/novox/mesh-networking/m…
route-proxy provides `route` to five modules and lived in novox/mesh-controller, archived once the controller is
removed (issue 1126). Its history comes along (git filter-repo of modules/route-proxy and its earlier home
examples/route-proxy). Its contract's Go module path names this repository, and route-proxy builds the contract from
its own tree through a replace, so no tag is needed before the first build. The two manifest tests that held its
public ACME account and mounted program lived in the controller's internal/ownmanifest; they move beside the module.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The table covers gitea and grafana moved by the placement, influxdb's bare port, mailu's and
photos' fixed mappings and home-assistant on the host's network; it replaces the loopback test it
subsumes, so route-proxy's test count does not grow.
The controller, NATS-native: no piece moves; route-proxy only.
route-proxy from plans dialled every route at the software's own port: gitea at 127.0.0.1:3000
(published at 20000) and grafana on ace at 3000 (published at 20012), and public sites answered
502. The proxy already reaches a module beside it over loopback and one elsewhere at the plan's
address; the plan now carries the assigned port, and a test composes the plan with the SDK and
reads it as the proxy does, so the two cannot drift again.
The controller, NATS-native: no piece moves; route-proxy only.
A bundle is built only from its module's directory (ADR 0480 clause 4), so the proxy leaves
examples/ and the controller's internal/broker; the broker keeps no second copy of what the
proxy shares with mesh-sdk. The image and its Dockerfile go, and a test holds that only
build-agent declares one (clause 11).
1090/1092: the move tests pick each report by kind and expect three, all already, on the second run. 1090-1093: under the share lock the switch reads the rows again and writes every key whose value differs from its row (and ends an assignment the store dropped) before recording the kind, so an update the old controller made after the first pass is not lost. 1093: route-proxy is pinned at mesh-sdk f185aedb and vendored; the controller uses only the SDK's asks package. KeepAssignmentPlans decides each key by keepStep, which never makes or revives an assignment. AssignmentsMirrorToWrite refuses once the assignments are moved.
jschoubben