mesh/check checking 9685990a15ed on 14de8dadb4ce | novox/mesh-sdk#140 in group fix/build-not-done-holds-one-module
At 19:30 on 2026-10-30 node-tools' trunk fingerprint moved to a build not yet done; fromBuilds then composed it from
the indexer's manifest, which names no bundle, and ace, g14 and shanks refused every module ("its build produced 0
bundle(s)") until another input moved after the build landed.
Quick fix: skip the runtime's check while its build is not done. Thorough fix: Compose reads each placed module at the
build its want names (as Scope.KeptAt), and a module that runs whose build is not done is held, keeping what runs (a
held runtime is composed as what runs of it, its running bundle), named with why; a module nothing runs of still
composes from the indexer's manifest as before. Input, PlansHeld and Answer read the trunk's builds as before. Chose
thorough: no running module is ever composed from a source manifest that names no build.
The culprit rule held a module whose stub made the composition fail otherwise. The runtime's stub carries no bundle,
so it always fails otherwise: any refusal naming node-tools (or a module whose name holds it) held the runtime, and
the node was then refused whole for the runtime's "0 bundle(s)".
Quick fix: never take node-tools as a culprit. Thorough fix: blames, the rule as one function, takes the runtime only
where its stub composes. Chose thorough: a runtime whose stub composes may still be held alone.
At 19:30 on 2026-10-30 ace, g14 and shanks refused every module with "node-tools … its build produced 0 bundle(s)":
the refusal of node-tools' stand-in, while why node-tools could not be composed was dropped with the hold.
Quick fix: log held in mesh-host before marking. Thorough fix: Compose's node-wide error carries "(held before:
<module>: <why>; …)", so the engine's journal, every have's detail and any caller see the cause. Chose thorough.