Commit Graph
17 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben 1c7356c247 catalogue: the composition's rules and refusals leave for the node-engine, so mesh-sdk renders no declaration and refuses no composition (ADR 0593 §7)
mesh/check failed: unit: git.novox.be/novox/mesh-sdk/go/process.TestStatePutWritesAKeyWhole: a Put through a short blackout: 0, mesh-mail's state send…
mesh/delivery-group group feat/sdk1 rejected: composed together: the checker's verdict at the members' heads (428d048dd50a): unit: git.novox.be/novox/mesh-sdk/…
mesh/delivery closed: a newer head of the same pull request
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
2026-11-02 19:19:25 +01:00
jschoubben 155669e69c catalogue keeps only what a reader or the node-engine's composition uses; the judge's rules are the indexer's own (ADR 0578 §7, ADR 0593 §1)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
2026-11-02 18:54:06 +01:00
jschoubben c459f75730 compose: an offer of form none composes no credential and holds nothing
mesh/check pass c459f757308a on 036266daff85 | unit 6028 run, 142 kept, 16 skipped | integration 6091 run, 174 kept, 25 skipped | over bound: unit, in…
mesh/delivery merged: source.main moved to novox/mesh-sdk@d6c87ee1a7ae
mesh/delivery-group group fix/1126-provision-credentials merged: every member is merged
After the controller, nothing makes a pair row for a new consumer, so a need whose provider offers no credential
(form none) was composed with a stand-in on both ends and the node-engine held the consumer (issue 1126:
mesh-cli on ace, "stands in for the grant of mcp-endpoint"). The vault never mints for form none, so such a need
now composes with no credential: the consumer's need carries none, the provider's grant carries the consumer
and nothing sealed, neither is named foreseen, CredentialsNeeded asks the vault for neither, and no empty grant
file is written.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
2026-11-02 15:30:43 +01:00
jschoubben bb01a656d0 Carry an unassigned port as the declaration publishes it, refusing only a port a module does not listen on (issue 774, research 072 row 34)
mesh/delivery merged: source.main moved to novox/mesh-sdk@fea48f19cea5
mesh/delivery-group group fix/route-ports merged: every member is merged
mesh/check failed: integration: mesh-vault/cmd/mesh-vault.TestTheVaultWholeMintsOnTheBusWhoeverHoldsTheLease: never: the account minted under the cont…
influxdb and unifi publish bare ports that mesh-placement assigns none: the machine runs them at
the software's own number, so a plan refusing them held their whole plan for a route that works.
2026-10-31 13:21:37 +01:00
jschoubben b611022457 Carry the machine-assigned port in a plan's contribution, so a provider serving from plans dials where the module listens (issue 774, research 072 row 34)
route-proxy served every route at the software's own port (gitea's 3000, published at 20000;
grafana's 3000 on another machine, published at 20012) and public sites answered 502. The plan's
contribution now carries the port the placement assigned, the number ${port:N} gives the module,
and a composition for plans refuses a port none assigned by module, node and port.
2026-10-31 13:08:35 +01:00
jschoubben acbf80ad91 Carry what a consumer contributes in its plan entry as one opaque payload, so a provider serving from the seat's plans reads it with its own contract and the provisioner knows no provision's fields (issue 774, research 072 row 34)
mesh/delivery merged: source.main moved to novox/mesh-sdk@fbbfae7629bf
mesh/delivery-group group feat/072-moves merged: every member is merged
mesh/check failed: shanks: the check of novox/mesh-controller#487 failed: go mod download in modules/route-proxy: go: git.novox.be/novox/mesh-controll…
2026-10-31 09:47:08 +01:00
jschoubben 085f17e935 Let a node composing itself hand a module exactly when the vault judged its plan handed, through one rule (catalogue.AssignmentHands), so the vault and the node never judge postgres's secrets two ways again (issue 774) 2026-10-31 09:29:33 +01:00
jschoubben 2d1d8def75 Take the plan entry's Given and ConsumerAt back out: route-proxy's seat defines its own contract and the provisioner's plan stays generic (the operator, 2026-10-31; issue 774). process.Conn.Read stays. 2026-10-31 09:29:17 +01:00
jschoubben a4e7629742 Carry each contribution, composed, and the consumer's address in its plan entry, and let a process read another module's state, so route-proxy serves routes from the seat's plans alone (issue 774, research 072 row 34) 2026-10-31 09:27:26 +01:00
jschoubben 91aa7b78fc Key provisions by one rule the plan, the seat and the assigner share (issue 774)
The assigner's rule 8 waited for a key for every `requires`, while the plans named only the needs of handed modules:
every new build of grafana, dnsmasq, mesh-knowledge, mesh-mail and the builders waited for a key nobody would make,
and grafana, not handed, had no plan, so no route key and no route on route-proxy.

catalogue.Keyed is the rule (a need a module answers is keyed when its consumer is handed or the provider's helper
answers it), catalogue.Awaited the same rule from manifests for the assigner, and a module not handed now has a plan
for what a helper answers of it. Handed modules' plans are unchanged.

Quick fix: drop the missing-key check from rule 8. Thorough fix (chosen): one rule in mesh-sdk all three parts use,
since the kind (three parts deciding the same set apart) already drifted once and hid failures as waits.
2026-10-30 22:29:12 +01:00
jschoubben eff81f1220 Never refuse a node for a held module's stand-in by its own runtime's rules (issue 774)
mesh/delivery merged: source.main moved to novox/mesh-sdk@b74e23f973ab
mesh/delivery-group group fix/held-module-and-assigner-contract merged: every member is merged
mesh/check checking eff81f1220e2 on b74e23f973ab | novox/mesh-sdk#142 in group fix/held-module-and-assigner-contract
On 2026-10-30 at 21:04 mesh-self-check (ace) and mesh-conditions, mesh-healers (novox) were placed before
their bus accounts were issued. Each was held for "needs a secret called broker and none was made"; its bare
stub then lost its own secrets and was refused by ownRuntimes ("runs as its own account and declares no own
secret broker"), a refusal no culprit takes, so 74 modules on ace and 79 on novox failed. A held runtime's stub
met the same kind earlier today ("its build produced 0 bundle(s)").

Quick fix: let the bare stub keep its broker own secret, for this one rule.
Thorough fix (chosen, the fourth of the kind today): a held module's stand-in (Stubbed) has no runtime
composed at all, so no rule about its runtime, bundle or broker can refuse it: ownRuntimes passes it over and
runtimeProcess composes none for a held runtime (what runs of either is carried, as before). A module of its
own account left without its runtime by a held runtime is refused with a typed NoRuntimeToRunError, which makes
the held runtime the culprit, so those modules are held after it and the node composes the rest.
2026-10-30 21:18:06 +01:00
jschoubben 8e3d7a4c3c Give a tools bundle's bus-account secret to the runtime's account and refuse it where that account cannot reach, so the bus tools can read their credential (issue 1952 S5, ADR 0564 Limits 4) 2026-10-29 21:59:11 +01:00
jschoubben c2999a4e13 A held module is no dependence of its neighbours: its hold stops spreading (issue 1126)
mesh/delivery merged: source.main moved to novox/mesh-sdk@394fec8a63c1
mesh/delivery-group group fix/1126-held-as-runs merged: every member is merged
mesh/check pass c2999a4e13cc on d4c61ee8ffd0 | unit 3054 run, 234 kept, 36 skipped | integration 3075 run, 266 kept, 29 skipped | over bound: unit (sl…
novox's seed p-20261028t231141-ec84b4 refused 11 modules "what it composes of ..., held, is not what runs of them":
de-spiegel's hold spread through mailu to postgres, nftables and route-proxy, and from postgres to every consumer, and
gitea, held so, refused the node: "its credential of postgres-database is handed to the provisioner and the module is
not: nothing would fill it". Three rounds each moved the error. The kind: a held module still took part in the
composition as a dependence, so its hold spread.

- The quick fix: let heldAsToday also follow dependsOnHeld's words, and skip the handed refusal for gitea. It moves the
  error once more and leaves every node's applying path holding consumers.
- The thorough fix, chosen: a held module composes only as what runs of it. composeEach no longer compares the
  composition with each held module as its stub (dependsOnHeld removed): a consumer or collector composes against what
  runs of the held module like any other module, and a real difference is still a named difference in the answer, a
  module's own refusal still its refusal. A stub (compose.Stub, catalogue.Manifest.Stubbed) leaves the credentials and
  own secrets it would hand the provisioner out of its plan as they run, never refused for want of a plan. Only what a
  held module's new manifest says to others in their own files is still held behind it (dependents: the provider of
  what it contributes to, the filter where it listens), which heldAsToday already follows.

Tests: rows added to existing tests (a held provider with a binding consumer, which the old code held in the seed's
words; a held feeder of a collector; a held module with a handed credential and own secret). No new test function.
2026-10-29 00:49:00 +01:00
jschoubben 06742d0448 A contribution's unset required value is refused in its module's own form's words, as a file's is (issue 1126, seed-8: de-spiegel in the config form was told ${setting:…} and settings set) 2026-10-28 14:07:59 +01:00
jschoubben 16b8d8a1ee Compose as the controller does, so a node's shadow can answer same (issue 1126, C1 C2 C3 C5 C6, T1)
Seals are reused and compared by slot (resource, field), never across resources;
one rule says which resolved config values are laid; a seat path that steps back
is owned by the seat it steps back for, whatever the seat order; a folded module
of an old-form build is composed from what runs of it; the operator export's file
is carried as it runs; a differing resource names its differing JSON paths, found
before its bodies are cut, and an answer is fitted to the node's key.
2026-10-28 09:36:36 +01:00
jschoubben b7b81e040f Carry shares on a requirement of s3-bucket to the provider's grant, so a bucket's other users are named in the manifest (issue 1591) 2026-10-21 11:15:49 +02:00
mesh-tools 5e4fcc6db7 Copy mesh-controller's catalogue into mesh-sdk, part 1: the package and its testdata, from mesh-control 6c2a8d62 (issue 1354) 2026-10-20 06:05:52 +00:00