runProvisioner now reconciles the mesh's `receives` contributions: for each
consumer it reads the mesh-minted password from the file the host unsealed and calls
the adapter to create the resource under the login the mesh derived. The adapter is
create({as,password,values}) / remove({as}), returning nothing — the consumer
already receives its copy through the mesh's own asymmetric channel. $MESH_SEAL_KEY,
the symmetric seal()/writeSealedCredential path, and the *.grant.json / *.credential
files are gone; the seal()/unseal() primitive had no other caller and was removed.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LrgweAeERJYBg88c5cKDzF
Per novox/hq ADR 0044/0045: the sdk holds only what rarely changes and
is shared across modules; per-module code (a client, tool impls, a
create-a-resource adapter) lives in the module.
Five areas, real and tested:
- contracts: the runtime shapes module code touches (grant, credential,
a mesh Interface, tool + envelope types) — not the manifest schema,
which the control plane owns.
- provisioner: the reconcile harness every provider shares (watch grants,
create via the module's adapter, seal + write the credential, remove on
withdrawal). A module writes only the adapter.
- tools: registerModuleTools + collectTools — the serving harness; tools
and their client live in the module.
- messaging: the Broker/Envelope/event contract over the mesh broker; the
concrete binding is provided by the hosting runtime.
- primitives: AES-256-GCM seal/unseal, semver, resolved-env access.
Compiles (tsc, NodeNext) and passes tests: sealing round-trip + wrong-key
rejection, semver, tool registration (a thrower is skipped not fatal), and
the provisioner creating then removing a sealed grant.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LrgweAeERJYBg88c5cKDzF
jschoubben