Commit Graph
9 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben f913918a60 Take the tunnel key at issue and place a joining node on the operator's yes, so the hub peers it before redeem
The operator's decision of 2026-11-02 01:05: issue requires overlay_key, the machine's tunnel public key; the vault's
enrolment-token tunnel declares all five fields a token needs (hub_key, hub_endpoint, address, key, range). An
add-node is proposed at the yes with the tunnel key alone; the identity keys come whole at redeem or not at all. A new
remove-node, mesh-enrolment's alone on the same warrant and the proposal's one change, takes a joining node running
nothing off placement when its enrolment ends unconfirmed (RemovedNodes names the key the holder deletes; LayChanges
lays nothing for it and refuses a node that runs modules or holds seats). NodeLogin gains Acts, the hand acts that
warranted its rotations. Tested as rows of TestPlacement, TestNodeRecord and the two seat tests; no new test function
(1438 unit tests).

(issue 774, review round 1b)

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
2026-11-02 01:41:36 +01:00
jschoubben 90a5fc5797 Let placement take an add-node with its enrolment's warrant, so one Approve lets a machine join
ADR 0587 §7: at redeem mesh-enrolment proposes one change, the node with its decided fields (the approved address,
never the hub) and the public halves of its keys, carrying the issue's warrant; mesh-placement checks the warrant
names this node and address and that the caller is mesh-enrolment, and writes the key with no ask of its own
(changing ADR 0567 §2 and §5 for this one change by this one caller). The proposal codec refuses an add-node beside
other changes, without a warrant, or whose warrant names another node or address, and a warrant on any other
proposal; AddNodeRefusal adds the caller's check for the assigner; LayChanges adds the node and refuses one placed
already. Tested as rows of TestPlacement's proposal subtest, no new test function.

(issue 774, 774/S42)

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
2026-11-02 01:41:03 +01:00
jschoubben 09a5eb5783 Delete PlacementProposalChange.BeforeLease: the assigner no longer keeps the controller's assignments in step
It said which placement changes waited for the lease write while the assigner called the controller's assign,
unassign, pin and unpin (ADR 0567 §8). Since the assigner calls no controller verb (774/S25), nothing reads it.

Test: its table in TestPlacement goes with it.

(issue 774, 774/S25)

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
2026-11-02 00:32:13 +01:00
jschoubben e84a121b8a Let the seed carry the differences its nodes found, each named in its brief for the operator to approve knowingly; a refusal or silence still fails (issue 1126) 2026-10-28 22:24:57 +01:00
jschoubben a2dbcf670b Bound a proposal's answers and ask by pulse keys whose expiry the holder hears, and name a hand-back proposal, so no timer waits (ADR 0567 §4, §7, issue 1126) 2026-10-28 18:43:39 +01:00
jschoubben e987a8280b Let a module's config values be proposed before the lease write: only a layer's places and accesses wait (ADR 0567 §13, issue 1126) 2026-10-28 18:42:05 +01:00
jschoubben 4b4a173d84 Let withdraw mark a proposal for its holder to end, since the holder's process alone says the seat's events (ADR 0567 §2, issue 1126) 2026-10-28 18:21:59 +01:00
jschoubben 0282229fd9 Name the placement ask and a proposal's again and warrant, so the holder asks through the teller as its other asks (ADR 0567 §5, §10, issue 1126) 2026-10-28 18:20:27 +01:00
jschoubben edc6f269f3 Name the seat's states, candidates by proposal and the proposal itself, so readers and the holder share one contract (ADR 0567 §1-§6, issue 1126) 2026-10-28 18:09:38 +01:00