An optional holds() on the adapter is asked for every applied consumer
every minute; false applies it again. A backend that forgets what it was
given while the provisioner runs (hq issue 120) is healed within a
minute instead of failing its consumers in silence. Unable to ask is not
treated as loss. Adapters without holds() behave as before.
It compiles itself on install and then shipped everything except the result.
With no explicit file list npm falls back to .gitignore, which ignores dist —
so every consumer received a package whose every entry point pointed at a
directory that had just been built and then excluded.
The workaround for this lived in mesh-tools, which compiled the dependency by
hand after installing it.
Its entry points all resolve into a compiled directory that is not in source
control, so anything installing it from a clone got a package whose every
export pointed at nothing. npm runs this after a git install; that is what lets
a build with only one repository in front of it depend on this one.
The lighter sibling of provisioning — 1:many and broadcast, no credential,
just the broker's topic routing. A thin, audit-ready surface over the
broker's publish/subscribe:
- emit(type, body): publishes an Event carrying who emitted it (MESH_MODULE),
on which node (MESH_NODE) and when (ISO timestamp) — so a listener can
build a real audit trail.
- on(pattern, handler): react to events by topic pattern. The audit logger
is just on("#", ...).
Tested: a module emits; a targeted listener (module.umami.#) hears only its
events, the audit sink (#) hears every module's, and the metadata audit
needs is present.
The declared side — a manifest's emits/consumes, so the mesh knows the
event graph — and the audit-logger module are the next pieces.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LrgweAeERJYBg88c5cKDzF
Per novox/hq ADR 0044/0045: the sdk holds only what rarely changes and
is shared across modules; per-module code (a client, tool impls, a
create-a-resource adapter) lives in the module.
Five areas, real and tested:
- contracts: the runtime shapes module code touches (grant, credential,
a mesh Interface, tool + envelope types) — not the manifest schema,
which the control plane owns.
- provisioner: the reconcile harness every provider shares (watch grants,
create via the module's adapter, seal + write the credential, remove on
withdrawal). A module writes only the adapter.
- tools: registerModuleTools + collectTools — the serving harness; tools
and their client live in the module.
- messaging: the Broker/Envelope/event contract over the mesh broker; the
concrete binding is provided by the hosting runtime.
- primitives: AES-256-GCM seal/unseal, semver, resolved-env access.
Compiles (tsc, NodeNext) and passes tests: sealing round-trip + wrong-key
rejection, semver, tool registration (a thrower is skipped not fatal), and
the provisioner creating then removing a sealed grant.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LrgweAeERJYBg88c5cKDzF
jochen
jschoubben