Files
mesh-sdk/go/catalogue/identity_bound_test.go
T
jschoubben 68aaf235d4 Take the judge out of mesh-sdk: it is mesh-delivery's now (ADR 0578 §4, §7)
Issue 1585, S19: the strict parser, every manifest problem function and the judge's tables (192 declarations,
about 5,200 lines) and their 244 tests leave; composition keeps its own refusals and the helpers it uses. The
catalogue's tests decode the manifests they build. ParseManifest, ParseManifestWith, ParseManifestForInputs,
CatalogueProblems and the rest are gone; mesh-delivery-indexer/judge holds them.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
2026-11-01 02:36:24 +01:00

85 lines
4.5 KiB
Go

package catalogue
import (
"strings"
"testing"
)
// Each test names the decision it defends: novox/hq ADR 0225, which refines ADR 0049 after issue 263.
// The provision a module requires sets the bound on its identity, not the tightest backend anywhere.
func TestABoundIsTheProvisionsOwn(t *testing.T) {
store := Manifest{Module: "objects", Provides: []Offer{{Name: "s3-bucket", Scope: ScopeMesh,
Identity: &OfferIdentity{Max: 20, In: "an S3 access key"}}},
Receives: map[string]string{"s3-bucket": "/var/lib/mesh/objects/mesh.json"}}
database := Manifest{Module: "db", Provides: []Offer{{Name: "postgres-database", Scope: ScopeMesh,
Identity: &OfferIdentity{Max: 63, In: "a PostgreSQL role"}}},
Receives: map[string]string{"postgres-database": "/var/lib/mesh/db/mesh.json"}}
if b := store.IdentityBoundOf("s3-bucket"); b.Max != 20 || b.In != "an S3 access key" {
t.Errorf("an object store's stated bound was not taken: %+v", b)
}
if b := database.IdentityBoundOf("postgres-database"); b.Max != 63 {
t.Errorf("a database's stated bound was not taken: %+v", b)
}
// mesh_workstation_keycloak is 25: refused by the object store, accepted by the database.
if CheckIdentityWithin("workstation", "keycloak", store.IdentityBoundOf("s3-bucket")) == nil {
t.Error("a 25-character identity fit a 20-character access key")
}
if err := CheckIdentityWithin("workstation", "keycloak", database.IdentityBoundOf("postgres-database")); err != nil {
t.Errorf("a database consumer paid the object store's limit: %v", err)
}
}
// What an offer leaves unsaid follows from whether its provider can keep a name at all.
func TestAnUnstatedBoundFollowsWhatTheProviderIsTold(t *testing.T) {
// Told nothing about its consumers — no receives, nothing served from their identity: no bound.
// The resolver provision is exactly this, and its consumers paid an object store's limit (263).
resolver := Manifest{Module: "resolver", Provides: []Offer{{Name: "wildcard-resolution", Scope: ScopeMesh}}}
if b := resolver.IdentityBoundOf("wildcard-resolution"); b.Bounded() {
t.Errorf("a provision that is told nothing of its consumers bounds them: %+v", b)
}
// Told each consumer and silent about its backend: the old global bound, not none.
told := Manifest{Module: "told", Provides: []Offer{{Name: "thing", Scope: ScopeMesh}},
Receives: map[string]string{"thing": "/var/lib/mesh/told/mesh.json"}}
if b := told.IdentityBoundOf("thing"); b.Max != DefaultIdentityLimit {
t.Errorf("a provider told its consumers and silent about its backend is not held to %d: %+v",
DefaultIdentityLimit, b)
}
// Serving a value built from the identity is being told it, too.
serving := Manifest{Module: "serving", Provides: []Offer{{Name: "bucket", Scope: ScopeMesh}},
Serves: map[string]map[string]any{"bucket": {"name": "b-${consumer:as:dns}"}}}
if b := serving.IdentityBoundOf("bucket"); b.Max != DefaultIdentityLimit {
t.Errorf("a provider deriving a name from its consumers is not bounded: %+v", b)
}
// And `false` says it outright, even for a provider that receives.
routes := Manifest{Module: "routes", Provides: []Offer{{Name: "route", Scope: ScopeMesh,
Identity: &OfferIdentity{None: true}}},
Receives: map[string]string{"route": "/var/lib/mesh/routes/mesh.json"}}
if b := routes.IdentityBoundOf("route"); b.Bounded() {
t.Errorf("`identity: false` still bounds: %+v", b)
}
}
// The consumer's side of the same judgement the provider's composition makes: what `status` says.
func TestAnOverflowingRequirementIsNamedFromTheConsumersSide(t *testing.T) {
bound := IdentityBound{Max: 20, In: "an S3 access key"}
r := Resolution{Node: "laptop",
Modules: []Manifest{{Module: "photoalbum"}, {Module: "files"}, {Module: "gallery", Slug: "gal"}},
Needs: []Needed{
{Name: "s3-bucket", From: "anchor", For: "photoalbum", Identity: bound},
{Name: "s3-bucket", From: "anchor", For: "photoalbum", Local: "second", Identity: bound},
{Name: "s3-bucket", From: "anchor", For: "files", Identity: bound},
{Name: "s3-bucket", From: "anchor", For: "gallery", Identity: bound},
{Name: "licence", From: "records", For: "photoalbum", ByRecord: true, Identity: bound},
}}
got := r.Overflowing()
if len(got) != 1 || got[0].Module != "photoalbum" || got[0].Identity != "mesh_laptop_photoalbum" ||
got[0].Provider != "anchor" {
t.Fatalf("one overflow, once, was expected: %+v", got)
}
if said := got[0].String(); !strings.Contains(said, "an S3 access key keeps 20") ||
!strings.Contains(said, "slug") {
t.Fatalf("the overflow does not say what keeps it or the remedy: %s", said)
}
}