Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben e7b98f1fbc A runtime serves what the mesh issued it, and a seat's verbs are implemented under the seat's name (hq ADR 0160)
The one address a runtime derives for itself is mesh.assignment.<node>.<module>. It reads the
membership there with a direct get on the ASSIGNMENTS stream, serves each tool exactly where the
membership says — the plain subject in the module's queue when the mesh issued one, this machine's
beside it — and follows the subject, re-serving when a new membership arrives. A mesh that has issued
nothing yet gets the shape it always derived, and the log says so.

A seat's verbs are the role's, not the software's (ADR 0159): a module implements them with
registerModuleTools("<seat>", …), the runtime serves that on the seat's subjects when the credential
claims the seat, and never lists it among the module's own tools. A module named like its seat
registers once and is both.

The tools answer carries each tool's subjects, and the console and CLI call the subject the listing
gave them instead of composing one.
2026-10-01 15:17:14 +02:00
jschoubben c65f1993ba A tool call names the machine it is for, every answer says which machine answered, and a holder's
runtime serves its seat's verbs (novox/hq ADR 0159)

A module on several machines served one subject in one queue group, so a call reached whichever
instance answered first and nobody could ask one machine's instance. Now each instance also serves
its subject with its machine as the last token, `<module>.<tool>@<node>` addresses it, and every
answer carries the machine that gave it: the console lists `node` on every module tool, strips it
into the subject, and appends "answered by <node>" to the answer; `mesh call` prints it.

And a seat's verbs are served by whoever claims the seat: the credential names the claimed seats
and the verbs each promises, the runtime serves each verb with the module's tool of the same name
on the seat's own subject, and the bus — which admits only the holder's subscription — decides where
that serving is real. Design 33 §3 and §4, built.
2026-10-01 13:58:22 +02:00
jschoubben 80b02740ab The console: mesh serve on loopback, and every runtime answers tools
The runtime serves a tools verb per module with names, descriptions and schemas (design 34 §3), and
refuses a module naming its own tool tools. Discovery asks catalog_modules then each module, naming
what did not answer. One MCP handler over two transports: stdio (mesh mcp) and loopback HTTP (mesh
serve, the mesh-console module, novox/hq ADR 0152); serve refuses any bind but loopback. tools/call
may go through a running console with --console and no credential.
2026-09-30 16:19:22 +02:00
jschoubben 04a689e008 runtime: connect with a sealed credential, scoped, over pinned amqps (ADR 0048)
A module reads its broker credential from MESH_BROKER_FILE — the sealed
{url,fingerprint} the mesh delivered — and connects over amqps pinned to
exactly that certificate. The pin is two-phase (fetch cert, verify, then
trust only it), because Node's checkServerIdentity does not run under
rejectUnauthorized:false, so a naive connect-then-check would already have
sent the password to whoever answered.

A scoped module (assumeExchanges) never declares the exchanges (its account
may not) nor its own queue with a dead-letter (the broker refuses that to a
non-administrator) — the mesh pre-declared the queue, so it passively checks
it, binds and consumes. The RPC reply queue is lazy, and a module that
registered no tools serves none: a pure-events consumer touches only what its
account allows.

Verified end-to-end against a real broker as the scoped account: the audit
logger consumes # and records events, over an account that is not the
broker's own.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LrgweAeERJYBg88c5cKDzF
2026-09-04 01:51:17 +02:00
jschoubben 9eddcdb0a0 mesh-tools — the tool runtime and AMQP broker binding
The per-node process that makes a module's tools serve on the mesh:
- broker-amqp.ts: a concrete AMQP implementation of the sdk's Broker
  contract (request/reply over a reply queue + correlation id, publish/
  subscribe over a topic exchange). Kept here, not in the sdk, so a
  broker-client change never rebuilds a module (ADR 0044).
- runtime.ts: bind the broker, import the assigned modules' tool
  entrypoints (each registers as it loads), serveTools. The thin wrapper.
- main.ts: the entrypoint, configured by MESH_BROKER_URL + MESH_TOOL_MODULES.
- Dockerfile: the container a node runs it as.

Verified over a REAL broker: the test spins LavinMQ (the mesh's broker),
the runtime serves a registered tool, a separate connection invokes it by
name over AMQP and gets the result, and an unknown tool is refused over
the wire. So 'modules can serve' is now running-on-the-mesh, not just
proven in a mock.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LrgweAeERJYBg88c5cKDzF
2026-09-03 23:21:01 +02:00