Merge pull request 'ADR 0138: reach asks for names on a routed endpoint' (#178) from decision/0138-insight-reach-and-the-proxy into main

This commit was merged in pull request #178.
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-29 00:50:28 +00:00
@@ -99,6 +99,31 @@ composed, so it is not certified.
binding. The per-node source override becomes its reach, widened from the filter alone to the names
and the certificate as well.
## Progressive insight — 2026-09-29, from building it
**Reach does not mean the same thing to the filter for an endpoint the proxy serves.** The decision
above says `internal` means "the filter opens the machine port to the private network" and `public`
means "the filter opens it to anywhere". For a routed endpoint the second half is wrong, and
[ADR 0045](0045-a-machine-firewall-is-the-sum-of-what-it-listens-on.md) already said so before this
record was written: *a public service is exposed through the proxy, not by opening its own port* — it
listens `from: mesh`, only the proxy reaches it, and it is exposed by name.
Found by trying to express one real module, not by review. Its routed name must be public, because
browsers post to it; its machine-side port must not be, because that port serves the dashboard in
cleartext. Under one value driving both, saying "public" would have reopened a port an operator had
just closed. Measured the same evening: that module's routed name answered from the internet over TLS
while its machine-side port was refused from the same place. The port is not the path.
So the reach of a **routed** endpoint asks for names, and its port keeps what the manifest said. The
reach of an **unrouted** endpoint — git over ssh, a mail port, the bus — governs the port, because
there is no name and the port is the only way in. That is the same split this record already draws in
*an endpoint that is not routed is reached but never named*; what it got wrong was carrying the filter
across it.
This corrects a fact, not the decision: one statement per endpoint, three things derived from it and
none of them deciding on its own, all stand. The table in the decision should be read with the filter
column applying to an unrouted endpoint.
## Consequences
- **A manifest gains endpoint names, and a route contribution names an endpoint instead of a port.**