Design 55: the review section uses the word the operator chose, architectural domain

03-DESIGN/01-to-be/55-the-knowledge-base.md

@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ milestones and nothing of how a delivery runs; it only listens for the announcem
 | A stream that keeps its history, and an object bucket of a module's own | in the integration test: a history stream at its cap refuses a new message and keeps its oldest, its condition raised at 75 percent and cleared below; an object no version or draft names is removed after a day, one still named is kept; unit tests of registration refusing a name already taken |
 | A long record is judged whole, one part at a time | unit tests: the frame never passes 16 KiB and says what it cut, with twenty clauses of 2000 bytes and a 40 KiB Context; every question stays under 60 KiB with a 40 KiB section and that frame, and the head part with 40 KiB of clauses; a section over 40 KiB is refused saying split it; an unchanged section keeps its review, a changed frame asks it again |
 
-**The fifth slice's tests, one per failure path** (ADR 0592; the review by aspect's testing ruling). Unit tests are
+**The fifth slice's tests, one per failure path** (ADR 0592; the review by architectural domain's testing ruling). Unit tests are
 table-driven; one integration test starts the module whole against the real bus server. The module's count today is
 1 integration and 104 unit tests; these add about 20 table cases and stay within the budget of 50 and 500.
 
@@ -677,9 +677,9 @@ done:
 Semantic or vector search; a browser view (its reading of the buckets is announced, ADR 0592); line comments on a proposal (the judgement's findings name the section and
 clause instead); and the rules of how-we-build, which are not decision records. Each needs a decision of its own.
 
-## Reviewed by aspect
+## Reviewed by architectural domain
 
-The fifth slice was reviewed by aspect on 2026-11-02 (four reviewers, two aspects each; the knowledge base's own
+The fifth slice was reviewed by architectural domain on 2026-11-02 (four reviewers, two aspects each; the knowledge base's own
 review of ADR 0592's fourth version beside), and the lead ruled on every finding. What was found, and what answers it:
 
 | Aspect | Found | Answered by |