Playbook 02: name no record in the seams rule

This commit is contained in:
2026-11-03 12:14:48 +01:00
parent 10df1c7be5
commit d829fd6f9b
+1 -1
View File
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ the record's area (`knowledge-base.ask`, `holds`), and name in the draft, for ev
record decides, the seat and verb, event, provision, state on the bus or manifest field that carries it. Then
`review-seams-and-tools` reviews the draft before it is proposed: a clause that has one module name another, read its
internals or be special-cased in another part, or puts a module's name into shared code, is a finding (the operator,
2026-11-03, after ADR 0594 and ADR 0598 named the bus in the shared contract and both were dropped the same morning).
2026-11-03).
How it is checked: the record's References name the seams review's verdict; a record proposed without it is a breach
the lead names.