Playbook 02: name no record in the seams rule
This commit is contained in:
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ the record's area (`knowledge-base.ask`, `holds`), and name in the draft, for ev
|
||||
record decides, the seat and verb, event, provision, state on the bus or manifest field that carries it. Then
|
||||
`review-seams-and-tools` reviews the draft before it is proposed: a clause that has one module name another, read its
|
||||
internals or be special-cased in another part, or puts a module's name into shared code, is a finding (the operator,
|
||||
2026-11-03, after ADR 0594 and ADR 0598 named the bus in the shared contract and both were dropped the same morning).
|
||||
2026-11-03).
|
||||
How it is checked: the record's References name the seams review's verdict; a record proposed without it is a breach
|
||||
the lead names.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user