connectivity: name the code that builds the one resolver, zones and the hosts file

ADR 0199: a module that answers names declares its zone, and a node's hosts file is one module's
The per-node resolvers 0194 retires held two kinds of names that are neither nodes nor routes: the lab's scenario machines and an operator's own lines. A zone a module declares is forwarded by the mesh's resolver to that module; /etc/hosts is held per node through node-hosts-file, the operator's lines in its kept region. Research 023 parks seats that define what their holder owns.
2026-10-04 00:23:43 +02:00 · 2026-10-03 23:19:36 +02:00
32 changed files with 205 additions and 1111 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+---
+status: active
+initiated: 2026-10-03
+touches: [the seats, the seat protocol, the controller's ownership check, 03-DESIGN/01-to-be/26-the-seats.md]
+---
+
+# 023 — A seat protocol that defines what its holder owns
+
+## What is investigated
+
+**A seat is a definition — a protocol — and a module occupies it by implementing that protocol.**
+Today the protocol is what the holder accepts, emits and serves (ADR 0118, 0129, 0132): its verbs, as MCP
+tool definitions. This asks whether the protocol should also name the **files and directories the
+holder owns**, so that occupying the seat means owning them: `node-resolver-config` owns
+`/etc/resolv.conf`, `node-hosts-file` owns `/etc/hosts`, the intrusion prevention owns its jail file.
+
+The direction is the protocol's, not the holder's: the seat states what any holder must own; a module
+that wants the seat must declare those paths among its resources, or the controller refuses the claim
+as not implementing the seat. Two seats may not name one path.
+
+## Why
+
+Who owns a singular file is today answered by reading every manifest, and enforced only after the fact,
+when two modules on one machine both declare the same path. The question *which module owns
+`/etc/resolv.conf`?* came up on 2026-10-03 with no place to look it up. A seat that names the path answers
+it from the seat table, before any module is written, and makes "implements the seat" checkable.
+
+## What it touches
+
+- The seat definition and its table (ADR 0122) — a new part of the protocol.
+- The controller's ownership check (`checkResources`), which already refuses two modules owning one path.
+- Every node seat that is really about a file: `node-resolver-config`, `node-hosts-file`
+  ([ADR 0199](../../02-DECISIONS/0199-a-module-that-answers-names-declares-its-zone-and-a-nodes-hosts-file-is-one-modules.md)),
+  `node-intrusion-prevention`, `node-packet-filter`.
+
+Raised by the operator during the resolver work of ADRs 0194–0199 and parked there so that work was not
+widened by it.
@@ -1,131 +0,0 @@
---
-topic: the mesh
-status: accepted
-date: 2026-10-02
-deciders: jochen
-reconstructed: false
-extends: 02-DECISIONS/0082-the-registry-is-reached-by-name-and-trusted-by-the-overlay.md
---
-
-# 189. The store keeps what the records name, and a maintenance step holds its writers still
-
-## Context
-
-The mesh's artifact store has never collected anything
-([issue 108](../04-ISSUES/108-the-registry-has-no-garbage-collection-once-it-has-two-doors/00-report.md)).
-Every build pushes another layer set; nothing has ever removed one. The predecessor ran a routine
-on a timer — stop the registry, collect, start it — and the conversion carried the settings that
-routine depends on without the routine, because the routine was a script beside the module and not
-a resource in it. The store now holds fifty-three repositories on the machine that serves
-everything else, and the only outcome of leaving it is a full disk reported as somebody else's
-failure.
-
-Three things stood in the way, and the issue names all three.
-
-**Nothing in the mesh's vocabulary expresses a maintenance window.** The collector requires every
-writer stopped while it runs. A `run-once` step runs *beside* containers, not instead of them, and
-a scheduled step is the same container on a cadence. There is no way for a module to say *hold this
-container of mine still while this runs*.
-
-**Deletion is not enabled, and the door it would be enabled on has no accounts.** The store is
-internal, reached by name over the overlay, trusted because being on that network is the permission
-([ADR 0082](0082-the-registry-is-reached-by-name-and-trusted-by-the-overlay.md)). The predecessor
-kept deletion behind an authenticated door, which it could, having one.
-
-**Nothing says what may be removed.** The registry's own answer — collect everything no tag names —
-is wrong here. The mesh pushes each artifact under one moving tag and pins machines by digest, so
-every build but the newest is untagged and some machine may still be running it.
-
-## Decision
-
-**1. Deletion is enabled on the store's one door, and the overlay stays the permission.** The
-objection dissolves on inspection: that door **already accepts a push**, and a writer who can push
-can replace any tag in the store with anything it likes. Delete takes nothing a push did not
-already have, and the machines that can reach the door are the ones the mesh's own filter admits
-([ADR 0168](0168-a-converged-machine-is-filtered-by-the-mesh-alone.md)). Putting an authenticated
-door in front of deletion while leaving push open would be a lock on the window beside an open
-door, and it would cost the thing ADR 0082 bought: a store every machine can reach without a
-credential to distribute first.
-
-**2. The mesh deletes what it made and no longer keeps; the store reclaims the bytes.** Two halves,
-each doing what only it can.
-
-The **mesh** decides. It does not need to enumerate the store to do it — it has never put anything
-there it did not record, so **every digest it could remove is already in its own build records**.
-It deletes those manifests through the store's door, by digest, and remembers that it did.
-
-The **store** reclaims. A deleted manifest frees no bytes until the registry's own collector walks
-the storage with nothing writing to it, so the module declares that collector as a scheduled step
-with the server held still for its duration. Plain collection, not `--delete-untagged`: what the
-mesh keeps is still a manifest in the store, so it is still referenced, so its blobs stay — the
-dangerous flag is not needed at all once the mesh is the one deciding.
-
-**3. What the mesh keeps, stated as three reasons rather than a number.** A digest is kept because:
-
- **a definition names it** — every artifact reference in any module's current recorded manifest,
-  which is what the mesh would hand a machine now. No age limit: this is the floor;
- **the mesh can still go back to it** — every artifact of the **five most recent successful
-  builds** of each module, so a release that turns out wrong has somewhere to return to;
- **nothing else.** An artifact older than that, which no definition names, is what the store is
-  carrying for no stated reason.
-
-A digest the mesh did not record making is never touched. That is not a safety margin, it is the
-whole rule restated: the mesh removes what it put there and can account for, and the images genesis
-pushed before any record existed are exactly what this must not reach
-([04-ISSUES/102](../04-ISSUES/102-an-address-recorded-at-genesis-or-build-does-not-follow-the-nodes-ports/00-report.md), F4).
-
-**4. A scheduled step may hold its module's own containers still while it runs** —
-`while-stopped`, naming resource ids in the same module. The host stops each, runs the step, and
-starts them again **whatever the step did**, including when it failed or the host was interrupted.
-Three boundaries:
-
- **Its own module's containers only.** A module that could quiesce a neighbour could stop the
-  mesh; a maintenance window is a statement about one service's own insides.
- **Scheduled steps only, not `run-once`.** At apply time the host already has a window: the
-  declaration is applied in order and a step gates what follows, so a one-time offline migration
-  says *before* rather than *instead of*. A recurring window is the case order cannot express.
- **Restoring is not conditional.** A step that fails must leave the service running; the whole
-  risk of this field is a window that never closes.
-
-**5. The sweep runs where the records change — after a build the mesh recorded.** That is the
-moment new bytes landed and the moment the keep set moved, and it needs no new timer. The
-store's collection runs nightly, because reclaiming is slow and the thing it reclaims is already
-unreferenced.
-
-## Consequences
-
- Disk stops growing without bound on the machine that serves the mesh. That is the whole point
-  and it has no other way to be true.
- A machine behind by more than five builds of a module, which recreates a container, cannot pull
-  what it was running. It is already a machine the mesh reports as behind, and the answer is the
-  one the mesh already gives it: the current declaration. Stated here rather than discovered.
- The store is a little less of a museum. A digest in an old build record may no longer be
-  fetchable, and the record still says what that build made — the record is history, not an
-  index of what is on disk. The collected mark is kept beside it so the two can be told apart.
- `while-stopped` is a second thing the host does to a container it did not start this pass. It is
-  deliberately the narrowest form: the module's own, by id, restored unconditionally.
- The store is briefly unavailable each night, for as long as collection takes. Everything that
-  pulls from it retries; nothing in the mesh treats a momentary store as a failure
-  ([ADR 0185](0185-a-control-plane-behind-its-seats-row-serves-what-it-can.md)).
-
-## How this is checked
-
- The host: a scheduled step with `while-stopped` stops the named containers before the run and
-  starts them after; it starts them again **when the step fails**; it refuses an id that is not a
-  container of the same module, its own id, and `while-stopped` on a `run-once` step. Each refusal
-  is tested for what it says, not only that it says something.
- The controller: given build records and current manifests, the keep set holds every reference a
-  manifest names and every reference of the five most recent builds per module, and nothing else;
-  a reference the mesh never recorded is never in the delete set; a delete that answers 404 is
-  recorded as collected rather than retried forever.
- The sweep is tested against a fake store that records what it was asked to delete, so what is
-  asserted is the decision and not the registry's behaviour.
- Live: the store's size before and after the first nightly collection, read from the machine.
-
-## References
-
- [issue 108 — the registry has no garbage collection](../04-ISSUES/108-the-registry-has-no-garbage-collection-once-it-has-two-doors/00-report.md)
- [ADR 0082 — the registry is reached by name and trusted by the overlay](0082-the-registry-is-reached-by-name-and-trusted-by-the-overlay.md)
- [ADR 0053 — a step that runs on a schedule](0053-a-step-that-runs-on-a-schedule.md)
- [ADR 0156 — an artifact is what a build produces, and the store is named for its scope](0156-an-artifact-is-what-a-build-produces-and-the-store-is-named-for-its-scope.md)
- [design 32 — what a module declares](../03-DESIGN/01-to-be/32-what-a-module-declares.md)
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+---
+topic: the tiers
+status: accepted
+date: 2026-10-03
+deciders: jochen
+reconstructed: false
+extends: 0194-the-mesh-has-one-resolver-and-every-node-asks-it-for-the-meshs-names.md
+---
+
+# 199. A module that answers names declares its zone, and a node's hosts file is one module's
+
+## Context
+
+**[ADR 0194](0194-the-mesh-has-one-resolver-and-every-node-asks-it-for-the-meshs-names.md) and
+[ADR 0196](0196-a-node-asks-the-meshs-resolver-first-and-a-public-one-only-when-it-is-silent.md) leave
+one resolver holding the nodes' internal domains, and retire the resolver every node ran.** Two kinds
+of names lived in those per-node resolvers that are neither a node nor a route, and both were found on
+the workstation on 2026-10-03:
+
+- **Names a module answers.** The lab raises scenario machines and gives them addresses from its
+  scenario files — the anchor's stand-in at a documentation address, the home server's on the LAN —
+  and the workstation resolved `<machine>.incus` through two wildcard lines in a drop-in file its
+  resolver read. The lines were written by hand; the addresses are the lab's, known only while a
+  scenario runs.
+- **The operator's own names, unrelated to the mesh.** Twelve `<loopback> <name>` lines for a
+  client's development hosts, kept in `/etc/hosts` and again in `/etc/hosts.local`, which the per-node
+  resolver read as additional hosts.
+
+**A manifest never names an address, a node or a domain** ([ADR 0112](0112-a-module-definition-names-no-node-mesh-or-path.md)).
+So the lab cannot list `<machine>.incus → <address>` in its definition, and the operator's twelve lines
+are not any module's to define.
+
+## Considered Options
+
+**For a module's names:**
+
+1. **The manifest lists its records.** Refused by ADR 0112: the addresses are the lab's runtime facts
+   and the scenario's choice.
+2. **The module reports its records at runtime to the mesh's resolver**, which writes them into its
+   configuration. It works, and it makes the resolver hold every module's runtime state and decide,
+   per call, whether the caller may write the name it sent — authorisation for a write, on the one
+   server every node depends on.
+3. **The module declares the zone it answers and the listen that answers it; the mesh's resolver
+   forwards that zone there.** The definition names a zone (from a setting) and one of its own listens,
+   which ADR 0112 allows; the address and the port are the mesh's facts. The records stay where they
+   are known — in the module, at runtime. Chosen.
+
+**For the operator's names:**
+
+1. **Records the controller holds, served by the mesh's resolver.** They are not the mesh's: a client's
+   development hosts on one machine are nothing any other node should resolve, and the controller would
+   become the keeper of a workstation's private notes.
+2. **A node-scoped module owns `/etc/hosts`, and the operator's lines live in its kept region**
+   ([ADR 0174](0174-a-node-varies-a-module-through-settings-and-kept-regions-never-an-edit.md)), changed
+   through that module's tools on that machine. Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+**1. A module that answers names declares a zone.** Its definition names the zone — a single label or a
+dotted name, from a setting, never a domain the mesh knows — and the listen that answers DNS for it.
+The controller refuses two modules in the mesh declaring one zone, and a zone that is the mesh's suffix,
+under it, or one of a node's public domains: a module may not shadow names the mesh or the public DNS
+answers.
+
+**2. The mesh's resolver forwards each zone to the module that declared it.** The controller hands the
+holder of `mesh-dns-resolver` every declared zone with the private address of the node its module runs
+on and the port that listen is published on; the holder places one forwarding rule per zone into its
+configuration and answers nothing in that zone itself. What names exist in the zone, and their
+addresses, are the module's — answered by its own long-running code
+([ADR 0198](0198-a-modules-long-running-code-is-launched-by-the-node-runtime-and-reaches-the-bus-through-it.md)),
+from its own state, as they change. Whether an answered address is reachable from the asking node is
+the module's matter, not the resolver's.
+
+**3. A node's `/etc/hosts` is held by one module, through a node seat, `node-hosts-file`.** The seat is
+the definition: its holder owns `/etc/hosts`, and implements three verbs — MCP tool definitions served
+as `<node>/node-hosts-file.<verb>` ([ADR 0195](0195-the-meshs-tools-are-found-by-address-not-announced-whole.md)):
+**`entries`** (the file's lines, the module's and the operator's, each marked whose), **`add`** (one
+address and its names, into the operator's region) and **`remove`** (one name or address from it). The
+module writes the machine's own lines — loopback and the machine's name — and keeps a region for the
+operator, which survives every push and is given back when the module goes. Its tools change that
+region on that machine, escalating as the packet filter's do
+([ADR 0175](0175-one-tool-runtime-per-node-serves-every-modules-tools-on-the-host-side.md) §4). **The
+controller holds none of it:** an operator's line is the machine's, not a record.
+
+**4. No other module writes `/etc/hosts`.** The private network's region goes, as ADR 0194 already has
+it; a module that once wrote a line there asks the mesh's resolver instead.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- **The lab's names follow its scenarios.** A scenario raised is resolvable from every node at once; a
+  scenario torn down is gone, with no line left behind in any file.
+- **The mesh's resolver holds no module's state.** It holds the nodes' domains and a table of who
+  answers which zone, both composed by the controller; nothing writes to it at runtime.
+- **A module answering a zone needs a DNS answerer of its own** — a long-running bundle, or a resolver
+  it runs. The lab gains one.
+- **The operator's names reach the machine's own programs, not its containers.** A container does not
+  read the machine's `/etc/hosts`. For names unrelated to the mesh that is the right boundary; a name a
+  container needs belongs in a zone.
+- **Taking `/etc/hosts` keeps what is there.** The first time the module writes the file, every line
+  that is not the machine's own goes into the operator's region, so a workstation's twelve lines survive
+  the take — the same adoption [ADR 0102](0102-the-mesh-writes-into-a-shared-file-never-over-it.md) gives
+  every shared file.
+
+**How each is checked:**
+
+- **Zones:** the controller's catalogue tests refuse a second module declaring a zone, a zone under the
+  mesh suffix, and a zone equal to a node's public domain.
+- **Forwarding:** on the holder, the resolver's configuration carries one forwarding rule per declared
+  zone, at the declaring node's private address and published port; asking any node's resolver for a
+  name in the lab's zone while a scenario runs returns the scenario's address.
+- **The hosts file:** a push leaves the operator's region byte for byte; `add` followed by `entries`
+  shows the line as the operator's; unassigning the module gives the region back.
+
+## References
+
+- [ADR 0194](0194-the-mesh-has-one-resolver-and-every-node-asks-it-for-the-meshs-names.md),
+  [ADR 0196](0196-a-node-asks-the-meshs-resolver-first-and-a-public-one-only-when-it-is-silent.md) —
+  the one resolver and how nodes ask it.
+- [ADR 0112](0112-a-module-definition-names-no-node-mesh-or-path.md) — why a definition names no address.
+- [ADR 0174](0174-a-node-varies-a-module-through-settings-and-kept-regions-never-an-edit.md),
+  [ADR 0102](0102-the-mesh-writes-into-a-shared-file-never-over-it.md) — kept regions and shared files.
+- [ADR 0198](0198-a-modules-long-running-code-is-launched-by-the-node-runtime-and-reaches-the-bus-through-it.md) —
+  where a zone's answerer runs.
+- [Connectivity §2](../03-DESIGN/01-to-be/08-connectivity.md) and [the seats](../03-DESIGN/01-to-be/26-the-seats.md),
+  amended alongside.
+- [Research 023](../01-RESEARCH/023-a-seat-protocol-that-defines-what-its-holder-owns/00-overview.md) —
+  the general form of decision 3's "the holder owns `/etc/hosts`".
@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
---
-topic: building it
-status: accepted
-date: 2026-10-04
-deciders: jochen
-reconstructed: false
-extends: 02-DECISIONS/0067-genesis-is-a-pivot.md
---
-
-# 200. Genesis pivots to the controller as a container, and the first push hands it to a process
-
-## Context
-
-The controller is Go, compiled to one static binary, and is the last of the mesh's own programs a
-machine runs from an image ([issue 213](../04-ISSUES/213-the-controller-is-a-go-program-run-in-a-container/00-report.md)).
-[ADR 0188](0188-a-modules-own-code-is-bundles-in-any-language-and-a-tools-bundle-speaks-mcp-to-the-runtime.md)
-§1 says a module's own code is bundles, never an image, and §3 that a service bundle is a `process` the
-host runs. The handover exists: a process may name the container it `replaces`, and the host removes
-that container only after the process has stayed up across two checks; two controllers are safe
-together for that moment, the second standing by on the controller's consumers and every plan held by
-one lock.
-
-What stands in the way is genesis ([ADR 0067](0067-genesis-is-a-pivot.md)), which
-[issue 223](../04-ISSUES/223-a-new-mesh-installs-its-controller-as-a-container/00-report.md) found
-assumes an image and a container at every step from its third: it builds the controller's image,
-starts a temporary controller from it, publishes it, finds the controller's container in the pivot
-declaration, and from then on talks to the controller through it. A process's bundle is fetched from
-the artifact store, and genesis raises the artifact store only after the pivot.
-
-## Considered Options
-
-1. **Raise the artifact store before the pivot**, publish the controller's bundle to it, and talk to
-   the controller from the host's side. Rejected for now: it reorders genesis around a store that is
-   itself a module the controller deploys, and rewrites the steps that talk to the controller — a
-   larger change to the one path that is exercised least, to remove a container that exists for
-   minutes.
-2. **Pivot to the controller as a container, as today, and let the first push hand it over to the
-   process**, through the handover that already exists. Chosen.
-3. **Keep the controller a container.** Rejected: it is the exception to ADR 0188 that every other
-   module's code has now left, and it costs a container runtime on the control machine and a
-   container recreation in the middle of a plan.
-
-## Decision
-
-**Genesis raises the controller as a container, under the resource the controller's process
-`replaces`, and the first declaration the controller composes for its own machine hands it over.**
-The container is genesis's own shape, built from the controller's repository, and is recorded on the
-control machine exactly as the manifest's `replaces` names it, so the first apply after the pivot
-finds a replacement for it and removes it once the process is up. The controller's manifest declares
-only the process; the image form exists for genesis alone and is not a second way to run the
-controller on a live mesh.
-
-This is the one bounded exception to ADR 0188 §1: a module's own code in an image, for the minutes
-between the pivot and the first push, on a mesh being created.
-
-## Consequences
-
- A new mesh ends where a running one is: the controller a process, no controller container.
- Genesis keeps its steps; what changes is that it no longer reads the controller's container from the
-  manifest, and that it records the container under the name the handover expects.
- The controller's repository keeps its image build for genesis and the lab.
- The handover is now on genesis's path too: a process that fails to stay up leaves the genesis
-  container serving, and the apply says so — the same rule as on a live mesh.
-
-## How it is checked
-
-The installer's test raises a mesh whose controller manifest is the process form, and asserts that the
-container genesis recorded is exactly what the process `replaces`, so the first apply hands over and
-leaves one controller. Live, on the running mesh: after the manifest change is pushed, the control
-machine runs the controller as a process and no controller container, and the controller's seat
-answers throughout.
-
-## References
-
- [Issue 213](../04-ISSUES/213-the-controller-is-a-go-program-run-in-a-container/00-report.md),
-  [issue 223](../04-ISSUES/223-a-new-mesh-installs-its-controller-as-a-container/00-report.md)
- mesh-host#86 (the handover), mesh-controller#252 (two controllers safe together),
-  mesh-controller#253 (the controller's manifest as a process)
@@ -1,134 +0,0 @@
---
-topic: the mesh
-status: accepted
-date: 2026-10-02
-deciders: jochen
-reconstructed: false
-extends: 02-DECISIONS/0048-a-provider-creates-the-credential-the-mesh-minted.md
---
-
-# 201. A provider declares what it derives for each consumer, and the mesh tells both ends
-
-> Written as 0188 on 2026-10-02 and renumbered to 0201 on 2026-10-04: the record of the bundles
-> refactor took 0188 on main while this one waited in a pull request, and the mesh's own code now
-> cites that one. Only the number moved; the decision is the one taken on the 2nd.
-
-## Context
-
-An arrangement between a consumer and a provider is delivered entirely by the mesh. Where the
-provider is, which port it answers on, what name the consumer must present, where its password
-is — each arrives as a fact the consumer reads from its binding, or as `${bound:…}` filled into a
-file before the declaration leaves the control plane. The provider invents none of it and hands
-none of it back ([ADR 0048](0048-a-provider-creates-the-credential-the-mesh-minted.md)).
-
-One kind of value escapes that. Where the **provider names the resource** — a bucket, a database,
-a vhost — the name is derived from the consumer, per consumer, and the mesh has no way to carry
-it. `serves` is a literal block in the provider's definition: the same values for every consumer.
-A provisioner's contract takes a provision and returns nothing. So a value the mesh's own rule
-produced reaches neither end as a statement; it is recomputed at one end and transcribed at the
-other.
-
-The object store is the instance ([issue 124](../04-ISSUES/124-a-consumer-cannot-be-told-what-its-provider-derived/00-report.md)).
-Its provisioner normalises the login the mesh minted into a bucket name and creates, checks and
-removes exactly that; the rule lives in twenty lines of the module's own TypeScript. Its three
-consumers each write the answer into their own definition by hand. Two transcribed it correctly;
-one named a predecessor's bucket, and would have authenticated successfully and been refused on
-every object, which reads like a credential fault and is not one.
-
-Even corrected, the transcriptions are wrong in a second way. Each is `mesh-<node>-<slug>`, so
-each **names the machine the module happens to run on today** — a definition stating a fact about
-one installation, which [ADR 0155](0155-a-definition-names-no-installation-and-how-that-is-checked.md)
-forbids and whose check does not catch because the name is not a domain. Move any of the three to
-another machine and its configuration points at a bucket its key cannot open.
-
-The shape is not the object store's. A database provisioner that prefixed names, a queue provider
-that scoped vhosts, any provider that derives a resource from who is asking: each forces the
-consumer to reproduce somebody else's rule and keep it in agreement by hand.
-
-## Decision
-
-**1. A served value may name the consumer the mesh is serving.** A `serves` block, which is
-literal today, may interpolate the mesh's own statement of who the consumer is:
-
- `${consumer:as}` — the identity the mesh minted for this consumer, exactly as the login it is
-  told to present ([ADR 0049](0049-a-consumers-identity-fits-the-tightest-backend.md));
- `${consumer:as:dns}` — the same identity written as a DNS label.
-
-Nothing else. **The mesh learns no protocol here; it spells its own name in an alphabet it already
-knows.** The identity is the mesh's, minted by the mesh, already capped at twenty characters
-because of what an S3 access key accepts; `dns` is that same name with its separator written `-`
-instead of `_`, which is the whole of the difference between the mesh's identifier alphabet and
-the one buckets, vhosts and hostnames use. A provider that needs a prefix or a suffix writes it
-around the placeholder, because a served value is a string.
-
-The rejected alternative is **the provider returning values from provisioning** — the natural
-channel, since the provider is what derived them. It is rejected for three reasons, in order of
-weight. It inverts the delivery the mesh is built on: a grant would carry data the provider wrote
-rather than only data the mesh minted, and [ADR 0048](0048-a-provider-creates-the-credential-the-mesh-minted.md)
-removed exactly that second path once already. It makes a consumer's declaration incomplete until
-its provider's reconcile loop has run, so a consumer could not be composed before a provider
-answered — a bootstrap order the mesh does not have and does not want. And it puts the rule where
-nothing can check it: a value that arrives from a running process cannot be refused at resolution,
-only discovered wrong later, which is the failure this record exists to end.
-
-**2. The mesh resolves it once, per consumer, and tells both ends from the one resolution.** At the
-moment a consumer's declaration is composed, the mesh knows exactly who the consumer is. There, and
-only there, the placeholders are filled. The result reaches:
-
- the **consumer**, as the served facts in its binding file and as `${bound:<provision>:<key>}` in
-  any file it writes — unchanged mechanisms, carrying one more key;
- the **provider**, as `serves` on that consumer's entry in its contributions file, so the
-  provisioner is *told* the name rather than recomputing it.
-
-**The provider stops deriving in code and starts declaring.** One statement, filled once, delivered
-to both ends: the two cannot disagree, because there is no second computation to disagree with.
-
-**3. A served value stays settled before it is per-consumer.** Settings still compose into `serves`
-([ADR 0174](0174-a-node-varies-a-module-through-settings-and-kept-regions-never-an-edit.md)), and the consumer
-placeholders are filled after that, so an operator may set a prefix and the mesh still derives the
-rest. A `${consumer:…}` naming a fact or an alphabet the mesh does not have is refused when the
-definition is parsed, with what it may say.
-
-**4. A consumer may no longer name the resource its provider derives.** With the value delivered,
-a literal in a consumer's definition is not merely redundant — it is the one thing that can
-disagree with what the provider will actually create. The three object-store consumers lose their
-hand-written bucket names in this change.
-
-## Consequences
-
- One more thing a definition may say, and one less thing a module may be wrong about. The
-  vocabulary grows by a placeholder; the catalogue loses three literals that named this
-  installation's control node.
- A provider's naming rule becomes readable in its definition instead of in its source. `minio`'s
-  `bucketFor` goes; the manifest says `"bucket": "${consumer:as:dns}"` and the provisioner uses
-  what it is given.
- A provider that already serves consumers keeps serving them: the derived value equals what the
-  code derived, so no bucket, database or login changes name. This is a change of **who says it**,
-  not of **what is said**.
- The mesh now holds a rule in another system's alphabet — one rule, `dns`, stated once. A second
-  alphabet is a decision, not an addition: the cost of each is that the mesh must be right about
-  somebody else's naming, and that cost is only worth paying where the mesh already mints the name.
-
-## How this is checked
-
- A served value naming an unknown fact or alphabet is refused at parse, with the list of what it
-  may say — tested on both halves of the message.
- Resolving a consumer whose provider derives a value puts that value in the consumer's binding
-  file, in its `${bound:…}` substitutions, and in the provider's contributions entry for that
-  consumer — one test asserting the three agree, because agreeing is the whole point.
- Two consumers of one provider on one machine get two different derived values, and neither gets
-  the other's.
- A catalogue-wide test refuses a consumer definition that writes a literal where its provider
-  derives: the provider's `serves` names the key, so the catalogue can say which definitions
-  transcribe one.
- `dns` is checked against the identity the mesh actually mints, not against an invented string:
-  the test derives an identity with `ConsumerIdentity` and asserts the label it becomes.
-
-## References
-
- [issue 124 — a consumer cannot be told a value its provider derived for it](../04-ISSUES/124-a-consumer-cannot-be-told-what-its-provider-derived/00-report.md)
- [ADR 0048 — a provider creates the credential the mesh minted, and seals nothing](0048-a-provider-creates-the-credential-the-mesh-minted.md)
- [ADR 0049 — a consumer's identity fits the tightest backend](0049-a-consumers-identity-fits-the-tightest-backend.md)
- [ADR 0174 — a node varies a module through settings and kept regions, never through an edit](0174-a-node-varies-a-module-through-settings-and-kept-regions-never-an-edit.md)
- [ADR 0155 — a definition names no installation, and how that is checked](0155-a-definition-names-no-installation-and-how-that-is-checked.md)
- [design 27 — a module requires, the mesh resolves](../03-DESIGN/01-to-be/27-a-module-requires-the-mesh-resolves.md)
@@ -188,9 +188,7 @@ python3 00-META/checks/index.py            fail if stale
 - **0185** — [A control plane behind its seat's row serves what it can](0185-a-control-plane-behind-its-seats-row-serves-what-it-can.md)
 - **0186** — [A ban list never holds a neighbour, and the mesh's own bans are its own wherever they hang](0186-a-ban-list-never-holds-a-neighbour.md)
 - **0187** — [A dead tracker is not the machine's failure](0187-a-dead-tracker-is-not-the-machines-failure.md)
- **0189** — [The store keeps what the records name, and a maintenance step holds its writers still](0189-the-store-keeps-what-the-records-name.md)
 - **0190** — [A seat's work is shared by its holders, and building is the first such role](0190-a-seats-work-is-shared-by-its-holders-and-building-is-the-first-such-role.md)
- **0201** — [A provider declares what it derives for each consumer, and the mesh tells both ends](0201-a-provider-declares-what-it-derives-for-each-consumer.md)

 ### Its tiers, from the bottom up

@@ -227,6 +225,7 @@ python3 00-META/checks/index.py            fail if stale
 - **0191** — [The mesh's resolver holds only the mesh's own names; a public name resolves publicly](0191-the-meshs-resolver-holds-only-the-meshs-own-names.md)
 - **0194** — [The mesh has one resolver, and every node asks it for the mesh's names](0194-the-mesh-has-one-resolver-and-every-node-asks-it-for-the-meshs-names.md)
 - **0196** — [A node asks the mesh's resolver first, and a public one only when it is silent](0196-a-node-asks-the-meshs-resolver-first-and-a-public-one-only-when-it-is-silent.md)
+- **0199** — [A module that answers names declares its zone, and a node's hosts file is one module's](0199-a-module-that-answers-names-declares-its-zone-and-a-nodes-hosts-file-is-one-modules.md)

 ### What runs on them, and how it gets there

@@ -322,7 +321,6 @@ python3 00-META/checks/index.py            fail if stale
 - **0111** — [A build source is on the mesh's git seat, or it is an external repository](0111-a-build-source-is-on-the-git-seat-or-external.md)
 - **0149** — [The live mesh is the test bed](0149-the-live-mesh-is-the-test-bed.md)
 - **0174** — [A node varies a module through settings and kept regions, never through an edit](0174-a-node-varies-a-module-through-settings-and-kept-regions-never-an-edit.md)
- **0200** — [Genesis pivots to the controller as a container, and the first push hands it to a process](0200-genesis-pivots-to-the-controller-as-a-container-and-the-first-push-hands-it-to-a-process.md)

 ### How it is checked

@@ -6,10 +6,16 @@ code:
  - mesh-controller examples/route-proxy
  - mesh-controller internal/identity/authority.go
  - mesh-controller cmd/mesh-controller/plan.go (the names the roster publishes)
+  - mesh-controller internal/catalogue/zones.go (the zones a module answers, ADR 0199)
+  - mesh-controller internal/catalogue/seats.go (mesh-dns-resolver, node-hosts-file)
+  - mesh-catalog modules/dnsmasq (the mesh's one resolver)
+  - mesh-catalog modules/resolv-conf (what a node asks)
+  - mesh-catalog modules/hosts (a node's /etc/hosts)
  - mesh-host internal/identity/serving.go
  - mesh-host internal/apply (the service that reflects a rule set)
 updated: 2026-10-03
 decisions:
+  - 02-DECISIONS/0199-a-module-that-answers-names-declares-its-zone-and-a-nodes-hosts-file-is-one-modules.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0196-a-node-asks-the-meshs-resolver-first-and-a-public-one-only-when-it-is-silent.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0194-the-mesh-has-one-resolver-and-every-node-asks-it-for-the-meshs-names.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0191-the-meshs-resolver-holds-only-the-meshs-own-names.md
@@ -377,6 +383,16 @@ member's resolver answers a LAN; a router pointing at one is moved first. *Check
 `/etc/resolv.conf` naming `mesh-resolver` then a public resolver, by no node but the holder answering
 DNS on any address, and by the router's DHCP DNS option naming the router.*

+**Names that are neither a node nor a route.** A module that answers names declares a zone (a
+setting) and the listen that answers it; the controller hands the `mesh-dns-resolver` holder every
+zone with its module's node address and published port, and the holder forwards that zone there and
+answers nothing in it itself — the lab answers `<machine>.incus` for its running scenarios this way.
+An operator's own names, unrelated to the mesh, live in `/etc/hosts`'s kept region, held per node by
+the `node-hosts-file` seat's holder and changed through its tools; the controller holds none of them
+([ADR 0199](../../02-DECISIONS/0199-a-module-that-answers-names-declares-its-zone-and-a-nodes-hosts-file-is-one-modules.md)).
+*Checked by the holder's configuration carrying one forwarding rule per declared zone, and by a push
+leaving the hosts file's operator region byte for byte.*
+
 *What follows describes the per-node resolver this replaces — how it was built and why the roles were
 split. The split stands; the serving role's scope is what moved.*

@@ -1021,6 +1037,8 @@ The list is worth having in one place, because it is most of the argument:

 - **One resolver ([ADR 0194](../../02-DECISIONS/0194-the-mesh-has-one-resolver-and-every-node-asks-it-for-the-meshs-names.md)).** Not built: every node still runs
  `node-dns-resolver`. The migration's four steps are in the record, in order.
+  Nor are zones or the hosts file's holder ([ADR 0199](../../02-DECISIONS/0199-a-module-that-answers-names-declares-its-zone-and-a-nodes-hosts-file-is-one-modules.md)): the
+  workstation moves to the one resolver only once both exist, its lab and operator names depending on them.

 - ~~**What happens when the hub is down.**~~ **Resolved** by
  [ADR 0006](../../02-DECISIONS/0006-the-substrate-and-the-control-plane.md), together with `06`'s
@@ -5,11 +5,10 @@ code:
  - mesh-controller cmd/mesh-builder
  - mesh-controller internal/builder
  - mesh-catalog modules/build-agent
-updated: 2026-10-04
+updated: 2026-10-03
 decisions:
  - 02-DECISIONS/0190-a-seats-work-is-shared-by-its-holders-and-building-is-the-first-such-role.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0157-a-build-says-what-it-does-on-the-bus-as-it-happens.md
-  - 02-DECISIONS/0189-the-store-keeps-what-the-records-name.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0150-a-modules-own-code-runs-as-supervised-processes-under-one-account.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0142-the-mesh-delivers-its-own-components-as-binaries.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0111-a-build-source-is-on-the-git-seat-or-external.md
@@ -318,44 +317,6 @@ build's lines reach a reader of its subject in order and the stream holds them a
 against a real server); the seat verb with an id reads the log (controller test); and, live, a build
 after the roll-out read line by line through the console.

-## The store keeps what the records name
-
-*2026-10-02 — [ADR 0189](../../02-DECISIONS/0189-the-store-keeps-what-the-records-name.md),
-[issue 108](../../04-ISSUES/108-the-registry-has-no-garbage-collection-once-it-has-two-doors/00-report.md).*
-
-Every build pushes another layer set and, until this, nothing ever removed one. The registry's own
-answer — collect what no tag names — is wrong for this mesh: each artifact is pushed under one
-moving tag and machines are pinned by digest, so every build but the newest is untagged and some
-machine may still be running it.
-
-**The mesh decides and the store reclaims.** Deletion is enabled on the store's one door — that
-door already accepts a push, and a writer who can push can replace any tag, so delete takes
-nothing a push did not already have, and ADR 0082's bargain (a store every machine reaches with no
-credential to distribute first) is kept. The mesh then removes what it put there and no longer
-keeps, **naming it from its own build records** rather than enumerating the store: it has never
-put anything there it did not record, so a digest it did not record making is never named, which
-is what keeps the sweep away from the images genesis pushed before any record existed.
-
-An artifact stays for one of two reasons and otherwise goes: a definition the mesh holds names it
-(no age limit — this is the floor), or it belongs to one of the five most recent successful builds
-of its module (somewhere for a wrong release to return to). The sweep runs after a build the mesh
-recorded, which is the moment new bytes landed and the moment the keep set moved; it needs no
-timer. Deleting a manifest frees no bytes, so the store's own collector runs nightly as a
-scheduled step with the server held still — which is what `while-stopped` exists for
-([design 20](20-writing-a-module.md)). Plain collection, not `--delete-untagged`: what the mesh
-keeps is still a manifest and so still referenced, and the dangerous flag is not needed once the
-mesh is the one deciding.
-
-A machine behind by more than five builds of a module, recreating a container, cannot pull what it
-was running. It is already a machine the mesh reports as behind, and the answer is the current
-declaration.
-
-*How it is checked:* the keep set, against records, holds what a manifest names and the five most
-recent builds and nothing else; a reference the mesh never recorded is never in the delete set; an
-image and an archive are asked for at their own endpoints; a store with deletion off names the
-remedy rather than the status code; a store that does not have it is recorded collected rather
-than retried for ever. Live: the store's size before and after the first nightly collection.
-
 ## The builder compiles the languages the mesh is written in

 *2026-09-29 —
@@ -5,12 +5,11 @@ code:
  - mesh-catalog modules/showcase
  - mesh-controller internal/builder
  - mesh-sdk src
-updated: 2026-10-02
+updated: 2026-09-30
 decisions:
  - 02-DECISIONS/0150-a-modules-own-code-runs-as-supervised-processes-under-one-account.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0099-a-step-that-runs-once-names-what-it-reads.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0053-a-step-that-runs-on-a-schedule.md
-  - 02-DECISIONS/0189-the-store-keeps-what-the-records-name.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0074-the-wire-is-specified-not-the-types.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0040-what-a-module-is.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0039-what-the-sdk-holds-and-refuses.md
@@ -209,27 +208,3 @@ is recreated with the new fact
 ([ADR 0099](../../02-DECISIONS/0099-a-step-that-runs-once-names-what-it-reads.md)). *How it is
 checked:* the host's unit tests run a step again when its named file changed and not otherwise,
 and recreate a container naming a step after the step ran.
-
-## A recurring step may hold its own module's containers still
-
-*Written 2026-10-02, from [ADR 0189](../../02-DECISIONS/0189-the-store-keeps-what-the-records-name.md)
-and [issue 108](../../04-ISSUES/108-the-registry-has-no-garbage-collection-once-it-has-two-doors/00-report.md).*
-
-Some work cannot be done underneath a running service: an artifact store's collector walks the
-storage and requires every writer stopped. A `run-once` step runs *beside* containers and a
-scheduled one is the same container again, so until this a module had no way to say it — and the
-mesh inherited a store that has never collected anything, because the predecessor said it with a
-shell script and a script beside a module is not a resource in it.
-
-A scheduled step may name `while-stopped`: resource ids of **its own module's** containers, which
-the host stops before the run and starts again after it, in the reverse order, **whatever the step
-did**. Three boundaries, each refused where it can be seen earliest — its own module's containers
-only, because a module that could quiesce a neighbour could stop the mesh; scheduled steps only,
-because at apply the declaration is applied in order and a step already gates what follows, so a
-one-time offline job says *before* rather than *instead of*; and restoring that is not conditional
-on anything, because the only real risk of the field is a window that never closes.
-
-*How it is checked:* the host's unit tests assert stop–run–start in that order, the restart after a
-step that **failed**, the reverse order for several containers, and a service left down said
-loudly. The controller refuses, from the definition alone, a window with no schedule, one on a
-run-once step, one naming a container the module does not declare, and one naming itself.
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ code:
  - mesh-catalog modules/gitea/module.json
 updated: 2026-10-03
 decisions:
+  - 02-DECISIONS/0199-a-module-that-answers-names-declares-its-zone-and-a-nodes-hosts-file-is-one-modules.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0194-the-mesh-has-one-resolver-and-every-node-asks-it-for-the-meshs-names.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0161-what-deserves-a-seat.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0131-everything-on-the-mesh-speaks-to-the-broker-seat.md
@@ -129,6 +130,7 @@ convention, which later seats departed from.
 | `mesh-build-machine` | `the-build-machine` | node | — | a builder |
 | `mesh-resolver` | — | mesh | — | the mesh's one resolver, holding every node's internal domain ([ADR 0194](../../02-DECISIONS/0194-the-mesh-has-one-resolver-and-every-node-asks-it-for-the-meshs-names.md)) |
 | ~~`mesh-dns-port`~~ | `the-dns-port` | node | — | retired by [ADR 0194](../../02-DECISIONS/0194-the-mesh-has-one-resolver-and-every-node-asks-it-for-the-meshs-names.md): the local resolver became the mesh's one |
+| `node-hosts-file` | — | node | — | owns `/etc/hosts`: the machine's own lines and the operator's kept region, changed through its verbs `entries`, `add`, `remove` ([ADR 0199](../../02-DECISIONS/0199-a-module-that-answers-names-declares-its-zone-and-a-nodes-hosts-file-is-one-modules.md)) |
 | `mesh-intrusion-prevention` | `the-intrusion-prevention` | node | — | an intrusion-prevention service |
 | `mesh-packet-filter` | `the-packet-filter` | node | — | the packet filter |
 | `mesh-private-network` | `the-private-network` | node | — | the private network the mesh runs over |
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 layer: to-be
 status: in-progress
 code: [mesh-controller internal/catalogue]
-updated: 2026-10-02
+updated: 2026-09-30
 decisions:
  - 02-DECISIONS/0112-a-module-definition-names-no-node-mesh-or-path.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0155-a-definition-names-no-installation-and-how-that-is-checked.md
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ decisions:
  - 02-DECISIONS/0084-which-provider-serves-a-consumer.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0046-a-module-configuration-is-its-assignments-not-its-manifest.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0038-the-mesh-assigns-the-port.md
-  - 02-DECISIONS/0201-a-provider-declares-what-it-derives-for-each-consumer.md
 ---

 # 27 — A module requires, the mesh resolves
@@ -207,22 +206,6 @@ name when nothing sets it. That is the contract half of this design's operator p
 the placeholder allows: the definition says which values reach which requirement, and nothing else
 does. *How it is checked:* the unit tests named in issue 173, and the plan comparison that closed it.

-*A provider says once what it derives for each consumer (2026-10-02,
-[ADR 0201](../../02-DECISIONS/0201-a-provider-declares-what-it-derives-for-each-consumer.md),
-[issue 124](../../04-ISSUES/124-a-consumer-cannot-be-told-what-its-provider-derived/00-report.md)):*
-where a provider **names the resource** it gives each consumer — a bucket, a database, a vhost — the
-name is derived per consumer, and a literal `serves` block could not carry it. A served value may
-now name the consumer the mesh is serving: `${consumer:as}`, the identity the mesh minted, and
-`${consumer:as:dns}`, that same identity written as a DNS label. Nothing else — **the mesh learns no
-protocol here; it spells its own name in an alphabet it already knows.** Settings are laid on first,
-so an operator may still set a prefix and the mesh derives the rest. The mesh fills it at the one
-moment it knows who the consumer is, and the one filled value reaches both ends: the consumer, as
-its binding's served facts and as `${bound:<provision>:<key>}` in any file it writes; the provider,
-as `derived` on that consumer's entry in its contributions file, so its provisioner is told the name
-rather than recomputing it. A consumer that writes the derived value into its own definition instead
-of asking for it is refused, naming the placeholder to use. *How it is checked:* the unit tests in
-ADR 0201's "how this is checked", each run against the unchanged controller first.
-
 ## How a definition reads what was resolved

 **One form, naming a requirement and a field of its contract.** A definition that needs the database's
@@ -231,9 +214,7 @@ name in a configuration file writes the same thing: the requirement's name and t
 controller fills it at resolution.

 This one form replaces the placeholders that exist today, one per mechanism: bound values, secrets,
-ports and machine facts. It subsumes the consumer placeholder too — a value a provider derives is
-read by the consumer exactly as any other field of the contract is, and `${consumer:…}` is only
-how the *provider* states the rule.
+ports and machine facts.

 **The seat placeholder stays, for the controller alone.** The controller composes its own
 declaration and reaches the store and broker it made before any module existed, so it cannot be
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 layer: to-be
 status: in-progress
 code: [mesh-tools, mesh-controller, mesh-host, mesh-catalog]
-updated: 2026-10-04
+updated: 2026-10-03
 decisions:
  - 02-DECISIONS/0175-one-tool-runtime-per-node-serves-every-modules-tools-on-the-host-side.md
  - 02-DECISIONS/0173-the-operators-machine-is-the-meshs-and-a-module-is-what-it-declares.md
@@ -309,25 +309,6 @@ nextcloud, minio), the two whose clients exist on no system (mongodb, mssql: a d
 and last the mesh's own (mesh-catalog, mesh-vault, records, gitea, mailu, audit-logger, lab, and the
 three mains).

-*Built 2026-10-04.* Thirty-four modules no longer run their own code in a container: the first wave
-(mesh-catalog#245), the mesh's own and the media modules (mesh-catalog#248, mesh-media-catalog#13),
-with a step run where and as it is declared (mesh-host#85) and a process's words filled like a
-container's (mesh-controller#250). **Proven live** on every machine that runs them: each moved
-module's tools answer from the node's runtime, the steps run as their oneshot units, and the forge's
-merge events reach the build pipeline from the runtime — the merge after the move started its own
-plan. **Two corrections the machines taught:** a tool that called a broker's command-line client now
-runs it inside the broker's own container, because a host package may be uninstallable on a machine
-whose package index is stale (mesh-catalog#249); and a module reading its application's own key reads
-it through the application's container, because that directory belongs to the account the application
-runs as there, which is not the runtime's (mesh-media-catalog#14). *Completed 2026-10-04:* the last three — mesh-catalog, mongodb and mssql, whose code imports npm
-packages of its own — moved once the builder installs a bundle's own dependencies before compiling,
-keeping the toolchain's SDK authoritative (mesh-controller#255, mesh-catalog#250). Their database
-clients are now drivers inlined into the bundle, not command-line clients fetched by a container; one
-more correction the machines taught: a driver reaching its server on loopback must give TLS a host
-name, since the runtime's Node refuses an address (mesh-catalog#252). **No module's own code runs in
-a container any more;** every module with tools answers from its node's runtime, proven by calling a
-tool of each.
-
 ## WP5 — The shell, on a server first

 *mesh-catalog #224, already written. Half a day to assign and prove.*
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 ---
-status: resolved
+status: open
 opened: 2026-09-23
-located-in: [mesh-controller internal/inventory, mesh-controller internal/artifacts, mesh-host internal/apply, mesh-catalog modules/distribution]
-fixed-by: 02-DECISIONS/0189-the-store-keeps-what-the-records-name.md
-amended-design: 03-DESIGN/01-to-be/18-building-a-module.md
+located-in: []
+fixed-by:
+amended-design:
 ---

 # 108 — The registry has no garbage collection, and two doors make it harder to add
@@ -75,32 +75,3 @@ real thing services need, and the mesh cannot express one.
  images by digest and moves by version — is retention "the digests no recorded build names"?
 - Who owns the routine when the store and its public door are two modules — the store, since the
  volume is its?
-
-## Answered, 2026-10-02 — [ADR 0189](../../02-DECISIONS/0189-the-store-keeps-what-the-records-name.md)
-
-The three open questions, answered:
-
- **A maintenance step, or a backend that does not need its writers stopped?** The step. A
-  scheduled container may name `while-stopped` — resource ids of **its own module's** containers,
-  which the host stops before the run and starts again after it whatever the step did. A storage
-  backend the mesh does not run would be a bigger thing to own than the mechanism it avoids, and
-  the mechanism is wanted anyway: a service that cannot have work done underneath it is a real
-  shape and the mesh could not express it at all.
- **Is retention "the digests no recorded build names"?** Nearly. An artifact stays because a
-  definition the mesh holds names it (no age limit), or because it belongs to one of the five most
-  recent successful builds of its module. Last-N-tags was the predecessor's rule for a registry
-  that knew nothing else; this mesh knows what each digest is for.
- **Who owns the routine now the second door is gone?** Both halves, each where it can be. The
-  **mesh** decides what may go — only it holds the records — and asks the store to drop it. The
-  **store** reclaims the bytes, because only it can stop its own server. Neither half can be done
-  by the other.
-
-And the sharpened point — enabling deletion on a door with no accounts — dissolved on inspection:
-**that door already accepts a push**, so a writer who can reach it can already replace any tag.
-Delete takes nothing a push did not have. What it does not do is undo ADR 0082's bargain, which
-putting an authenticated door in front of deletion would have.
-
-The second registry process is not built, as the 2026-09-26 note says, so the shared blob cache
-and the deletion-cached-by-the-other-door problem never arise. Plain `garbage-collect` is enough:
-what the mesh keeps is still a manifest in the store, so `--delete-untagged` — the flag that would
-delete images machines are running — is not needed at all.
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 ---
-status: resolved
+status: located
 opened: 2026-09-26
-located-in: [mesh-controller internal/catalogue, mesh-sdk src/provisioner, mesh-catalog modules/minio]
-fixed-by: 02-DECISIONS/0201-a-provider-declares-what-it-derives-for-each-consumer.md
-amended-design: 03-DESIGN/01-to-be/27-a-module-requires-the-mesh-resolves.md
+located-in: [mesh-controller internal/catalogue/declaration.go, mesh-sdk src/provisioner, mesh-catalog modules/minio]
+fixed-by:
+amended-design:
 ---

 # 124 — A consumer cannot be told a value its provider derived for it, so it transcribes one
@@ -63,27 +63,3 @@ compares it to what the provider will actually create. The one wrong instance wa
 - What would have caught the wrong instance? A test that resolves a consumer's grant and compares the
  bucket in its own configuration against the one the provider would create is a check that could
  exist today, for any interface, without the mechanism above.
-
-## Answered, 2026-10-02 — [ADR 0201](../../02-DECISIONS/0201-a-provider-declares-what-it-derives-for-each-consumer.md)
-
-The channel is the provider's own `serves` block, which may now name the consumer the mesh is
-serving: `${consumer:as}` and `${consumer:as:dns}`. The mesh fills it once, where it knows who the
-consumer is, and delivers the one filled value to both ends — the consumer's binding and its
-`${bound:…}` substitutions, and the provider's contributions entry, so a provisioner is told the
-name rather than deriving it. Each open question above, answered:
-
- **Should a provider return values from provisioning?** No. It would make a grant carry data the
-  provider wrote, make a consumer's declaration wait on its provider's reconcile loop, and put the
-  rule where nothing can refuse it. The reasoning is in the record.
- **Or should `serves` say a value is derived?** Yes, and the mesh performs the derivation — but it
-  learns no protocol doing it. The only fact is the identity the mesh itself minted, in one of two
-  alphabets it already knows.
- **Should a consumer that names the resource be refused?** Yes. A consumer's file that already
-  contains the value the mesh is about to derive for it is refused at resolution, naming the
-  placeholder to write instead. That is the check this report asked for, and it is exact rather than
-  heuristic: a derived value carries the identity minted for this consumer on this machine, which
-  nothing else would spell out.
-
-minio's `bucketFor` is gone; its manifest serves `"bucket": "${consumer:as:dns}"`. The three
-consumers' hand-written bucket names are gone with it — each of them also named the machine the
-module happens to run on, which is the second thing wrong with a transcription.
@@ -1,93 +0,0 @@
---
-status: open
-opened: 2026-10-02
-located-in: [mesh-catalog modules/dnsmasq, mesh-controller cmd/mesh-controller]
-fixed-by:
-amended-design:
---
-
-# 202 — A module whose required setting nobody set is left out of the machine, and the resolver is the module it happened to
-
-## What was observed
-
-Running the controller's own test suite against the catalogue beside it, 2026-10-02.
-`TestTheResolverIsToldEveryMachineOnTheNetworkAndToldAgainWhenOneLeaves` fails with *"the resolver
-was not handed the machines"*. Composing the same machine by hand and listing what it receives
-shows why: **dnsmasq contributes nothing at all.** Four resources are composed for that node, all
-of them the overlay's. The resolver's package, its configuration, its service and the fact that
-carries every machine's name are simply not there.
-
-The cause is one line added to `dnsmasq`'s configuration earlier the same day: the addresses it
-listens on beside the machine's own became an operator setting,
-`listen-address=${setting:listen-addresses}`, with no default. A `${setting:…}` nothing sets is
-refused, a module that cannot be composed is **left out** rather than failing the whole machine
-([ADR 0163](../../02-DECISIONS/0163-taking-a-module-over-is-a-comparison.md)), and so a node
-assigned the resolver is handed a declaration with no resolver in it.
-
-The failing test is the symptom that surfaced it. The test is not what is wrong.
-
-**Proven rather than inferred.** Composing the same machine a second time with
-`listen-addresses` set to `127.0.0.1` and nothing else changed, every one of dnsmasq's eight
-resources appears — `needs-broker`, `mesh-state`, `package`, `config`, `runtime-dns`, `runtime`,
-`service` and `fact-node-zones`. The only difference between a machine with a resolver and a
-machine without one is whether somebody set a value that did not exist yesterday.
-
-## Why it matters beyond this instance
-
-**Leaving a module out is right, and being quiet about it is not.** The rule exists so one
-module's broken setting cannot stop a machine converging — a good rule. But the outcome here is a
-machine that applies cleanly, reports current, and is missing its DNS resolver. Every name on that
-machine then resolves through whatever was there before, or not at all, and nothing in the mesh
-says the resolver was dropped. That is the shape
-[issue 152](../152-a-nodes-plan-failure-silently-drops-its-routed-names/00-report.md) records for
-routed names, here for a whole module.
-
-**And a setting with no default is a definition that cannot be assigned.** Every other
-`${setting:…}` in the catalogue names something that is genuinely particular to one installation —
-a public domain, an issuer. "Which addresses besides my own do I answer on" has an obvious correct
-default for every machine that is not a LAN gateway: none beside loopback. A definition that
-refuses to compose until somebody sets a value most machines do not need is a definition that
-breaks the next node to be assigned it, and genesis with it.
-
-## What this does not claim
-
-Whether the live machines are affected was not checked — those four have had the setting set, or
-their resolvers would already be gone. The claim is about a machine assigned the resolver *from
-now on*, and about the silence.
-
-## Open questions
-
- Should the declaration say which modules it left out, where a person or the console can see it?
-  `left_out` already travels to the host ([ADR 0163](../../02-DECISIONS/0163-taking-a-module-over-is-a-comparison.md));
-  what is missing is anything that reads it back and says so.
- ~~Should a `${setting:…}` be allowed a default?~~ **Decided in principle and not built.**
-  [ADR 0164](../../02-DECISIONS/0164-a-setting-is-declared-with-its-default-its-meaning-and-what-changing-it-costs.md)
-  (proposed, 2026-10-01) says a setting with a default is a tunable and one without is the
-  operator's, and narrows 0155's refusal to exactly the second. `listen-addresses` is a tunable by
-  that rule, and dnsmasq declares no settings block at all. So this issue is, in part, 0164 waiting
-  to be built — and in part the silence, which 0164 does not address.
- Is leaving a module out ever right for a module a node is **assigned**, as opposed to one it
-  merely pulls in? An assignment is somebody saying *this machine runs this*; silently not running
-  it is the one answer nobody asked for.
-
-## Still true on 2026-10-04, and the evidence had to be re-taken
-
-Re-checked after the bundles refactor landed (fourteen records, ADRs 0188 and 0190–0200). **The
-fault stands and the old evidence no longer reaches it.**
-
-`TestTheResolverIsToldEveryMachineOnTheNetworkAndToldAgainWhenOneLeaves` still fails on
-mesh-controller main, with the same message — and now for a *different first reason*. `assign` is
-refused before composition ever happens:
-
-> dnsmasq on anchor has no bus credential: nothing was issued for anchor.dnsmasq … (novox/hq issue 203)
-
-That is [issue 203](../203-a-fresh-assignment-is-pushed-before-its-credential-exists/00-report.md)'s
-new guard doing its job on a test harness that mints no credential. Two faults are stacked in one
-failing test, and the second was invisible behind the first.
-
-Proven again, past both: mint `anchor.dnsmasq` so the assignment stands, then compose the machine
-twice. **Without `listen-addresses` the node composes four resources, all the overlay's. With it
-set to `127.0.0.1`, all eight of dnsmasq's appear** — `needs-broker`, `mesh-state`, `package`,
-`config`, `runtime-dns`, `runtime`, `service`, `fact-node-zones`. Nothing else differs.
-
-The test is now wrong about two things and should be fixed with whichever of these is fixed first.
@@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
 ---
-status: resolved
+status: located
 opened: 2026-10-03
 located-in:
  - mesh-controller
 fixed-by:
-  - mesh-controller#246
 amended-design:
 ---

@@ -46,7 +45,3 @@ have to write — a bundle of language L depends on the module that publishes L'
 bundle lands in the tier after it. A test: a merge touching the toolchain module and a TypeScript
 bundle plans the bundle one tier later. Worked around on the day by building the bundle again once
 the toolchain was built.
-
-## Resolved
-
-Every mesh-tools plan since the fix ran in two rounds: the toolchain and runtime images first, what is built in or on them after. Before it, a merge moving both tiered them together. The planner's test proves the order: a merge moving a bundle and its toolchain plans two rounds.
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-# 211 — Diagnosis
-
-*2026-10-03.* The planner orders a merge's modules by `inventory.Dependencies`, whose edges come from a
-manifest's `build.on`, from what a build recorded it stood on, from the repositories it read, and from
-the build machine. A bundle names its toolchain by `language`; the builder takes the toolchain image
-(`ToolchainFor(language)`) from what the mesh holds and records nothing of it as stood on. So no edge
-ran from a bundle to the module publishing its toolchain, and a merge moving both (mesh-tools: the
-images and node-tools) tiered them together. **Fix (mesh-controller, branch
-`fix/issue-211-a-bundle-stands-on-its-toolchain`, commit c72f6ca):** `dependenciesOf` adds a `stands-on`
-edge from every bundle artifact to its toolchain's module, read from the manifest. Tested: TypeScript
-bundle → mesh-tools, Go bundle → mesh-tools-go, image → none; a merge moving both plans two tiers.
@@ -1,11 +1,10 @@
 ---
-status: resolved
+status: located
 opened: 2026-10-03
 located-in:
  - mesh-tools
  - mesh-controller
 fixed-by:
-  - mesh-tools#44
 amended-design:
 ---

@@ -43,7 +42,3 @@ install from a lockfile that a release updates, or build the install layer witho
 the build should record which SDK version the image carries, so a bundle's record says what it was
 compiled against. A check: after an SDK release and a toolchain rebuild, a bundle built on it reports
 the released version.
-
-## Resolved
-
-The toolchain now installs the exact SDK version the mesh last published, passed in as a build argument from the SDK module's published package, and the planner orders the toolchain after the SDK. Proven 2026-10-04: the toolchain built with the published SDK, and the six TypeScript bundles built in it serve their tools and seat verbs.
@@ -1,14 +1,10 @@
 ---
-status: resolved
+status: open
 opened: 2026-10-03
 located-in:
  - mesh-controller
-  - mesh-host
+  - mesh-catalog
 fixed-by:
-  - mesh-host#86
-  - mesh-controller#252
-  - mesh-controller#253
-  - mesh-host#88
 amended-design:
 ---

@@ -54,27 +50,3 @@ of a plan today.

 Located only by owner; the move is a change of the controller's module and its deployment, not of
 its code.
-
-## Fix prepared (2026-10-04)
-
-Three changes. mesh-host#86, merged: a process may name the container it `replaces`, and the host
-removes that container only once the process has stayed up across two checks. mesh-controller#252,
-awaiting the operator's merge: the controller's composition for a service process, and two
-controllers safe together for the handover — the second stands by on the controller's consumers
-until the first lets go, and all plan work holds one advisory lock. mesh-controller#253, held: the
-controller's manifest as a Go bundle and a process. It waits on
-[issue 223](../223-a-new-mesh-installs-its-controller-as-a-container/00-report.md), because with it a
-new mesh cannot be installed.
-
-## Resolved
-
-Proven 2026-10-04 on the control machine: after the manifest change was merged and pushed, the host
-created the controller's account, ran its preparation step, started the controller as a process,
-found it up across both checks and removed the container. The controller now runs as its own account
-from its bundle, no controller container remains, its seat answered throughout, and the merge's own
-plan finished all three tiers under the new process.
-
-One fault on the way, fixed before it could leave two controllers or none: the host read the account
-not existing yet as a user database that did not answer — it matched the exit as text in a wording
-its own runner did not use — so the first apply stopped at the account and the container kept serving,
-which is the handover's safe failure (mesh-host#88).
@@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
 ---
-status: resolved
+status: open
 opened: 2026-10-03
 located-in:
  - mesh-controller
 fixed-by:
-  - mesh-controller#246
 amended-design:
 ---

@@ -35,7 +34,3 @@ Owner mesh-controller (the planner). **Fix direction:** on start, and whenever a
 build, the plan settles an `asked` build against the build records — a build recorded as built from
 the plan's commit is that tier's outcome — so a plan resumes after the controller replaced itself.
 A test: a plan whose build outcome was recorded while no controller followed it resumes on start.
-
-## Resolved
-
-A plan settles an asked build from the build records, whoever heard the outcome. Proven 2026-10-03 and 2026-10-04: both controller merge plans since the fix finished all three rounds, including the round that replaced the controller, without being stopped by hand.
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-# 214 — Diagnosis
-
-*2026-10-03.* A plan learns a tier's outcome only through `planBuilt`, called when a controller takes
-in a build result off the bus. A merge to the controller's repository replaces the controller in tier
-0; the build that produced the new controller was recorded, but the plan state the new controller
-loaded still read `asked`, and no path ever revisited it. **Fix (branch
-`fix/issue-214-a-plan-settles-from-the-build-records`, commit d86baeb):** `advanceOnce` settles every
-still-asked module from its build records — a build recorded after the ask is that ask's outcome,
-built or failed — on every advance and on the 30-second ticker. Tested with a pure helper. Live
-proof: the next merge to mesh-controller passes tier 0 on its own.
@@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
 ---
-status: resolved
+status: open
 opened: 2026-10-03
 located-in:
  - mesh-controller
 fixed-by:
-  - mesh-controller#246
 amended-design:
 ---

@@ -34,9 +33,3 @@ Owner mesh-controller. **Fix direction:** a build asked at a commit does not cha
 module follows; or, if pinning is meant, the pin is said — in `module list`, in `status`, and by a
 merge's plan naming the module it leaves out and why. A test: building a module at a commit and then
 merging a change to it plans it.
-
-## Resolved
-
-Proven 2026-10-04: the catalogue merges since the fix rebuilt the module that had been pinned at an
-old commit, at the merge's commit, by an ordinary plan — the same as every other module of the
-catalogue. Nothing was asked for it by hand.
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-# 215 — Diagnosis
-
-*2026-10-03.* `takeIn` registers a build's `Ref` as the branch the module follows. unifi was once
-built with `ref=9c97a8a`, which became its followed ref. `sourceIs` matches a merge only to modules
-whose ref is empty or the merged base — so every merge into main left unifi out — and `askTier`
-re-asks `Source.Ref`, so every plan that rebuilt unifi built the same old commit again (its build
-records all read "at 9c97a8a"). **Fix (branch `fix/issue-215-a-commit-is-never-a-branch-to-follow`,
-commit 6784efa):** registration keeps the followed branch when a build names a commit; matching and
-re-asking read a recorded commit as the default branch, healing existing records; a merge names the
-modules of its repository it leaves out. Store-backed test fails without the fix.
@@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
 ---
-status: resolved
+status: open
 opened: 2026-10-03
 located-in:
  - mesh-controller
 fixed-by:
-  - mesh-controller#246
 amended-design:
 ---

@@ -29,7 +28,3 @@ Owner mesh-controller (the catalogue's registration check). **Fix direction:** a
 loads, runs or unpacks — no `loads`, no `tools` list on its module, no resource naming it — is refused
 at registration, naming the field that would deliver it. A test: such a manifest is refused; adding
 `loads` admits it.
-
-## Resolved
-
-A bundle nothing would deliver is refused at registration, by name. Proven by the controller's tests; the catalogue's bundles all name what the runtime loads (mesh-catalog#243).
@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
-# 216 — Diagnosis
-
-*2026-10-03.* The composer delivers a bundle as an archive only when its `Loads` is non-empty, and
-`Loads` derives from the artifact's `loads` or, failing that, from the module's `tools` list. The
-seven modules had neither, so their bundles were recorded and never composed into any declaration;
-nothing checked it. **Fix (branch `fix/issue-216-a-bundle-nothing-delivers-is-refused`, commit
-cf2bb3b):** registration refuses a bundle that nothing loads, runs or unpacks — no `loads`, no `tools`,
-no resource naming it, and not the runtime — naming the field that would deliver it. The current
-catalogue passes the check.
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
---
-status: resolved
-opened: 2026-10-03
-located-in:
-  - mesh-tools
-fixed-by:
-  - mesh-tools#42
-  - mesh-tools#43
-amended-design:
---
-
-# 217 — A refused announcement took down every container's runtime, and the console with it
-
-## What was observed
-
-2026-10-03, rolling out [ADR 0197](../../02-DECISIONS/0197-every-tool-announces-itself-on-the-bus-in-the-nats-services-protocol.md).
-The tool runtimes announced themselves by subscribing `$SRV.<verb>.>`; the grants composed for them
-allowed only `$SRV.<verb>` and the service's own name and instance. The bus refused the wildcard:
-
-```
-Subscription Violation - User "novox.gitea", Subject "$SRV.PING.>"
-NatsError: 'Permissions Violation for Subscription to "$SRV.PING.>"'
-```
-
-The TypeScript runtime the per-module containers run treats a refused subscription as fatal, so on
-the one machine that had received the new images nine containers crash-looped — gitea's runtime,
-postgres's, the catalogue, the vault, mongodb, mssql, keycloak, mailu, nextcloud. Gitea's tools went
-with them, which closed the usual path for merging the fix.
-
-Then the console stopped answering the controller's verbs, though the controller held every
-subscription: the console builds the list that tells a seat's verb from a module's tool by asking the
-controller *and* the catalogue, and gives up on both when the catalogue does not answer — so
-`mesh-controller.status` was asked of a module subject nobody serves.
-
-## Why it matters beyond this instance
-
-Two properties, each worse than the mistake that exposed it:
-
- **A runtime dies for an optional subscription.** Announcing is discovery; serving tools and running
-  provisioners is the work. A refusal of the first should never stop the second.
- **The console's view of the mesh's own verbs depended on a module.** The controller's verbs are how
-  the operator repairs the mesh; they must not become unreachable because the catalogue is down.
-
-## Diagnosis
-
-Owner mesh-tools. The wildcard is fixed on branch `fix/announce-only-what-the-grants-allow`: both
-runtimes subscribe exactly what the grants allow. The console that discovers from what announces itself
-(ADR 0195, 0197, on main) asks the bus and the controller, not the catalogue, which removes the second
-property once it is deployed. **Still to do:** the TypeScript runtime treats a refused announcement
-subscription as a logged warning, not as fatal; a test against a bus with real grants proves the
-announcement subscriptions are allowed for every principal kind.
-
-Recovered on the day without the forge's API: the toolchain images built by the controller straight
-from the fix branch, every module image rebuilt on them, and the machine pushed.
-
-## Resolved
-
-A refused announcement is logged and the runtime serves on, and every runtime subscribes only the discovery subjects its grants allow. Proven 2026-10-04: after rolling out to every machine, no container restarts anywhere, and the discovery console lists no runtime as not answering. A refused tool subscription was made non-fatal the same way afterwards, under issue 218 (mesh-tools#46).
@@ -1,92 +0,0 @@
---
-status: resolved
-opened: 2026-10-03
-located-in:
-  - mesh-controller
-  - mesh-tools
-fixed-by:
-  - mesh-controller#248
-  - mesh-tools#45
-  - mesh-tools#46
-amended-design:
---
-
-# 218 — A seat held once for the mesh is answered by a module on a machine that does not hold it
-
-## What was observed
-
-2026-10-03. Asked which databases the mesh's store holds, `mesh-store.databases` answered from the
-postgres on one machine with that machine's application databases; the controller's own database
-lives on the postgres of the other machine, which the controller's records name as the seat's one
-holder:
-
-```
-mesh-store  scope: mesh  delivers: postgres-database  holders: [ {node: <the control machine>, module: postgres} ]
-```
-
-The discovery console, which reads what answers on the bus ([ADR 0197](../../02-DECISIONS/0197-every-tool-announces-itself-on-the-bus-in-the-nats-services-protocol.md)),
-shows the same seat announced from **both** machines running postgres.
-
-## Why it matters beyond this instance
-
-A seat held once for the mesh promises one answerer: the role's holder. A module that implements a
-seat's verbs on every machine it runs on, and is let serve them on each, turns "the mesh's store" into
-"whichever postgres replied first" — a read against the wrong database that looks like a right one,
-and a write would be worse. Every mesh-scoped seat whose implementing module runs on more than one
-machine has this shape.
-
-## Where to look
-
-Whether the runtime serves a seat's verbs where its module merely *claims* the seat rather than where
-the mesh made it the holder ([ADR 0159](../../02-DECISIONS/0159-a-tool-call-names-the-machine-and-a-holder-serves-its-seats-verbs.md),
-[ADR 0160](../../02-DECISIONS/0160-the-mesh-issues-an-assignments-subjects-and-a-runtime-serves-what-it-is-issued.md)):
-the membership the controller issues each assignment, and what the runtime admits from it. A check:
-a mesh-scoped seat's verbs are served by exactly the holder the records name, on every machine.
-
-## Root cause
-
-The controller composed each assignment's held seats from what its module *claims*, once per module
-and not once per machine. Every machine running postgres was therefore given the store seat's grants
-and issued its subjects, and each runtime served the seat's verbs because it serves what it is issued
-([ADR 0160](../../02-DECISIONS/0160-the-mesh-issues-an-assignments-subjects-and-a-runtime-serves-what-it-is-issued.md)).
-The runtime behaved as designed. The fault was in what it was issued.
-
-The seat's verbs are not the module's tools. The store's `databases` and `query` are a separate
-implementation registered under the seat's name ([ADR 0159](../../02-DECISIONS/0159-a-tool-call-names-the-machine-and-a-holder-serves-its-seats-verbs.md)).
-Only that implementation should be withdrawn where the module does not hold the seat. postgres's own
-tools stay served on every machine it runs on.
-
-## Fix
-
-The controller now reads the recorded seat holdings when it composes grants and memberships. A seat
-held once for the mesh is issued only to the machine and module the records name as its holder. A
-seat held once per machine, and a mesh seat with no holder on record, are issued as before. Grants
-and memberships come from the same list, so they cannot disagree.
-
-**How it is checked.** A controller test asserts that a claimant on another machine keeps its node
-seats and loses the recorded mesh seat. Live, the discovery console's overview must show each
-mesh-scoped seat announced from exactly the holder the records name. Status moves to `resolved` once
-that holds after the fix is rolled out.
-
-## A second cause, and what the rollout broke (2026-10-04)
-
-With the grants corrected, calls to the store reached only the holder, yet the console still showed
-the seat announced from both machines. The module's runtime added every seat its start-up credential
-claims, even after the mesh issued a membership that left the seat out. Once a membership exists,
-it now alone decides which seat verbs a runtime serves (mesh-tools#45).
-
-The rollout then exposed a third fault. The module on the machine that does not hold the seat was
-still running an image built before #45, so it subscribed to the seat's subject. The corrected grants
-refused that subscription, and the refusal ended the process. Its runtime crash-looped until the
-module was rebuilt on the new runtime image. The database itself kept running. A refused tool
-subscription is now logged and costs only that subject (mesh-tools#46), as a refused announcement
-already did ([issue 217](../217-a-refused-announcement-took-down-every-containers-runtime/00-report.md)).
-
-The module was not rebuilt by the plan that rebuilt the runtime image. This is the ordering gap of
-[issue 211](../211-a-bundle-is-built-before-the-toolchain-it-is-compiled-in/00-report.md) seen
-from a container module.
-
-**Proven 2026-10-04.** The discovery console's overview shows the store seat announced from the
-recorded holder only. Repeated calls to the store are answered by that machine, and the answers
-include the controller's own database. The non-holder still answers its own module tools. No
-container restarts on any machine.
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
---
-status: resolved
-opened: 2026-10-04
-located-in:
-  - mesh-controller
-fixed-by:
-  - mesh-controller#249
-amended-design:
---
-
-# 219 — An older build that finishes later replaces a newer one
-
-## What was observed
-
-2026-10-03. Two merges to the runtime module came minutes apart. Each plan asked for every module
-built on the runtime image to be rebuilt. One module's two builds were of the same source and
-differed only in the runtime image they stood on:
-
-| Build | Requested | Finished | Stood on |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| asked by the first plan | 21:33 | 22:04 | the runtime image before the fix |
-| asked by the second plan | 21:49 | 21:56 | the runtime image with the fix |
-
-The older request finished last, and its image became the module's current artifact. The next push
-deployed it, and the module's runtime crash-looped on a fault the newer image had already fixed
-([issue 218](../218-a-mesh-seat-is-answered-by-a-module-that-does-not-hold-it/00-report.md)).
-
-## Why it matters beyond this instance
-
-Which build is current should follow what it was built from, not which build machine was slowest.
-Whenever two plans overlap, which happens on any busy evening, a fix can be silently reverted by a
-build that started before it existed. Every passing check still passes.
-
-## Where to look
-
-How a finished build is recorded and how a module's current artifact is chosen. **How it is checked:**
-a test in which an older request completes after a newer one for the same artifact, and the newer
-stays current.
-
-## Resolved
-
-A build is ordered by when it was requested, read from the id the controller gives it, and a
-module's registered manifest is replaced only by a build requested at or after the one it came from.
-An older request finishing later is recorded and changes nothing; a plan settles only from builds it
-asked for itself. **How it is checked:** store-backed tests replay the incident — the newer request
-stays what the module is — and fail without the fix. Live since 2026-10-04: the rebuilds of every
-runtime-image module and the three waves of module code moves since then each registered the build
-they asked for.
@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
---
-status: resolved
-opened: 2026-10-04
-located-in:
-  - mesh-host
-fixed-by:
-  - mesh-host#84
-amended-design:
---
-
-# 220 — A delivered bundle keeps the files of the one before
-
-## What was observed
-
-2026-10-04. A tools bundle was rebuilt as one self-contained file per entrypoint
-([ADR 0193](../../02-DECISIONS/0193-every-bundle-the-runtime-serves-is-launched-and-the-runtime-knows-no-language.md)),
-so it no longer carries a package directory. On the machine it was delivered to, its directory still
-held the package directory and a compiled file from the earlier delivery, dated hours before the
-new files. The new files were written over the old directory, and nothing removed what the new
-bundle no longer contains.
-
-## Why it matters beyond this instance
-
-A bundle on disk should be exactly the artifact that was built. Leftover files can be imported by
-code that should no longer find them. A fix that removes a file then works on a fresh machine and
-fails on every machine that ran an earlier version. It also makes "what runs here" impossible to
-read from the artifact.
-
-## Where to look
-
-How the host unpacks a bundle into its directory. **How it is checked:** deliver a bundle, then a
-version without one of its files, and the file is gone.
-
-## Resolved
-
-An archive is unpacked into a fresh directory beside the old one and swapped in by rename; a refused
-or failed unpack leaves the old tree whole. **How it is checked:** a second delivery without a file
-removes it, and nothing is left beside the directory; both tests fail without the fix. Proven
-2026-10-04: a bundle rebuilt and delivered after the fix holds exactly the new build and nothing
-beside it. A bundle that has not changed since keeps its old leftovers until its next version, by
-design: an unchanged archive is not unpacked again.
@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
---
-status: resolved
-opened: 2026-10-04
-located-in:
-  - mesh-controller
-fixed-by:
-  - policy: `upgrade build-agent roll-out` (2026-10-04)
-amended-design:
---
-
-# 221 — A build machine learns a new builder only from a push
-
-## What was observed
-
-2026-10-04. A controller merge changed how TypeScript bundles are built: one file per entrypoint
-instead of a package directory. Its plan finished, and six bundles were rebuilt right after. They
-came out in the old shape, because the build machines still ran the previous builder. They got the
-new one only from the next push. Rebuilt after that push, the same six came out right.
-
-The same order showed in the bus grants the same night. A push sent while the controller was still
-the previous build composed grants with the previous code. A second push was needed after the new
-controller had started.
-
-## Why it matters beyond this instance
-
-A merge to the controller is not in effect when its plan says done. Anything built or pushed in the
-gap uses the old code and looks current. Today only the operator knows to push first and build
-second, and even the operator forgot.
-
-## Where to look
-
-Whether a controller plan should end by delivering itself to the build machines and the control
-machine, or whether a build should refuse a builder older than the controller that asked for it.
-**How it is checked:** after a controller merge, a build asked right after its plan finishes runs
-the new builder.
-
-## Located
-
-The mechanism existed: a module whose upgrade policy is `roll-out` is sent to its machines when its
-tier is built, and the plan's next tier waits until it is applied. The build agent's policy was
-`record` — built, never sent — as was that of 76 other modules, which is why every rollout on
-2026-10-03 needed a push by hand. The build agent was set to `roll-out`, one machine at a time,
-stopping at the first failure. **How it is checked:** the next controller merge's plan sends the
-build agent to the build machines before its last tier, and a build asked right after the plan
-finishes runs the new builder; then this moves to resolved. Whether the other modules roll out is
-the operator's policy, not this issue's.
-
-## Resolved
-
-Proven 2026-10-04: the next controller merge's plan logged that its first tier was built and the
-build agent sent to all four build machines, and only then asked its next tier. The builder change
-in that merge reached the build machines without a hand push.
@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
---
-status: resolved
-opened: 2026-10-04
-located-in:
-  - mesh-tools
-fixed-by:
-  - mesh-tools#47
-amended-design:
---
-
-# 222 — An assignment is refused on the bus until the bus's machine is pushed
-
-## What was observed
-
-2026-10-04. A module was assigned to the laptop, and the laptop alone was pushed. The module's two
-bundles arrived and the node's runtime launched both, and then the bus refused every one of the
-module's subjects:
-
-```
-nats: permissions violation: Permissions Violation for Subscription to "mesh.mod.<module>.tool.<tool>.<node>"
-```
-
-The tools were unreachable until a later push that included the machine running the bus. Then the
-runtime served them without a restart, because a new membership arrived and it re-subscribed.
-
-## Why it matters beyond this instance
-
-What an account may answer lives in the bus's user list, and the controller writes that list only
-into the declaration of the machine that runs the bus. Assigning anything to any machine changes
-that list, so `push <machine>` after `assign <machine> <module>`, which is what the controller itself
-tells the operator to run, leaves the module running and unreachable, with nothing reporting a fault.
-
-## Where to look
-
-Whether a push to one machine should also send the bus's machine when the user list it would
-compose differs from the one that machine holds. **How it is checked:** assign a module with tools
-to a machine that does not run the bus, push only that machine, and its tools answer.
-
-## Diagnosed and resolved
-
-The push did send the bus's machine: the controller's log shows both machines applying in the same
-second. The fault was the order within that second. The node's runtime subscribed before the bus
-had reloaded its user list, the bus refused, and the bus client marks a refused subscription dead.
-Nothing asked again until a later membership happened to re-serve the module.
-
-A subject the runtime answers on is now asked for again when the bus refuses it, after waits from
-two seconds to two minutes, and given up and said after about five minutes. **How it is checked:**
-a test refuses a subject and finds it asked for again and answering, given up past its attempts,
-and not asked again once stopped; and by hand against a bus whose permissions were reloaded while
-connected, the runtime answered two seconds after the grant arrived, where the runtime before the
-fix never answered.
@@ -1,60 +0,0 @@
---
-status: resolved
-opened: 2026-10-04
-located-in:
-  - mesh-host
-fixed-by:
-  - mesh-host#87
-amended-design:
---
-
-# 223 — A new mesh installs its controller as a container
-
-## What was observed
-
-2026-10-04. Preparing [issue 213](../213-the-controller-is-a-go-program-run-in-a-container/00-report.md),
-the controller's own manifest was changed to a Go bundle run as a process. The installer that raises a
-new mesh assumes the controller is an image and a container at every step from its third on:
-
- it requires the controller's build to produce exactly one image;
- it starts a temporary controller from that image, and publishes the image to the registry;
- at the pivot, it finds the controller's container in the declaration, reads its environment and
-  volumes, waits for it, and from then on talks to the controller only through the container.
-
-## Why it matters beyond this instance
-
-With the controller's manifest changed, a new mesh cannot be installed: the pivot fails. The deeper
-constraint is ordering. A process's bundle is fetched from the artifact store, and the installer
-raises the artifact store only after the pivot, so the controller's first declaration names a bundle
-nothing can serve yet.
-
-## What a fix has to settle
-
-One of two shapes, and it is a decision, not a repair:
-
-1. raise the artifact store before the pivot, publish the controller's bundle to it, and talk to the
-   controller from the host's side rather than through a container; or
-2. pivot to the image form as today, and let the first push hand over to the process, which
-   requires the controller's manifest to carry both forms.
-
-Until it is settled, the change of the controller's manifest (mesh-controller#253) is held. The
-handover itself is built and merged (mesh-host#86); the controller's half (mesh-controller#252) waits
-on the operator. **How it is checked:** the installer's test raises a mesh whose controller manifest
-is the process form, and the controller answers its seat's verbs at the end.
-
-## Decided (2026-10-04)
-
-Option 2, [ADR 0200](../../02-DECISIONS/0200-genesis-pivots-to-the-controller-as-a-container-and-the-first-push-hands-it-to-a-process.md):
-genesis pivots to the controller as a container recorded under the name the process `replaces`, and
-the first push hands it over.
-
-## Resolved
-
-Built as [ADR 0200](../../02-DECISIONS/0200-genesis-pivots-to-the-controller-as-a-container-and-the-first-push-hands-it-to-a-process.md)
-decided: genesis reads only the controller's process from the manifest, builds the controller's image
-from its repository, and pivots to a container of its own shape recorded under the id the process
-`replaces`; an older controller in the image form still builds as before. **How it is checked:** the
-installer's tests build the genesis form from the controller's real manifest, and apply the
-controller's first process declaration over the recorded container with the host's own apply — the
-process starts, the container is removed, one controller remains. A real install from nothing has not
-been run since; the handover it ends in was proven live on the running mesh (issue 213).