Playbook 07: the prepare reads the code; the lead answers design questions against the principles

Conversation 1 Commits 2 Files Changed 8

+118 -80

2 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
jschoubben	a2da2a3e74	Let the lead answer every design question against the principles mesh/check checking a2da2a3e7451 on 87f2901f556b mesh/delivery merged: source.main moved to novox/hq@87f2901f556b Details The operator replaced the instruction on implementing a design on 2026-11-11 about 21:48 CET: the lead answers each question met while building in one line against the principles, and only one no principle settles goes on, to the operator when it changes what they see or how they work, removes data or needs their terminal, otherwise to the design writer as a design line. Playbooks 02, 07 and 08, the glossary's design question, AGENTS.md, the code reviewer and the drawn overview still said only the operator or the design writer answers; they now say the rule. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfGKaxw984XyAPfLm4h	2026-11-11 23:53:03 +01:00
jschoubben	b6ea3a740c	Have the prepare read the code and list where design and code disagree In milestone 47/G's develop the lead answered over 100 questions, most of them a design line meeting the code: a form the code cannot take, or a part assumed built that was not. The prepare had read the design alone. The operator, 2026-11-11 about 23:45 CET: the prepare reads the code each design line lands in as well, and lists every such place before any developer starts; the lead answers each in one line against the principles. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfGKaxw984XyAPfLm4h	2026-11-11 23:50:17 +01:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

jschoubben

a2da2a3e74

Let the lead answer every design question against the principles

mesh/check checking a2da2a3e7451 on 87f2901f556b

mesh/delivery merged: source.main moved to novox/hq@87f2901f556b

Details

The operator replaced the instruction on implementing a design on
2026-11-11 about 21:48 CET: the lead answers each question met while
building in one line against the principles, and only one no principle
settles goes on, to the operator when it changes what they see or how
they work, removes data or needs their terminal, otherwise to the design
writer as a design line. Playbooks 02, 07 and 08, the glossary's design
question, AGENTS.md, the code reviewer and the drawn overview still said
only the operator or the design writer answers; they now say the rule.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfGKaxw984XyAPfLm4h

2026-11-11 23:53:03 +01:00

jschoubben

b6ea3a740c

Have the prepare read the code and list where design and code disagree

In milestone 47/G's develop the lead answered over 100 questions, most of
them a design line meeting the code: a form the code cannot take, or a part
assumed built that was not. The prepare had read the design alone. The
operator, 2026-11-11 about 23:45 CET: the prepare reads the code each design
line lands in as well, and lists every such place before any developer
starts; the lead answers each in one line against the principles.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfGKaxw984XyAPfLm4h

2026-11-11 23:50:17 +01:00

Playbook 07: the prepare reads the code; the lead answers design questions against the principles #562