Files
hq/04-ISSUES/149-a-declaration-that-shrinks-to-empty-is-skipped-not-sent/00-report.md
T
jschoubben 96bdffa9bc Two records were numbered 127; the second becomes 149, and is resolved
A number identifies a record, and two were given 127 on 2026-09-27. The one
three documents and three source files cite by number keeps it; the other
becomes 149, says so in its own heading, and its two inbound references are
repointed.

It is also resolved: an empty declaration is sent carrying owns_nothing rather
than skipped, and the host refuses an empty body that does not carry it, so
emptiness cannot be read as a truncated declaration.
2026-09-29 22:33:40 +02:00

59 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown

---
status: resolved
opened: 2026-09-27
located-in: [mesh-controller cmd/mesh-controller/push.go, mesh-controller cmd/mesh-controller/sendable.go]
fixed-by: mesh-controller sendable.go and push.go — an empty declaration is sent carrying `owns_nothing`, and the host refuses an empty body that does not carry it
---
# 149 — a declaration that shrinks to empty is skipped, so the node keeps what it should drop
*Opened as 127 and renumbered on 2026-09-29: two records were given that number on the same day.*
*The other kept it, because three documents and three source files cite it by number and nothing
cited this one but a decision and a sibling issue, both corrected with this move.*
## What was observed
Fixing the broker-opening leak (the foundation port scoped to the broker's host) made ace's
declaration compose to **zero resources** — ace is adopted with nothing assigned, and the
stray opening was its only resource. `push ace` then printed `ace is assigned nothing —
skipped` and sent nothing. ace goes on holding `adoption.opening-tcp-5671-incoming` in its
ufw, because it was never told the resource is gone.
`composeEach` (push.go) skips any node whose composed declaration has no resources. That is
right for a node that never had anything. It is wrong for a node that **had** resources and
now composes to none: the empty declaration is the correction, and skipping it leaves the last
non-empty one in force forever.
## Why it matters
Any adopted node whose openings (or other baseline resources) are all removed keeps the stale
ones until something else pushes a non-empty declaration to it. Converge is unaffected — it
composes the full ruleset fresh — so this is an incremental-push gap, not a firewall-safety
one. But "the mesh cannot tell a node to drop its last resource" is a real hole in reconcile.
## The fix, roughly
Send the empty declaration when the node's last-sent declaration was non-empty — i.e. skip
only when empty-and-was-already-empty. Requires push to know (or the host to be told) that the
node held something. Simplest: always send to a placed, enrolled node; let an empty declaration
mean "own nothing", which the host already applies correctly when it receives one.
## Workaround used
On ace, one command drops it permanently (the corrected controller never re-composes it):
`sudo ufw delete allow 5671`. At ace's converge it would clear on its own.
## Closed
*2026-09-29, in a grooming pass.* Both halves are on `main` and both name this issue.
- The control plane **sends** it: a declaration that composes to no resources goes out with
`owns_nothing`, and `push` says *sent, not skipped*.
- The host **refuses an empty body that does not carry it**, so a truncated or mis-composed
declaration can never be read as "own nothing" — which is the failure the fix had to avoid while
making the empty case expressible.
Closed by reading the code rather than by watching a machine let go of a stray resource; the record
says so rather than implying a run.