Files
hq/00-META/process/07-feature-branches.md
T
jschoubben 050a2d08e8 Playbook 07: a feature worktree needs the siblings the lab reads
A bed run from .work/<slug>/mesh-lab derives mesh-tools and mesh-sdk by
sibling path and fails at once when the directory holds only the touched
repos. Detached worktrees on main, never symlinks.
2026-09-21 00:27:01 +02:00

70 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown

# Playbook 07 — Feature branches across repos
**Trigger.** Work that changes code — in one code repo or in several at once (`mesh-sdk`,
`mesh-controller`, `mesh-catalog`, `mesh-host`, `mesh-lab`, and `hq` when a decision rides along).
**Who runs it.** Anyone who writes code, engineers and agents alike. Agents follow it exactly —
it is the guard against the failure it was written for.
## The failure it prevents
A feature was worked as a branch-and-MR per *unit of thought* — one per decision, one per
stacked increment — and each MR was treated as finished when it was *opened*, not when it was
*merged*. Across repos the same feature took a different branch name in each. The MRs piled up
unmerged: one session left **sixteen** stacked intermediate MRs that had to be consolidated and
closed by hand. An MR is a review checkpoint, not a scratchpad.
## The rule
One feature is **one branch name**, **one worktree per repo**, **one MR per repo**, opened
**once, at the end**.
1. **Name the feature once.** `feat/<slug>`. The *same* branch name in every repo the feature
touches — never a different name per repo, never a fresh branch per increment within the
feature.
2. **Isolate each repo.** One git worktree per touched repo under `.work/<slug>/<repo>`, branched
off `main`:
```
git worktree add .work/<slug>/<repo> -b feat/<slug> origin/main
```
Parallel features never collide, and no shared checkout is edited.
**Add the untouched siblings the lab reads.** The lab beds find the other repositories by
sibling path from the lab checkout (`../mesh-tools/module.json`, `../mesh-sdk`, …), the way
the main layout has them. A `.work/<slug>/` directory holding only the touched repos fails a
bed at once with `no manifest for mesh-tools at …/.work/<slug>/mesh-tools/module.json`, after
genesis has already passed. Give the directory those repos as **detached worktrees on `main`**
— never symlinks:
```
git worktree add --detach .work/<slug>/mesh-tools main
```
3. **Commit as you go — locally.** Increments land on the one branch. Nothing is pushed and no
MR is opened mid-feature.
4. **Finish, then publish.** When the whole feature is done — every repo, tests green — push
every branch and open **one MR per touched repo**, together.
5. **Merge promptly, once approved.** Every merge into `main` is notified and approved
([ADR 0023](../../02-DECISIONS/0023-approval-is-the-checkpoint.md)); once it is, merge —
do not leave it sitting. The branch is deleted on merge.
6. **Leave nothing behind.** After the MRs merge, no `feat/<slug>` branch and no `.work/<slug>`
worktree survive.
## What this is not
- **Not a licence to batch unbounded work.** A feature is a *bounded* unit; if it sprawls for
days, end-of-feature bloat merely replaces per-increment bloat. Split it into features, each
its own branch and MR.
- **Not a second trunk.** Every repo branches off `main`. There is no longer an `initialization`
trunk.
## How it is checked
The end state is visible, and its absence is the smell:
- After a feature merges, `git branch -r | grep feat/<slug>` and `git worktree list` return
nothing for it. A surviving branch or worktree means step 6 was skipped.
- A bed run from `.work/<slug>/mesh-lab` that fails naming a `.work/<slug>/<repo>/…` path it
cannot find is a missing sibling worktree, not a mesh fault.
- More than one open MR in a repo that share no feature name, or a stack of MRs none of which is
merged, is the failure this playbook exists to prevent — stop and consolidate before opening
more.