ADR 0201 gains the boundary found reading it back: a consumer keeping several
holders of a deriving provider is refused, because the two ends have no way
to agree. ADR 0189 gains two consequences — the sweep is bounded because it
runs inside a build, and an apply arriving mid-window reopens it.
That last one is issue 224, recorded rather than fixed: the host's rule for a
stopped container is to replace it, and while-stopped is the first thing that
makes a stopped container intentional. Both candidate fixes are decisions with
their own cost. Nothing is worse than it was; the store has never collected.
The front door for "something is wrong" at the level of the mesh's design or governance.
Diagnosis happens here, where the whole mesh is in view; the fix lands in the owning code
repository.
What belongs here
Belongs here
Belongs in the knowledge base
The design permits a failure to be silent
How to fix one occurrence of it
A documented rule is enforced by nothing
A command that works around it
A stated invariant is false in practice
A node-specific quirk
The owner is unknown and finding it needs the whole mesh in view
Symptom → fix, once the answer is known
The knowledge base already holds the operational record and is indexed on symptoms. This
folder is not a second copy of it. An issue here is a question HQ must answer; an entry
there is an incident someone must clear. An issue whose answer is a general lesson belongs in
both.
Structure
NNN-short-name/
00-report.md the symptom as observed, with the evidence; status in frontmatter
01-diagnosis.md the investigation trail, dated, including what was ruled out
Frontmatter, on 00-report.md
---status:open | diagnosing | located | resolved | wontfixopened:YYYY-MM-DDlocated-in:[]# owning repo(s) or module(s), filled by diagnosisfixed-by:# pull request or commit reference, filled at resolutionamended-design:# design doc path, when the root cause was a design gap---
Rules
Anyone may open an issue. No localisation is required to report one.
jschoubben
a3523617d3