jschoubben
c0b35652d0
papa-hq reads 01 research -> 03 decision -> 02 design. The order is a scar, not a choice: 02-DESIGN existed from its initial commit, and when adr/ was finally promoted on 2026-07-13 it took the next free number rather than its place in the sequence. By then design was too settled to renumber. hal-hq was three commits old, so it is not. adr/ becomes 02-DECISIONS and 02-DESIGN becomes 03-DESIGN, and following the folder numbers now walks the process in the order it happens: research produces a decision, the decision authorises a design. 00-GENESIS becomes 00-META, matching papa's rename from the same restructure. Every path reference rewritten across documents, frontmatter, playbooks and skills. All links resolve; all 58 frontmatter blocks parse and their path fields still point at files that exist.
4.7 KiB
layer, status, code, updated, decisions
| layer | status | code | updated | decisions | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| as-is | implemented |
|
2026-08-23 |
|
The catalogue, and what its shape says
The catalogue holds 124 modules. Thirty-three belong to the mesh's own domain; the other ninety-one run on the mesh rather than being of it (ADR 0015).
The count is not the finding. The shape is.
How it is organised today
By namespace, and the namespace records origin rather than purpose:
- The mesh's own namespace holds the platform: the runtime and its daemons, the shared library, delivery, provisioning, configuration synchronisation, knowledge, identity, the board, developer tooling, and node presentation.
- A second namespace holds the work domain — tasks, workflows, agents, meetings — split across a handful of packages that share one schema.
- Everything else sits flat at the top level, one directory per piece of software.
What the flat level actually contains
Grouped by what they are for — a grouping the catalogue itself does not express:
| Purpose | Roughly |
|---|---|
| Data and storage services the mesh provisions against | Relational and document databases, a cache, an object store, a package registry, a time-series store |
| Messaging and identity | A message broker, an identity provider |
| Reachability | A VPN, a firewall, an intrusion filter, an SSH daemon, a resolver, a certificate authority, a reverse proxy, network equipment control |
| Forge and container plumbing | Forge integrations, an image registry, container lifecycle and retention |
| Media libraries | Acquisition, organisation, playback, transcoding, streaming |
| Workstation and desktop | Browser, file manager, monitors, session management, audio, package management, runtime managers |
| Hardware-specific support | Power and firmware control for particular hardware, filesystem management |
| Collaboration and productivity | File sync, office tooling, boards, automation, chat and messaging bridges, mail, analytics, dashboards, home automation, issue trackers and wikis |
| Third-party organisation integrations | Systems belonging to organisations outside the mesh |
Every row is several modules, and no row is a thing the mesh can see. Four modules together constitute "how a node is reachable", and they have no relationship the mesh can assign, version, reason about or replace as one unit. A change to how the mesh handles connectivity is made four times.
What the shape records
The catalogue's shape records what was installed, not what anything is for. One module is the unit of one piece of software, because that is the only granularity the module system offers.
This is the same failure ADR 0015 names for the platform core — boundaries drawn by deployment accident rather than by domain — appearing outside it, at four times the scale. The core is being recomposed; the flat level is addressed in principle by ADR 0017, which deliberately does not yet settle the domain list.
Two properties worth keeping
Whatever replaces the shape, two things about it are right.
Uniformity. A media server and the mesh's own coordinator are installed, provisioned, delivered and verified by identical machinery. The mesh's own components hold no privilege — which is what makes dogfooding structural rather than a discipline, and what makes moving a module out of the repository safe.
Placement is already decided. A standalone application belongs in its own repository (ADR 0010), and reviewers reject it in the monorepo. The catalogue's flat level is not a dumping ground by policy; it is one by history.
Known inconsistencies in the catalogue itself
Recorded because a reader will meet them:
- A documented requirement that every capability-exposing module declare the core runtime as a dependency is met by zero modules.
- A firewall-scoping key is declared by five manifests and read by none
(
04-ISSUES/003). - A connections block in the manifest is metadata: it describes a module's reachability and wires nothing.
- At least one module deliberately runs outside the standard per-module supervision, for reasons recorded in the operational memory. The standard path is not universal.