Files
hq/.claude/skills/hq-new-issue/SKILL.md
T
jschoubben 93a1231e00 Retire the HAL name where it points forward
Skills take the hq- prefix: they are HQ process workflows, not mesh
workflows, and HQ is company-scoped now. hq-new-research, hq-graduate,
hq-new-issue, hq-diagnose, hq-amend-design, hq-handoff,
hq-sync-constitution, hq-status.

Forward-looking prose becomes Novox Mesh or simply the mesh — the root
README, AGENTS.md, the 00-META README, the mission's module example, and
one to-be document that addressed 'someone working on HAL'.

Three categories deliberately keep HAL, per ADR 0027:

The monorepo is still called hal on the forge. repos.md, every code: field
and every located-in: field name a repository that exists under that name,
and renaming them in prose would make them false.

The as-is layer and the research that measured it describe the system that
runs, and that system is called HAL. 124 modules, 9 daemons, a dead
containerised node — those are observations, not intentions.

Records 0001-0026 are immutable. A record says what was decided when it
was decided, and no record is edited for a name.

Also repoints ADR 0022's link at the renamed skill — a path fix, which the
immutability rule permits, not a change of meaning.
2026-08-23 21:26:09 +02:00

48 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown

---
name: hq-new-issue
description: Use when something is wrong with the mesh at the level of design or governance — a rule enforced by nothing, a stated behaviour that does not happen, a failure the design lets pass silently. Triggers on "this is broken", "open an issue", "that rule isn't enforced", "this reports success and does nothing".
---
# hq-new-issue
Opens a numbered issue. **Authoritative playbook:**
[`00-META/process/03-issues.md`](../../../00-META/process/03-issues.md).
## First, decide it belongs here
| Belongs in `04-ISSUES` | Belongs in the knowledge base |
|---|---|
| The design permits a failure to be silent | How to fix one occurrence of it |
| A documented rule is enforced by nothing | A command that works around it |
| A stated invariant is false in practice | A node-specific quirk |
| Finding the owner needs the whole mesh in view | Symptom → fix, once the answer is known |
**Search the knowledge base first** for the literal symptom text. If the answer is already
there, this is not an issue — it is a lookup. If the answer is a general lesson, it belongs in
both.
## Steps
1. Next free number. Create `04-ISSUES/NNN-short-name/00-report.md` with:
```yaml
---
status: open
opened: YYYY-MM-DD
located-in: []
fixed-by:
amended-design:
---
```
2. Write the symptom **as observed**, in plain terms, with the evidence that it happened —
what was run, what came back, when.
3. Say why it matters beyond the instance. An issue that is only one occurrence is a knowledge
base entry.
4. End with open questions rather than a proposed fix. Diagnosis is a separate step.
## Do not
- Do not name nodes, domains, addresses or paths. This repository is public.
- Do not guess the owner — `located-in:` is filled by diagnosis, not by opening.