Files
hq/04-ISSUES/004-certificate-issuance-targets-production/00-report.md
T
jschoubben e1febe8e0f Renumber the records 1 to 23
The consolidation left a sparse sequence -- 1, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 15, 16, 18,
19, 25, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 42, 44, 45, 48, 49, 58 -- where the gaps were only
the archaeology of what used to be there.

Renumbered contiguously. Renames run in ascending order, so every target number
is already free and no two files ever collide.

The reference rewrite is one simultaneous pass rather than a sequence of
replacements. Numbers moved into slots other numbers were vacating -- the node
host went 37 to 16 while the lab went 16 to 9 -- so replacing one at a time
would have cascaded and silently pointed things at the wrong record.

Seven plain-text references survived the merges as prose rather than links,
naming records that no longer existed: the enrolment token, the link boundary,
what a declaration is, reachability, the repository structure. Each mapped to
the consolidated record that now holds it.

Verified rather than assumed: every [ADR NNNN](path) link now has matching text
and target, checked across the whole repository, and the checker passes.

Frontmatter `consolidates:` lists dropped -- they named records that are gone,
and each consolidated record already says in prose what it absorbed.
2026-08-28 23:28:34 +02:00

38 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown

---
status: open
opened: 2026-08-22
located-in: []
fixed-by:
amended-design:
---
# 004 — Certificate issuance always targets the authority's production endpoint
## Symptom
The reverse proxy sets no staging endpoint for its certificate resolver. Issuance therefore
goes to the public authority's production endpoint in every case, including experiments.
## Why this matters
Production issuance is rate-limited per domain and per account. Every certificate experiment on
a real node consumes quota that is not replenished quickly, and exhausting it is not
recoverable by retrying — it removes the ability to issue a certificate anyone actually needs.
The consequence lands hardest on exactly the work most likely to iterate: standing up a new
node, changing how names resolve, or testing the lab's certificate authority split
([ADR 0009](../../02-DECISIONS/0009-the-lab.md)).
## Evidence
- The resolver configuration declares no staging endpoint.
- Observed 2026-08-22.
## Open questions
- Should the endpoint be a node property — production for nodes serving real traffic, staging
everywhere else — rather than a fixed proxy setting?
- The lab issues its own certificates and so does not consume public quota at all. Does that
make this a problem only for experiments run outside the lab, and therefore an argument for
running them inside it?