Files
hq/AGENTS.md
T
jschoubben 418261213c
mesh/merge-gate pass: the change touches no module of the mesh's graph
mesh/repo-check pass: THE CHANGE ALTERS ITS OWN CHECK (merge-check.sh): main's version judged it; the change's judges the pull requests after it merges; it…
mesh/delivery superseded: a newer head of the same pull request
Remove the decision records and research efforts, which the knowledge base now holds whole (issue 426)
ADR 0290 rule 9: once the import is checked record by record, hq keeps no copy.
The records and efforts are removed; every link or path to them reads "ADR NNNN" or
"research NNN"; a design's decisions: lists "ADR NNNN". 02-DECISIONS keeps a pointer
README with the reading order's six topics, which the knowledge base reads through the
records module; 01-RESEARCH keeps a pointer README. The checks drop the rules that
judged records (the knowledge base holds each at propose; checks/README.md says where)
and refuse a record written here again. Playbooks 01 and 02 and the skills write and
read records with the knowledge base's verbs.
2026-10-11 12:56:09 +02:00

101 lines
7.0 KiB
Markdown

# Agent instructions — Novox HQ
This repository is the source of truth for Novox's mission and design —
today almost entirely those of **Novox Mesh**, its first product (ADR 0019). Its decision records and
research efforts live in the knowledge base, the seat `knowledge-base` (ADR 0290), and nowhere here.
Implementation lives in the code repositories (see [`00-META/repos.md`](00-META/repos.md)).
Before changing anything here, read the playbooks in
[`00-META/process/`](00-META/process/) — every workflow (research, graduation, design
amendment, issues, build handoff, constitution sync) is documented there, and agents operate
through them. Thin skills in `.claude/skills/` wrap these playbooks for invocation
(`hq-new-research`, `hq-graduate`, `hq-new-issue`, `hq-diagnose`, `hq-amend-design`,
`hq-handoff`, `hq-sync-constitution`, `hq-status`); each defers to its playbook as
authoritative and adds only the mechanical scaffolding.
## The development cycle
Work enters as an **idea** (playbook [01 — research](00-META/process/01-research.md)) or a
**symptom** (playbook [03 — issues](00-META/process/03-issues.md)), becomes a **decision**
(in the knowledge base, via playbook [02](00-META/process/02-graduation.md)), lands in a
**to-be design** naming that decision, is handed to a code repository (playbook
[04](00-META/process/04-build-handoff.md), on a feature branch per playbook
[07](00-META/process/07-feature-branches.md)) — and on shipping the as-is is updated and the
design flips to `implemented`. **No design without a decision; no development without a design
that names its owner.** Enforced by [`00-META/checks/cycle.py`](00-META/checks/cycle.py)
alongside `records.py`, `index.py` and `words.py` — run all four before any merge here.
## Where to look (before assuming anything)
| Question | Read |
|---|---|
| What does this word mean? | [`00-META/glossary.md`](00-META/glossary.md) |
| How do I do X in this repo? | [`00-META/process/`](00-META/process/) — the playbook index is in `00-overview.md` |
| What was decided, and why? | the knowledge base, through the mesh MCP server: `knowledge-base.ask` with the question in plain words, `knowledge-base.get` with a record's number (`reasoning: true` for the why), `knowledge-base.holds` with a topic of the reading order ([`02-DECISIONS/README.md`](02-DECISIONS/README.md)) |
| What was researched? | the knowledge base: `knowledge-base.ask`, or `knowledge-base.get` with `kind: research` and its number |
| What is being built / already runs? | [`03-DESIGN/01-to-be/`](03-DESIGN/01-to-be/) / [`03-DESIGN/00-as-is/`](03-DESIGN/00-as-is/) — each doc's frontmatter says its status, decisions and owning code |
| What is broken or was? | the issue tracker: `issue-tracker.list` and `issue-tracker.get` through the mesh MCP server; a design or governance issue's narrative is in [`04-ISSUES/`](04-ISSUES/) under its number |
| Which repo owns what code? | [`00-META/repos.md`](00-META/repos.md) |
| Cross-cutting status view? | the `hq-status` skill (generated, never stored) |
A design's status lives **only** in its frontmatter; follow the pointers there (`decisions:`, `code:`)
instead of reconstructing history from memory. A decision record's and a research effort's status and links
live in the knowledge base (ADR 0290); `knowledge-base.links` gives a record's links both ways. An issue's
status, owner and fix live in the issue tracker (ADR 0275).
## Words
One name per thing. [`00-META/glossary.md`](00-META/glossary.md) is the authority on
vocabulary, organised by the mesh's domains (ADR 0244):
*controller* (not "control plane"), *foundation* (not "substrate"), *node-engine* (not "the host"), a
*node* is a machine the mesh has adopted, *seat* / *bench* / *claim*, *package* vs *artifact*. Use those
words. A retired word is named on its replacement's *Not:* line, and `00-META/checks/words.py` fails on it
in running prose; a quotation keeps its words.
## Ground rules
- **Markdown only** — but for the checks in `00-META/checks/` and `merge-check.sh` at the root, which
runs them on every pull request as its `mesh/repo-check` (ADR 0238).
No new top-level folders without explicit confirmation.
- **Status lives in YAML frontmatter** — on design docs (`layer`, `status`, `code`, `updated`,
and `decisions` as "ADR NNNN"). A decision record's and a research effort's status live in the knowledge
base, and an issue's status, owner and fix in the issue tracker, not here: an issue report carries
`opened` and nothing of its status (playbook [03](00-META/process/03-issues.md)).
Never create a central status file; cross-cutting views are generated when they are read.
- **No decision record or research effort is written here.** They live whole in the knowledge base and
are written with `knowledge-base.reserve` and `knowledge-base.propose` (playbooks
[01](00-META/process/01-research.md) and [02](00-META/process/02-graduation.md)); `records.py` refuses a
new path under `02-DECISIONS/` or `01-RESEARCH/`. A record is cited as "ADR NNNN" or "research NNN".
- **Decision records hold their meaning.** Supersede with a new record rather than rewriting
what was decided, the options weighed, or a consequence another record relies on. A **progressive
insight** — a correction of *fact* that leaves the decision standing — is a new version of the record,
marked and dated (playbook [02](00-META/process/02-graduation.md)). A fact going stale is not the
decision going wrong, and superseding a sound record for one buries it.
- **Design docs are prose and diagrams only** — no code. A manifest field may be named; a
manifest may not be pasted.
- **Two layers, never mixed.** [`03-DESIGN/00-as-is/`](03-DESIGN/00-as-is/) describes the mesh
that exists; [`03-DESIGN/01-to-be/`](03-DESIGN/01-to-be/) describes the one being built
toward. Every design doc says which it is in `layer:`. A statement about the future does not
belong in an as-is document, and an as-is document is never edited to describe an intention.
- **`00-META/how-we-build.md` is the source of the mesh constitution.** The knowledge-base
constitution page is derived from it — see playbook
[`05-constitution-sync.md`](00-META/process/05-constitution-sync.md). Never edit the
derived page directly.
## This repository is public
Nothing here may contain routable addresses, real domain names, hosting providers, node
names, absolute paths, usernames, credentials, or operational detail useful only to an
attacker. Use documentation ranges (RFC 5737, RFC 1918) and role names — `anchor`,
`home-server`, `workstation`, `laptop`, `the build node`, `the broker node`.
The test: would this paragraph still teach a stranger running an entirely different mesh?
If yes, it belongs. If it only makes sense to someone who knows this installation, it is
either a note in the wrong place or a disclosure. The full rule is in
[`README.md`](README.md).
## A rule states how it is checked
If a document states a rule about the mesh, it says how that rule is verified. An unenforced
rule is indistinguishable from a wrong one, and costs more, because people believe it.