jschoubben
f05e4a0dce
Research efforts move from status.md to 00-overview.md with active / graduated / abandoned, matching papa-hq so the two repositories read the same way. Playbooks, skills, README and the ledger follow. Reverses yesterday's withdrawal of the symlink note in GENESIS. The note was right and the withdrawal was wrong: the intent is that the mesh creates no symlinks at all, so a founding document listing "symlinks, not copies" as a design principle does point the opposite way from where this is going, and that is a contradiction rather than a stale detail. ADR 0018 records the position, proposed. ADR 0011 stays as it is — it is the historical decision and the incident behind it is why anyone believes either record — and is superseded in intent, not edited. Its one editorial line, which called the wider reading false, is corrected to state what is actually true: centralising who may link narrowed the incident class without closing it, because a link the installer makes resolves exactly like one made by hand. The argument that kept linking was staleness. ADR 0004 removed it: every managed file is already derived and reconciled, so a copy is the natural form and a pointer into source is the shape the mesh's own model forbids everywhere else. What is not settled, and is marked open, is how staleness gets detected — which is the decision that makes or breaks it.
2.2 KiB
2.2 KiB
status, initiated, touches, became
| status | initiated | touches | became | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| active | 2026-08-22 |
|
|
001 — Module domain decomposition
- Initiated by: jochen, 2026-08-22
- Areas touched: every
hal/*andnoxflow/*module; the pipeline's dependency graph; the knowledge base; agent identity and credentials.
Summary
HAL has 124 modules. That number is not a maintenance problem in itself — it is the symptom of missing bounded contexts. Modules are split not because they model different domains, but because splitting is the only lever the platform offers:
- no way to run one daemon on one node without making it a module
(
hal/claude-licences— one daemon, single-node) - no way to expose two of a kind from one module
- no namespace separating the mesh from the software it runs
This effort establishes the current state, the ideal state, and the sequence between them.
Trigger
A night of debugging that produced four fixes and one conclusion. Every fault was a boundary fault:
- Per-agent Claude credentials had to be written by the noxflow runtime, because
agents.claude_accountis in noxflow's database — even though agent identity is a mesh concept and node identity already lives in the mesh registry. - Whether
hal/brainmay depend on noxflow took three attempts to answer, twice wrongly, because the ownership boundary was never stated. - Authoritative documentation existed in
mesh_docsand was not found, while a proposal in repo markdown was invisible to search entirely.
Decisions taken (2026-08-22)
| Question | Decision |
|---|---|
| What should noxflow become? | Decompose into hal/* modules; noxflow returns to tasks/workflows |
| Who owns agent identity? | hal/agents — a mesh concept, alongside nodes |
| Where do third-party apps live? | Out of this repo. They run on the mesh; they are not of it |
| Knowledge structure | Modelled on papa-hq; implementation choice left open |
Open questions
Tracked in analysis.md under "Open questions".