Let a proposed record be withdrawn (issue 1081) #355

Merged
mesh-tools merged 3 commits from fix/1081-withdraw into main 2026-10-17 22:15:25 +00:00
Member

Issue 1081. The knowledge base could not withdraw a proposed decision or research effort; the operator decided on 2026-10-17 to withdraw ADR 0393, and four other records sit at proposed.

  • New verb knowledge-base.withdraw (kind, number, why): a proposed or reserved record becomes withdrawn as one new version by the caller, its pending version cleared; a waiting operator ask is ended and taken back on the router (as the controller takes back its asks), so the operator no longer sees an Approve for it; a failed take-back is logged and the withdraw stands. Refuses accepted, superseded, withdrawn and accepted-research records, and an empty why. The number stays spent.
  • The old reservation job is renamed WithdrawStale; it runs as before.

Unit tests for each case, each failing first. Review: round 1 one finding (the router's ask stayed open), round 2 approved.

Reviewed-by: reviewer-1081@g14 at 684e8801c4

Issue 1081. The knowledge base could not withdraw a proposed decision or research effort; the operator decided on 2026-10-17 to withdraw ADR 0393, and four other records sit at proposed. - New verb `knowledge-base.withdraw` (kind, number, why): a proposed or reserved record becomes withdrawn as one new version by the caller, its pending version cleared; a waiting operator ask is ended and taken back on the router (as the controller takes back its asks), so the operator no longer sees an Approve for it; a failed take-back is logged and the withdraw stands. Refuses accepted, superseded, withdrawn and accepted-research records, and an empty why. The number stays spent. - The old reservation job is renamed WithdrawStale; it runs as before. Unit tests for each case, each failing first. Review: round 1 one finding (the router's ask stayed open), round 2 approved. Reviewed-by: reviewer-1081@g14 at 684e8801c4200f64a659878bae7d0e81a245625d
mesh-tools added 3 commits 2026-10-17 22:10:16 +00:00
A dropped proposal or a stale reservation stayed proposed forever: there was
no way to say the operator decided against it. knowledge-base.withdraw takes
a reserved or proposed record to withdrawn as a new version naming why, ends
a waiting operator's ask and clears a pending review in the same version,
and refuses an already accepted, superseded or withdrawn record. The number
stays spent either way.

The old Withdraw (the background job for reservations never proposed) is
renamed WithdrawStale to make room for the new, caller-driven WithdrawRecord.
Take the ask back on the router when withdrawing a record (issue 1081, review round 1)
mesh/merge-gate head 684e8801c420 merged into trunk 3395af96bc34 — pass: builds mesh-knowledge → novox; no bus step; every machine composes with the change…
mesh/repo-check head 684e8801c420 merged into trunk 3395af96bc34 — pass: its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-…
mesh/delivery delivered
684e8801c4
WithdrawRecord only ended the waiting ask locally; the router kept it open, so
the operator still saw Approve/Decline for a withdrawn record and an answer to
it was dropped silently. It now also publishes a cancel on the router's
subject once the withdraw is saved, as the controller's asker does; a cancel
the router cannot be told of is logged and the withdraw still stands. The
module's existing "uses": ["operator-channel"] already grants this; no manifest
change needed, since the ask and cancel subjects are both under that seat.
Author
Member

Delivery novox/mesh-catalog@684e8801c420 — delivered since 2026-10-17T22:17:18Z

Delivery plan — builds mesh-knowledge → novox; no bus step

  • tier 0: mesh-knowledge
  • novox: receives mesh-knowledge

Machines

  • mesh-knowledge on every machine running it: sent

Transitions

  • 2026-10-17 22:10 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-catalog#355's head announced
  • 2026-10-17 22:14 proposed → checked (checked): a verdict names this commit and the trunk's head as its trunk commit
  • 2026-10-17 22:14 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail
  • 2026-10-17 22:15 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move
  • 2026-10-17 22:15 published → delivering (go): its walk started: let go by this owner in its group's order, by a person, or on the controller's own path — not a failed walk that carried a later commit for it, after which it waits for a walk of its own commit
  • 2026-10-17 22:17 delivering → delivered (done): its walk is done, carrying its own commit: every machine of its deploy plan passed, or was left as its policy says

The commit's note under refs/notes/mesh-plan keeps every transition: git log --notes=mesh-plan.

<!-- mesh-delivery:view --> **Delivery** `novox/mesh-catalog@684e8801c420` — **delivered** since 2026-10-17T22:17:18Z **Delivery plan** — builds mesh-knowledge → novox; no bus step - tier 0: mesh-knowledge - novox: receives mesh-knowledge **Machines** - mesh-knowledge on every machine running it: sent **Transitions** - 2026-10-17 22:10 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-catalog#355's head announced - 2026-10-17 22:14 proposed → checked (checked): a verdict names this commit and the trunk's head as its trunk commit - 2026-10-17 22:14 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail - 2026-10-17 22:15 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move - 2026-10-17 22:15 published → delivering (go): its walk started: let go by this owner in its group's order, by a person, or on the controller's own path — not a failed walk that carried a later commit for it, after which it waits for a walk of its own commit - 2026-10-17 22:17 delivering → delivered (done): its walk is done, carrying its own commit: every machine of its deploy plan passed, or was left as its policy says The commit's note under `refs/notes/mesh-plan` keeps every transition: `git log --notes=mesh-plan`.
Author
Member

Merge check at 684e8801
Judged: head 684e8801c420 merged into trunk 3395af96bc34; read beside it: mesh-controller 7c9c187ca6e2, mesh-controller-main 7c9c187ca6e2, mesh-host 6469e8238443, mesh-tools 7412c5b6c9c5

  • mesh/merge-gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: mesh-knowledge)
  • mesh/repo-check: PASS — its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)

Delivery plan — builds mesh-knowledge → novox; no bus step

  • tier 0: mesh-knowledge
  • novox: receives mesh-knowledge
  • read by no module's build: modules/mesh-knowledge/README.md, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/highest_test.go, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/kit_test.go, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/manifest_test.go, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/review_test.go, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/withdraw_test.go

Run by the build seat on ace as build-1792275026330081387 (builds --log build-1792275026330081387).

--- the gate: mesh-knowledge
note: mesh-knowledge uses the seat "operator-channel", which no module declares and the mesh does not define among the manifests given; registration judges it against the whole catalogue, and passing the declaring module's manifest too judges it here
mesh-knowledge: ok, 2 tool(s), invokes seat:issue-tracker.reserve, claude-code.claude_code_judge, claude-code.claude_code_judged, records.records_status, records.records_list, records.records_read, seat:operator-channel.notify, ready: keep by unit every 30s; watch by its tool knowledge_health every 1m0s
long-running resources without health: 0
files asking for a setting without saying whether it is trusted: 0
1 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here
judging 1 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-17T21:44:21Z says they run
composing every machine as the mesh is
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
composing every machine with the change
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-17T21:44:21Z

modules the change moves:
  - mesh-knowledge (changed)

machines:
  - a machine (f35): composes
  - holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes
  - holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-config, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-provisioner, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes
  - a machine (yvbpsm): composes

a merge would rebuild 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s): mesh-knowledge

notes:
  - modules/mesh-knowledge/README.md, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/highest_test.go, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/kit_test.go, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/manifest_test.go, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/review_test.go and modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/withdraw_test.go read by no module's build, and rebuild nothing (issue 280)
--- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain)
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/words	0.002s
words: 12 retired words and 70 daemons' lines, none in the 53722 strings of 807 files
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/agenthome	0.010s
agent-home: no archive and no file written into under the agent's home
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/mailstore	0.007s
mail-store: claimed only by mesh-mail
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/sshdir	0.015s
~/.ssh: named only by ssh-client
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/owned	0.006s
owned paths: every directory and archive says how it treats unknown files; no module declares inside another's directory
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/secrets	0.012s
secrets: no setting can replace a vault secret in a mergeable file (1 known, nested)
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/predefined	0.216s
predefined.json: 2 key(s), none removed that a module names
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/config	0.013s
config: no moved module says settings, takes-settings or ${setting:<key>}, or takes a whole layer (0 not yet moved)
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/templates	0.009s
templates: no module keeps a file's text inline but the 0 listed
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/paths	0.005s
paths: no module names another's state on its machine (3 known, listed to go)
long-running resources without health: 61, as kept
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/deps	0.193s
testing modules/mesh-knowledge
ok  	mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge	102.788s
--- its merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript toolchain)
**Merge check** at `684e8801` Judged: head `684e8801c420` merged into trunk `3395af96bc34`; read beside it: mesh-controller `7c9c187ca6e2`, mesh-controller-main `7c9c187ca6e2`, mesh-host `6469e8238443`, mesh-tools `7412c5b6c9c5` - `mesh/merge-gate`: **PASS** — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: mesh-knowledge) - `mesh/repo-check`: **PASS** — its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript) **Delivery plan** — builds mesh-knowledge → novox; no bus step - tier 0: mesh-knowledge - novox: receives mesh-knowledge - read by no module's build: modules/mesh-knowledge/README.md, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/highest_test.go, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/kit_test.go, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/manifest_test.go, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/review_test.go, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/withdraw_test.go Run by the build seat on ace as `build-1792275026330081387` (`builds --log build-1792275026330081387`). ``` --- the gate: mesh-knowledge note: mesh-knowledge uses the seat "operator-channel", which no module declares and the mesh does not define among the manifests given; registration judges it against the whole catalogue, and passing the declaring module's manifest too judges it here mesh-knowledge: ok, 2 tool(s), invokes seat:issue-tracker.reserve, claude-code.claude_code_judge, claude-code.claude_code_judged, records.records_status, records.records_list, records.records_read, seat:operator-channel.notify, ready: keep by unit every 30s; watch by its tool knowledge_health every 1m0s long-running resources without health: 0 files asking for a setting without saying whether it is trusted: 0 1 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here judging 1 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-17T21:44:21Z says they run composing every machine as the mesh is HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus composing every machine with the change HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-17T21:44:21Z modules the change moves: - mesh-knowledge (changed) machines: - a machine (f35): composes - holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes - holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-config, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-provisioner, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes - a machine (yvbpsm): composes a merge would rebuild 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s): mesh-knowledge notes: - modules/mesh-knowledge/README.md, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/highest_test.go, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/kit_test.go, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/manifest_test.go, modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/review_test.go and modules/mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge/withdraw_test.go read by no module's build, and rebuild nothing (issue 280) --- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain) ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/words 0.002s words: 12 retired words and 70 daemons' lines, none in the 53722 strings of 807 files ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/agenthome 0.010s agent-home: no archive and no file written into under the agent's home ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/mailstore 0.007s mail-store: claimed only by mesh-mail ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/sshdir 0.015s ~/.ssh: named only by ssh-client ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/owned 0.006s owned paths: every directory and archive says how it treats unknown files; no module declares inside another's directory ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/secrets 0.012s secrets: no setting can replace a vault secret in a mergeable file (1 known, nested) ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/predefined 0.216s predefined.json: 2 key(s), none removed that a module names ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/config 0.013s config: no moved module says settings, takes-settings or ${setting:<key>}, or takes a whole layer (0 not yet moved) ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/templates 0.009s templates: no module keeps a file's text inline but the 0 listed ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/paths 0.005s paths: no module names another's state on its machine (3 known, listed to go) long-running resources without health: 61, as kept ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/deps 0.193s testing modules/mesh-knowledge ok mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge 102.788s --- its merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript toolchain) ```
mesh-tools merged commit 0c56f60305 into main 2026-10-17 22:15:25 +00:00
mesh-tools deleted branch fix/1081-withdraw 2026-10-17 22:15:25 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Reviewers
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: novox/mesh-catalog#355