A group member refused for its own pending repo-check is asked its own check, not the composed one (issue 1049) #358

Merged

mesh-tools merged 1 commits from fix/1049-own-check-on-refusal into main 2026-10-18 02:41:26 +00:00

Conversation 2 Commits 1 Files Changed 3

+100 -10

mesh-tools commented 2026-10-18 02:30:12 +00:00

Member

Copy Link

Copy Source

Issue 1049, live on 2026-10-18 with the group feat/chain-on-the-bus. A sibling's new head put mesh-controller#378's mesh/repo-check back to pending, and only the member's own check sets it again. Each composed pass sets only the merge gate. After every merge the forge refused ("not a success: mesh/repo-check (pending)"), planGroup asked the composed check again (issue 1082's path), an endless loop. It ran seven times between 02:04Z and 02:24Z.

• planGroup: when a closed group's member is refused with only its own repo-check pending (no mesh/merge-gate in the list), it asks that member's own check once per head (ReadyRun.OwnAskedAt, cleared if the ask fails). Any other refusal keeps issue 1082's path and asks the composed check.
• The own verdict sets mesh/repo-check through gitea's statusesFor and leaves the composed gate standing. The merge is asked again within a minute on the standing Approve.
• New unit test TestAClosedGroupsMemberRefusedForItsOwnPendingStatusAsksItsOwnCheckOncePerHead failed on main first. The 1082 test is unchanged and still passes.

Once delivered, it frees the stuck group with no hand step.

Reviewed-by: reviewer-chain@shanks at b0ec4f6f14

Issue 1049, live on 2026-10-18 with the group feat/chain-on-the-bus. A sibling's new head put mesh-controller#378's mesh/repo-check back to pending, and only the member's own check sets it again. Each composed pass sets only the merge gate. After every merge the forge refused ("not a success: mesh/repo-check (pending)"), planGroup asked the composed check again (issue 1082's path), an endless loop. It ran seven times between 02:04Z and 02:24Z. - planGroup: when a closed group's member is refused with only its own repo-check pending (no mesh/merge-gate in the list), it asks that member's own check once per head (ReadyRun.OwnAskedAt, cleared if the ask fails). Any other refusal keeps issue 1082's path and asks the composed check. - The own verdict sets mesh/repo-check through gitea's statusesFor and leaves the composed gate standing. The merge is asked again within a minute on the standing Approve. - New unit test TestAClosedGroupsMemberRefusedForItsOwnPendingStatusAsksItsOwnCheckOncePerHead failed on main first. The 1082 test is unchanged and still passes. Once delivered, it frees the stuck group with no hand step. Reviewed-by: reviewer-chain@shanks at b0ec4f6f14056757a749c010328521d2b3e3c2bd

mesh-tools added 1 commit 2026-10-18 02:30:12 +00:00

A group member refused for a pending status of its own asks its own check once, not the composed check (issue 1049) b0ec4f6f14

mesh-tools commented 2026-10-18 02:30:17 +00:00

Author

Member

Copy Link

Copy Source

Delivery novox/mesh-catalog@b0ec4f6f1405 — delivered since 2026-10-18T02:43:13Z

Delivery plan — builds mesh-delivery → novox; no bus step

• tier 0: mesh-delivery
• novox: receives mesh-delivery

Machines

• mesh-delivery on every machine running it: sent

Transitions

• 2026-10-18 02:30 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-catalog#358's head announced
• 2026-10-18 02:34 proposed → checked (checked): a verdict names this commit and the trunk's head as its trunk commit
• 2026-10-18 02:34 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail
• 2026-10-18 02:41 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move
• 2026-10-18 02:41 published → delivering (go): its walk started: let go by this owner in its group's order, by a person, or on the controller's own path — not a failed walk that carried a later commit for it, after which it waits for a walk of its own commit
• 2026-10-18 02:43 delivering → delivered (done): its walk is done, carrying its own commit: every machine of its deploy plan passed, or was left as its policy says

The commit's note under refs/notes/mesh-plan keeps every transition: git log --notes=mesh-plan.

<!-- mesh-delivery:view --> **Delivery** `novox/mesh-catalog@b0ec4f6f1405` — **delivered** since 2026-10-18T02:43:13Z **Delivery plan** — builds mesh-delivery → novox; no bus step - tier 0: mesh-delivery - novox: receives mesh-delivery **Machines** - mesh-delivery on every machine running it: sent **Transitions** - 2026-10-18 02:30 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-catalog#358's head announced - 2026-10-18 02:34 proposed → checked (checked): a verdict names this commit and the trunk's head as its trunk commit - 2026-10-18 02:34 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail - 2026-10-18 02:41 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move - 2026-10-18 02:41 published → delivering (go): its walk started: let go by this owner in its group's order, by a person, or on the controller's own path — not a failed walk that carried a later commit for it, after which it waits for a walk of its own commit - 2026-10-18 02:43 delivering → delivered (done): its walk is done, carrying its own commit: every machine of its deploy plan passed, or was left as its policy says The commit's note under `refs/notes/mesh-plan` keeps every transition: `git log --notes=mesh-plan`.

mesh-tools commented 2026-10-18 02:34:02 +00:00

Author

Member

Copy Link

Copy Source

Merge check at b0ec4f6f
Judged: head b0ec4f6f1405 merged into trunk d3dd46a9fdb4; read beside it: mesh-controller 54070f5bc32b, mesh-controller-main 54070f5bc32b, mesh-host 6469e8238443, mesh-tools 7412c5b6c9c5

• mesh/merge-gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: mesh-delivery)
• mesh/repo-check: PASS — its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)

Delivery plan — builds mesh-delivery → novox; no bus step

• tier 0: mesh-delivery
• novox: receives mesh-delivery
• read by no module's build: modules/mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery/group_test.go

Run by the build seat on shanks as build-1792290615343902123 (builds --log build-1792290615343902123).

--- the gate: mesh-delivery
note: mesh-delivery uses the seat "operator-channel", which no module declares and the mesh does not define among the manifests given; registration judges it against the whole catalogue, and passing the declaring module's manifest too judges it here
mesh-delivery: ok, 1 tool(s), invokes seat:mesh-controller.delivery-plan, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-check, seat:mesh-controller.deliver, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-backups-again, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-stop, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-walks, seat:mesh-controller.forget-checks, gitea.gitea_note_append, gitea.gitea_delivery_view, gitea.gitea_commit_status, gitea.gitea_commit_statuses, gitea.gitea_contains, gitea.gitea_open_pulls, gitea.gitea_merge_pull_request, gitea.gitea_add_comment, seat:operator-channel.notify, keeps state deliveries, groups, asked, pulls
long-running resources without health: 0
files asking for a setting without saying whether it is trusted: 0
1 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here
judging 0 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-18T00:18:06Z says they run
composing every machine as the mesh is
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
composing every machine with the change
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-18T00:18:06Z

machines:
  - a machine (f35): composes
  - holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes
  - holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-config, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-provisioner, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes
  - a machine (yvbpsm): composes

a merge would rebuild 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s): mesh-delivery

notes:
  - modules/mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery/group_test.go read by no module's build, and rebuild nothing (issue 280)
--- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain)
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/words	0.003s
words: 12 retired words and 70 daemons' lines, none in the 53777 strings of 807 files
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/agenthome	0.013s
agent-home: no archive and no file written into under the agent's home
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/mailstore	0.009s
mail-store: claimed only by mesh-mail
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/sshdir	0.018s
~/.ssh: named only by ssh-client
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/owned	0.008s
owned paths: every directory and archive says how it treats unknown files; no module declares inside another's directory
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/secrets	0.015s
secrets: no setting can replace a vault secret in a mergeable file (1 known, nested)
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/predefined	0.279s
predefined.json: 2 key(s), none removed that a module names
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/config	0.017s
config: no moved module says settings, takes-settings or ${setting:<key>}, or takes a whole layer (0 not yet moved)
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/templates	0.012s
templates: no module keeps a file's text inline but the 0 listed
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/paths	0.006s
paths: no module names another's state on its machine (3 known, listed to go)
long-running resources without health: 61, as kept
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/deps	0.237s
testing modules/mesh-delivery
ok  	mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery	12.367s
--- its merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript toolchain)

**Merge check** at `b0ec4f6f` Judged: head `b0ec4f6f1405` merged into trunk `d3dd46a9fdb4`; read beside it: mesh-controller `54070f5bc32b`, mesh-controller-main `54070f5bc32b`, mesh-host `6469e8238443`, mesh-tools `7412c5b6c9c5` - `mesh/merge-gate`: **PASS** — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: mesh-delivery) - `mesh/repo-check`: **PASS** — its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript) **Delivery plan** — builds mesh-delivery → novox; no bus step - tier 0: mesh-delivery - novox: receives mesh-delivery - read by no module's build: modules/mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery/group_test.go Run by the build seat on shanks as `build-1792290615343902123` (`builds --log build-1792290615343902123`). ``` --- the gate: mesh-delivery note: mesh-delivery uses the seat "operator-channel", which no module declares and the mesh does not define among the manifests given; registration judges it against the whole catalogue, and passing the declaring module's manifest too judges it here mesh-delivery: ok, 1 tool(s), invokes seat:mesh-controller.delivery-plan, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-check, seat:mesh-controller.deliver, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-backups-again, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-stop, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-walks, seat:mesh-controller.forget-checks, gitea.gitea_note_append, gitea.gitea_delivery_view, gitea.gitea_commit_status, gitea.gitea_commit_statuses, gitea.gitea_contains, gitea.gitea_open_pulls, gitea.gitea_merge_pull_request, gitea.gitea_add_comment, seat:operator-channel.notify, keeps state deliveries, groups, asked, pulls long-running resources without health: 0 files asking for a setting without saying whether it is trusted: 0 1 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here judging 0 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-18T00:18:06Z says they run composing every machine as the mesh is HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus composing every machine with the change HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-18T00:18:06Z machines: - a machine (f35): composes - holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes - holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-config, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-provisioner, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes - a machine (yvbpsm): composes a merge would rebuild 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s): mesh-delivery notes: - modules/mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery/group_test.go read by no module's build, and rebuild nothing (issue 280) --- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain) ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/words 0.003s words: 12 retired words and 70 daemons' lines, none in the 53777 strings of 807 files ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/agenthome 0.013s agent-home: no archive and no file written into under the agent's home ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/mailstore 0.009s mail-store: claimed only by mesh-mail ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/sshdir 0.018s ~/.ssh: named only by ssh-client ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/owned 0.008s owned paths: every directory and archive says how it treats unknown files; no module declares inside another's directory ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/secrets 0.015s secrets: no setting can replace a vault secret in a mergeable file (1 known, nested) ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/predefined 0.279s predefined.json: 2 key(s), none removed that a module names ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/config 0.017s config: no moved module says settings, takes-settings or ${setting:<key>}, or takes a whole layer (0 not yet moved) ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/templates 0.012s templates: no module keeps a file's text inline but the 0 listed ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/paths 0.006s paths: no module names another's state on its machine (3 known, listed to go) long-running resources without health: 61, as kept ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/deps 0.237s testing modules/mesh-delivery ok mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery 12.367s --- its merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript toolchain) ```

mesh-tools merged commit 798d6fd685 into main 2026-10-18 02:41:26 +00:00

mesh-tools deleted branch fix/1049-own-check-on-refusal 2026-10-18 02:41:26 +00:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

Reviewers

No Reviewers

Labels

Clear labels

mesh/ready

Reviewed and ready: mesh-delivery merges at the marked head once its checks pass (hq ADR 0364)

No labels

Milestone

No items

No Milestone

Projects

Clear projects

No projects

Assignees

Clear assignees

agent-ace agent-g14 agent-novox agent-shanks jschoubben mesh-tools miel.truyen nox-agent

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: novox/mesh-catalog#358