jochen e69506a26f
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds zfs, sent nowhere; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed
mesh/delivery superseded: a newer head of the same pull request
Make the zfs module safe to put on the home server, and give it the pool's scrub schedule
The safety review of the first version found it safe for the pool's data and asked for these fixes before
it goes on the home server:

- zfs_snapshot: no recursive. Every answer gives the dataset's free space and the pool's capacity, and
  says that the snapshot holds every block deleted or overwritten until it is destroyed by hand.
- A command that runs out of time is ended with its whole process group. An act that timed out is
  answered from the list, or as "outcome unknown", never as "NOT DONE".
- The watch runs as the operator account.
- The event follower reads ZFS's queue from its start, with a cursor per boot, so the pool's import and
  any downtime reach the journal once. It writes "dropped N events", kills zpool before waiting for it,
  and exits non-zero after five failed follows in a row.
- Past error counts are a warning, and counts that rise are unhealthy.
- The guard test catches .Run(, exec.Command(, exec.CommandContext( and process starts.
- The fixtures and the parser follow OpenZFS 2.4.4's own printers: human scan sizes under -p, no iostat
  section lines, error scrubs, per-vdev rebuild resilvers, paused scrubs.

The operator also asked the module to own the scrub. A timer and a service of the module's own run
zpool scrub -w -- <pool> from the scrub-pool, scrub-cadence, scrub-day and scrub-time settings. In the
same declaration, the distribution's weekly and monthly timers for that pool are held stopped and
disabled, so exactly one schedule scrubs it. zfs_scrub shows the schedule and the next run, with any
resilver's progress. zfs_scrub_start, zfs_scrub_pause and zfs_scrub_stop act with why. The health check
warns of a late or failed scrub and of a running resilver, and is unhealthy for a resilver that finished
with errors.
2026-10-09 01:17:34 +02:00

mesh-catalog

The Novox Mesh catalogue. The modules the mesh builds, provisions and runs — as manifests, one per module under modules/.

This is data, not a control-plane concern. The manifests describe what a module is: what it provides, what it requires, the seats it claims, the resources the host applies for it. The engine that reads them — parsing, eligibility resolution, sealing, declaration emission — lives in the control plane (novox/mesh-controller, internal/catalogue), which consumes this repository as a build source. The host (novox/mesh-host) applies the declarations the control plane emits. Neither is here.

What a module is, and is not

A module is one thing the mesh can run, named once, described completely by its manifest. A manifest names its image (pinned by digest), the resources the host owns for it (directories, files, the container, the private network it joins), what it requires from a provider and what it provides to consumers, and the sealed secrets it needs filled on the machine.

  • Core mesh components are not modules. The node host, the foundation, the control-plane contexts and the surfaces are the mesh itself; they ship as their own repositories (mesh-host, mesh-foundation, mesh-controller, mesh-surfaces, mesh-sdk), not from here.
  • Standalone applications are not here either. A larger application lives in its own repository with its manifest at the root, registered with the mesh as a build source (novox/hq ADR 0010). This repository holds the modules the mesh maintains as its shared catalogue; an application the mesh merely hosts keeps its manifest beside its own code.

So there is one home for the catalogue the mesh owns, and every application that runs on the mesh rather than being of it carries its own — both reach the pipeline the same way, as a registered source.

Layout

modules/<name>.json      one manifest per module

Flat, because the catalogue's shape carries no meaning: a module is found by its name and described by its manifest, and what relates two modules — a shared seat, a claim, a provider/consumer edge — is data inside the manifests, not a directory the tree encodes (novox/hq, the domain-grouping question closed in favour of seats, claims and tags).

The manifest contract

The shape a manifest must satisfy is owned by the control plane's catalogue engine and is what validates a manifest before a machine ever sees it — a stray key, a consumer contributing the wrong provision field, an image that nothing builds. That validation belongs with this repository and is being re-homed here from mesh-controller; until it is, the pipeline is the gate — it builds each module and refuses a manifest it cannot resolve.

Where the reasoning lives

Design and decisions are in novox/hq:

  • 02-DECISIONS/0002-everything-is-a-module.md — one unit, no second mechanism
  • 02-DECISIONS/0010-applications-live-in-their-own-repository.md — why applications are not here
  • 02-DECISIONS/0030-the-repository-structure.md — the repositories, and the open tier-4 question this repository answers
  • 03-DESIGN/00-as-is/10-module-catalogue.md — the catalogue's shape, and what it records
S
Description
Novox Mesh — the catalogue. Module manifests the mesh builds, provisions and runs. Data, not a control-plane concern.
Readme
89 MiB
Languages
Go 77.2%
Shell 11.2%
TypeScript 9.9%
C++ 1.6%