A merge the controller hears is now kept in the bucket of the merges (ADR 0539 §17); the test that sends one passed
only when an earlier test on the shared bus had made that bucket.
Every grant #456 gives was already feat/r6's, by the SDK's names: each conflict takes feat/r6's side, with main's
test of the user list before the switch kept beside feat/r6's, and the duplicate assertion of the digests' bucket
dropped.
The first want at the switch skips the record hold only where it changes nothing on the node. A slice differing only in
the bus's user list is marked user-list-only, so no yes waits on it at the switch; any other change at the same
fingerprint is judged as any move, against the declaration's digest.
Its want names a composition (ADR 0539 clauses 1 and 6), so a module whose needs others meet must still have one at
its fingerprint, or no want could ever be written for it. Found by the served test.
Assignments and builds live on the bus (ADR 0408), so a fixture written before the chain was attached was not what
the serving controller read; and push, which the row test used, went with the plans.
The tests no longer call the writer on a bus without permissions: the controller runs as it serves, the builder and
the indexer write their own keys as their own accounts, and the operator's rotate is the real verb, so a subject the
user list does not grant fails them as it would fail the mesh.
With no send left nothing else writes a missed grant, so the take-in of a done key returns it and tries again every
half minute under an urgent condition until it is written. plan-moved and sent go with the plans. The controller's
first-start deletions are said on a granted subject, a node hears only its backup holder, and the operator's account
writes the hand path, an object replaced included (ADR 0539 clauses 2, 7, 10 and 13).
The object store reads an object's metadata and purges its old chunks when it replaces one, so the hand path is
granted the direct and message gets and the purge of each node's object stream; a test on a bus running the composed
user list walks the hand path end to end.
A node applies exactly the composition its want names (ADR 0539 clause 1), which may be a revision a newer one
replaced: its files over 64 KiB stay until no want names it.
The user list is a file in a directory the bus's container mounts, so it read as moving data and held every new
credential for a person's yes, against ADR 0539 clause 7; mesh-sdk's UserListOnly lets the assigner write such a
revision at once.
The new controller says its first start's deletions as an event, a node-engine hears only its backup holder, and the
way back right after the switch, a want and a composition written at the terminal, runs on the user list today's
controller composes (ADR 0539 clauses 2, 10 and 13). The operator is the administrator person, the one second
writer ADR 0539 names.
The switch to release 6 is today's controller's last plan, and the bus runs the user list it composes until the new
controller writes one: so the new controller's writes of each node's compositions and their digests, each new
node-engine's reads of its own compositions and wants and its backup holder's verbs and word, and the assigner's read
of the digests must be granted by this controller already (ADR 0539 clauses 2, 6, 9 and 16; the review's A1).
A node away during the switch finds its last declaration on the stream; once every node's have names the
node-engine registered, no node reads one, so the stream and the nodes' consumers on it go, said once, and a raise
leaves them out (ADR 0539 clause 11).
jschoubben
mesh-tools