A refusal stood for its part whenever no ask was open, so after the retry
was taken and answered, "Questions for you not delivered" came back with
the old words for an hour, then again after each answer. A refusal is now
current only while no ask was made after it that the router did not refuse;
the verdict wait applies only to that newer ask. Tests reconcile inside the
wait and after an answer.
The router refused an ask while its channels had not yet said they could
send; both could twenty minutes later, and the controller repeated that
refusal every minute for eleven hours, escalating "Questions for you not
delivered" on it, because a refused ask was asked again only when the
channels' claims changed.
A refused ask is now asked again after 1 min, doubling with each refusal
in a row, at most 30 min, and at once when the channels change. While the
router's word on an ask made again is awaited (2 min), the condition
stands as it was, so it neither flaps nor clears early; once the ask is
taken it clears; a new refusal is said in its own words. Its explanation
no longer says its verdict twice.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without …
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without …
A what-if named the build seat's holder as packaging the controller's
source, "rebuilt without their own source moving", while it was in the
plan because an open plan had not built it yet. The what-if and the merge
log now say, per module, which changed files of its build source moved it,
or that it is read whole and why: no build source recorded, a newer build
failed, or a plan has not built it yet.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
The gate passes only the manifests a change touches, so a module that starts using the operator channel
was refused for a declaration it could not see. Over every manifest it stays a refusal.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
A module that asks the operator acts with its own grants, and the hand-act log is where a person's
decisions are read back. The new verb warranted records who chose, how and with which proofs from the
router's record, never the caller's word, once per ask however many instances ask.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
A plan that closed without building a module hid a missed merge from it;
a window of recent plans let an old closure back in once the plan that
overtook it slid out; a merge the forge gave no time was acted on again
every pass. A plan answering the merge's own commit is now a look at it,
and clocks a little apart do not make a merge history.
A failed build, or a plan closed before reaching a module, left the
closure its last good build said, and a fix-forward to a newly imported
package would have moved nothing. A missed merge moving only a module
that packages the repository was never caught up, and an older merge
read as history for it through a look that was not its own. The gate,
a pull request's check, the what-if and a delivery's order now read the
same view the merge handler does.
Every merge to the controller's repository planned the controller, the
build seat's holder and the route proxy in three gated tiers, whatever it
changed (issue 338). The planner now maps a merge's files onto the build
source each module's newest trunk build said: a README moves nothing, the
controller's command the controller alone, the proxy's program the proxy
alone. A module with none said, or one an open plan has yet to build, is
read whole as before. Sharing a repository draws no packages edge any more,
and one recorded before neither widens nor orders a plan.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
A merge to the controller's repository moved the route proxy and the build
seat's holder whatever it changed, because nothing said which files their
builds read. A build of a trunk commit now says its build source per
repository: a Go program's import closure, an archive's directory, an
image's recipe and the package it names in the new 'compiles' field. That
image is built from its build source alone, so a recipe reading past it
fails by name, and its fingerprint is over what it was handed.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
After the operator removes by hand what the last search found, no apply says so and nothing searched again
until the next day. node setuid-search <node> signs the ask as a hand-over is, under its own context, on a
subject only the node's engine hears and only the controller may publish.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
The node-engine's search has no bound any more: it runs at idle priority
and judges from its last complete, fresh result. The controller's quiet
while an agent account waits is the engine's rootsearch.Quiet, not the
old fifteen-minute bound, and the node-engine is pinned at its pull
request.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
The reviewer found that the logged reason quoted the refused fragment: a
hash-shaped secret would reach the journal, and a changing clock time
defeated the once-per-kind dedupe. The reason is now logged without its
quoted fragment, the test resets the dedupe so it repeats, and a module
name too long for the headline falls back to the machine.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
The secret-given condition's explanation carried a clock time, which the
plain rule refuses, so the operator read the scope's fallback ("needs a
look") instead of what changed. Its words now carry no time and say the
secret's name as words; a test holds them to the rule through a keeper.
With no test hook set, the keeper logs a refused or missing wording once
per kind and reason, so a fallback is never silent again (hq issue 359).
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
The subject proved nothing: the bus lets any principal allowed to answer reply to a message it received on the reply subject that message named, so a tool server — the operator's account, every agent — could deliver a hand-over to an engine. The controller now signs the ask with the mesh's key over a fixed context (node, path, who asked, a minute's expiry, a fresh nonce), as declarations are signed, and the engine verifies it. The writers table gains the row for mesh.node.*.ask.hand-over; the subject's comment no longer claims who the engine hears. The line's known-node check and the refusal branch are tested; every check was removed in turn and a test failed.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
A module's condition told the operator to run the node-engine's hand-over at the machine, as root (issue 339), and the mesh had no channel for it. Now node hand-over <node> <path> is the controller's terminal's — a node subcommand that is not a read, so every verb and mesh-cli outside the terminal refuse it — and asks that node's engine on mesh.node.<node>.ask.hand-over, a request only the controller may publish and only that node's engine may hear and answer (its grant gains the subject and the right to answer what it was asked). The line's node and path are judged before anything is asked; the engine's answer is printed, a refusal as a refusal. Every text addressed to the operator names the nox line (ADR 0272); the condition's words stay plain.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
The grant is composed from the router's assignment and reaches the bus when its machine is next
pushed. Between assign and push the record said a router was here and the bus refused every ask
(seven refusals on 2026-10-09, 17:54 to 17:56). The asker now judges, as a push does, whether the
bus's machine was last sent the user list composed now; while it was not, nothing is published, it
is said once, and the conditions that need the operator are raised as undelivered, naming the push
that carries the grant.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
On 2026-10-09 a release's gate on the control node read the machine's
report against a newer send another plan had just made there, failed
three builds the machine had reported healthy, and put them back on
every machine to a controller older than the store's schema; that
controller then passed the newer plan's gate from its own health.
- A gate keeps what its send carried (digest, sequence) and reads the
report against it; a report on the last send is on it too.
- A gate judges only the build the machine was last sent: another build
there supersedes the judging — no verdict, nothing put back.
- A controller is told its build (MESH_CONTROLLER_VERSION, ${version}
in a process's env) and records how far it reads the store's schema;
a put-back to a build that reaches less, or never said, is refused
and the current build kept, said as urgent.
- A release's open gate holds other sends of its modules there, and a
plan's own first send waits on it.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
A secret given at the controller's terminal through mesh-cli (secret accept … --from -) never reached the
line: every line ran with no standard input. A line that runs as the terminal now reads what mesh-cli
carried (at most 64 KiB); an ordinary call carrying any is refused and nothing runs; the calls record keeps
only that some was given, the journal and the answer nothing of it.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
The terminal path's order is one function, keepGiven, so the test fails when the announcement before a
trusted party's secret is removed, and when a failed announcement still keeps it. give also refuses a
machine the mesh does not know, as the secret's or as the desk, before the prompt (the final review).
A desk's prompt is answered over the desk machine's bus, on a subject that machine's runtime answers;
on a desk machine agents run as the operator, who holds that credential, so an agent could answer first
with a bot token of its own sealed to the call's key. The secret of a module running as an account of
its own (the Telegram bot's token) is now refused at the desk, before anybody is asked, naming the line
to type at the controller's terminal; there it is announced on every channel, the old one among them,
before it is kept, and not kept when that announcement fails. What is typed at the terminal is not
echoed. Tests: the refusal with nobody asked, and only the desk machine's launcher may answer its
prompt (MaySubscribe).
Restacked on #157, which carries #164's rule that no verb runs secret accept. give's line carries no value:
the operator types it into the desk's hidden prompt, sealed to the call and then to the module's machine.
Only that exact line passes: a value, a file, a provider or any extra word stays the terminal's.
The review of 2026-10-09 (M4):
- give refuses broker (the bus account issue mints) and any own secret the mesh may make itself;
- the desk's prompt is asked by module, secret and machine, never with words of the caller's, and the
bus denies the prompt's subjects to every principal but the controller, however wide its grant, so the
prompt's 'the controller asks' is the bus's word (Permissions.PublishDeny, broker.ControllerOnly);
- secret accept with a value is refused through a verb: a value comes from the terminal or the desk;
- every value given for an own secret, at the terminal or the desk, raises the urgent condition
secret-given on every channel, until the operator silences it.
Choosing Silence silenced the condition, the condition was no longer wanted, and the next reconcile
cancelled the Restart or Release ask beside it: an acknowledgement, which any desk click may give,
took an approval back. An open approval ask now stays until it is answered or expires while its
condition is open and silenced with the same answers. The test silences as the controller does; it
failed before (0 open) and passes, and the kept Restart is performed on its warrant.
rehearse refused only a verb's process. Since mesh-cli (ADR 0272 §4) the serving controller runs an
ordinary mesh-cli line without a verb, naming its caller: such a line, from an agent's account, read as
the terminal and could start a question the operator did not ask. rehearse now asks
startedAtTheTerminal. And main's mesh-cli test helper asked is cliAsked, beside the asker's asked.
- M1: a condition offering both kinds of answer is asked twice: its authorising answers about the
condition, its acknowledging ones (Silence) apart, so an answer from a channel that only acknowledges
never ends an approval.
- L2: the asked store creates once and changes only over the revision it read, deciding again on what it
reads; a stale cancel no longer writes over an act.
- L3: every ask is kept before it is published, one whose publishing failed is marked unsent and asked
again, and a cancel is kept before it is said. The terminal's test question is now `rehearse`, so it is
not called what the glossary calls a drill; its two answers are both approve-level.
- L7: two deliveries of one warrant to two controllers at once act exactly once, on a real bus.
- Re-vendored onto mesh-sdk 76902998 (canonical digests): an option binds an asks.Act with each argument
as arg.<name>.
- The lab's bus fixture composes verified-sender only where the lab says its machine is root-free
(MESH_LAB_ASKS_ROOT_FREE=true).
With no router, or an ask the router refused and nothing changed since, the controller asked nothing
and said it only in its own log. It now keeps a condition of its own, asks-undelivered, naming the
conditions not asked and why, cleared once each can be asked again.
The live acceptance needs an approval the operator can ask for at will and that changes nothing. A
drill is asked like any condition's ask, bound to its own act, claimed once on its warrant and recorded
as a warrant hand-act with who answered, through which channel and the proofs. A verb's process may not
start one, so no agent asks the operator a question they did not start.
Every option the controller asks with carries the digest of its verb, machine, arguments and level
(the SDK's Option.Binds). A warrant must name the digest of the ask the controller keeps, and before
acting the controller checks that the act it is about to perform is the one the option bound: a
record changed after the ask is refused, never performed. mesh-sdk moves to d4077b4.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
The review of PR 179 found four paths no test held: which of two earlier
plans NewestMergeOf takes, a tie between them, gaps kept across a second
reopening in one keeper, and a merge time's fraction of a second.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
- A reopened fault keeps its gaps: it was there at a send unless the send
fell in one, so a send that breaks a machine recovered before it still
fails its gate (A2).
- An undecided part holds only the conditions that name it (A4).
- D2 holds a silent resolver for the next run again, refused or not: a
burst of refusals is also a restart (A3).
- A late merge is planned at the newest planned merge of its branch in any
state, not only an open one (A1); merge times to the nanosecond (A5).
A merge acted on late by the catch-up made its plan after the plan of the
merge that followed it, superseded it by creation time, and folded its
unbuilt modules into a plan at the older commit: on 2026-10-09 the
forge's security fix (a082615b) was superseded by 8ff8197a. A plan now
keeps its merge time (migration 0086), supersession follows it, and a
merge older than an open plan of its branch is planned at that plan's
commit, which contains it.
On 2026-10-09 the control node's resolver refused from 10:57:57 UTC. A
node-engine restarted by the 10:59:34 send said its names undecided, that
statement cleared the network condition, the next look raised it again
after the send, and the gate put back two builds for a fault older than
them.
- A condition keeps First across a reopening; the gate reads Began.
- An undecided network statement (unknown, starting) clears nothing.
- D10 counts what a release's tier names as rolling, so a walked
node-engine is not core-behind on its own first machine.
- D2 raises a resolver that refuses every try at once: a refusal is an
answer, not a loaded resolver (issue 277).
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
The confirmation review of 2026-10-09 found D-root and DA writing one key, machine.<m>.agent-root, from
two probes with different words, so it flapped every run; D-root is now root-not-free. D-root raised the
urgent condition after every node-engine restart while the first setuid search ran; it now keeps the
same quiet window as DA, and the root-free verb still answers that machine not free. agentConfined
takes the judging clock.
The confirmation review asked who may answer root-free on the bus. Composed from the controller's own
manifest, the module principal of the machine running the controller and that machine's runtime were
granted the controller seat's tool subjects too: either could answer root-free, and the runtime's
credential is one an agent on that machine may hold. The controller's seat is now served by the
controller principal alone, in grants and memberships; TestOnlyTheServingControllerMayAnswerRootFree
failed before (3 answerers) and passes. And a machine waiting for its first setuid search is not
root-free, whatever ADR 0266's quiet window does to the self-check.
The router's contract names the machines as a JSON array. A verb's argument declared a list now takes
an array of names (or one text separated by commas), and refuses anything else in it.
The agent-root probe read the sudo module's answer, given in the machine's runtime as the very account
an agent could become, and took a missing account, a missing answer or no accounts as a pass. One
judgement now decides: the machine names an agent account its node-engine judged unable to become
root within 15 minutes (agentConfined, mesh-controller #164), and the login shell's execute is not
served there; anything not read is not free. The probe raises agent-root on it, the new root-free
verb answers it live for the router, and a push composes verified-sender for a kind only while its
machine and the router's pass it.
jochen
mesh-admin
jschoubben