Commit Graph
287 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
mesh-admin 17b8f14fe1 Merge pull request 'A module's state on the bus: buckets from the catalogue, grants, membership (hq ADR 0201)' (#257) from feat/module-state-on-the-bus into main 2026-10-04 01:43:36 +00:00
jschoubben b9ad7a2948 Review before merge: refuse a silent disagreement, and bound the sweep
Three things found reading this back, each of which would have been quiet.

A consumer that keeps several holders of one provision (ADR 0094) gets a
login per holder, and a provider derives from the login — so it would make a
resource per holder while the consumer is told one value for the requirement.
That is issue 124's own failure one case to the side: authenticate, then be
refused on every object. Refused now, naming both ends.

The sweep runs inside somebody's build and was unbounded. At most two hundred
artifacts and sixty seconds, stopping at the first refusal because a store
that refuses one refuses all; the rest is offered again next build.

The citation and migration renumbers are in the commit before this one.
2026-10-04 03:27:32 +02:00
jochen cde22ff627 module check names a read of state its owner does not keep, and says what each module keeps and reads (novox/hq ADR 0201) 2026-10-04 02:50:02 +02:00
jochen aec55b7072 A module's state on the bus: buckets from the catalogue, grants, membership (novox/hq ADR 0201)
A manifest names the state it keeps (state) and reads (reads); the controller
asserts a key-value bucket per name on every raise, grants owners write and
readers read (measured against a running server), issues each assignment its
buckets in the membership, and reports buckets nothing declares without
removing them.
2026-10-04 02:40:49 +02:00
jschoubben c7884f5a72 The store keeps what the records name (hq ADR 0189)
The mesh names what may go from its own build records — a digest it did not
record making is never named, which is what keeps the sweep away from the
images genesis pushed. An artifact stays because a definition the mesh holds
names it, or because it belongs to one of the five most recent successful
builds of its module.

internal/artifacts asks the store to let go of one; internal/inventory
decides and remembers (migration 0055); the sweep runs after a build the mesh
recorded, which is when both the bytes and the keep set moved. Never fatal to
a build.

And the manifest side of while-stopped, refused from the definition alone:
no schedule, run-once, a container the module does not declare, itself.
2026-10-04 02:32:19 +02:00
jochen c23be73d4d Run the controller as a Go bundle the host starts as a process (hq issue 213)
The controller is a Go program and was the one piece of the mesh's own Go
code still shipped and run as an image (novox/hq issue 213; ADR 0188 §1:
a module's own code is bundles; §3: a service bundle is a process).

The manifest now builds one Go bundle, `controller`, and runs it as the
process `mesh-controller` (`./mesh-controller serve`) under an account
the module declares. What the container gave it, replaced:

- host network: a process is on the host's network; nothing it reads
  names a container network
- user 65534: the account `mesh-controller`, which owns its secrets and
  its state directory
- the eight mounts: the env names the host paths the mesh already places
  (the store, broker and bus files under the state directory, the
  broker's certificate under /var/lib/mesh-broker-tls); the `broker`
  mount was read by nothing and is gone with the others
- `container-runtime` is no longer required on its machine

Its preparation is the same binary with `prepare`, as a run-once process,
and the process `replaces` the container `server`: the host keeps the
container answering until the process is running (mesh-host). Needs the
previous commit live in the running controller, and the host's
`replaces` on the controller's machine, before it is registered.

No image is built by the mesh any more. The Dockerfile stays for genesis
and the lab (`make image`, its Go base now pinned in the Makefile).
2026-10-04 01:45:25 +02:00
jochen e11caecdad Let two controllers overlap safely while one hands over to the other (hq issue 213)
The controller's machine moves it from the container to a process by
starting the process first and removing the container once the process
is up (mesh-host's `replaces`). For that moment two controllers share the
store and the bus. Checked what each does:

- the seat's verbs: a queue group per seat, each call answered once. Safe.
- the controller's consumers on CONTROL and EVENTS: push consumers with
  no delivery group, so the second bind is refused with "consumer is
  already bound" and serve exited. The process would restart for ever,
  the host would never see it up, and the container would never go. The
  second controller now stands by and binds when the first lets go
  (tested on a real bus; fails without the change).
- plans: read, changed and saved whole by the 30s timer, by build
  outcomes, by a merge and by `plans stop`. Two timers would each ask a
  tier the other had just asked. Working the plans now takes a
  session-level advisory lock on the inventory: the timer skips while
  another holds it, the other paths wait for it. Build asks happen only
  inside plan work and are covered by the same lock.
2026-10-04 01:11:26 +02:00
jochen 9745c1ab31 An older build request never replaces a newer one's artifact
Builds of one module in flight together finish in any order, and the mesh
took whatever it heard last as what the module is: RegisterModule overwrote
the module's manifest unconditionally, and Held/BuiltAgainst/ReadRepositories
ordered builds by when they were recorded. A postgres build asked before the
mesh-tools runtime fix finished after the one asked after it, and the next
push deployed the stale image (novox/hq issue 219).

A build is now ordered by when it was asked, read from the build-<nanos> id
the controller writes: build.asked and module.built_asked (migration 0055).
A registration from an earlier request than the module's current one is
recorded and refused as superseded. A plan takes as its outcome only a build
asked at or after its own ask, so an earlier plan's leftover build cannot
settle a later plan. Ids of any other shape keep the old order.
2026-10-04 00:22:11 +02:00
jochen 74efe8e2e7 Tests follow the grants and issue 203: a person may ask what answers; the resolver test mints its credential 2026-10-03 23:15:57 +02:00
jochen 50cf253a43 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/fix/issue-215-a-commit-is-never-a-branch-to-follow' into integrate 2026-10-03 23:12:03 +02:00
jochen 980a0dee93 integrate: 214 2026-10-03 23:12:03 +02:00
jochen 6784efae75 A commit is never a branch to follow (hq issue 215)
A build asked at a commit recorded that commit as the module's ref. Every merge after it failed to
match the module and its plan left it out without a word, and every plan that rebuilt it asked for
the same old commit again. Registration now keeps the branch the module followed (the default
branch for a new one); matching and re-asking read a recorded commit as the default branch, which
heals records already pinned this way; and a merge says which modules of its repository it leaves
out because they follow another branch.
2026-10-03 22:22:08 +02:00
jochen d86baebe9a A plan settles an asked build from the build records (hq issue 214)
A merge to the controller's own repository replaces the controller in its first tier; the build
that produced the new one was recorded, the plan never heard it, and it waited for ever with every
later plan behind it. The record is the fact: a build recorded after the ask is the tier's outcome,
whoever was listening when it came.
2026-10-03 22:20:33 +02:00
jochen 58b4fcb8c8 A bundle stands on the toolchain it is compiled in (hq issue 211)
A manifest names its toolchain by language, not in build.on, so the planner did not know a bundle
depends on the module that publishes its toolchain and built the two in one tier: the bundle
against the old toolchain, recorded as built from the new commit. The edge is read from the
manifest, so it holds before any build recorded it, and a toolchain that moves rebuilds every
bundle compiled in it.
2026-10-03 22:18:20 +02:00
jochen e67c58cd98 Every serving principal may answer the services discovery for what it serves; the controller announces its seat (hq ADR 0197)
Grants: a principal that serves tools subscribes $SRV.PING/$SRV.INFO and those questions under
each name it serves — its own and no other's; the tool runtime and people may ask. The controller
answers discovery for the mesh-controller seat in NATS's services format, one endpoint per verb it
serves, with the seat's description and schema. module list --json says which modules declare tools,
so the console expects an announcement only from those.
2026-10-03 22:11:00 +02:00
jochen 85873b19e1 node list and module list answer --json, and the nodes and modules verbs use it (hq ADR 0195)
The console's discovery reads the machines and the modules; parsing a printed column breaks when it
is reworded. Both now answer JSON on --json, as status and seats do, and the seat verbs ask for it.
2026-10-03 21:55:35 +02:00
jschoubben 11e4bc0ba1 The roster is the machines: each node's internal domain covers its routes (hq ADR 0191)
The roster published routed names — public ones first, then (in this PR's first take) internal ones
told apart by suffix. Neither is needed: a node has one internal domain and every route on it is a
name under it, answered by the resolver's per-node wildcard; a node's public domains are public
DNS's. routeNamesInTheMesh and NamesServed are removed, and a test pins .Names to the machines.
2026-10-03 16:10:16 +02:00
jschoubben e56f3aa1cb The roster publishes a route's internal name, never its public one (hq ADR 0191)
NamesServed read a route's public `name` and plan.go then filtered by suffix — telling the mesh's
names from public ones by their spelling, when the mesh composed both itself. It now publishes the
`internal-name` it composed under the serving node (ADR 0151); the suffix filter is gone.
2026-10-03 15:39:05 +02:00
jschoubben 408f6dbad9 The mesh answers only its own names privately; a public name resolves publicly (hq ADR 0191)
Every routed public name was published into each machine's hosts region at its serving node's
private address. ace's resolver also answers its LAN, so a phone there got the control-node's
tunnel address for the mail server and could not connect. Routes have internal names under the
serving node (ADR 0151), so only names under the mesh suffix are published now.
2026-10-03 15:14:01 +02:00
mesh-admin eae0577567 Merge pull request 'Issues 203 and 206: an assignment issues its credential; the controller owns a worker's shape; the build seat's holder follows the controller' (#233) from fix/issues-203-206 into main 2026-10-03 09:49:54 +00:00
jochen 28853a251b The build seat's holder follows the controller that defines its worker (hq issue 206)
A plan is ordered by artifacts and says nothing about what must be running before what (ADR 0162);
on 2026-10-03 that put the build machine in tier 0 and the controller in tier 1, and the new build
machine could not bind the worker the old controller had defined. One running order enters the
graph, named as its own edge: a module claiming the build seat follows the control plane, and the
built-by edge from the control plane to that holder yields to it — the controller is built by
whichever build machine is running, as the runtime image always was. The edge orders a plan and
never widens it, like built-by.
2026-10-03 04:04:41 +02:00
jochen f86f6a74f0 A declaration is numbered when it is composed, and a send is recorded even by a sender being replaced (hq issue 204)
On 2026-10-02 a runtime assigned and applied on two machines was undone two seconds later by a
declaration that had the assignments of a minute earlier. Every path composes from the records at
compose time and holds the machines it sends — but the number went on at SEND time, after
composing, so a declaration composed before an assignment changed and sent after a newer one
carried the higher number, and the host, which rightly refuses a lower number, took the older
content as the mesh's newest word. The record of that send was never written either: it is written
after the declaration is away, on the sender's context, and the controller sending it was being
replaced in that very second — status read "applied, current" over a machine just told otherwise.

Now the number is taken before the composition reads anything, in every path, so what was composed
earlier is numbered lower however late it goes out and the host's refusal does what it is for; and
what was sent is written down on a context that outlives the sender, bounded, so a dying controller
still records what it told a machine. The `declare` command — a declaration a person sends by hand —
records its send too. Proven: compositions in one order and sends in the other keep the numbers in
composition order; a send is recorded after the sender's context is cancelled.
2026-10-03 04:02:36 +02:00
jochen a3e8a4185b An assignment issues its bus credential, a push refuses one nobody issued, and what reads a secret restarts on it (hq issue 203)
`assign` recorded a module and `push` sealed a random own secret where its bus credential belongs;
the process crash-looped until a person ran `module issue` and pushed again, and the only warning was
one line in a list printed on every push. Now assigning a module that declares a broker secret issues
the credential in the same act — kept when one exists, so re-assigning rotates nothing — and when the
bus cannot be reached from here the assignment says which verb to run. A push never seals a
placeholder in a credential's place: a module whose bus user is unminted is refused by name, with the
verb. The control plane's own user is the installer's, seeded at genesis, which the test now says.

And what reads one of a module's own secrets is restarted when it changes — composed for a container
or daemon that names the secret's path in its volumes, environment or env-files, so a manifest need
not say it: the build machine ran on an hour-old credential because its manifest restarted it on its
environment file alone (issue 206). A scheduled or run-once process is left alone; it reads afresh.
2026-10-03 04:01:17 +02:00
mesh-admin 78de54381b Merge pull request 'A seat's work is shared by its holders: node-build-agent, pulled one ask at a time (hq ADR 0190)' (#228) from feat/a-seats-work-is-shared-by-its-holders into main 2026-10-03 00:53:42 +00:00
jochen ff5ef0ab60 The controller asks the build role that has a holder, and hears both roles' outcomes (hq ADR 0190, the handover)
A controller that asked node-build-agent from its first run would queue every build where nothing
pulls, and the build that registers build-agent — the first holder — would be among them. So the
role is chosen at ask time from the catalogue: the current role when any assigned module claims it,
the retired one while only the builder does, the current one when neither. Outcomes are followed on
both seats, the controller may publish to both, and a build's log is read under whichever role did
it; a machine on the retired role is proven on the bus to take that role's asks. The switch order
is written where the role is named, and the retired half is marked for removal with the seat row.
2026-10-03 02:51:03 +02:00
jochen a5d6a1187c A build machine serves the seat its credential claims (hq ADR 0190, the handover)
After the build role moved to node-build-agent, nothing would hold it until build-agent is
registered — and registering build-agent needs a build outcome that only the running builder
could produce, bound as it was to the old seat by name. One binary, two roles: the seat a machine
serves is the first its credential claims, as the mesh writes the claims beside the credential it
issues (ADR 0159); the old builder keeps draining mesh-build-machine, a build-agent takes
node-build-agent, and what each says about a build goes out as that seat's events, so an outcome
is heard where the asker of that seat listens. A credential naming no claim serves the current role.
2026-10-03 02:47:49 +02:00
jschoubben 7d82751862 The bus is never public: the broker port is no longer a foundation opening
The controller widened the bus's from-mesh port to from-anywhere on the
broker's host so a machine could enrol before it had a tunnel. ADR 0169
has machines join through the tunnel and decides the bus is never public;
every live bus connection already comes from the mesh.
2026-10-02 22:52:22 +02:00
mesh-admin 08bb56f1d3 Merge pull request 'The controller composes one tool runtime per node: its principal, the bundles, its process, and the gate (hq ADR 0175, to-be 38 WP2)' (#223) from feat/the-operators-machine into main 2026-10-02 19:27:52 +00:00
jschoubben 1c8fe65601 node show cites ADR 0180 for a removed front end (hq ADR 0186)
Another session took 0175 while that record was in review; the line printed on every converged
machine was pointing at an unrelated decision.
2026-10-02 18:42:16 +02:00
jochen 8eb6c3e94a A tool container on the runtime's image is refused once the runtime is registered (hq ADR 0175, to-be 38 WP2.4)
A module declaring tools, a container, and a build on mesh-tools' runtime image is a container whose
purpose is serving tools — the pattern the node's tool runtime retires. Once node-tools is in the
catalogue, registering one is refused by name, with the record that says why; before, it is accepted
as it always was, so a mesh converts in the design's order and nothing is refused before there is
anything to move to. This is the mechanism that keeps the old pattern from returning by habit.

Judged from a repository manifest's own build.on, and for a built manifest — which carries no build
— from what its build stood on, now recorded beside the commit as part of a module's provenance.
2026-10-02 18:30:14 +02:00
jschoubben 21d38c9b0e A control plane behind its seat's row serves what it can (hq ADR 0185)
One verb in the row that this binary cannot run aborted the start, and a stale push that put an
older control plane back took the whole mesh off the bus for ten minutes — recoverable only by a
person running the binary outside its service, because the push that repairs it is one of the verbs
that had stopped being served. Now the verbs it knows are served, the ones it does not answer the
reason, and the start names them once.
2026-10-02 18:16:24 +02:00
jochen 1f86ed4135 One runtime principal per node carries every assigned module's tools (hq ADR 0175, to-be 38 WP2.1)
Where the node-tools module is assigned, the machine's bus user list gains one principal of kind
node-tools in place of that module's own: it may subscribe every carried module's tool namespace
and every held seat's verbs on its node, read and follow every membership on its node, call any
tool anywhere, answer what it is asked — and consume nothing, because tools are what it runs.
Every other module keeps its own principal, so a module still serving tools from its container
holds its own credential until it moves.

Named exactly as the module it stands for, so `module issue` and `rollout mint` deliver its
credential through the path a module's already takes, into node-tools' own `broker` secret. The
runtime module's name is one constant in each of the broker and catalogue packages, held to one
string by the agreement test, because a rule turns on it.
2026-10-02 18:16:14 +02:00
jochen a9307d9f33 The controller seat gains a generic verb: command runs one line of the binary and answers what it printed
Beside the named verbs, `command` takes a command line as the controller's
own shell would — `node account g14 jochen`, `node show ace`, `module list` —
splits it as a shell does (quotes group, backslash escapes, nothing expanded)
and runs it in this binary like every other verb. The named verbs keep their
schemas; this is the whole binary, added because the operator decided any
node may call any tool (hq ADR 0175) and a verb per command was the only
thing keeping the rest behind a shell on the control node. ADR 0154 carries
the dated note. Tests: a plain line, quoted words, an empty line and an
unclosed quote refused.
2026-10-02 16:53:27 +02:00
jschoubben 424406b2d6 node show says a found firewall that was uninstalled is removed (hq ADR 0175) 2026-10-02 16:27:39 +02:00
jschoubben b5df244096 The mesh says what filters a converged machine: filters kept per node, shown by node show, named by status, and previewed with their fates (hq ADR 0168)
A host reports every table and chain that refuses traffic with its owner,
and a converged machine's found firewall's state. The controller keeps both
on the node's record (migration 0054), shows them on node show, names every
converged machine something other than the mesh filters in status — text
and JSON, and such a machine is not well — and the converge preview lists
what filters the machine with the fate of each: retired with the front end,
left as the runtime's, left as a ban, or left in force and not the mesh's.
What was invisible for eleven hours (issues 144, 145) is said by name.
2026-10-02 12:00:12 +02:00
jschoubben db84142d38 The controller's tools can set an assignment's settings
Per-machine and mesh-wide settings could be set only from the
controller's command line. The settings verb runs settings set|clear,
passing the values inline, which the command now accepts as well as a
file (novox/hq issue 198).
2026-10-02 11:41:57 +02:00
jschoubben fbc3d320ea A take acts on the preview it showed; a setting is judged where it is stored; a kept network and a minted secret are said (hq ADR 0163)
take ends its preview with a digest and --yes names it, as the flip does; a
changed preview or an account older than the flip allows is refused. A module
the machine holds nothing for has nothing to compare, and --yes suffices. A
published port's reach is said as the machine reported it. Every secret the
module holds on the machine is listed with where it came from, and one the
mesh minted for a service whose data was found refuses unless --mint names it.

One judgement of a module's settings against its definition, in the catalogue:
settings set refuses what cannot compose or reaches nothing, naming node,
module, layer and key; Compose leaves out a module whose definition moved
under a stored setting, the envelope says so (left_out), plan and push say it
by name, and the machine is told everything else. A stray setting no longer
refuses the whole machine where it is read (issue 096).

The per-machine setting networks keeps a found network for a taken container,
on an adopted machine only; the container's declaration carries it and the
preview names it (rule 4).
2026-10-02 11:01:09 +02:00
mesh-admin cf495e315f Merge pull request 'The proxy is told its routes and the mesh on the bus, and serves internal names to the mesh only (hq issue 191, ADR 0167)' (#207) from jschoubben/an-internal-only-route into main 2026-10-02 07:42:45 +00:00
jschoubben c9eba5f3b8 The controller's tools can issue a module its bus account
A module's account was mintable only from the controller's command line,
so a rollout that gave a module one could not be finished through the
mesh's own tools (novox/hq issue 191). The issue verb runs module issue
for a module on a machine; the caller pushes the machine after.
2026-10-02 01:55:06 +02:00
jschoubben 24f024dd74 The proxy is told its routes and the mesh on the bus, and serves internal names to the mesh only
The proxy answered every routed name to any request carrying it, so an
internal-only route would have been public under its internal name. Each
membership now carries what its module receives, from the same
composition as its received file, and every machine's private-network
address, the list the packet filter's "from the mesh" is. The proxy
follows its membership, serves internal names only to those machines and
itself, and keeps the file until the bus has spoken (novox/hq ADR 0167,
issue 191).
2026-10-02 01:46:30 +02:00
jschoubben 0a40c046cf plans --what-if: the plan a merge would produce, read before merging
Given a repository and the files a branch changes (or the modules by name), plans answers with the tiers
the merge handler would produce — the modules those files touch, what packages their source, everything
reachable along the dependency relation — and what each tier does: built and sent to its machines, or
built and left because its policy records. Saved nowhere. On the seat as plans {repository, paths|modules}.
2026-10-01 22:38:49 +02:00
jschoubben 477d3ac9a7 A plan rolls out every tier it built
A dependent rebuilt because its base moved, or a module that packages another repository's source,
keeps its source commit; the catalogue announces no move for it, and its machines kept the old image
until somebody pushed — forty-three modules after every runtime-image merge (hq issue 189). When a tier
is built, the plan now sends the machines of every module in it whose policy rolls out, once, moved
commit or not; a module whose policy records is built and left, as its policy says. The gate between
tiers waits as before for the ones a later tier is built by.
2026-10-01 22:21:42 +02:00
jschoubben 3ca1f5d26a A plan sends what it waits for
A tier whose module a later tier is built by waited for the machines running it to report after the
build — and relied on the catalogue's moved event to send them. A rebuild from the same source commit is
not a move the catalogue announces: the build machine rebuilt for a controller change kept its commit,
nothing sent it, and the plan waited on a report that would never come (2026-10-01, 19:45Z). The plan
now sends the machines running a gated module once, records when, and waits for the reports after that.
2026-10-01 21:54:40 +02:00
jschoubben 40f169229d A converged machine says its strays too
node show printed what a machine reports only for an adopted one; a converged machine holds nothing
and can still run a container nobody asked for (hq ADR 0163), so its strays are said whatever its mode.
2026-10-01 21:41:23 +02:00
jschoubben 73a34cc0a7 A take is a comparison: the preview, its refusals, the strays, and the policy said at build (hq ADR 0163)
The host now reports, for every held thing, the facts a take compares; the controller keeps them, and
take puts them beside what the module declares — the found image and its age against the declared one,
the found networks and who else is on them, ports and mounts, a found file's difference from the
declared content — and refuses a downgrade without --downgrade and a differing file without --replace
<path>. Without --yes the comparison is printed and nothing is taken. node show lists the facts and
the strays the machine reports. build and the daemon's take-in say when a module's policy rolls the
result out at once. The own-secret refusal points at the provider form for a required secret.
2026-10-01 21:25:27 +02:00
jschoubben c430ca76f0 The rest of the mesh is quiet about a machine it resolved without the excluded one's offers
With one machine excluded, the others are resolved without its offers, and one that consumes them
cannot resolve by design — the view is partial, the machine is not dropped. The line that names a
dropped machine now speaks only for the whole-mesh view (seats), where a drop is a fault (hq 188).
2026-10-01 20:53:27 +02:00
jschoubben dcf6278523 The rest of the mesh resolves each machine with its own pins, and says which machine it leaves out
The second pass of theRestOfTheMesh resolved every machine without its pins. Since a machine with two
providers of one provision is refused unless a pin names one (195/196), the control node was refused
there and vanished: every seat it holds read as unheld, the build machine refused what needs the git
seat, the roll-out was refused — and nothing said why (hq issue 188). Each machine is now resolved as
its plan resolves it, with its pins; a machine left out is named with the resolver's words.
2026-10-01 18:22:17 +02:00
jschoubben d94f9e7f9f A built-by edge orders and gates a plan; it never widens it — and plans stop
The first live plan took seventy-five modules along for a controller change: the builder packages the
controller's source, everything is built by the builder, so everything was reachable. A module built by
the build machine is not changed by a new build machine. Reachability now follows the code and build
edges only; built-by still orders a tier after the build machine and gates it on the machine's roll-out.
plans stop <id> ends a plan by hand: what was asked still builds and registers, nothing further is asked.
2026-10-01 18:16:47 +02:00
jschoubben 882687afd4 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into fix/a-machine-not-on-the-network-is-said 2026-10-01 18:16:14 +02:00
jschoubben 884c088949 A machine the network filter drops is said, not skipped in silence (hq issue 188)
onTheNetwork resolves every machine unchecked and skipped one whose resolution refused. A machine
skipped there has no address, so its own plan fails on the first placeholder that needs one, in another
module's words, every seat held on it reads as unheld, and what is built from it cannot be built — four
symptoms, none naming the refusal (2026-10-01, the control node, forty minutes). The refusal is now said
where it happens, in the resolver's own words.
2026-10-01 18:14:34 +02:00