Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jochen 8adb7f1a05 Give each pending assignment its own condition, and keep a raised row until it clears
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed
mesh/delivery-group group fix/assign-says-why-a-module-is-not-there delivering: 1 of 2 delivered
mesh/delivery superseded: a newer delivery to the same trunk took over its walk
Second review of #150: one key per machine and module let a newer failure
be cleared in the tick that raised it, pruning could orphan an open
condition, and a build no longer waited for read as never asked although it
may still run.
2026-10-08 16:45:43 +02:00
jochen 249d97d1c8 Make pending assignments safe to race, settle them on a tick, and say only what was checked
Review of #150: a withdrawal could land between the look and the act, a
failed ask read as a build in flight, a request kept the wrong asker, a
build being registered read as not built, build "true" could ask a build
nothing waited on, and a status read changed state. Claim a row under the
machine's hold before making it, keep a request only once asked, settle on
the controller's own tick, raise an assignment not made as a condition
until it is answered, and tie each row to its machine.
2026-10-08 16:38:11 +02:00
jochen 7d63d2e68c Say why assign finds no module, and keep an assignment pending on its build
A merge asks for a new module's build, and assign answered "no module of that
name" until the build registered it, which read as a module nobody registered
(hq issue 325). Keep every build request, tell a build in flight, a module
known and not built, and an unknown name apart, and make an assignment made
while the build runs when the build registers the module.
2026-10-08 16:38:11 +02:00