Beside each sealed connection genesis wrote, the port this machine put the
seat's holder at: `${seat:mesh-store:5432}` for the three stores,
`${seat:mesh-broker:…}` for the bus, the plain AMQP port and the management API.
Filled from the node's settings when the control plane composes its own
declaration; empty — the sealed value stands — when the mesh has nothing to add.
On its own, after the commit before it is built and running: a control plane
that does not know the placeholder passes it through as the value, and this
manifest is composed by whatever control plane is running when it is pushed.
The reader ignores an unfilled placeholder either way, and a test holds it to
ignoring exactly what this manifest says.
novox/hq 04-ISSUES/102
Three readers did not follow a moved foundation port (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/102),
and each took the control-node down in its own way: the control plane's own
store and broker connections, sealed at genesis with the port inside; and every
build the mesh ever recorded, kept as `<registry>:<port>/<module>/<artifact>@…`.
The control plane cannot open its own sealed connections to move a port, and it
cannot bind the store as a consumer would — a binding mints a credential. So its
settings get a third twin, `NAME_PORT`, read on top of the sealed value by the
store, the broker, the management API and the bus connection, and filled into
its container by a placeholder that names a seat, `${seat:mesh-store:5432}`,
from the node's given or mesh-assigned ports — never the manifest's number, and
empty when the mesh has nothing to add, so what genesis wrote stands. A value
that is still a placeholder is nothing said, aloud: the manifest naming it lands
in the next commit, once every control plane that composes it knows it.
A build is now recorded by digest and path — `artifact-store://<module>/<artifact>@…`
— and the store's address is composed in where a reference is used: the
declaration, the trust file, the bases a build is handed, a replay to the
catalogue. Over the network as `<node>.internal:<port>`; on the store's own node
before any network exists — every genesis push before its "network" step — by
loopback. A reference recorded before this, with an address, is re-routed the
same way when the mesh built it. The trust file and every provider's address
come from one derivation: the node's given port, over the mesh's assignment,
over the manifest's number.
novox/hq 04-ISSUES/102
Review of the registry work found the seat node-scoped: a second `distribution` on another
machine resolved cleanly there, and only afterwards did the mesh notice `artifact-store`
offered by two nodes, with every consumer elsewhere refusing to choose. A node-scoped
requirement with one candidate installs that candidate, so anything that wanted the store
beside it would have raised a fresh, empty store on the wrong machine first.
The claim is mesh-scoped in mesh-catalog now; this holds the catalogue's manifest to it —
a second store anywhere is refused by name, where it is assigned.
On an adopted hub the private network takes over the tunnel it finds rather
than running beside it (hq ADR 0105): two tunnels leave the mesh's unreachable
through the provider's filter, so no machine can ever join.
The node presents the found tunnel when it enrols, under the key it took as
its own; the inventory records it (node.tunnel, tunnel_peer — migration 0031)
and the mesh composes from it: the overlay's range is the adopted tunnel's,
the hub is placed at the tunnel's address on the tunnel's port, and every
peer the tunnel had is carried in the hub's peer list as a peer of the
tunnel, not a node of the mesh, until a node enrols with that key — which
then keeps the address the tunnel had for it. A fresh node never gets an
address the tunnel holds. The hub's declaration tells the host which unit to
take over; the host's account of carrying it is recorded and shown.
Every reader of the range follows the setting; nothing stores it. A found
tunnel under another key is recorded and not adopted, so ADR 0100's
non-overlap rule keeps applying where a tunnel is left running beside the
mesh's. A lab bed and test skeleton for "How it is checked" are under lab/.
Review found the first pass aliased its answer under both ends of a mapping, which is
wrong wherever two mappings share a number: the alias lands on a key belonging to another
mapping, the later write wins, and the filter and the container then disagree — the very
fault this change exists to close. Two reproduced cases: a module publishing 8080:80 beside
9090:8080 had an explicit setting silently overwritten; a module publishing 4001:80 beside
4002:80 composed both containers onto one machine port, where before it was safely refused.
Now a mapping's answer is filed once, under the end the module names in its listens — the
number the plan, the filter, the openings, the guard and the consumer all ask for — and a
key that names two mappings is refused in the same words as a setting that does.
Also: the guard assertion in the end-to-end test failed open when the resource was absent;
the plan-mirroring helper now says it stands in only where the plan does not allocate, and
the assertions it feeds are narrowed to the port under test.
A module publishing `2222:22` — the machine's own ssh daemon holds 22, so
the module takes 2222 and says so in `listens` — could not be moved. The
setting was read against the last segment of each mapping alone, so the
number the module uses everywhere else was refused as a port it does not
publish, and the node's every push failed for as long as the setting was
stored. The one key that was accepted, the container's own port, was then
read only when the container's mapping was rewritten: the mapping moved
and the ports map, the filter, the adopted node's openings, its guard and
what a consumer is told all stayed on the number the software had left.
Either end of a mapping now names it, and a given port comes back under
both, so every reader finds the same number under the key it holds.
Ambiguity is refused where it is real — one number naming two different
mappings, or the two ends of one mapping given two different numbers.
${port:…} answered only inside a file's content, and the one place a module
routinely writes its own address is a container's `env` — where the literal is
wrong on every node whose assignment differs from the manifest's number, and
wrong again on a node given that port as a setting (ADR 0100). Nothing checked
it: the value is a string like any other, and it fails at runtime, on one node.
Filled by the control plane, like a bound value: a port is not secret, so there
is nothing for the host to be the only witness of and it learns no new field.
That is the line ADR 0086 draws — its objection is to a secret being in an
environment at all, not to who fills one in — so a port crosses it and a
credential still does not. Same guard as before: a port the module never said it
listens on is refused, now naming the container and the variable.
The env map is the catalogue's, shared by every node running the module, and the
resource around it is a shallow copy, so a filled value goes into a fresh map —
otherwise the first node composed writes its own port into the manifest and
every node after it is told that one.
Inert on the catalogue as it stands: ${port:…} is written in one other place in
it, a file. Renamed off _files, which this no longer is.
The builder carries a binding because at genesis nothing provides
`package-registry` to resolve one from; once the forge is a module the same
consumer is told what the forge serves. Nothing held the two to the same number,
so the catalogue could drift into dialling one port before the forge is assigned
and another after.
And `at` is now protected, for the reason it had to be: a setting that moves it
points the builder, and the registry password it sends, at a host somebody else
chose.
novox/hq 04-ISSUES/085
The package registry was the one foundation port not resolved from what its
module serves. Nothing in the controller had to change for it — `ports` on the
forge moves its container, what it serves and what consumers are told, and the
builder's carried binding is settable like any other mergeable file — but
nothing said so, which is how it came to be special in the first place.
Two tests over the catalogue's own manifests: the forge's port is given on a
node and reaches what it serves, and the builder's carried binding takes the
port from the node while keeping who the binding is with.
novox/hq 04-ISSUES/085
jschoubben