novox/hq ADR 0138, completing it. One block per endpoint instead of three keys
joined by a port number:
{"endpoints": {"web": {"port": 20009, "label": "cinema", "reach": "both"},
"stream": {"reach": "internal"}}}
Which machine port it lands on, the subdomain a proxy serves it under, and how far
it reaches are the three things an operator says when a module is assigned, and they
were said in ports, in the route's label and in reach — each keyed by the port. A
module with two endpoints of different shapes could only be configured by a reader
who knew which number was which.
Every field is optional; a block that says only a reach leaves the port to the mesh
and the label to the module, which is the ordinary case. A name the module does not
declare is refused, and the refusal lists what it does declare. A port or a reach
said both here and through the older key is refused rather than merged — two places
saying one thing is what this key exists to end, and merging would follow whichever
was read last.
Eight tests. The reach assertion deliberately narrows what the manifest says, because
a reach that agrees with the manifest proves nothing about whether the block was read
— which I found by writing the weaker version first and watching a revert not fail.
novox/hq ADR 0138's remaining half, and the words ship one release before any
manifest uses them.
A port number is not a name. Three facts have to be said about an endpoint when a
module is assigned — which machine port it lands on, the subdomain a proxy serves
it under, and how far it reaches — and they were said in three places keyed by the
port. A module with two endpoints of different shapes cannot be configured that way
without a reader joining numbers by hand: a web surface behind the proxy, whose
port only the proxy need reach, and a protocol port clients dial directly because
the client expects that number.
So a listen carries a name, lowercase and unique within the module, and a route
names the endpoint it serves instead of repeating its port. Two endpoints with one
name are refused, because an assignment configuring one would silently configure
whichever the mesh read last. A route naming an endpoint the module does not declare
is refused where it is written rather than resolving to no port and serving nothing.
An unnamed endpoint stays valid and a route repeating a port still resolves, which
is every module in the catalogue today.
A routed endpoint's port is how the proxy reaches it and nothing else (ADR 0045):
a public service listens from the mesh, only the proxy reaches it, and it is
exposed by name. So reach on a routed endpoint asks for names, and the port keeps
what the manifest said; on an unrouted one — git over ssh, a mail port, the bus —
it governs the port, because there is no name and the port is the only way in.
Found by trying to express a real module rather than by review: routed name public
because browsers post to it, machine-side port private because it serves a
dashboard in cleartext. Under one value for both there was no way to say it, and
'public' would have reopened a port narrowed an hour earlier.
novox/hq ADR 0138, corrected in place the same day.
novox/hq ADR 0138. Reachability was settled three times over: the filter read a
listen's source with expose able to override it; the proxy composed a public name
and an internal name for every route it was given, because it could; and the
certificate authority followed from which names existed. Each was defensible and
the combination was unstated, so "this endpoint must not be public" could not be
written and was enforced by nothing — while a public certificate for that name was
obtained anyway. Measured on the control node: an identity provider holding a
90-day public certificate and a 24-hour internal one, neither asked for.
`reach` is one value per endpoint, per node — machine, internal, public or both —
and the filter's source and the composed names both follow it. The authority needs
no work: the proxy already asks the public authority for a route's own name and its
internal authority for the internal one, so controlling the names controls the
authority.
Joined by the port, which a route already names: 35 of the catalogue's 36 route
entries name a port the same module declares a listen on, and the one that does not
is a path-level refusal — a rule about a name rather than an endpoint, left alone.
Nothing said composes both names and follows the manifest's `from`, so every mesh
already running is unchanged until an assignment speaks. A port that says both
reach and expose is refused: they say the same thing in different words, and the
filter would follow one while the names followed the other.
The forward chain blocked everything passing through the machine and then allowed
the machine's own containers back by naming their address ranges: 172.16.0.0/12 and
192.168.128.0/17 fixed here, the rest recorded per machine by 0043. Every way of
keeping that list correct fails — a constant describes one machine, a recorded range
goes stale in silence and cannot tell a network the mesh made from one a predecessor
left behind, and generating it from the modules would put half the rule set on the
machine.
The mesh has no position on a container reaching outward: that is not a port opened
to anybody. So both chains are written around the links traffic arrives on. What did
not arrive from outside is accepted in one line; what did meets the declared rules.
The tunnel is named beside the outward links rather than treated as inside, or a port
nothing declares would be reachable from every machine in the mesh.
A machine that has not reported an outward link is sent no filter and keeps the one
it has, refused where a person reads it rather than as a rule set that will not load.
Removes the two constants, `node networks`, and the column behind it. novox/hq ADR
0140, superseding 0137 and 0139.
First of the steps in novox/hq ADR 0142, and it ships alone: a new manifest word
reaches the builder and the controller one release before any manifest uses it.
A toolchain deliberately accepts nothing from the module — anything a module
could override there it would be writing a Dockerfile to override — and yet a
compiled binary is per operating system, pinned at link time so a host refuses to
touch a machine it was not built for (ADR 0005). The way out is that the target
belongs to the artifact: one artifact per system, one build each, recipe still the
mesh's.
A bundle in a language that compiles to a binary must name a system, or it would
be built for whatever the build machine happened to be — which reads as portable
and is not. A bundle in a language that runs anywhere may not name one, because a
system that decides nothing reads as though it did. The list is the host's own
names, not a compiler's: the difference between two of them is a C library rather
than a kernel.
Nothing declares a system yet, and no toolchain compiles to a binary yet, so this
changes no build.
The derived filter denies forwarding by default and then allows the container
runtime's two default pools, named in this code with a comment saying a machine
configured otherwise needs to say so -- and no way to say it. So the filter was
right on a machine using the defaults and silently wrong on any other.
Measured today: flipping a workstation to the derived filter cut egress for five
of its container networks and for every network its test beds create, because
those come from ranges the defaults do not cover. Nothing reported a fault; the
guests just could not reach anything, while the machine reported it had applied
what it was told.
A node-level fact beside the public domain, because the machine routes them and
the module that loads the filter may be replaced. Added to the defaults, never
replacing them. Their guests also keep address and name service, without which a
network does not work at all, and the converge preview now says what a machine
routes instead of leaving it to a sentence about what it cannot preview.
The grant permitted the control plane to state what it applied and the seat said nothing about it, so
the check that every derived subscription has an owner found the catalogue subscribing to a subject
nothing publishes — which is exactly the fault that check exists for, pointed at me.
A seat carries the protocol of its role (novox/hq ADR 0129), so the facts are the mesh-controller
seat's `emits`. That is also what lets another module declare it consumes them. No accepts, so no work
queue is raised for the seat — only what its holder may say. The agreement test now holds all three
places to one another: the seat, the grant, and the words the mesh states them with.
A second Accept value would have overwritten the first, because the header was Set per value rather
than Added. One value is all any caller passes today, so nothing was wrong — but a helper that
quietly keeps only the last of what it was given is a trap for whoever passes two.
And a replayed announcement that could not be written was published as an empty body: a fact on the
mesh that says nothing, which the reader can only log and drop. It is now said and skipped, because a
body that cannot be marshalled is this program's fault rather than the bus's.
The pipeline was observable from a merge to an artifact and went dark where it touched a machine: a
node's report is control traffic only the control plane reads, so nothing said which version a
machine runs, or that it refused to (novox/hq ADR 0134). The control plane now states both under the
seat it holds — a role's events belong to the role and keep their address when the holder is
replaced — and only when the report is news, because a machine reconciles every minute and a fact per
report would be a fact per minute per machine.
Whether a report is news is the store's answer: it holds the previous one, so the listener returns it
and the server states the fact. That also gives the catch-up replay a subject the controller may
publish: it was published as a module's event from a module called "control-plane", which does not
exist, so the controller's own account refused it and every catalogue that asked what it missed was
answered with nothing.
A resource's id is `<module>.<its own id>` and a module's name may itself contain a dot — novox.be is
one — so the owner of a resource is everything before the *last* dot. The preparation step's id used a
dot, which made its owner unreadable by that rule; it uses a hyphen, and the id says what it belongs
to whichever way a reader splits it.
The check that skips copying a base the mesh already holds asked with no Accept header, and a
registry answers a manifest only in a media type the caller named: the same digest answered 200 with
the manifest types and 404 without them. So the builder concluded it held nothing, copied every
vendor base again, and exhausted the public hub's pull limit a second time today.
The test could not have caught it, because the fake registry answered a manifest HEAD regardless of
Accept — more permissive than the thing it stands in for. It is now as strict as a real registry, and
fails without the fix.
The mesh derives the preparation from the module's own resource instead of each module hand-writing
a step beside it (novox/hq ADR 0135). A manifest says one word — `prepares` — and the mesh runs that
module's own program in its preparation mode, in the module's own context: the same image, the same
environment, the same mounts, because it is the same code. A published port and a fixed address are
taken away rather than copied, since the version being replaced still holds them.
One word for every kind of module: a Go binary receives `prepare` as its argument, a bundle receives
it through the runtime whose entry takes the same word. The control plane answers it like anything
else — its own schema stops being a special case, and its hand-written step is gone.
Three faults the mesh's own logs showed this morning. A handler that outlives the acknowledgement
window was handed its message again while it was still working: acting on a merge builds modules,
minutes against a thirty-second window, so one merge ran the whole catalogue five times over. The
transport now says the work is in progress while it runs, which is where the window belongs.
Everything the mesh hands out — a token, a membership, a person's credential — took its address
from the enrolment setting, which on a mesh that has moved still names the broker it moved from:
the first person issued after the move was handed the retired broker's port. There is one bus, and
its address is the one the control plane is connected to.
And `operator issue` documented an argument order its parser refused.
Three faults in one path. A merge rebuilt every module built from the repository, so one change in
a repository holding twenty-six of them meant twenty-six builds. A merge into a repository a module
only *packages* source from rebuilt nothing — two modules are built from the control plane's own
repository and neither had ever been rebuilt when it moved — because the manifest the mesh keeps
carries no build section, so a build now says which repositories it read and the mesh keeps that
beside what it stood on. And a module handed over by hand could record a repository with no
directory inside it, which is a module nothing can ever rebuild (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/131, /132).
A change inside no module's own directory is a change to what they share, and everything built from
that repository is rebuilt: rebuilding too much is the safe direction, because the fault this whole
path exists for is a mesh that believes it is current and is not.
The forge announces what it finds merged, and an old merge surfacing late moved the recorded head
backwards and rebuilt everything built from that repository, once per old merge. A merge made
before the source was last seen is history; one that says nothing about when is taken as news.
The catalogue now carries when each source was last seen. The bus-records test follows #116:
a module's tools are every one under its own name.
A base is named by digest, and a digest the mesh's registry holds under the module's repository
is the same bytes whatever upstream would say. Asked on every build, the public hub's anonymous
pull limit was reached on the first merge that rebuilt a whole catalogue, and every module whose
base lives there failed on a copy it did not need.
Every module moved onto the bus by the rollout was issued on the old one, so none had a consumer
waiting; and the grant named a push delivery a runtime's client never binds, while the pull it
does make — asking about its consumer, asking it for messages — was refused. The consumers a
module's declarations imply are now raised whenever the bus is, and the grant is the pull.
The control plane is the way in for tool calls (novox/hq ADR 0095): a person or an agent asks
through it, so it alone may publish to every module's tool subject. The first ask on the new bus
was refused the publish.
Every module that served a tool was refused the subscription on the new bus: the grant listed
tools from a manifest field no module fills, because the tools a module serves are what its code
answers and a second copy of that list would be a second source of truth. The grant is now the
module's own tool namespace; nothing else may subscribe it, a caller is still granted per tool by
name, and a module may answer what it was asked.
Bases reach a recipe as build arguments, so the digest was never in the file the builder read
edges from: no build on the mesh recorded what it stood on, and 'build --on', the bases-first
order and the merge follow-up all walked a graph with no edges (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/131). The
builder now reports every base it resolved; the controller records them by artifact path and
reads the newest build's edges from the store, since a recorded manifest carries no build.on.
The mesh runs on the seat's bus alone (novox/hq ADR 0131, design 28 task 5.5). The old
transport's consume loop, build request, tool ask, management API and account scoping are
deleted, and the bus switch with them; the controller connects to the broker seat and to
nothing else. The store-window tests keep their assertions on a bus-less fake, and the tests
that only made sense for the old transport's in-memory holding go with it.
The decoder named the forge's merge subject as the fourth thing followed and the
list was three long: every message that fell through to that switch panicked the
control plane (2026-09-28). The entry was written and lost between two attempts
at the same edit. A test now walks the list; the composed grants and the genesis
template carry the subject.
The controller follows the forge's merges (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/131). For each
module recorded as built from that repository and branch it records the move to
the merge commit and builds it — bases first, because a module built before the
module it stands on is built against the old one and reports success, and a base
that fails stops what stands on it. Nothing is pushed here: what a finished build
does to the machines running the module stays the upgrade's decision.
Two more things the same ordering gives: `build --behind` builds bases first, and
`build --on <module>` rebuilds everything that stands on a module — the rebuild a
changed base needs, which "behind" does not see because their sources did not
move.
The seat table has name, scope, delivers and decision, and the protocol ADR 0129
gave a seat lives only in the compiled defaults; loading the rows dropped it, so
no role's work queue was ever raised and the first build submitted over the new
bus met "no response from stream". Until the table gains the columns, a row with
no protocol keeps the compiled one of its name. And the holder of a seat is
granted what taking work from its queue needs — asking about the worker consumer
it binds, and acknowledging on it — which the first machine to try was refused.
The control plane's own seat placeholders no longer include the old bus's port,
which the switch removed with the variable.
Two halves of one gap the first build over the new bus met. The machine decided
its bus from a variable its container never received, so the credential the mesh
sealed to it went unread; a credential for the new bus names the bus by scheme and
carries user, password and fingerprint beside the address, and that is enough to
dial it, pinned. And the roles' work queues were raised with no holders, so the
consumer a machine binds to take work was never created: the holders are read
from the catalogue and the handover record, as the resolver reads them.
A push consumer delivers on _DELIVER.<its name>, and a client bound to it
subscribes exactly that. No principal was granted it, and the server refused
every one the first time it bound a consumer: the control plane, each machine,
and a module would have been next. Each kind is granted its own consumers'
delivery subjects and no other's. The line announcing the raised bus printed the
URL with the credential in it; the address alone now.
Two refusals the first live connections met. A user in the MESH account was told
"JetStream not enabled for account" the first time it bound a consumer: with
accounts defined, JetStream is enabled per account, not only globally — the
account's setting, which the mesh owns, not the server's block, which it does not.
And the control plane's client used a random inbox prefix where it is granted
exactly _INBOX.<its user>.>, so the server's first answer could not reach it. The
prefix now follows from the user in the URL, for every principal that dials so.
The bus presents the mesh's own certificate, which names nothing a public verifier
accepts; the client verified by name and failed against a bus that was answering
("certificate is not valid for any names", 2026-09-28). It now pins the leaf's
fingerprint from MESH_BROKER_CERTIFICATE, as every host does. And a connection
error named the whole URL, password included — the address alone now.
The seams were there and nothing chose a side: serve, push, ask and build all
opened the old bus's connection and declared over its channel, whatever
MESH_BUS_NATS said. So the switch moved every host and left the control plane
unable to follow — "this control plane has no MESH_BROKER_AMQP" with the new bus
named and standing (2026-09-28). That was task 4.3 of design 28, still open.
One place now decides: connectLink reads the switch, refuses both buses named at
once, raises the new bus's streams and this controller's consumers when it is
handed the inventory, and opens the link over whichever bus it is on. Every
caller that sent a declaration or asked a tool through the old channel goes
through the server's bus instead, which the new transport has and the channel is
not. OverNats is that outbound: a declaration is a JetStream publish into the
node's own subject, an event is announced on the subject its name derives to, a
tool is request and reply on the module's tool subject.
Binding to a consumer asks the server about it and hears the answer on the
client's inbox; hearing a declaration acknowledges it. A machine's user was granted
none of that and was refused the first time one dialled a permissioned server:
"this node cannot read its declarations". Its inbox is its own prefix, which the
host now sets.
`rollout mint` gives every principal the new bus will have a credential it does
not yet have and puts each where its owner reads it: a machine's as a membership
— bus address, fingerprint, password, transport — sealed into its declaration
(migration 0041, the `bus-membership` resource the host reads after applying); a
module's as its broker secret, through the same delivery `module issue` uses; the
control plane's own as its `bus` secret. Idempotent, and worked out from where the
bus's module is assigned rather than from this process's environment, because this
process is still on the old bus when it runs and must be.
This is the half of design 28 task 5.2 the first live attempt found missing: a
credential was minted only at enrolment, at `module issue` and for a person, so no
machine already enrolled could ever be moved. `rollout check` was right to refuse;
now there is something to run first.
Two halves of novox/hq ADR 0131. Migration 0040 moves the mesh-broker row from
`amqp` to `mesh-bus`, so the seat's holder answers for the mesh's bus and not for
the wire protocol the old broker spoke — which is what let only the retiring
broker hold the seat that names the bus. Safe under the current holder: the
control plane composes its own address through the seat by name and the overview
derives holders by name; only registration and provision resolution read the
column. What must not happen in between is re-registering the current holder.
And the parser refuses a manifest that provides or requires `amqp`, each refusal
saying what to do instead: a module reaches the mesh's bus through the sdk and
depends on the seat, not on a protocol. A whole-catalogue test asserts nothing
beside this checkout names it; the three modules that did are removed there.
Two tests that used the old broker as a fixture now use the module that replaces
it or a manifest this package owns.
`seat <name> --to <node>/<module>` makes one assignment the holder of a seat in
the same write that removes the previous one. The row is new (migration 0039);
without one, the resolver derives the holder as it always did — the sole eligible
assignment, two refused — so nothing changes for a mesh that never hands a seat
over. With one, the recorded assignment holds and any other whose module could
hold the seat is eligible and silent: not refused, not holding. That is what lets
the next holder run beside the current one until the switch (hq design 26, design
28 task 5.3, ADR 0131).
Why: the controller finds its own bus through a seat, and the day that seat was
left with nobody in it — because two eligible holders could not coexist and the
old one's claim was taken away — the control plane looped for two hours while
every service stayed up. A handover that is never empty in between is the fix,
not a workaround for it.
`CanHold` is the one judgement of whether a module may hold a seat — claims it at
its scope, provides what it delivers, against the store's row — shared by
registration and the handover so they cannot drift apart. The holding belongs to
the assignment and goes when it does, so a seat never points at nothing running.
Tests: the resolver with and without a record, on the same and another machine,
under a former name; the store's row replaced not added, refused for an
unassigned target, removed with its assignment; CanHold's four answers and that
they follow the store. Full suite green against a real NATS and store.
`rollout check` said the old broker stays running as an ordinary provider of
amqp, and this was not its retirement. That was ADR 0127, which ADR 0131 has
superseded: AMQP is not a provision, so once every machine reports on the new bus
nothing of the mesh speaks to the old broker and its module is unassigned. The
plan says so, as its last step.
The flag that made the "it stays" line conditional is gone with the line — there
is no case in which the broker is kept. The test that pinned the opposite now
pins this, and says which record changed under it. The stale citation of a
record numbered 0119 is corrected while here.
A claim on a seat was checked against `SeatNamed` inside `ParseManifest`, and the
build machine parses manifests too. It has no store, so there it answered from the
set compiled into the binary — a copy of data the control plane owns (ADR 0122).
When the two disagreed, that copy won where it mattered. The store's row said the
bus seat answers for `amqp`; the binary's said `mesh-bus`; and a holder that
provides `amqp` was refused at build time for not providing `mesh-bus`. The seat
went unheld, the controller lost the address it composes through that seat, and the
control plane crash-looped on a bus that was healthy the whole time.
So the two checks that read the set — a seat's scope, and what its holder must
provide — move to CatalogueProblems, which runs only in the control plane and only
after UseSeats has replaced the set with the store's. The parser keeps what it can
judge from the manifest alone, the reserved-namespace rule included.
A test pins it: the same manifest, two different values in the store, and the answer
follows the store both times. It fails if the check moves back.
Both branches changed the seat set from the same starting point, so every number
collided and every `mesh-*` name existed twice. The trunk's numbers and names win:
this branch's records became 0129/0130 and its migrations 0037/0038, and the
hardcoded rename map gave way to the trunk's `seat_alias` table — a rename is a
row now (ADR 0122), not a recompile.
Three of my checks were wrong and the merge is what showed it:
A seat with an empty protocol is a marker, not an incomplete declaration. Most
node-scoped seats are markers — which module is this machine's packet filter —
and refusing one refused most of the set, the showcase module included. A
mistyped field name is already refused by the parser, so an empty protocol was
written as one deliberately.
A claim on a seat this manifest does not declare is not the parser's to judge. A
module may hold a seat another module declared; that is the whole reason ADR 0126
has callers name the seat and not its provider. Whether the seat exists is a fact
about the catalogue, so the refusal is at registration, where every declaration
is in view.
And a seat may share a name with the provision it delivers. `git`, the npm
registry and the artifact store still do, because renaming a delivering seat
cascades to every consumer requiring it, with a window where a holder stops
resolving mid-flight. The trunk deferred exactly those three on purpose.
Full suite green against a real NATS and store.
The rollout moves every node at once, so there is nothing to inspect afterwards and no
half to roll back — either the mesh was ready or it was not. That makes the readiness
question the valuable half: it costs nothing, it can be asked of a mesh that is serving as
many times as you like, and every answer is a thing somebody can go and fix.
It reads from records and dials once. Is a bus answering, does a machine hold the seat, has
that machine been sent the composed user list, does every machine have a credential for the
new bus, does every module that speaks. Each missing thing names its own next step, because
"not ready" that cannot be acted on is not an answer — and this is read at the point where
the next step is irreversible.
**A machine with no credential is the one that must stop it.** It keeps running and cannot
come back, and afterwards there is no bus to tell it anything over, so the remedy has to
happen first. The message says so.
A module that never reaches the bus is not counted as missing a credential. A third of the
catalogue never speaks, and listing those would bury the ones that matter.
`rollout --confirm` refuses and says why: the move is not being written before its check has
been run against a real mesh. And the plan it prints says the old broker stays — it remains
an ordinary provider of `amqp` for whatever else uses it, which on this installation is a
whole automation layer that has nothing to do with the mesh. This move is not its retirement,
and that is why it is survivable: what breaks if it goes wrong is the mesh's ability to
change things, not the services its modules serve.
A node carries its operator account (name + home; migration 0036, Node.Account,
SetAccount, 'node account' CLI). The account and its home are offered as
machine facts ${machine:account} / ${machine:account-home}, and machineInto
now resolves placeholders in a resource's path and owner (not just content), so
a module writes into a person's home naming what it cannot know. A RosterFile
gains Home: the file is placed under the account's home and chowned to it, its
template sees each node's Account, and a machine with no account gets none —
this is how the ssh Host blocks for every node reach a person's ~/.ssh. Roster
carries per-node accounts (Rendering.Accounts). Tested, including ssh-client
composed end-to-end. Not deployed.
Found by asking what merging this would do to the mesh that is actually running — the
only place the question could have been asked, because the tests were green and both
buses were self-consistent.
Moving the build outcome to the role means a catalogue built from the current manifests
listens for the role's name. The catalogue *already running* listens for the module's,
because that is what it was told when it was installed. The two do not meet, so merging
as it stood would have stopped the live mesh's module graph being updated — silently,
since a binding that matches nothing is not an error.
A rename on a live bus needs the publisher and the subscriber to change together, and a
deployment cannot promise which arrives first. So the old bus announces under both names
and the order stops mattering. The module's own name retires with the bus, in step 5's
list; nothing has ever run on the bus being built, so there is no legacy name there and
this doubling has no counterpart.
Found by reading the live mesh's own notes before touching it, which is where this
was heading next.
Composing the bus's user list was gated on the controller already being on the new
bus. That cannot work: the server needs its user list *before* anything moves onto
it. Step 2 of the whole change is exactly that — the server stands in the mesh
carrying nothing, on its own ports, while every node stays where it is. Under the
old gating that step was impossible: the module would come up, find no accounts
file, and its entrypoint would wait for one the controller had decided not to write.
So the only question is whether this machine runs the module that asked for the
file. A mesh that never moves has written a user list nothing reads, costing a few
hundred bytes on one node. The reverse cost a step that could not be taken.
Pinned by a test over the records of a mesh mid-change: everything running, nothing
on the new bus, and a user list that contains the controller — because a file
without it is a bus its own writer cannot connect to.
Moving the build outcome onto its role broke the one module that consumes it, and my own
agreement check passed anyway. The catalogue's subscription derived
`mesh.mod.mesh-build-machine.event.built` — a module namespace for a role's event, which no
such module owns — so it started, connected, and its graph stayed empty. The check compared
names, and the names agreed: the build machine does emit `built`. Only the subjects
disagreed, and a subscription that matches nothing is silence.
A consumed name is a module's event unless it names a role, and this package cannot tell by
looking — so whoever resolved the declaration says which, the way it already does for a seat
held or used. A module that watches a role gets the role's event subject and a consumer
filtered on it; watching grants subscribe and nothing else, because hearing what a role
announced is not taking part in it.
The check now compares the two halves that actually have to match — the subject a consumer
subscribes against the subject an emitter publishes — with a case pinning that it catches
this exact confusion. Comparing names was checking the easy half.
**And that answered the open question about catch-up: there is nothing to build.** The
mechanism exists because a queue on the old bus receives only what is published after it is
bound, so everything built before the catalogue existed was announced to nobody. A stream is
a log and a consumer is a position in it: a consumer created afterwards starts at the
beginning, so the builds are simply there. Asked of a real server, since the whole decision
rested on it — three builds published with nothing listening, then a consumer created, and
all three waiting for it.
The mechanism, mirroring Filtering: a module declares Jails (name, failregex,
jail stanza) naming no node/path (ADR 0112); the intrusion-prevention holder
declares Jailing (where composed jails go); the mesh gathers every assigned
module's jails into one jail.d file (a fixed id the fail2ban service restarts
on) plus a filter.d file per jail. A node not running a module has none of its
jails. Tested. Behaviour-neutral until a service module declares a jail — the
per-service content (postgres/mssql/mailu failregex+logpath) is authored next,
against how each container actually logs.
Design 25 §7's first item, which existed as a permission model and as nothing a person
could actually be given. There is a record now, and three commands.
Their authority is a list of tools and nothing else. Not a module: they hold no seat,
nothing is addressed to them, nothing is delivered to them, and they have no consumer to
acknowledge. What they have is permission to ask — which is why there is no scope and no
node in the record.
Stating what somebody may call replaces what was there rather than adding to it: a list
that could only grow is a permission nobody can take back. Forgetting somebody takes
their credential with them, because a person's row gone with their bus user left behind
is a credential that still works and that nothing derives — the worst of both, since it
keeps working and nobody can explain why.
The credential is printed once and the mesh keeps only a hash, the same contract a token
has. And it starts working at the next composition rather than immediately, because the
bus's users are a file — said out loud in both the issue and the revoke messages, since
"revoked" that still works for another minute is worth knowing about.
Four properties held by test, each a way of being wrong that would not announce itself:
a person may publish exactly the tool subjects they were given and nothing on control,
nodes or events; they cannot answer a request; changing the list removes what is no longer
named; and forgetting them revokes them.
jschoubben
mesh-admin