An image artifact may name its own build context, apart from the module's repository #62

Merged
jschoubben merged 1 commits from feat/an-artifact-may-name-its-own-build-context into main 2026-09-25 15:39:48 +00:00
1 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben 20e57c3f51 an image artifact may name its own build context, apart from the module's repository
route-proxy's own Dockerfile documents the shape it has always needed and
never had: 'the proxy source is not vendored here... the build context is
the mesh-controller repository root, and this Dockerfile compiles
./examples/route-proxy from it.' Nothing in the mesh could do that — the
build command clones one repository and builds every artifact from
within it, so route-proxy has never once been built through the pipeline,
consistent with it never having been assigned anywhere. Found attempting
exactly that build tonight: 'stat go.mod: file does not exist', because
the context was mesh-catalog, which does not have one.

An image artifact may now carry a context: {repository, ref}, cloned
fresh alongside the module's own tree. The recipe (Dockerfile) is still
read from the module's own directory, at the module's own commit — only
docker build's own context argument moves. Packaging and source stay
exactly as separate as route-proxy's own comment already said they were,
now for real.
2026-09-25 17:39:27 +02:00