A bus module that both offers and asks bus state waited on itself for good at its first such build; it now waits on
nobody for it, as the graph and catalogue.Awaited leave a module's own provision out.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KG7AfSdh6FP8VrBqCn
bus-state is answered with no credential of a consumer's own, so ADR 0603 §5 counts the provider's own have: the
assigner reads, per pass, what the running healthy builds on online nodes offer (their manifests through the builder's
builds) and holds a consumer with a bus-state entry under the provisions' rule until one offers it, handed or not and
with no provisioner key. The words name bus state, and the delivery view names the edge from them.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KG7AfSdh6FP8VrBqCn
The assigner reads the indexer's module graph (a new reads line): of what a module invokes it waits only on the edges
the graph keeps and another module serves, so a left-out cycle holds nothing; a verb counts as served once a running
healthy build's manifest serves it. The hold is under the provisions' rule, its words naming the verb, since no reader
knows a rule number of its own yet. Without the graph no want waits on a verb.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KG7AfSdh6FP8VrBqCn
The rules read Module.Needs from the indexer's modules value and each node's stated reads from its record in
`<node>.node` of the haves; an engine stating none is read as the baseline, so the node-engine's own new build, whose
manifest uses only the baseline's words, is not held. The hold is rule 7 (no rule of its own is numbered in this
release, ADR 0614 F2) with words naming the node's engine and each capability, which the want tools and view_tiers
already show.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KG7AfSdh6FP8VrBqCn
D13b: the composition's warnings, and so the check's line, name the changed modules built with the Go build module the change alters and those standing on a changed base. D9: builder and verdict rows. D15: the assigner's integration test gets a source revision changing a provider, its new consumer and a build module.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KG7AfSdh6FP8VrBqCn
ADR 0593 §7, §8: the check's composition, its compose asks to the Go build seat and the state
compositions go (the checker asks the engines); a proposal is judged without frombus; mesh-wants.upgrade
compare reads every node's composed-<node> through mesh-host.composed. The assigner no longer imports
compose, composer, frombus or buildrun.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0593 §1, §8: compose/judge moves back from mesh-sdk; every node answers a proposal, what a placement
changes is read from its entries, and a node silent past the answer bound (60 s) is named and the
proposal decided on the answers it has.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
buildrun leaves mesh-sdk for the builder's own Go module (ADR 0593 §1); the
checker, assigner, indexer and watchman require it by a replace to the sibling
directory. Issue 1930's bound was already on mesh-sdk's main and moves with it.
The builder copies the imports a build module answers to the done key and the
log's end entry, where the indexer keeps them (§2; D7).
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
mesh-sdk's group B member renames the grant to Grant, drops the
controller principal, the signer and the lease fields from the user
list key, and the keeper's and config's take-over verbs. The grants
part, the assigner and the view use the new names; the judge's copies of
the health and config seats follow; the tests' fixtures lose the
controller's user, and the refused principal is one removing what the
closed set does not name, the controller's mirror being gone.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0590 clause 3 ends the choice of a condition source by the keeper's
take-over key, which mesh-sdk no longer defines. The assigner watched
that key and said every condition straight to the router while it named
the controller. It now writes each as a finding the keeper carries, and
says one straight only where it has no findings bucket at all.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The controller ended by its unassignment (ADR 0590) and mesh-sdk drops
its seat, the grants seat and placement's adopt and hand-back. The
indexer's judge still carried the controller's seat entry, the old
removal words and the two placement verbs, and counted 58 seats; the
checker still placed mesh-controller beside the node-engine's and the
catalogue's tests and failed a node-engine check without its trunk; the
assigner still asked a compose of the running controller, served adopt
and hand-back as stubs, and kept a policy-split finding that could no
longer arise.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
mesh/check being carried to a192052d82fe on be88162cde31 | from 0490043990e2
The grants part, the enrolment seat and the watchman now act without
reading the lease, so a controller placed again would write beside them
with nothing saying so. The assigner refuses every proposal, seed or
joining node's write that would place mesh-controller, naming why.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The enrolment's issue waits for the lease write itself (ADR 0587 §4); the assigner takes an add-node on its warrant at any time (ADR 0567 §8). (issue 774)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The operator's decision of 2026-11-02 01:05, on mesh-sdk 4224665:
- issue takes overlay_key, the machine's tunnel public key as `nox-mesh-host key` prints it, and refuses a missing one. The
token's first tunnel is whole: key, address, range (the hub's tunnel range in placement, the one the controller's token
carries today; a hub with none is a finding, never a guess), hub key and hub endpoint.
- On the operator's yes the node is proposed into placement at once (add-node with its tunnel key alone, on the warrant), and
only then is the token made, so the hub peers it before redeem. Redeem writes no placement: it refuses a tunnel key other
than the one issued for, or a node placement does not hold yet, and the certificate's call carries all four keys presented.
- A revoke, a refusal or an expiry before confirm takes the node off placement (remove-node, same warrant) before the end is
said, and the end brings the token's drop.
- The assigner applies a remove-node: the node's key deleted at once, with no ask, placement-changed carrying the warrant.
- The tunnel key is kept as one more member of the node key's JSON, beside delivery.Enrolment, until the contract carries it.
Tests: rows in the existing tables and both integration tests (the token's Missing() is empty; the node is placed before
redeem and leaves placement when its enrolment expires); no function added, mesh-delivery stays at 816.
(issue 774)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
- redeem writes the node into placement before it asks the vault for the account and the certificate of the serving key
presented (the vault reads the node's address from placement); a retry by the same keys still finishes (blocker 3).
- loadedVia reads mesh-grants.user-list's pass as the part's whole Result, the list state under user_list; the fixture
testdata/grants-pass.json was written by mesh-grants' own Result, not by hand (blocker 4).
- enrolment-expired is delivery.EnrolmentExpiry with IssuedID, through its codec; a key that expired before its content was
seen names no issued event, so nothing is said and its token is dropped at once (blocker 6).
- issue builds the joining node's first tunnel from placement (the hub, its endpoint, the node's address) and the hub's
record (its tunnel key) and passes it to enrolment-token; no hub, or a hub with no key or endpoint, is a finding of issue
(ADR 0587 §3, insight of 2026-11-02).
- The assigner takes an add-node only from mesh-enrolment's own bus user (stdio.Callers), never person.mesh-enrolment.
- The watchman raises machine.<node>.node-account-fallback from a node's health report's fall back and clears it when the
report no longer carries one (ADR 0583 §6, blocker 7).
- mesh-enrolment's ten unit test functions are two table tests now (blocker 8): the repository is back at 816.
(issue 774)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
propose takes the enrolment's warrant {node, address, ask, warrant} and refuses an add-node from any caller but
mesh-enrolment, with no warrant or with a warrant naming another node or address (delivery.AddNodeRefusal); the joining node
counts as having a record for this one change, as ADR 0587 §7 changes ADR 0567 §2. The assigner's process then writes
placement.<node> at once, with no node to answer and no ask raised, and says placement-changed carrying the enrolment's
warrant; the hand-act record of that warrant is the enrolment's, made when it was given. The holder of mesh-enrolment calls
propose with the change, the keys and the warrant read from the router's record of the ask. Tests: rows appended to the
seat's verbs test and a case to the whole-seat integration test; none added, so none to pay for (the budget is paid in
774/S60).
(issue 774, 774/S59)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The integration tests put placement (not assignments) and the node's own composition (not the controller's) on the bus; the
three that tested the controller's judgements of a move (waiting for a composition, a record move, a user-list revision) go,
their unit counterparts standing. Run locally against the embedded bus, all of this module's integration tests pass.
Found by them: the answer to a failed backup was dropped from a placed node's want at every pass, because the carry-over
compared the want's digest, which a placed node's want does not carry; fixed in wants.go, with a case in the existing unit test.
Tests: three integration tests deleted, none added; one case added to an existing unit test.
(issue 774, 774/S26, 774/S27)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The controller's placement-export is no longer called, its answer reader, the seed and the hand-back flow of the holder are
removed, and a seed or hand-back proposal a previous process left open ends at its next pass.
Tests: the adopt, hand-back and seed cases of the seat's verb test and of Propose are replaced by one gone-case; the export
reader's table and the seed test go.
(issue 774, 774/S28)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
mesh-controller.composed leaves the reads and the watches; upgrade compare lists the node composition digests of the haves
instead of comparing with the controller's policies, which the controller no longer writes.
(issue 774, 774/S27)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
Every handed-away branch is the only one: world.assigned is the placement, the pair comparison and its conditions go, the
lease and assignments buckets are no longer opened, watched or declared, and a proposal of any kind is taken.
Tests: the pair-comparison test and the controller-composition record-ask test are replaced by one placement test; the
rest are edited to place their modules instead of assigning them.
(issue 774, 774/S26)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
Drops callAll, the refused-call conditions and the pin reads; the conditions a previous process raised are cleared once.
Tests: deletes four (the refused-call condition, its clearing, the contract of the calls, the condition's shape) and adds one.
(issue 774, 774/S25)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
One helper serves every part that reads whole states (ADR 0580 clause 3): the assigner's own watched mirror goes, its
compare reads the large states from stdio.WatchedStates and each manifest once per digest. mesh-sdk pinned at 8311ecb.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
Issue 1585, S6-S8: 192 judge-only declarations (the strict parser, every manifest problem function, the tables)
moved whole by an AST mover, methods becoming functions; 163 helpers composition keeps too are copied. 245 tests
move with them, reading the captured catalogue through a copy of internal/beside. judge.WithTemplatesFrom and
ReadTreeManifest judge what mesh-sdk's readers now only fill. mesh-delivery's own tests decode. Pinned to mesh-sdk 25a2cec.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
Issue 1585, S11: world and wants read with catalogue.Decode; a trunk refusal is held, named and handed to the
composer in its input; a proposal's composition read that fails is said, not dropped; a reader that cannot read a
changed field is a warning, no longer a failure.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The holder writes a node's changed module keys, then its node key as the commit by compare-and-set at
the revision the proposal was laid over, then the placement.<node> mirror for readers not yet delivered.
Every reader assembles through mesh-sdk's PlacementKeys, which reads both forms.
On novox the asks of postgres, keycloak and mongodb were judged stale against the controller's compositions, taken away and made again under a new id every pass (8 s), so no answer could count; and every put is a change the node composes again on.
Quick fix: the stale check keeps a record ask whose digest the node's have waits on; the pass skips a put whose value the bucket holds.
Thorough fix beside it (not here, another branch owns the file): the node-engine's composer composes again only when a want's value changed.
Rule 8 asked a key for every `requires`, and the plans key only a handed module's needs and what a helper answers:
grafana waited on ace for oidc-client, which the controller still makes, and mesh-build-go for go-toolchain on its own
machine, for ever. MissingProvisions now takes catalogue.Awaited, the one rule the plan composition and mesh-provisioner
key by, judged against the providers placed somewhere.
Quick fix: drop the missing-key check. Thorough fix (chosen): the shared rule in mesh-sdk, so the three parts cannot
drift again. Needs mesh-sdk at 30098229b831.
mesh/check checking 8fe6442c4754 on c104e7500d21 | novox/mesh-delivery#118 in group fix/held-module-and-assigner-contract
A pin made by hand, as the condition's Needs asks, changed nothing the assigner looked at, so its urgent condition
never cleared, and a restart left every one raised. The assigner now reads the controller's pins (placement-export,
asked again only after the controller's compositions change, never on a timer) and clears a pin's condition once
they agree with the placement's after being seen differing, as a module's place already did. The first pass takes
over the call conditions a previous process raised, pins and places alike, and retries at the next pass when the
findings cannot be read.
The assigner added "why" to every assign, unassign, pin and unpin since 2026-10-28; the controller's seat contract
takes no such argument, so it refused each one and did nothing. No approved placement reached the controller's
assignments, no bus account was minted for a newly placed module, and the refusal was only a journal line.
Quick fix: drop "why" from ControllerCalls. Thorough fix: a contract test that every argument ControllerCalls gives,
for every verb, is declared (and every required one given) in catalogue.ControllerVerbs, plus an urgent condition per
pair whose call was refused (verb, node, module, the controller's words), cleared when a later call is answered or the
two sources agree. Chosen: both here; a caller-side check of arguments against the seat's contract for every seat
call belongs in mesh-sdk and is noted for the lead. The warrant stays in the assigner's own record (placement-changed,
the hand-act log).
Every module pins mesh-sdk eff81f1220e2 (in review).
mesh/check pass d54eab4052d1 on c1b4533201c8 | unit 3318 run, 1951 kept, 38 skipped | integration 3994 run, 2125 kept, 38 skipped | over bound: unit, …
On novox on 2026-10-29 the assigner wrote no want for de-spiegel and link2pay (rule 5: no provider of route runs
healthy) nor photos (rule 5: no provider of s3-bucket), and none where no node of a module was online (rule 3). A
module with no want is on no list and nothing applies it; a site runs while the proxy in front of it is down.
- Quick fix: skip rules 3 and 5 for the three modules' first wants. Leaves rule 5 holding every move and the
canary holding new assignments.
- Thorough fix, chosen: rule 5 holds no want; it is said per node (Outcome.Unreached, journaled once per words by the
pass). The canary (rule 3) no longer holds the first want of a node that does not run the module. A node that runs
it keeps the canary order: at an older composed and granted fingerprint of the new form its first want stays at what
it runs; at an old-form build it waits for the canary as before (issue 1945); at an older fingerprint with no
composition or grant it gets F. This departs from ADR 0429 §6, which makes every provider healthy a rule of every want.
Tests: rows changed in the existing rule tests, and rows for today's modules (route-proxy down: de-spiegel and
link2pay wanted; minio not healthy: photos moves; novox offline: a first want written, a move kept back).
jschoubben