buildrun leaves mesh-sdk for the builder's own Go module (ADR 0593 §1); the
checker, assigner, indexer and watchman require it by a replace to the sibling
directory. Issue 1930's bound was already on mesh-sdk's main and moves with it.
The builder copies the imports a build module answers to the done key and the
log's end entry, where the indexer keeps them (§2; D7).
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
Only the indexer computes what a fingerprint takes (ADR 0593 §2): the merged and
pull messages carry no Packages, and the kept inputs no longer hold them (D6).
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The fingerprint, named tree and package versions move from mesh-sdk into the
indexer's internal/fingerprint (ADR 0593 §2). The indexer publishes each reached
mesh Go module's package digests from the forge's listing in its new packages
state, keeps the imports a done build reports, and writes the import form only
when an input differs from the build that reported them (§4), so the form change
costs no rebuild and a package merge moves only its importers (§3). Candidates
take the same form against the group's member heads (D1-D4).
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
mesh/check being carried to d26781b403df on 4dd7dcfc1411 | from be88162cde31
A group's check judges each member against the group's heads (ADR 0482 §2,
ADR 0573 §4), but the checker placed mesh-catalog at its trunk beside every
other member even when the group held a catalogue pull request, so
mesh-delivery's judge tests in group feat/1126-removal judged the new judge
against catalogue main and failed. The catalogue now follows the rule of
every other sibling: the member's head and ref in a group, the trunk alone.
A catalogue change's own trunk copy (ADR 0529 §2) is placed separately and
is unchanged.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The counts change every pass, so a consumer that stays behind was said to the operator again at each pass. The
condition names the consumers alone; how far each is stays in the last pass.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The self-check's bus-consumer probe judged consumers the controller defined, and with the controller ended it judges none
(issue 1126). The grants part owns the account consumers, so it says when one stays more than 1000 messages behind its
stream's head at two passes running, the probe's bound and confirmation, and clears it once none is.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
mesh-sdk now says what upgrade's compare answers without the controller:
each node's own composition and the assigner's findings. The judge keeps
a copy of the seat, which must read the same.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
route-proxy leaves the controller's repository, which is archived, and nothing registered a move since the controller
went: the indexer left a module named by another repository's merge as it was, forever. Now that merge waits, and the
holding repository's merge that drops the module hands it over in place, so its key never goes missing between the two;
merged the other way round, the key is deleted and written new. A trunk that still holds the module keeps it (ADR 0420
clause 7, ADR 0501 clause 3).
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The watchman held a node a control node, urgent after half an hour
silent, while its have named mesh-controller; the controller ended by
its unassignment (ADR 0590), so no node was one any more and the bus
node's silence stayed a warning. The control node is now the node whose
have holds the bus module, nats, which the watchman already hears by
that name.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
mesh-sdk's group B member renames the grant to Grant, drops the
controller principal, the signer and the lease fields from the user
list key, and the keeper's and config's take-over verbs. The grants
part, the assigner and the view use the new names; the judge's copies of
the health and config seats follow; the tests' fixtures lose the
controller's user, and the refused principal is one removing what the
closed set does not name, the controller's mirror being gone.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0590 clause 3 ends the choice of a condition source by the keeper's
take-over key, which mesh-sdk no longer defines. The assigner watched
that key and said every condition straight to the router while it named
the controller. It now writes each as a finding the keeper carries, and
says one straight only where it has no findings bucket at all.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0590 supersedes the lease write: mesh-grants says no lease event any
more, so the watchman's lease-altered and removal-failed findings and
their row had nothing to hear. The ended controller's consumers are
removed as hand acts, so their deletion is no consumer lost; only the
one on DEAD_LETTER_NOTICES is still read, since its removal hands the
notices to the watchman. The builder hears artifacts-gone from the
artifact sweep seat alone, and mesh-enrolment's tokens no longer report
an issuing gate that nothing can turn off.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The controller ended by its unassignment (ADR 0590) and mesh-sdk drops
its seat, the grants seat and placement's adopt and hand-back. The
indexer's judge still carried the controller's seat entry, the old
removal words and the two placement verbs, and counted 58 seats; the
checker still placed mesh-controller beside the node-engine's and the
catalogue's tests and failed a node-engine check without its trunk; the
assigner still asked a compose of the running controller, served adopt
and hand-back as stubs, and kept a policy-split finding that could no
longer arise.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0590 §3 ends the choice of a condition source by the keeper's
take-over key: the controller is unassigned and the keeper is the one
source. The part still read the take-over key, fell back to the
controller's condition events when it was absent, and read and watched
the controller's lease, which nothing writes any more. It now hears the
keeper's events alone and reads neither.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The controller ended by its unassignment (ADR 0590), which supersedes the
lease write and its hand-back whole and makes the grants part's list the
only one the bus node follows. The lease write, its check, the removal
marker, the take-over and hand-back asks, their five tools, the seat
claim and the lease and takeover states had nothing left to act on; the
membership notice on its subject had no reader. A whole-module test on
the bus replaces the lease write's: with no controller at all, the part
publishes a membership in its state alone, makes the module's consumer
and writes the key the bus node follows.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
mesh/check being carried to a192052d82fe on be88162cde31 | from 0490043990e2
The grants part, the enrolment seat and the watchman now act without
reading the lease, so a controller placed again would write beside them
with nothing saying so. The assigner refuses every proposal, seed or
joining node's write that would place mesh-controller, naming why.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The controller ended by its unassignment, so its lease key is absent for
good and mesh-sdk reads that as not handed away: mesh-enrolment's issue
stayed off and the watchman never took DEAD_LETTER_NOTICES, whose notices
age out after a week. Both now act without reading the lease; the
watchman still waits, and says so, while the controller's consumer on the
notices stands. Neither manifest reads the lease any more.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The controller ended by its unassignment and its lease key expired, so
every gate on "the lease is handed away" stayed shut for good: no account
consumer was created or matched, grant-missing was never raised, the
enrolment users kept the controller's subject, memberships were still
said on their subject and the sealed key never said LeaseHanded. The
handed branch now always runs, and a hand-back is gone.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
mesh/check being carried to 8f87dbe94d76 on cc9c681fa348 | from f1c33439292d
The teller read the router's record from KV_asks, a bucket no composed grant
names, so every read was denied and its operator answers could not be read
back. It now reads messenger_asks, as mesh-grants does. The integration bed
grants the real subject and reads a record on the teller's credential, so it
no longer agrees with the mistake. (issue 774)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The lease write addressed node-service-manager at the lease holder's host, a
hostname no node carries ("novox-be" on novox), so the operator's yes timed out
at its first step and failed without a log line. The node now comes from
placement (exactly one node placing mesh-controller, else refused by name), a
failed act is logged beside its condition, and the asks record is read from
messenger_asks, the bucket the composed grant names, instead of asks, which no
grant allows. The fixtures give the lease a host unlike the node, so the tests
no longer agree with the mistake. (issue 774)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
mesh/check failed (2 tests): integration: mesh-mail-reader/cmd/mesh-mail-reader.TestAcceptanceOneMatteringMailSendsExactlyOneTellNamingIt: timed out w…
The judge refused nats's manifest for its invokes (seat:mesh-hand-acts.hand-act,
which nats_bucket_expiry asks to record its hand act), and with one manifest
refused the grants part holds the whole bus user list, freezing every build
that adds bus permissions. The bundle asks through the node's tool runner,
which buscompose grants every tool and seat verb, so the invokes are granted:
the same condition that already lets the bundle declare emits (ADR 0357).
ADR 0235's rule stands for a bus module with no bundle.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The enrolment's issue waits for the lease write itself (ADR 0587 §4); the assigner takes an add-node on its warrant at any time (ADR 0567 §8). (issue 774)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0589 version 29, clause 6. At start and after a catch-up an address key is an expiry never heard only when its
enrolment key is gone and the router records its ask answered yes; one declined or not answered yet is no expiry, and one
not answered stays until its ask ends. A confirm, a decline and a refused add delete the address key before their other
steps, so one stopped midway never leaves a key the catch-up would take for an expiry and unplace a node that joined. A
refused add (mesh-placement's refusal of the proposal, not a call that did not reach it) now ends the enrolment as refused;
a call that failed still waits for again. Tests: rows in the end table (after a confirm stopped before its enrolment key
went, after a decline, after a refused add, a declined ask, an ask not answered: nothing unplaced) and the integration test's
holder-was-down case reading the yes; no new function.
(issue 774)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0589 clause 6: a placed but unconfirmed node is always taken out again, on the warrant of its ask. The address key now
names the ask and the issue's time (delivery.EnrolmentAddress, mesh-sdk c7130e3), written just before the ask is raised and
with no expiry of its own, so it outlives the enrolment key; the holder deletes it at every end. An expiry, seen or not, ends
the enrolment in this order, each step safe to repeat: remove-node on the ask's warrant (only when placement holds the
node), enrolment-expired naming the rebuilt issued event (delivery.EnrolmentIssuedID), the vault's drop of the token, and
the address key last. Reconcile finds every address key that names an ask and whose enrolment key is gone (expired while
the holder was down, before its watch caught up, or an end that stopped) and ends it; it runs once the watch has caught up,
on every expiry, and again with a growing wait while a step fails. An address reserved by an issue under way (no ask yet) is
left alone. Tests: rows in the end table (expired unseen; the holder down with a drop that fails once; a reservation under
way) and the integration test's expiry case (the address key goes; a holder that was down unplaces on its pass); no new
function.
(issue 774)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
mesh-sdk 22c03af carries the machine's tunnel key on the enrolment (OverlayKey, overlay-key, required at every stage), so the
holder's wrapper that kept it beside the contract is gone; the wire is unchanged. Test fixtures give the seeded enrolments a
real tunnel key, which the contract now requires.
(issue 774)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
mesh-sdk 22c03af (feat/l3-enrol) requires overlay-key on every enrolment; the fixture of the enrolment-user subtest carries one.
(issue 774, review round 1b)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The operator's decision of 2026-11-02 01:05, on mesh-sdk 4224665:
- issue takes overlay_key, the machine's tunnel public key as `nox-mesh-host key` prints it, and refuses a missing one. The
token's first tunnel is whole: key, address, range (the hub's tunnel range in placement, the one the controller's token
carries today; a hub with none is a finding, never a guess), hub key and hub endpoint.
- On the operator's yes the node is proposed into placement at once (add-node with its tunnel key alone, on the warrant), and
only then is the token made, so the hub peers it before redeem. Redeem writes no placement: it refuses a tunnel key other
than the one issued for, or a node placement does not hold yet, and the certificate's call carries all four keys presented.
- A revoke, a refusal or an expiry before confirm takes the node off placement (remove-node, same warrant) before the end is
said, and the end brings the token's drop.
- The assigner applies a remove-node: the node's key deleted at once, with no ask, placement-changed carrying the warrant.
- The tunnel key is kept as one more member of the node key's JSON, beside delivery.Enrolment, until the contract carries it.
Tests: rows in the existing tables and both integration tests (the token's Missing() is empty; the node is placed before
redeem and leaves placement when its enrolment expires); no function added, mesh-delivery stays at 816.
(issue 774)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
- redeem writes the node into placement before it asks the vault for the account and the certificate of the serving key
presented (the vault reads the node's address from placement); a retry by the same keys still finishes (blocker 3).
- loadedVia reads mesh-grants.user-list's pass as the part's whole Result, the list state under user_list; the fixture
testdata/grants-pass.json was written by mesh-grants' own Result, not by hand (blocker 4).
- enrolment-expired is delivery.EnrolmentExpiry with IssuedID, through its codec; a key that expired before its content was
seen names no issued event, so nothing is said and its token is dropped at once (blocker 6).
- issue builds the joining node's first tunnel from placement (the hub, its endpoint, the node's address) and the hub's
record (its tunnel key) and passes it to enrolment-token; no hub, or a hub with no key or endpoint, is a finding of issue
(ADR 0587 §3, insight of 2026-11-02).
- The assigner takes an add-node only from mesh-enrolment's own bus user (stdio.Callers), never person.mesh-enrolment.
- The watchman raises machine.<node>.node-account-fallback from a node's health report's fall back and clears it when the
report no longer carries one (ADR 0583 §6, blocker 7).
- mesh-enrolment's ten unit test functions are two table tests now (blocker 8): the repository is back at 816.
(issue 774)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The holder's code over a real nats-server bucket with a time to live per key: issue, the operator's yes, redeem as enrol.ace,
the node confirming as the login its key of node-logins names (the stand-in vault writes it at node-account), node-enrolled
and placement-changed said on their subjects, the user enrol.ace composed while the key is live and gone with it, the token
dropped only after the end; and a token never redeemed expires on the bus, is heard, says enrolment-expired and is dropped.
Found by it: a bucket with a time to live per key must keep one revision per key, or the bus expires nothing (nats-server
2.11.17), so the state enrolments declares no history. Paid for: the integration test is paid by merging the builder's
archive-only and root-module integration tests into one table test; the module's ten unit tests by merging the assigner's
three small composition tests into one table (net 2 of 10 paid; the rest is for the lead, the repository being over budget).
(issue 774, 774/S60)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0583 §1 (insight 2026-11-01) and §2: the grants part reads the vault's node-logins as its named reader and
composes a node user per login, both while the node rotates and the new one alone after rotation-done; each node's
engine reads its own node's key alone (composed by mesh-sdk while the vault serves rotate-node). The part follows the
state by watch, so a rotation begun or ended composes again at once. A second login is judged its node's when the
list is compared (Placed), and a hash changing by a rotation node-logins names is not counted as a writer changing
several hashes at once (sealed.go). The state not on the bus yet is a standing gap: every node logs in as node.<n>,
as today. Tested as a subtest of TestGrants, no new test function. Built against the group's mesh-sdk head 5000774
through a go.work outside the worktree; the pin is the lead's.
(issue 774, 774/S53)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0587 §4: the grants part composes enrol.<node> from a key at live and the vault's hash, granted only the seat's
redeem and its own inbox; §5: when the key ends the user goes. The part reads mesh-enrolment.enrolments as its named
reader and follows it by watch: a key reaching live composes the user, and its end (by the holder, or by the bus at
its expiry) is a change of the key that takes it out, so no consume of the seat's ending events is added beside the
watch (the subtask named one; the watch already hears every end, the bus's expiry included). From the lease write the
user loses the controller's enrolment subject (§6) and the standing gap of the controller's tokens is dropped; before
it the gap stands. Tested as a subtest of TestGrants, no new test function. Built against the group's mesh-sdk head
5000774 through a go.work outside the worktree; the pin is the lead's.
(issue 774, 774/S52)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
propose takes the enrolment's warrant {node, address, ask, warrant} and refuses an add-node from any caller but
mesh-enrolment, with no warrant or with a warrant naming another node or address (delivery.AddNodeRefusal); the joining node
counts as having a record for this one change, as ADR 0587 §7 changes ADR 0567 §2. The assigner's process then writes
placement.<node> at once, with no node to answer and no ask raised, and says placement-changed carrying the enrolment's
warrant; the hand-act record of that warrant is the enrolment's, made when it was given. The holder of mesh-enrolment calls
propose with the change, the keys and the warrant read from the router's record of the ask. Tests: rows appended to the
seat's verbs test and a case to the whole-seat integration test; none added, so none to pay for (the budget is paid in
774/S60).
(issue 774, 774/S59)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The seat, the enrolment state, redeem and its proof, the answer the vault signs, and the vault's two verbs' answers are now
mesh-sdk's (catalogue and delivery), which the vault, the grants part and the engine read too; the proof is the contract's
RedeemProof, the answer carries the login, account, certificate and the vault's signing key (read from its state signers),
and the bucket's values are written through the contract's codecs. The expiry event names the issued event by message id as
well as by the sequence, which a bundle cannot learn. The module builds against the group's mesh-sdk head through a go.work
outside the tree; the lead re-pins go.mod before the push. Tests merged into the same functions; none added.
(issue 774, 774/S54-S58)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
revoke ends an enrolment at any stage without an Approve and records it as an act done by hand (the vault retires an
account minted for a redeem under way); the bus's expiry marker of a key at live says enrolment-expired with the issued
event; the durable consumer of the seat's own ending events asks the vault to drop the token and its hash, acknowledging
only once the vault answers, never before an end. No event or key holds a token (ADR 0587 §5, §8). Run starts the watch,
the consumer and the operator's answers. Tests added: two table-style tests.
(issue 774, 774/S58)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
Only the node dialled as node.<node> confirms (the runtime's proof of the caller is the confirmation, ADR 0587 §6); the
holder then says node-enrolled with the key's content and deletes the address key (while it still names the node) and the
node's key. A stop between the event and the deletes is finished by calling confirm again; the event keeps one message.
release now answers what it could not delete. Tests added: one table-style test.
(issue 774, 774/S57)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
redeem answers only enrol.<node> as the runtime proves it, checks the proof against the identity key presented, spends the
token once by compare-and-set (the keys lose their expiry), asks the vault for the node's account and certificate, writes
the node into placement on the issue's warrant, answers once the bus node loaded node.<node>, signed by the vault; the
same keys called again finish what is not done and answer the same (ADR 0587 §5-§7). The proof is mesh-host's EnrolProof
with the node's name in the token's place, since the seat never holds the secret. Tests added: two table-style tests.
(issue 774, 774/S56)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
issue refuses at once naming every finding (a bad name, a name a node record, a placement key or an open enrolment
holds, an expiry past a day, any call before the lease write), reserves the lowest free address by creating its key,
writes the enrolment at asked and asks the operator (ADR 0587 §4). On the yes the warrant is recorded, the vault
makes the token and both keys go live with the bus's expiry; a no or an expired ask takes both keys and says
enrolment-refused. Tests added: three table-style tests; none deleted here (paid with 774/S59's merges).
(issue 774, 774/S55)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The holder of the seat mesh-enrolment (ADR 0587 §1, §2, §8) runs as a bundle on its own account, keeps the bucket
enrolments with a time to live per key, and answers tokens: every open enrolment or one node's with stage, expiry,
ask and revision, the bucket's fill, whether issuing is on and why, and for one node at live the token sealed by
the vault and relayed, kept nowhere. Tests added: two (one table-style test of tokens, the manifest test); the
repository is over its budget, paid by merging tests in the assigner's seat tests in 774/S59's commit.
(issue 774, 774/S54)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
mesh/check failed: mesh-build-go: the check of novox/mesh-catalog#590: the ask mvyhumdm860c7f's step on shanks did not end within 30m0s of its start |…
ADR 0582 "How it is checked": against an embedded bus, a stand-in controller holds the lease in a bucket with an
expiry (2 s standing in for 15 s, through grants.LeaseExpiry, so the wait past it is seconds), with stand-in
node-service-manager and bus-tool seats (the expiry tool acting on the real bucket's stream, as nats-tools'
SetBucketExpiry does). On the warrant the key holder names mesh-grants, the expiry is gone, the controller's
create of the key is refused, and the lease still reads handed away past the old expiry; on the hand-back's
warrant the expiry is back and the controller takes the lease again. mesh-grants requires nats-server for it,
at mesh-sdk's version.
Budget: TestTheLeaseWriteOnTheBus (new, integration) is paid by merging the checker's
TestTheCheckerAwaitsTheAssignersComposition into TestTheCheckersLineSaysTheAssignersComposition as its first case.
(issue 774, 774/S23)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
jschoubben
mesh-tools