Issue 1134, found by the merge gate after mesh-delivery #1 merged: 'mesh-cli and mesh-delivery-view both declare the path /usr/local/bin'. Two modules declaring the same path are refused when one node composes both (mesh-controller internal/catalogue/resolve.go:1128-1153), so the view could run on no machine that runs mesh-cli.
The view's cli archive now unpacks into its own directory, /usr/local/lib/mesh-delivery-view, and a file resource places only /usr/local/bin/mesh-delivery-cli, a small wrapper (files/mesh-delivery-cli) that execs the program there, as betterbird and claude-code do. The alias nox-delivery is unchanged. Test TestNoSharedDirectoryIsClaimed (1134/AC7) failed on the old manifest.
This merge is also the view's first build: mesh-controller #386 (delivered 00:35) asks the first builds of an approved merge into a repository nothing is built from (issue 1146), and the Approve registers them (ADR 0432). Try build-1792361659330665836 passed in 31 s.
Issue 1134, found by the merge gate after mesh-delivery #1 merged: 'mesh-cli and mesh-delivery-view both declare the path /usr/local/bin'. Two modules declaring the same path are refused when one node composes both (mesh-controller internal/catalogue/resolve.go:1128-1153), so the view could run on no machine that runs mesh-cli.
The view's cli archive now unpacks into its own directory, /usr/local/lib/mesh-delivery-view, and a file resource places only /usr/local/bin/mesh-delivery-cli, a small wrapper (files/mesh-delivery-cli) that execs the program there, as betterbird and claude-code do. The alias nox-delivery is unchanged. Test TestNoSharedDirectoryIsClaimed (1134/AC7) failed on the old manifest.
This merge is also the view's first build: mesh-controller #386 (delivered 00:35) asks the first builds of an approved merge into a repository nothing is built from (issue 1146), and the Approve registers them (ADR 0432). Try build-1792361659330665836 passed in 31 s.
Reviewed-by: reviewer-r12@shanks at 8a8cafd3db98686262fe3eb82755855546ce55ec
mesh/merge-gate head 8a8cafd3db98 merged into trunk 0177ea7a7914 — pass: builds new: modules/mesh-delivery-view, sent nowhere; no bus step; every machine c…
Deliverynovox/mesh-delivery@8a8cafd3db98 — delivered since 2026-10-18T22:45:10Z
Delivery plan — builds new: modules/mesh-delivery-view, sent nowhere; no bus step
Transitions
2026-10-18 22:41 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-delivery#2's head announced
2026-10-18 22:43 proposed → checked (checked): a verdict names this commit and the trunk's head as its trunk commit
2026-10-18 22:43 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail
2026-10-18 22:45 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move
2026-10-18 22:45 published → delivered (done): nothing for a walk to move
The commit's note under refs/notes/mesh-plan keeps every transition: git log --notes=mesh-plan.
<!-- mesh-delivery:view -->
**Delivery** `novox/mesh-delivery@8a8cafd3db98` — **delivered** since 2026-10-18T22:45:10Z
**Delivery plan** — builds new: modules/mesh-delivery-view, sent nowhere; no bus step
**Transitions**
- 2026-10-18 22:41 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-delivery#2's head announced
- 2026-10-18 22:43 proposed → checked (checked): a verdict names this commit and the trunk's head as its trunk commit
- 2026-10-18 22:43 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail
- 2026-10-18 22:45 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move
- 2026-10-18 22:45 published → delivered (done): nothing for a walk to move
The commit's note under `refs/notes/mesh-plan` keeps every transition: `git log --notes=mesh-plan`.
Merge check at 8a8cafd3
Judged: head 8a8cafd3db98 merged into trunk 0177ea7a7914; read beside it: mesh-catalog b4527d9091e9, mesh-controller cec26d859695, mesh-controller-main cec26d859695, mesh-host 89025ad004d4, mesh-tools 7412c5b6c9c5
mesh/merge-gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: new:modules/mesh-delivery-view)
mesh/repo-check: PASS — its merge-check.sh passed
Delivery plan — builds new: modules/mesh-delivery-view, sent nowhere; no bus step
Run by the build seat on ace as build-1792363263862937480 (builds --log build-1792363263862937480).
--- the gate: new:modules/mesh-delivery-view
mesh-delivery-view: ok, reads mesh-controller.assignments, mesh-controller.builds, node-engine.have, ready: view by unit every 30s
long-running resources without health: 0
files asking for a setting without saying whether it is trusted: 0
1 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here
judging 1 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-18T22:36:29Z says they run
composing every machine as the mesh is
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
composing every machine with the change
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-18T22:36:29Z
modules the change moves:
- mesh-delivery-view (added)
machines:
- a machine (f35): composes
- holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes
- holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-config, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-provisioner, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes
- a machine (yvbpsm): composes
a merge would rebuild 0 module(s) in 0 tier(s)
--- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain)
== ./modules/mesh-delivery-view: go vet and the unit tests
ok mesh-delivery-view 0.003s
ok mesh-delivery-view/cmd/mesh-delivery-cli (cached)
ok mesh-delivery-view/cmd/mesh-delivery-view (cached)
ok mesh-delivery-view/internal/view (cached)
== ./modules/mesh-delivery-view: the integration tests (-tags integration)
ok mesh-delivery-view 0.003s
ok mesh-delivery-view/cmd/mesh-delivery-cli (cached)
ok mesh-delivery-view/cmd/mesh-delivery-view (cached)
ok mesh-delivery-view/internal/view (cached)
**Merge check** at `8a8cafd3`
Judged: head `8a8cafd3db98` merged into trunk `0177ea7a7914`; read beside it: mesh-catalog `b4527d9091e9`, mesh-controller `cec26d859695`, mesh-controller-main `cec26d859695`, mesh-host `89025ad004d4`, mesh-tools `7412c5b6c9c5`
- `mesh/merge-gate`: **PASS** — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: new:modules/mesh-delivery-view)
- `mesh/repo-check`: **PASS** — its merge-check.sh passed
**Delivery plan** — builds new: modules/mesh-delivery-view, sent nowhere; no bus step
Run by the build seat on ace as `build-1792363263862937480` (`builds --log build-1792363263862937480`).
```
--- the gate: new:modules/mesh-delivery-view
mesh-delivery-view: ok, reads mesh-controller.assignments, mesh-controller.builds, node-engine.have, ready: view by unit every 30s
long-running resources without health: 0
files asking for a setting without saying whether it is trusted: 0
1 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here
judging 1 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-18T22:36:29Z says they run
composing every machine as the mesh is
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
composing every machine with the change
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-18T22:36:29Z
modules the change moves:
- mesh-delivery-view (added)
machines:
- a machine (f35): composes
- holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes
- holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-config, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-provisioner, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes
- a machine (yvbpsm): composes
a merge would rebuild 0 module(s) in 0 tier(s)
--- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain)
== ./modules/mesh-delivery-view: go vet and the unit tests
ok mesh-delivery-view 0.003s
ok mesh-delivery-view/cmd/mesh-delivery-cli (cached)
ok mesh-delivery-view/cmd/mesh-delivery-view (cached)
ok mesh-delivery-view/internal/view (cached)
== ./modules/mesh-delivery-view: the integration tests (-tags integration)
ok mesh-delivery-view 0.003s
ok mesh-delivery-view/cmd/mesh-delivery-cli (cached)
ok mesh-delivery-view/cmd/mesh-delivery-view (cached)
ok mesh-delivery-view/internal/view (cached)
```
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Issue 1134, found by the merge gate after mesh-delivery #1 merged: 'mesh-cli and mesh-delivery-view both declare the path /usr/local/bin'. Two modules declaring the same path are refused when one node composes both (mesh-controller internal/catalogue/resolve.go:1128-1153), so the view could run on no machine that runs mesh-cli.
The view's cli archive now unpacks into its own directory, /usr/local/lib/mesh-delivery-view, and a file resource places only /usr/local/bin/mesh-delivery-cli, a small wrapper (files/mesh-delivery-cli) that execs the program there, as betterbird and claude-code do. The alias nox-delivery is unchanged. Test TestNoSharedDirectoryIsClaimed (1134/AC7) failed on the old manifest.
This merge is also the view's first build: mesh-controller #386 (delivered 00:35) asks the first builds of an approved merge into a repository nothing is built from (issue 1146), and the Approve registers them (ADR 0432). Try build-1792361659330665836 passed in 31 s.
Reviewed-by: reviewer-r12@shanks at
8a8cafd3dbDelivery
novox/mesh-delivery@8a8cafd3db98— delivered since 2026-10-18T22:45:10ZDelivery plan — builds new: modules/mesh-delivery-view, sent nowhere; no bus step
Transitions
The commit's note under
refs/notes/mesh-plankeeps every transition:git log --notes=mesh-plan.Merge check at
8a8cafd3Judged: head
8a8cafd3db98merged into trunk0177ea7a7914; read beside it: mesh-catalogb4527d9091e9, mesh-controllercec26d859695, mesh-controller-maincec26d859695, mesh-host89025ad004d4, mesh-tools7412c5b6c9c5mesh/merge-gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: new:modules/mesh-delivery-view)mesh/repo-check: PASS — its merge-check.sh passedDelivery plan — builds new: modules/mesh-delivery-view, sent nowhere; no bus step
Run by the build seat on ace as
build-1792363263862937480(builds --log build-1792363263862937480).