novox's mesh-vault has failed since 01:16 on 2026-10-29: its have says failed, so loadHad (fbea777) takes no
composition from it, and what runs falls back to the kept declaration, whose export (mesh-vault.kept) names
f099eaa1, an object the controller's sweep removed. The node wrote a newer export since. The composer carries that
file as it runs (mesh-sdk frombus keptOf), so what runs now names the digest and size of what is on disk, but only
where the node's record says it wrote exactly that content at that path (Applied.Wrote, Target). The apply then
finds the file in place and needs no object.
Quick fix weighed: have the controller put the object back. Thorough (chosen, in the node): what runs is what the node
wrote, never a guess from an older declaration. The rows join the existing whole-apply test; the test count stays.
On novox at 01:16 on 2026-10-29, after the node began composing its own modules, mesh-vault's apply failed while the
vault ran: its own composition carries the export as it runs (mesh-sdk frombus KeptRuns) by a digest whose object the
controller's sweep (mesh-controller cmd/mesh-controller/declaration_sweep.go, sweepNode and sweepDeclarationFiles)
had removed, since the sweep keeps only what the controller's compositions in composed-<node> and the wants name.
The node may only read its bucket (ADR 0486 §2), so the node keeps what it had: a file here that verifies, or an
object fetched, goes to <state dir>/objects under the object's name, and a kept one is used before the bus is asked.
An object unused for 14 days is let go. A fetch that still fails says the keep never held it, before its cause.
Quick fix weighed: re-put the object from the controller's store. Thorough (chosen): the node never depends on the
bucket for content it once had, for every module, since the sweep and a node composing its own can always disagree.
The whole-apply test gains three rows that fail on the old code; the test count stays.
The kept-declaration fallback built a composition without Data, so after a restart a data module (mongodb, mssql
on novox) was judged to move its data against its first composition and the operator was asked a false yes. Now
every such composition takes Data from the manifest (agent.Env.HoldsData, the composer's DataItems), and a module
whose manifest cannot be read is said to be unjudgeable rather than taken to hold none. The composition a have
names comes before the kept declaration in the judgement too.
loadHad takes a have only in the phases baseline takes as running (running, held, a composer's mark): one backing
up, applying, checking, failed or waiting names a composition not applied (review of 031e106). Two rows added to
the same table test; the count stays.
A held module on a node composing its own never gets a composition, so the agent never took it and the filling
judged its files by the kept declaration, older than power's three new drop-ins: refused from every engine start
on ace, g14 and shanks until some module settled (2026-10-29 00:09 UTC). The second meeting of issue 924.
Quick fix: knock the filling once the haves are read at the start. Thorough fix (chosen, the kind recurs for every
file added since the switch): what runs of such a module is the composition its have names, from the bucket or
its revisions, ahead of the kept declaration; the filling is knocked on every change of what runs, not only on a
settle. One unit test replaced by a table of four cases; the count stays.
mesh/check pass a6c70803ab72 on bb6e47293909 | unit 3054 run, 234 kept, 36 skipped | integration 3075 run, 266 kept, 29 skipped | over bound: unit (sl…
novox's seed p-20261028t231141-ec84b4 refused 11 modules behind de-spiegel's hold and gitea's handed credential. The
node composes and answers through mesh-sdk's frombus, so the fix is the pin.
- The quick fix: follow one more set of words in the answer. It moves the error again.
- The thorough fix, chosen (mesh-sdk fix/1126-held-as-runs): a held module composes only as what runs of it; a consumer
or collector composes against that and is never held for the held one's stub, and a stub's handed credentials and own
secrets are left out as they run rather than refused.
mesh/delivery-group group feat/774-vault-mints-l2 checking: the checker's verdict is out of date: novox/mesh-delivery@64d364a7686c was judged on trunk fa075dc8…
mesh/check failed: ace: the check of novox/mesh-host#168 failed: the pin of git.novox.be/novox/mesh-sdk/go at commit d4c61ee8ffd0 is on no pull reques…
mesh/delivery-group group feat/774-vault-mints-l2 checking: the checker's verdict is out of date: novox/mesh-host@e0c7f36ca90c was judged on trunk d2a868f99f05…
mesh/check failed: integration: meshbuildgo/cmd/mesh-build-go.TestAComposeAskIsBuiltOnceAndAnsweredOnTheBus: the compose ask mvsg85b34d25b4 never ende…
The answer names its proposal and the revision of the node's own candidate key; a node with no key in a proposal is not asked. The watch for its own placement key is tried again until the seat's state exists, so the node switches when its key is written.
mesh/check being carried to bf667a602d21 on 58b4f8b6bc07 | from 9a8b3870bad0
A reboot left the have running, so a unit that failed to start at boot was never started again and nothing said so. Baseline now asks the machine; the judge's look calls Agent.Reconcile once per down edge, leaving held and unwanted modules alone.
mesh/check pass 24c23a1d066f on a548a61e86d7 | unit 2667 run, 590 kept, 36 skipped | integration 2676 run, 633 kept, 29 skipped | over bound: unit (sl…
frombus.Compose now holds a module refused alone (mesh-sdk 0de3006, the rule
its answer follows too): composed as what runs of it, with what depends on
how it is held held too. The composer hands every other module, keeps what it
handed of a held one, and tells the agent which modules it holds and why;
agent.NotComposedEach marks those alone and clears the rest. Only a refusal
of no single module still marks every module (NotComposed).
heldOut also holds out, of the node's own composition as it runs, the
resources of each module held alone, until a composition of its own is
handed: the node's own apply never removes a module leaving the fold with its
names unset (review of the apply, round 1; issue 1945 by a new path).
Pins mesh-sdk fix/1126-apply-culprit at 0de3006 (a group).
mesh/check pass bc28606d4566 on 690aa662a837 | unit 2192 run, 3794 kept, 57 skipped | integration 2208 run, 3829 kept, 57 skipped | over bound: unit, …
A skipped or held file comes back on every apply; counting it would reload the
service manager on every apply of a node with a gated or held module. The same
allowlist as MovesRoot: created, updated, corrected, removed.
A drop-in that no service reflects, like the power module's bound on
reboot.target, was written but never loaded: the node-engine reloaded units only
for a file named in a service's restart-on, so the next reboot still ran the
target as loaded. Any file written or removed under a system unit directory, or
a drop-in directory below one, now gets one daemon-reload per apply.
mesh/check pass 8bd0b5db15a3 on b4fd2cc210bf | unit 1639 run, 4201 kept, 46 skipped | integration 1674 run, 4215 kept, 47 skipped | over bound: unit, …
Each answer's line now reads 'answering placement candidate G (revision N; woken by X)', X being its first answer,
a retry after a read the bus did not answer, the candidate, or the inputs that changed (placement, records, modules,
values, haves, wants). The single input counter becomes one per input, which also decides whether a group is answered
again, as before.
Quick fix weighed: a counter word in the line. Thorough fix chosen: one count per input, so the line names exactly what
moved since the group's last answer.
mesh/check being carried to 1a021052fe07 on b4fd2cc210bf | from 7a2af2376405
Review round 1 measured it on systemd 262.1: a finished one-shot nothing references is
unloaded, and loaded again it reads inactive, ExecMainStatus=0 and a start timestamp of
0, as one that never ran does. The previous commit's rule read such a unit stopped, so
a one-shot declared running would be started, read stopped and fail on every apply, and
the hold, the take-over and the giving back would judge it wrongly.
ServiceState keeps main's reading. ServiceAtRest and declaredState stay: they alone
satisfy a stopped declaration for a one-shot at rest, which is the kernel cleanup's
case. A one-shot declared running that must be seen to have run lingers
(RemainAfterExit) or is enabled at boot. Unit tests: the arch table has 5 rows, the
apply test 1; 1262 in all.
The kernel module's boot-time cleanup, linux-modules-cleanup.service (Type=oneshot,
declared stopped and enabled at boot), failed its delivery on ace with 'was asked to
be stopped and is running': ServiceState read every inactive one-shot with
ExecMainStatus=0 as running, and systemd says 0 for one that never ran too. Stopping
an inactive unit changes nothing, so the read back said running again; after a boot
that ran it, the same declaration would fail every apply.
ServiceState now reads ExecMainStartTimestampMonotonic: 0 means never ran, read as
stopped (a package's one-shot declared running is then started, and the hold no
longer counts it as in use). The service apply reads a one-shot at rest as stopped
to a declaration that it be stopped (ServiceAtRest), whatever its last run did.
Quick fix weighed: declare the cleanup running in the catalogue. Thorough chosen:
the reading was wrong for every one-shot, and this is its second fault of the kind
(the firewall's was the first). Unit tests: three arch one-shot tests merged into one
table (7 rows), one apply test (2 rows); 1263 to 1262.
jschoubben
mesh-tools