Commit Graph
56 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben 70b8bff570 Dial a route at the machine port its module's placement assigned, from the mesh-sdk whose plans carry it (issue 774, research 072 row 34)
route-proxy from plans dialled every route at the software's own port: gitea at 127.0.0.1:3000
(published at 20000) and grafana on ace at 3000 (published at 20012), and public sites answered
502. The proxy already reaches a module beside it over loopback and one elsewhere at the plan's
address; the plan now carries the assigned port, and a test composes the plan with the SDK and
reads it as the proxy does, so the two cannot drift again.

The controller, NATS-native: no piece moves; route-proxy only.
2026-10-31 13:11:00 +01:00
mesh-tools de46374d10 Merge pull request 'route-proxy from the provisioner's plans with its own contract; the controller forwards accounts to the vault (issue 774)' (#487) from feat/072-moves into main 2026-10-31 10:31:07 +00:00
jschoubben 26dea32f5f Pin route-proxy at the group's mesh-sdk head acbf80a and its contract at the published tag v0.1.0, so it builds and reads the contributed payload; refresh its manifest digest for the events its contract names (issue 774) 2026-10-31 10:27:05 +01:00
jschoubben fa56e38429 Serve route-proxy's routes through its own contract: decode each plan entry's opaque contribution with it, say each name served, withdrawn or refused on the bus, and take who is inside from the seat mesh-placement, since the membership went with the assignments stream (issue 774, research 072 rows 33 and 34) 2026-10-31 09:44:07 +01:00
jschoubben bf395f88ee Publish route-proxy's contract as a Go module of its own: the route a consumer asks, its schema, the events the proxy says, what it keeps on the bus and its tools' arguments, so other modules use the contract by its version and the provisioner carries a route unread (issue 774, research 072 row 34) 2026-10-31 09:44:00 +01:00
jschoubben 373565c2f7 Serve route-proxy's routes from the seat mesh-provisioner's plans alone and drop its received routes file, since a route is a provision and the file is the deprecated path (issue 774, research 072 row 34; needs the mesh-sdk pin carrying plan entries' given and Conn.Read) 2026-10-31 09:24:53 +01:00
mesh-tools c7493f4889 Merge pull request 'The web front's route helper reads the seat's plans, so a route-only module's route is provided (issue 774)' (#486) from fix/route-proxy-reads-plans into main 2026-10-30 23:43:15 +00:00
jschoubben fd74e38ee0 Start route-proxy's provider helper only once Serve holds the runtime's channel, so its first watch is never refused and the helper never stops until a restart (issue 774, review) 2026-10-31 00:32:26 +01:00
jschoubben 69bffee443 Answer route-proxy's routes from the seat mesh-provisioner's plans and keys, not the controller's assignments, so a route the seat keys for a module not handed is marked provided and its new builds are no longer withheld (issue 774) 2026-10-31 00:27:11 +01:00
mesh-tools dd52c9cce1 Merge pull request 'The web front keeps what it serves, its certificates and what it refuses on the bus, with tools to read them (issue 774)' (#485) from feat/route-proxy-tools into main 2026-10-30 22:11:52 +00:00
jschoubben d2e5323b7c Keep a scan out of route-proxy's unrouted state: only names under a served domain, a few a minute, no visitor address (issue 774)
Review of 3e14a13b: a scanner's random Host or SNI names each became a key, bounded only by the
bucket's lifetime and size, and every failed write was retried at each change and logged each time.

A refused name is now kept by name only under the registrable domain of a name the proxy serves, and
at most five new names a minute; every other refusal is counted in memory and written once a minute
under <node>._other (last minute, since start), which route_proxy_unrouted shows. A refused write of
that state is dropped and logged once until a write succeeds; trimming memory to 4096 names moved
from the request to the writer. The visitor's address is no longer kept: the journal has it.

Quick: drop unrouted keys from strangers by a fixed allow-list. Thorough: bound by the proxy's own
domains, by rate, and by never retrying. Chose thorough: the scan is constant on a public machine.
2026-10-30 23:03:00 +01:00
jschoubben 3e14a13b1a Give route-proxy its state on the bus and three tools, so a site's route, certificate and last answer are read from the mesh instead of with curl (issue 774)
The web front kept nothing on the bus: whether grafana or drive was routed, where to, with which
certificate, and what it last answered could only be learned with curl or the container's log.

The proxy now keeps `routes` and `unrouted` (announced readable, keyed <node>.<name>), written on
change by one writer: route set changes, certificates stored by autocert's cache or failing at a
handshake, upstream answers that differ from the last written (or are a minute old), and names
refused in a request or a handshake. The provider helper's bundle serves route_proxy_routes,
route_proxy_route and route_proxy_unrouted from those states.

Quick: log the routes at start and grep the journal. Thorough: the state on the bus and the tools
that read it, mesh-wide, in one call. Chose thorough: the operator's question is mesh-wide and
recurs, and the log says nothing about certificates or answers.

Tests: two table tests added (the ledger, the tools), both failing without the change; four
authority tests and four skipped-route tests merged into two, so the module has four fewer.
2026-10-30 22:58:04 +01:00
jschoubben 4a90e698aa Reword route-provider's stdout line, so route-proxy's tree differs from the 01:52 build whose files are gone (issue 1933) 2026-10-24 02:50:12 +02:00
jschoubben bab562df63 Give route-proxy a build the fixed controller takes in, dropping the incident note #450 added (issue 1933) 2026-10-24 02:49:56 +02:00
jschoubben 9ca01594c3 Merge pull request 'Give route-proxy a new build: the controller's sweep removed its last build's files from the store, so novox and ace cannot apply (issue 1933)' (#450) from fix/1933-rebuild-route-proxy into main
Reviewed-on: novox/mesh-controller#450
2026-10-24 00:39:47 +00:00
jschoubben ecf3519592 Give route-proxy a new build: the controller's sweep removed its last build's files from the store, so novox and ace cannot apply (issue 1933) 2026-10-24 02:37:06 +02:00
jschoubben 9cc6ed04de Merge pull request 'A module the catalogue no longer holds ends deleted instead of failing the plan; vendor/ goes; tests name verbs that exist (issues 1922, 1305, 1931)' (#449) from fix/1922-removed-module into main
Reviewed-on: novox/mesh-controller#449
2026-10-23 23:47:05 +00:00
jschoubben 2d5130cbb7 Delete the committed dependencies; builds resolve by go.sum (issue 1305) 2026-10-23 22:16:09 +02:00
jschoubben 02273b8eaf Merge pull request 'R4g+R5 (mesh-controller): the controller asks no build, build-agent and the merge gate go, register by reference (design 47)' (#448) from feat/r4g into main
Reviewed-on: novox/mesh-controller#448
2026-10-23 17:50:22 +00:00
jschoubben bad5cf5c54 Revert "Delete vendor/ and the route proxy's: the build module fetches the modules, the root image builds with -mod=mod (issue 1305, C6)"
This reverts commit ff4c7b7919.
2026-10-23 16:37:40 +02:00
jschoubben ff4c7b7919 Delete vendor/ and the route proxy's: the build module fetches the modules, the root image builds with -mod=mod (issue 1305, C6) 2026-10-23 15:14:58 +02:00
jschoubben 857ecaf04d Pin mesh-sdk at the R4e member's final head 104533e8 and vendor it (R4e E)
The SDK's S1 and S2 review fixes landed after 875c680d.
2026-10-22 21:19:46 +02:00
jschoubben 638734fc12 Merge main (upgrade safety's declared packages, issue 1840) and pin the R4e mesh-sdk member's final head 875c680d, re-vendored here and in modules/route-proxy; the controller announces declared-packages readable (issue 1790, D1; E) 2026-10-22 20:44:59 +02:00
jschoubben fa19caf2c1 Move the route proxy into its module and run it from the trust image, on mesh-sdk's public membership (issues 1633, 1634, 1635)
A bundle is built only from its module's directory (ADR 0480 clause 4), so the proxy leaves
examples/ and the controller's internal/broker; the broker keeps no second copy of what the
proxy shares with mesh-sdk. The image and its Dockerfile go, and a test holds that only
build-agent declares one (clause 11).
2026-10-22 09:53:56 +02:00
jschoubben faca99b6bf Announce the pull request's head again, so its delivery is made with its base and asks the Approve (issue 1726; tree unchanged) 2026-10-21 16:17:00 +02:00
jschoubben 50751428f2 Pin route-proxy to a commit of mesh-sdk main, since the pinned one is on a feature branch only (issue 1669) 2026-10-21 14:25:34 +02:00
mesh-tools eb2dcf1a18 Merge pull request 'Builds, rollouts and assignments live on the bus, each assignment naming its commit, build and rollout (design 47 milestone 5, issues 1089-1095)' (#379) from feat/chain-on-the-bus-controller into main 2026-10-18 10:40:32 +00:00
jschoubben bef006075e Review round 1 of milestone 5: the move settles changed rows under the lock; reports counted by kind; route-proxy at the new SDK; the plan pass never revives an ended assignment; the store's mirror is refused once moved (issues 1090, 1092, 1093)
1090/1092: the move tests pick each report by kind and expect three, all already, on the second run. 1090-1093: under the share lock the switch reads the rows again and writes every key whose value differs from its row (and ends an assignment the store dropped) before recording the kind, so an update the old controller made after the first pass is not lost. 1093: route-proxy is pinned at mesh-sdk f185aedb and vendored; the controller uses only the SDK's asks package. KeepAssignmentPlans decides each key by keepStep, which never makes or revives an assignment. AssignmentsMirrorToWrite refuses once the assignments are moved.
2026-10-18 03:36:05 +02:00
jschoubben 5d20d96c57 One route-proxy Dockerfile: the module's, which the Makefile builds (issue 1019) 2026-10-17 18:15:52 +02:00
jschoubben f0c6ce265c Vendor route-proxy's SDK so its provider builds offline (issue 1019) 2026-10-17 18:15:43 +02:00
jschoubben d82f24b51a Bring build-agent and route-proxy in whole (issue 1019) 2026-10-17 18:15:33 +02:00
jochen 99b2737b79 Stamp no commit in this repository's own image recipes either (hq issue 363, review of #292)
The genesis image copies the whole clone with .git, so its controller
carried the commit it was built at, as the bundles did.
2026-10-13 06:47:18 +02:00
mesh-admin 9aea1bd264 Merge pull request 'The route proxy tells a backend the request was HTTPS, and for which name' (#245) from fix/the-route-proxy-says-the-request-was-https into main 2026-10-03 20:23:02 +00:00
jochen 6d0a6a5116 The route proxy tells a backend the request was HTTPS, and for which name
NewSingleHostReverseProxy sets only X-Forwarded-For, so a backend that writes its own addresses saw
the plain hop from the proxy: Gitea's Go import tag named an http clone URL and go get refused the
SDK's module path. The proxy now sets X-Forwarded-Proto, -Host and -For from the request it received,
and keeps the Host header as it was.
2026-10-03 22:22:51 +02:00
jschoubben 961bf804c9 The intrusion-prevention seat serves status, banned, ban and unban; the proxy logs a refused name (hq ADR 0179)
Every holder of node-intrusion-prevention owes the four verbs, as the packet filter's holder owes
its three (ADR 0170). The proxy says in its log when a name this mesh does not serve is asked for,
with the asking address last, so its own jail can read it.
2026-10-02 17:02:49 +02:00
mesh-admin 946cf93ac2 Merge pull request 'The example images build from the Go the manifest pins' (#216) from jschoubben/example-images-go-base into main 2026-10-02 13:56:22 +00:00
jschoubben b0d831cd08 The example images build from the Go the manifest pins
Four example Dockerfiles named golang:1.25 while go.mod requires 1.26;
the control plane's image takes GO_BASE from the manifest and these did
not, so a build that could not fetch a newer toolchain failed at go mod
download (found running the lab through the mesh).
2026-10-02 15:52:25 +02:00
jschoubben 70b3bef9ee The proxy is told its routes and the mesh on the bus, and serves internal names to the mesh only
The proxy answered every routed name to any request carrying it, so an
internal-only route would have been public under its internal name. Each
membership now carries what its module receives, from the same
composition as its received file, and every machine's private-network
address, the list the packet filter's "from the mesh" is. The proxy
follows its membership, serves internal names only to those machines and
itself, and keeps the file until the bus has spoken (novox/hq ADR 0167,
issue 191).
2026-10-02 01:46:30 +02:00
jschoubben 531431a42f route-proxy: serve a route that names only its internal host
Since ADR 0138 an endpoint that reaches only the private network gets an
internal-name and no name, and the proxy skipped it as naming nothing, so
every internal-only module was unreachable by name (novox/hq issue 191).
2026-10-01 23:31:57 +02:00
jschoubben bae9fe1e4d Merge pull request 'A route may say the largest body it carries' (#68) from feat/a-route-may-limit-the-body-it-carries into main 2026-09-26 14:01:56 +00:00
jochen 91635ab5ac A route may say the largest body it carries
Proxy configuration beside insecure, not a fifth policy — ADR 0108 closed that set at four, and both
of these tune how a request is carried rather than deciding what a name admits. A registry is the
case that needs it: image layers arrive as single requests of gigabytes and a proxy's own default
refuses them long before the workload is reached.

Absent is no limit, which is what every route already got. A limit that is not a whole positive
number of bytes takes the route with it, named in the log like a port that is not one — serving it
without the limit would carry exactly what the module said not to carry. Enforced on the declared
length where there is one, and while reading for a chunked body, which declares none: without the
second, a limit is advice.
2026-09-26 16:01:21 +02:00
jschoubben c27c965262 Merge pull request 'route-proxy: a policy refusal is also not-my-token' (#67) from fix/a-policy-refusal-is-also-not-my-token into main 2026-09-26 12:26:19 +00:00
jschoubben 1edee852a6 route-proxy: a policy refusal is also not-my-token
autocert checks the host policy before the token and answers 403 — the
internal authority does this for every public name, so mail.novox.be's
challenge died on the internal manager's probe one commit after it
stopped dying on the public one's 404. Both shapes of refusal now fall
through to routing; a fifth test pins the 403 case with a refusing
policy.
2026-09-26 14:26:01 +02:00
jschoubben 3953757fd4 Merge pull request 'route-proxy: the challenge path falls through for real' (#66) from fix/the-challenge-path-falls-through-for-real into main 2026-09-26 12:22:21 +00:00
jschoubben 4bb4970569 route-proxy: the challenge path falls through for real
autocert's HTTPHandler answers 404 itself for a token it does not hold
and never consults its fallback on the challenge path — the
predecessor's exact fault, rediscovered live when Mailu's renewal died
behind this proxy on cutover day. tokenOrRoute probes each authority
against a buffered writer and hands a token none of them holds to plain
routing, so a consumer's own ACME client answers its own challenge
through an ordinary path-scoped route. Four tests pin it, including the
cache-key shape a restart-surviving token actually has.
2026-09-26 14:21:52 +02:00
jschoubben d46b5327b1 route-proxy: a second authority for internal names, and a target a route names the scheme of
Internal aliases were served over plain HTTP only — correctly refused a
public certificate (no public CA can validate a private name), and then
left with nothing. The mesh has two authorities for its two name spaces
(08-connectivity §2), so the proxy now takes an optional internal ACME
directory and dispatches at the handshake by the same question HostPolicy
already answers: which authority may certify this name at all.

A route may also say its target speaks https, with insecure for a backend
whose own certificate nothing would trust — the shape Mailu's webmail
front needs, and the exception: everything else the mesh hands this proxy
stays plain http on the private network.
2026-09-25 20:37:03 +02:00
jschoubben ed58eb2c80 Merge pull request 'route-proxy serves a route's internal-name alias, never certifies it' (#61) from feat/route-proxy-serves-internal-alias into main 2026-09-25 15:24:36 +00:00
jschoubben edb85c0416 route-proxy serves a route's internal-name alias, never certifies it
A route now consumed with two hosts when the mesh composed both — the
same host under internal-name reaches the same rule as its public name,
restoring the convenience a predecessor proxy gave for reaching a service
over the VPN without a public TLS round trip (the field composeName now
writes, feat/route-carries-internal-alias — this branch depends on that
one landing for internal-name to ever be populated; builds and tests
clean without it, just serves nothing extra).

Never certified: onlyWhatTheMeshSaid used routed(), which answered yes
for any host in the table regardless of how it got there. A new
eligibleForACME() checks a parallel 'public' set instead — every host
reached through a route's own name, never one reached only through its
internal-name — so an internal alias is proxied but never given its own
failing ACME order. routed() is unchanged and still used for the 404
message, which legitimately wants 'is this host served at all.'
2026-09-25 17:24:13 +02:00
jschoubben e693143685 Merge pull request 'route-proxy: a route carries the policy applied to a request' (#58) from issue/116-route-proxy-has-no-auth-or-ip-restriction into main 2026-09-25 12:21:43 +00:00
jochen 3397cb3f47 route-proxy: a priority is an ordering, not a port
Found reviewing my own change before merging it, and it was load-bearing rather than cosmetic.

Priority was read with asPort, which caps at 65535. A rule declared above that silently became
priority 0 and stopped shadowing the route it exists to shadow. The one real rule this has to
reproduce is declared at 100000 — so path scoping and refusal would both have shipped looking
complete, passing their tests, and doing nothing on the only case that motivated them.

A priority is an ordering and has no range. asWhole takes any whole number the mesh wrote and
rejects a non-integral one, which was not meant as a priority.

Also: a host may now be routed on some paths and not others, which made the 404 dishonest — it
said "no route for this name" while listing that very name as served, a contradiction an
operator has to disbelieve the proxy to get past. An uncovered path now says so, and a name
that is genuinely not served still lists what is.

Two regression tests, both through the proxy rather than against the parser, because the parser
was where the bug looked fine.
2026-09-25 14:20:06 +02:00