Merge pull request 'Playbooks 01 and 02: place research in the domains; its words reach the glossary at graduation' (#382) from playbooks/01-place-it-in-the-domains into main

Reviewed-on: #382

00-META/process/01-research.md

@@ -63,13 +63,20 @@ An idea arrives in one of two forms, and the first step differs:
      the reviews.
    - **Pre-check before proposing**, against what the review sends back most: every record, issue or design
      the text names is in `links`; work put off names the issue that tracks it (an acceptance test is not
-     put-off work: it is what the build proves, step 6); each figure is given as measured (a range, not a
+     put-off work: it is what the build proves, step 7); each figure is given as measured (a range, not a
      rounded claim); no word on a glossary *Not:* line.
    - **Try at the cheapest level that answers the question.** A program's own behaviour (a library, a
      server, a protocol) is tried in process, on the machine's loopback, in minutes. Lab runs (about 12 to
      16 minutes fresh) are for the mesh's own code; before that code exists, a lab run tests nothing an
      in-process test does not, and its lab scenario is written as the build's acceptance test instead.
-6. **Settle the direction with the operator.** When the questions are answered, write `05-direction.md`:
+6. **Place it in the domains.** Before the direction, write `03-domains.md`: the domain or domains the idea
+   belongs to (the glossary's sections, ADR 0244); the modules and seats it lands in, each new, changed or
+   retired; what it does to each domain's words, each word added (with its domain and a one-line meaning),
+   changed or retired, and none on a *Not:* line or already meaning something else (the glossary's homonyms);
+   and whether a domain grows or shrinks, a concept moving between domains included. The direction names its
+   decisions in those words. Asked when the idea is set up, too: an option that lands a concept in the wrong
+   domain is offered with that cost named, like one that breaks a rule.
+7. **Settle the direction with the operator.** When the questions are answered, write `05-direction.md`:
    the proposed decisions in a few lines each, the options rejected and why, and the build's acceptance
    tests: what the build must prove before it is done, carried by its milestones (playbook
    [04](04-build-handoff.md)). Nothing else is left open: each question closes by a test, by a decision the
@@ -84,7 +91,8 @@ An idea arrives in one of two forms, and the first step differs:
 | reading and the setup questions (1, 2) | 30 minutes | the session's own, larger |
 | proposing (3, 4) | 15 minutes | larger |
 | each experiment or reading task (5) | 30 minutes | smaller, one agent at a time unless the operator allows more |
-| the direction (6) | 30 minutes | larger |
+| placing it in the domains (6) | 15 minutes | larger |
+| the direction (7) | 30 minutes | larger |
 
 A step past its bound is said to the operator at once, with what is being done about it. The lead reports
 as playbook 07 does: every ten minutes and at once when something is found, stops or needs the operator,
@@ -124,7 +132,7 @@ and why, is the more expensive half to rediscover.
 
 The rules on an effort are the knowledge base's: `propose` refuses one that breaks a rule that judges one
 record (the module's table test holds one case per rule), and the rules that judge the whole record set run
-after every acceptance and raise a condition when one fails. The habits of steps 2, 5 and 6 (options checked
+after every acceptance and raise a condition when one fails. The habits of steps 2, 5, 6 and 7 (options checked
 against the rules, one version per settled set, the cheapest level, nothing left open) are the lead's, read by
 the reviewer; of the pre-check, `propose` refuses a link to nothing and a retired word, and the review returns
 a record named but not linked, an untracked deferral and a figure not as measured. That this repository holds

00-META/process/02-graduation.md

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ clauses in force for a topic or a record).
 
 ## Graduating research
 
-The effort's `05-direction.md`, confirmed by the operator (playbook [01](01-research.md), step 6), is what
+The effort's `05-direction.md`, confirmed by the operator (playbook [01](01-research.md), step 7), is what
 graduates. The lead writes the records and the design on the larger model; it is one sitting, bounded at
 about an hour, and said to the operator if it runs past.
 
@@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ about an hour, and said to the operator if it runs past.
 
    The design lists the direction's acceptance tests: what the build proves before it is done.
 
+   The words of the effort's `03-domains.md` go into the glossary in the same change, each in its domain: a
+   word added gets its entry, a word whose meaning changed gets its entry rewritten, and a retired word moves to
+   its replacement's *Not:* line. A word that already means something else in another domain is named as a
+   homonym with the qualified form each domain uses.
+
 4. **Hand it to the work breakdown.** The design goes on through playbook [04](04-build-handoff.md):
    milestones, issues, and each milestone built as one feature step (playbook [07](07-feature-branches.md)).
 5. **Close the effort.** `knowledge-base.propose` the effort again, whole, with `status: graduated` and a