Merge pull request 'Research 028: a conversation with the operator over channels that are seats; Telegram as first holder' (#139) from research/028-telegram-channels-and-triggers into main
mesh/delivery held for a person: merged without a passing check: only a person decides that it goes on

This commit was merged in pull request #139.
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-06 14:33:22 +00:00
8 changed files with 1396 additions and 2 deletions
@@ -10,6 +10,14 @@ touches:
- 02-DECISIONS/0208-the-graphical-session-is-one-module-per-piece-on-the-meshs-seats.md
- 02-DECISIONS/0210-a-tools-configuration-is-its-seat-holders-and-every-other-module-extends-it-through-the-seat.md
- 03-DESIGN/01-to-be/32-what-a-module-declares.md
- 03-DESIGN/01-to-be/45-a-core-that-cannot-fail-silently.md
- 02-DECISIONS/0190-a-seats-work-is-shared-by-its-holders-and-building-is-the-first-such-role.md
- 02-DECISIONS/0212-a-seat-says-what-it-receives-and-the-machines-hotkeys-are-a-seat.md
- 02-DECISIONS/0223-the-mesh-has-two-resolvers-and-a-machine-lists-only-them.md
- 02-DECISIONS/0227-the-core-holds-nine-rules-each-checked-and-is-built-to-them-in-six-phases.md
- 02-DECISIONS/0228-a-value-given-by-hand-lives-only-until-its-modules-first-good-start.md
- 02-DECISIONS/0230-a-consumer-the-mesh-stops-asking-for-is-retired-and-deleted-only-by-a-person.md
- 02-DECISIONS/0232-a-binding-to-a-consumers-data-moves-only-by-a-person.md
became: []
---
@@ -32,7 +40,34 @@ The effort looks at:
- **the life of a message:** deduplicated while it holds, resolved when it stops, acknowledged or
silenced by the operator;
- **the watcher's watcher:** who tells the operator when the parts that would tell them are the
ones that failed.
ones that failed;
- **the conversation** (widened 2026-10-06): the mesh, its modules and its agents send messages and
**asks** (a question, a choice, a value, an approval), and the operator answers or writes first, over
channels chosen by their declared **capabilities** and by the operator's **work context**. Inputs
from outside (a mail arriving) share the same envelope;
- **asks that authorise:** one layer on top, for the answers that perform an action. These are checked
by the controller, and allowed only on channels whose capabilities prove that the operator answered.
### Why this effort widened rather than a new one opened
On 2026-10-06 the operator asked for these:
- approving and rejecting through Telegram;
- a generic shape in which Telegram simply holds a seat;
- input triggers alongside output channels;
- capabilities that decide which actions may travel on which channel;
- the work context as a factor in choosing the channel;
- asks that are not about permission at all.
That could have opened a new effort. It did not, because:
- every part of it hangs on this effort's open questions: Q1 (where a channel attaches), Q4
(presence), Q7 (answering back) and Q8 (what may leave);
- ADR 0227 kept answering back open **here**, and said this effort's graduation amends to-be 45 §5;
- an answer belongs to the message or ask this seat sends. Splitting them would leave two efforts each
owning half of one conversation.
Input that is not an answer (a mail arriving, a webhook) shares the envelope and the seat shape, and
is designed here only as far as that shape. Its consumers are later work.
## Why
@@ -69,3 +104,19 @@ for the mesh, sources that call it, and channels that deliver.
2. [The channels](02-the-channels.md): the candidates, Telegram first, weighed on the same questions.
3. [Open questions](03-open-questions.md): the seat, routing, life of a message, the watcher's
watcher, what may leave the mesh.
4. [Telegram, as the first holder](04-telegram-as-the-first-holder.md): making the bot, the bot
API's limits and semantics, what Telegram sees, and ten defects in the built code.
5. [The other holders, on the same axes](05-the-other-holders-on-the-same-axes.md): ntfy, Matrix,
Pushover, Gotify, mail, Signal, SMS and a dead-man service, as away channel and as the watcher's
path.
6. [A conversation with the operator](06-a-conversation-with-the-operator.md): messages, asks and
operator messages; asks' kinds and life; the kinded benches `channel` and `intake`; the capability
vocabulary; agents as participants; the migration.
7. [The work context, and the desk](07-the-work-context-and-the-desk.md): the signals, the routing
by context and its escalation, presence kept inside the mesh, and the desk as a full participant
(notification actions, the launcher's prompt).
8. [Asks that authorise](08-asks-that-authorise.md): the actions that need a person, the trust
capabilities, the three proofs and the three tiers, the controller's checks, why the desk needs a
factor, and what a compromise can reach.
9. [A proposed decision](09-a-proposed-decision.md): the recommendation, the operator's steps, the
tables, and a record ready for graduation.
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
# 03 — Open questions
Each question names the options seen so far. None is decided here.
Each question names the options seen so far. None is decided here. Q1 and Q7 are taken further in
[06](06-a-conversation-with-the-operator.md) and [08](08-asks-that-authorise.md).
## Q1. The seat
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
# 04 — Telegram, as the first holder of a channel
Telegram was the operator's first required channel ([02](02-the-channels.md)) and it is built:
the output seat's holder carries a Telegram client, and so does the watcher's watcher (to-be 45 §5).
Neither is configured, because no bot exists yet. This document is what the operator needs to make one,
what the mesh's use of the bot API must respect, and what the built code gets wrong against it.
[06](06-a-conversation-with-the-operator.md) makes Telegram one holder of a generic channel seat rather
than the subject of the design. Everything here stays true under that shape: it is the first holder's
analysis.
Facts are as of 2026-10-06, Bot API 10.3 (2026-08-24). Sources are listed at the end.
## What the mesh uses from Telegram
Two programs send, and neither reads anything back yet:
- **The output seat's holder**, on the control node. It sends a message when a condition is raised,
says it again as a reminder, and edits the first message in place when the condition clears.
- **The watcher's watcher**, on a machine that is not the control node. It sends straight to the bot
API over HTTPS when the controller's self-check or the bus has been silent past its bound.
Each holds a **bot token** as its own secret, issued outside the mesh (ADR 0228, `issued-by: outside`),
and a **chat id** as a setting. Each sends plain text: no `parse_mode`, so no markup to escape and none
to inject.
## Making the bot
Telegram has no developer console. A bot is made by talking to Telegram's own bot, BotFather, from an
ordinary Telegram account.
- **An account is required, and an account needs a phone number.** There is no other sign-up. The
number can be a virtual one bought on Telegram's own marketplace, at a price that makes it
irrelevant here.
- **`/newbot`** asks for a display name and a username. The username is 5–32 characters of Latin
letters, digits and underscores, must end in `bot`, and cannot be changed later.
- BotFather answers with the **token**: digits, a colon, then a key. Anyone holding it controls the bot.
- **`/token`** issues a new token for the bot. The old one stops working at once. This is the rotation
path, and it is the only one.
- **`/setjoingroups` → Disable** stops anyone adding the bot to a group. The mesh's bot talks to one
person; a group is only a way for someone else to see what it says.
- **Privacy mode** (`/setprivacy`) governs what a bot sees **in groups**: with it on, only commands
meant for it, replies to it and service messages. In a private chat a bot sees everything the person
writes. With groups disabled, privacy mode does not matter; leave it on.
### A bot cannot speak first
A bot cannot open a conversation. Until the person presses **Start** in the bot's chat, every send to
them fails with a "Forbidden" error. So the operator presses Start once, on each bot.
### Finding the chat id, safely
In a private chat the chat id equals the person's user id. There are two ways to learn it:
- **Read `getUpdates` once by hand.** After pressing Start, a call to `getUpdates` returns the `/start`
message with the chat's id. It works today. Its two weaknesses: the token appears in a command line
(and so in a shell's history) unless read from a file, and it trusts that the `/start` it sees is the
operator's. A bot's username is public, and anyone who finds it can press Start too.
- **A linking verb with a one-time code.** The holder makes a short code and answers with a deep link
(`https://t.me/<bot>?start=<code>`). The operator opens it on the phone; Telegram sends `/start <code>`.
The holder reads it by `getUpdates`, and binds **that** chat and **that** user id only if the code
matches and is fresh. This proves the chat belongs to whoever held the code, and it never shows the
token to anyone. It needs the holder to read updates, which approvals need anyway
([08](08-asks-that-authorise.md)).
The second is the one to build. The first is the stop-gap until it exists.
### One bot or two
The holder and the watcher each have their own secret. They can hold the same token or two.
**Two bots are better:**
- Revoking one does not silence the other. The watcher exists for the day the rest is broken, and
that day must not also be the day its token was rotated away.
- The phone shows which program spoke.
- **Only one program may read a bot's updates.** Two concurrent `getUpdates` callers on one token make
Telegram answer the older with HTTP 409, "terminated by other getUpdates request". The moment the
holder reads answers, the watcher could no longer share its token with anything that reads.
## The bot API, as the mesh uses it
### Limits
- **Rate.** Telegram's FAQ: "In a single chat, avoid sending more than one message per second." In a
group, 20 messages a minute. Broadcast across chats: about 30 a second. The holder's own cap is 20 an
hour, so the limit is never near.
- **Over the limit** the API answers HTTP 429 with `parameters.retry_after`, the seconds to wait
before the request may be repeated. Repeating early prolongs the wait.
- **Length.** A text message is at most 4096 characters after entity parsing. Longer is refused with
HTTP 400, not cut.
- **Callback data** on a button is 1–64 bytes ([08](08-asks-that-authorise.md)).
### Editing
- **`editMessageText`** replaces a sent message's text. For an ordinary bot message there is no time
limit. The 48-hour limit applies only to business messages, and deletion has its own 48-hour limit.
- **An edit notifies nobody.** No sound, no banner, and the message stays where it was in the chat's
history. This is why a clearing is cheap to say by edit. It is also why an edit must never be the
only way something **new** is said.
- **An identical edit is an error:** HTTP 400, "message is not modified". It is harmless and must be
read as success, not as a failure to fall back from.
- **A deleted message** answers "message to edit not found". Falling back to a new message is right
then.
### Loudness
Telegram has **no message priority**. The only lever is **`disable_notification`**: the message
arrives without sound. It cannot break through the phone's do-not-disturb, so an urgent message at
night is as quiet as the phone is set to be. Per-chat notification settings on the phone (a custom
sound, an exception to do-not-disturb) are the operator's, not the mesh's.
### Formatting
With no `parse_mode` the text is shown as written, and nothing in a message can be read as markup.
That is the right default for words that pass a content rule rather than a template. If markup is ever
wanted, `MarkdownV2` needs every reserved character escaped and fails the whole send on one miss, so
plain text or `HTML` with escaping are the safer options.
`disable_web_page_preview` was **deprecated in Bot API 7.0** in favour of
`link_preview_options: {is_disabled: true}`. It still works, but the mesh's messages carry no links
(the content rule refuses URLs), so the parameter can simply be dropped.
### Answering back
Answers reach a bot two ways:
- **Long polling with `getUpdates`**, over outbound HTTPS. Updates wait at Telegram for at most
24 hours.
- **A webhook** (`setWebhook`), which Telegram calls over HTTPS on port 443, 80, 88 or 8443. It may
carry a secret header (`X-Telegram-Bot-Api-Secret-Token`) that proves the call came from the webhook
that was set.
Only one of the two at a time. [08](08-asks-that-authorise.md) chooses between them.
## What Telegram sees
- **Everything in the message.** A bot chat is a "cloud chat": encrypted between the phone and
Telegram, and between Telegram and the bot API caller, and readable by Telegram. Bots cannot take
part in Telegram's end-to-end "secret chats".
- **That is what the content rule is for.** The holder refuses any message carrying an address, a
path or a secret's shape (to-be 45 §5), so what Telegram stores is roles, words and condition keys.
- **Who the operator is.** The account's phone number, and the addresses the phone and the sending
machines connect from. Since September 2024 Telegram's privacy policy says it may disclose a user's
IP address and phone number to judicial authorities on a valid order.
- **Machine names.** A condition key names the machine it is about, and so does the watcher's message
("told by mesh-watcher on …"). The content rule refuses host names with a top-level domain, not bare
machine names. To-be 45 says a message's subject is "a machine's role". Whether a bare machine name
may leave is a decision this effort has not taken; today it does.
## When Telegram is unreachable
- **A send fails at the transport** (no DNS, no connection, timeout). The holder keeps what it held
and tries again every minute. The watcher keeps what it owes and tries again at its next tick.
Neither loses a message while it runs.
- **A send fails because Telegram refuses** (400 or 403). It is permanent for that message. The holder
today treats it like a transport failure and tries again every minute, for ever (see the defects).
- **Telegram being down is invisible to Telegram.** The holder's status says the channel is failing.
The operator sees that only through another channel or by asking. This is what a second holder of a
different kind is for ([05](05-the-other-holders-on-the-same-axes.md)).
- **Telegram is blocked** in some countries and on some networks. An operator travelling should know
the mesh's phone channel may be one of them.
## Cost
- **Free.** No per-message charge. Telegram's paid broadcasts (above 30 messages a second) are far
out of range.
- **One account**, which the operator very likely already has.
- **Two secrets**, one token per bot, both `issued-by: outside`.
## The built code, checked against this
Read from the code repository's main branch on 2026-10-06: the holder's `telegram.go`, `outbox.go`,
`holder.go`, `content.go`, and the watcher's `telegram.go` and `watcher.go`. The two Telegram clients
are copies of each other, kept apart on purpose so the watcher depends on nothing it watches.
What is right:
- **Plain text**, with no `parse_mode`.
- **The token is kept out of every error.** The client rebuilds transport errors from their kind,
because the URL carries the token. It also strips the token from the API's own description.
- **Token and chat id are re-read at each send**, so accepting the secret or changing the setting needs
no restart.
- **A token's shape is checked.** A random value the mesh minted for an un-accepted secret is named as
that, not sent to Telegram to be refused.
- **A missing edit falls back to a new message.**
- **The holder caps itself** at 20 messages an hour and folds bursts into digests, far inside
Telegram's limits.
### Defects
| # | Where | What | Effect | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | holder: `telegram.go`, `outbox.go` | Nothing bounds a message to 4096 characters. A long summary, or a digest of long titles, is refused with 400. `failed` keeps the whole batch and retries it every minute. | One oversized message wedges the Telegram channel: everything queued behind it waits for ever. | high |
| D2 | holder: `holder.go` (`h.edit(old, "reopened", false)`) | A condition that clears and is raised again within ten minutes is said by **editing** the first message. On Telegram an edit notifies nobody. | A reopened urgent condition reaches the phone **silently**, high up in the chat's history. | high |
| D3 | holder: `outbox.go` (`r.Sent[name]` keeps only the first id) | Reminders and escalations are new messages, but clearing edits only the first. | The newest thing on the phone still says "STILL OPEN" or "NOW URGENT" after the condition cleared. The "CLEARED" is a silent edit, out of sight. | medium |
| D4 | both: `telegram.go` | `Message.Quiet` and `Message.Urgent` are ignored. `disable_notification` is never set. | A clearing, or a warning, rings as loudly as an urgent message. Telegram's only loudness lever is unused. | medium |
| D5 | both: `telegram.go` (`call`) | HTTP 429's `parameters.retry_after` is not read. The retry is a flat minute. | Harmless at the holder's cap. Under a real flood wait, repeating early prolongs it. | low |
| D6 | holder: `telegram.go`, `outbox.go` | Every refusal (400, 403) is retried like a transport failure. "message is not modified" on an edit is read as a failed edit, and a new message is sent instead. | Permanent errors loop every minute in the log. A no-op edit becomes a duplicate message. | low |
| D7 | both: `telegram.go` | `disable_web_page_preview` is deprecated since Bot API 7.0. | Works today. Moot, since no message carries a link. Drop it. | low |
| D8 | both: `telegram.go` (`call`) | The `json.Marshal` error is discarded. A non-numeric `message_id` (`json.Number`) makes the body empty. | A confusing refusal from Telegram instead of a local error. Ids come from Telegram, so it is unlikely. | low |
| D9 | watcher: `watcher.go` (`Tick`) | A "silent" message that could not be sent is overwritten by the "CLEARED" message when the signal returns. | The operator can receive "heard again" for a silence they were never told of. Better to say both, or one line saying it was silent for N minutes and is back. | low |
| D10 | both | `Ready()` is satisfied by a token and a chat id. It does not know whether the operator pressed Start, or whether the bot was blocked (403). | Status says "ready" until the first send fails. The watcher's own test verb is the only proof. A `getChat` check at status time would say it. | low |
D1 and D2 matter before the channel is configured. D1 can silence the channel. D2 silences exactly the
case (a flapping urgent condition) the operator most needs to hear.
## Sources
- Telegram, *Bots FAQ*: rate limits, paid broadcasts. https://core.telegram.org/bots/faq
- Telegram, *Bot API* (version 10.3, recent changes, `getUpdates` retention, `ResponseParameters`,
`setWebhook`, `link_preview_options`). https://core.telegram.org/bots/api
- Telegram, *Bot features*: BotFather, `/newbot`, `/token`, `/setprivacy`, deep linking.
https://core.telegram.org/bots/features
- `link_preview_options` replacing `disable_web_page_preview` (Bot API 7.0); the removal of the old
argument in python-telegram-bot v22. https://docs.python-telegram-bot.org/en/v22.0/telegram.ext.defaults.html
- "message is not modified" and "message to edit not found" in practice:
https://github.com/tdlib/telegram-bot-api/issues/400
- 409 "terminated by other getUpdates request":
https://community.home-assistant.io/t/help-on-telegram-extension-error-while-getting-updates-conflict-terminated-by-other-getupdates-request-make-sure-that-only-one-bot-instance-is-running-409/177544
- Telegram privacy policy change, September 2024:
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/telegram-now-shares-users-ip-and-phone-number-on-legal-requests/
- Bots and secret chats; cloud-chat encryption:
https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/telegram-privacy-security/38444/
- Phone number required; anonymous numbers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegram_(software)
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
# 05 — The other holders, on the same axes
Every candidate is judged as a holder of the channel and intake seats in
[06](06-a-conversation-with-the-operator.md): which capabilities it can honestly declare
(the vocabulary is defined there), and what it needs. [02](02-the-channels.md) weighed the same
candidates before any of this was measured. This document replaces its reading of them with facts as
of 2026-10-06, and adds the question 02 could not ask: **can the operator answer through it, and
authorise an action through it?** ([08](08-asks-that-authorise.md)).
Two roles are judged separately, because they want different things:
- **The away channel:** the mesh's urgent messages and its asks, wherever the operator is.
- **The watcher's path:** the message that the mesh itself has gone silent. It must not depend on the
control node, the bus or the controller. The mesh observed has its controller, its bus and its mail
server on the anchor (the control node). Its Matrix server is on the home-server, behind a household
connection.
## The candidates
### ntfy
A small push server. Topics are published to over HTTP; the phone app subscribes.
- **Self-hosted vs the public server.** Self-hosted keeps the words on the operator's machines.
The public `ntfy.sh` takes no sign-up. Its free tier allows 250 messages a day **per IP address**,
shared with whoever else sends from that address. Paid tiers (from about $5–6 a month) give
reserved topics and higher quotas. An unreserved topic on the public server is readable by anyone
who guesses its name.
- **Phone delivery.**
- **Android:** through Google's FCM from the public server, or through the app's own long-lived
connection to a self-hosted server ("instant delivery"), which costs battery.
- **iOS:** cannot be reached by a self-hosted server alone. The server must name an upstream
(`upstream-base-url`, normally `ntfy.sh`), which receives a poll request carrying only a message
id and a hash of the topic, and has Apple wake the phone. The words do not pass through the
upstream. The dependency does.
- **Loudness:** five priorities. The highest gives "really long vibration bursts" and a pop-over on
Android.
- **Answers:** up to three action buttons. An `http` action makes **the phone** send a request,
which needs a route from the phone to the mesh and a credential carried inside the notification.
Nothing tells the server **who** tapped, only that someone holding the notification did. No free-text
reply.
- **As the watcher's path:** self-hosted, it fails with the machine it runs on. The public server
works, at the cost of a guessable topic or a subscription.
### Matrix (a homeserver is already one of the mesh's modules)
The module runs Conduit and Element Web, on the home-server.
- **Reach:** any Matrix client on the phone. Push goes from the homeserver to the client's **push
gateway**: for the stock Element apps, Element's gateway at matrix.org, which hands it to Apple or
Google. A self-hosted gateway needs a self-built app. UnifiedPush (via ntfy) is an option on Android.
- **Push support in Conduit has lagged.** Its own documentation long listed mobile push as missing,
and forks have since reworked pushers. Whether the running version pushes reliably is **unverified**
and must be measured before Matrix is relied on for anything urgent.
- **Answers:** free text, and reactions (`m.reaction` annotations) as one-tap choices. Clients add
emoji variation selectors, which must be normalised before a reaction is read as a choice.
- **Who answered:** the sender's Matrix id is authenticated **by the homeserver**, which the mesh
runs. That is strong for an account on the mesh's own server, and only as strong as that server.
- **Privacy:** end-to-end encrypted if the bot supports it. Otherwise readable by the homeserver,
which is the mesh's own.
- **As the watcher's path:** it survives the control node going down. It does not survive the home's
connection going down, and its phone push still depends on matrix.org's gateway.
- **Cost:** a bot account and its secret. No third party for the words.
### Pushover
A paid push service with a stable API.
- **Cost:** $4.99 one-time per platform after a 30-day trial. 10,000 messages a month per
application.
- **Limits:** 1024 characters, a 250-character title.
- **Loudness:** the strongest of any candidate.
- Priority 1 bypasses the user's quiet hours.
- Priority 2 ("emergency") repeats every `retry` seconds (at least 30) until acknowledged or until
`expire` (at most three hours). It returns a **receipt** that can be polled outbound to learn
whether, and when, it was acknowledged.
- **Answers:** acknowledgement only. No buttons, no reply.
- **As the watcher's path:** yes. It is outbound HTTPS from any machine, to a third party.
- **Where the words go:** to Pushover.
### Gotify
Self-hosted, Android only. Delivers over a WebSocket the app keeps open. There is no official iOS app,
and Apple's restrictions make a self-hosted iOS push impossible without a relay. It has no answer path
beyond opening the app. **Not pursued:** it covers less than ntfy and nothing ntfy does not.
### Mail through an outside provider
- **The mesh's own mail server is on the control node,** so it fails with it.
- **An outside relay** (an SMTP account at a mail provider) reaches the operator from any machine.
- **Urgency:** none. Mail is the digest and the record.
- **Answers:** a reply, slowly. **Who answered is weak:** a From line can be forged, and checking
DKIM only proves the operator's provider sent it.
- **Mail as an intake** (a new mail arriving) is a trigger in its own right
([06](06-a-conversation-with-the-operator.md)), whatever its weakness as a channel for asks that authorise.
### Signal, through `signal-cli`
- **An unofficial client,** and it needs its own phone number, registered with a captcha.
- **It must be kept current.** Signal's own clients expire after three months, and the server then
changes incompatibly. In March 2026 Signal began unregistering accounts whose client lacked a new
protocol feature, and every `signal-cli` account registered before that date was dropped.
- **Privacy:** end-to-end encrypted. Sender identity is strong (Signal's identity keys). Reactions
and replies both work.
- **Weight:** a phone number and a maintenance burden with a hard failure mode. It is the right
choice only for an operator who requires end-to-end encryption on the phone and accepts that burden.
### SMS through a paid gateway
The only candidate that reaches a phone with **no data connection**.
- **Cost:** per message, with an account at a gateway.
- **Privacy:** no encryption. Sender identity on replies is spoofable.
- **Its place:** the last resort of an outside dead-man service (below), which offers SMS and phone
calls on paid plans, rather than a channel of the mesh's own.
### An outside dead-man service
A service the mesh **pings**, which alerts by its own means when the pings stop. It is not a channel
of the mesh: it is the one thing that still speaks when **every** machine, or the home's connection
and the anchor together, are gone. [03](03-open-questions.md) Q6 named it the cheapest answer that
also covers "the whole house is offline".
- **Healthchecks.io** (also self-hostable, which defeats the point here) monitors 20 checks free,
without a card.
- It notifies through Telegram, Signal, Matrix, ntfy, Pushover, mail and others.
- Paid plans add SMS, WhatsApp and phone-call credits.
## The table
Capabilities are those of [06](06-a-conversation-with-the-operator.md). ✓ declared honestly,
— not, ~ conditional (the note says on what).
| Holder | reaches-away | loud | silent | edit | choice | reply | verified-sender | exact-render | code-factor | private | off the control node | cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Telegram | ✓ | — (do-not-disturb wins) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ (user id) | ✓ | ✓ (code as a reply) | — | ~ (a holder on another machine) | free |
| desktop notifier | — | ~ (critical urgency) | ✓ | ✓ | ~ (actions, read by nobody) | — | — (any program of the account) | ✓ | — | ✓ | — | none |
| ntfy, self-hosted | ✓ | ✓ (priority 5) | ✓ | — | ~ (http action, phone → mesh) | — | — | ✓ | — | ✓ (iOS: relay sees ids) | — | a module |
| ntfy.sh | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | ~ | — | — | ✓ | — | — | ✓ | free (250/day/IP) or ~$5/mo |
| Matrix (own server) | ~ (push unverified) | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ (reactions) | ✓ | ✓ (own homeserver) | ✓ | ✓ | ~ (E2E if the bot does it) | ~ (home-server, not anchor) | a bot account |
| Pushover | ✓ | ✓✓ (emergency, repeats) | ✓ | — | ~ (acknowledge only) | — | ✓ (for acknowledge) | ✓ | — | — | ✓ | $4.99 once |
| mail, outside relay | ✓ (slow) | — | ✓ | — | — | ✓ | — (forgeable) | ✓ | ~ (code in a reply) | — | ✓ | an account |
| Signal (`signal-cli`) | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ (reactions) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | a number + upkeep |
| SMS gateway | ✓ (no data needed) | ✓ | — | — | — | ~ | — | ✓ | — | — | ✓ | per message |
## Reading it
**For the away channel and for asks,** Telegram is the only candidate that is all of these at
once: free, on both phone platforms, without a server of the mesh's own, and able to carry every tier
of authorising ask ([08](08-asks-that-authorise.md)), including a code as a second proof. Its price is that
Telegram reads the words, which is what the content rule is for.
- **Matrix** is the self-hosted equivalent for asks. It waits on a measurement of Conduit's push.
- **Signal** is the end-to-end-encrypted equivalent, at a maintenance cost that has already broken
every installation once this year.
**For waking the operator,** Pushover's emergency priority is the only thing that repeats until
acknowledged and gets through quiet hours. Telegram cannot. It is a reasonable **second** away holder
for urgent conditions only, if the operator wants to be woken. It cannot carry an answer beyond
"acknowledged".
**For the watcher's path,** the requirement is independence from what it watches:
- **Telegram, sent directly** from a machine that is not the control node, with its own bot, meets it
(to-be 45 §5).
- **ntfy self-hosted does not.**
- **Matrix only half meets it** (it is on the home-server, and its push goes through matrix.org).
- **What none of them covers** is the watcher's own machine, or the home's connection, going down
together with the anchor. Only an outside dead-man service covers that.
## Sources
- ntfy, *Configuration* (iOS upstream relay, FCM, access control): https://docs.ntfy.sh/config/
- ntfy, *Publishing* (priorities, actions, `http` action, message size): https://docs.ntfy.sh/publish/
- ntfy.sh pricing: https://ntfy.sh/#pricing. Its free-tier rate limit is per IP:
https://github.com/binwiederhier/ntfy/issues/1963
- Pushover API (length, quota, priorities, emergency retry/expire, receipts): https://pushover.net/api
- Pushover pricing: https://pushover.net/pricing
- Gotify, platform support: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.gotify and
https://guancyxx.cn/en/blog/ntfy-vs-gotify-vs-nostr
- Element push gateway (Sygnal at matrix.org):
https://github.com/vector-im/element-android/blob/develop/docs/notifications.md
- Matrix reactions (`m.annotation`): https://github.com/uhoreg/matrix-doc/blob/aggregations-reactions/proposals/2677-reactions.md
- Conduit changelog: https://conduit.rs/changelog/
- signal-cli, registration with a captcha: https://github.com/AsamK/signal-cli/wiki/Registration-with-captcha
- signal-cli, unregistration of outdated clients in 2026: https://github.com/AsamK/signal-cli/issues/1993
- Healthchecks.io pricing: https://healthchecks.io/pricing/. Its Telegram integration:
https://healthchecks.io/integrations/telegram/
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
# 06 — A conversation with the operator
The operator's directions, 2026-10-06, in substance:
- **Telegram is one output channel among many to come.** The setup must be generic, and Telegram
simply fulfils a seat.
- **The same holds for input:** a new mail, a new message from the operator.
- **Each channel has capabilities.**
- **Approval is only an example.** An agent may just as well want to ask a simple question, and "it
doesn't have to be permission related".
So the core of this effort is not a notifier and not an approval path. It is **a conversation with
the operator, held over channels**:
- the mesh, its modules and its agents **say** things and **ask** things;
- the operator **answers**, or **writes first**;
- each exchange goes over whichever channel is right for its needs and for where the operator is.
This document is that general model. [07](07-the-work-context-and-the-desk.md) is how the work context
chooses the channel. [08](08-asks-that-authorise.md) is one layer on top: asks whose answer performs an
action, and the checks that makes necessary. [04](04-telegram-as-the-first-holder.md) and
[05](05-the-other-holders-on-the-same-axes.md) are the first holders.
## What exists, and how it is shaped
Read from the catalogue's main branch on 2026-10-06.
- **The output seat's holder is one module doing three jobs.** It claims `operator-channel` (mesh
scope, serving `open`, `history` and `notify`). It consumes the controller's three condition events.
It holds the Telegram bot token as its own secret. It reaches the desktop through the `node-notifier`
seat's `send`.
- The router, the Telegram client and the desktop adapter are one process.
- `notify` is a served verb, not the work queue to-be 32 §3 sketched.
- **The desktop notifier** is the node seat `node-notifier`, held by the dunst module on each
graphical machine.
- **The watcher's watcher** has its own Telegram client and token, and is not assigned yet.
- **Nothing reads anything back.** The operator speaks to the mesh only through an agent session or a
shell.
## The three things said
- **A message:** the mesh tells the operator something. A condition raised, a reminder, a clearing,
a notice from a module. It expects no answer. It may be edited later (a clearing).
- **An ask:** someone wants the operator's input, of a declared kind. The answer goes back to whoever
asked.
- **An operator message:** the operator writes first. It is a message to an agent, a note to the mesh,
or an answer to an ask written in the thread instead of tapped.
Inputs from outside that are not the operator (a mail arriving, a webhook) are the same kind of
envelope as an operator message, with a sender that is not the operator. This effort designs their
shape only. Their consumers are later work.
## Asks
### Kinds
| Kind | The operator gives | Required capabilities of the channel |
|---|---|---|
| `yes-no` | yes or no | `choice`, or `reply` (read as yes or no) |
| `one-of` | one of up to eight labelled options | `choice`, or `reply` with the option's number |
| `text` | free text | `reply` |
| `number`, `date` | a value of that type, within bounds | `reply`. Parsed and checked by the seat's holder; asked again once if it does not parse. |
| `acknowledge` | "seen" | `choice` |
An ask whose answer **performs an action** (approve a retirement, delete data) is the same ask with
an **authorising** flag. It adds requirements of trust, which [08](08-asks-that-authorise.md)
defines. Everything else about it is as below.
### What an ask carries
- an id;
- the asker (its bus principal and its machine);
- the kind, with its options or bounds;
- the words;
- a priority (urgent or normal);
- optionally a timeout and a default;
- optionally a conversation handle (where the asker is talking with the operator);
- optionally a group, for batching.
The words pass the content rule like every message.
### Its life
**open → answered | defaulted | expired | cancelled**
- **Answered:** the first answer wins. Copies of the ask shown on other channels are edited to say
where it was answered.
- **Defaulted:** the timeout passed and the ask declared a default. The asker receives the default,
marked as a default, never as the operator's answer.
- **Expired:** the timeout passed with no default. The asker is told.
- **An authorising ask never defaults to performing.** It expires. ADR 0230's rule, "a timer is the
mesh acting alone again, only later", applies to every ask that authorises.
- **Cancelled:** the asker no longer needs it (`ask cancel`), or its owner sees it is moot (the
condition behind it cleared). Its copies are edited to "no longer needed".
### How the asker gets the answer
- The answer is emitted as **`ask-answered`**, with the ask's id and, where there is one, the
conversation handle.
- An asker may **wait**: `ask` with a wait of up to a few minutes returns the answer if it comes in
time, and otherwise returns the id.
- An agent working through a long task can **poll** `asks <id>`.
### Batching
- **Asks to the same channel within the burst window go out together.** A heading says how many are
open ("3 questions waiting"), and each ask follows as its own message, so each can be answered and
edited alone.
- **An asker may hold at most three open asks.** A fourth is refused to it, in words, so an agent in
a loop cannot flood the operator.
- **Asks count against the router's hourly cap** like messages. Answers do not.
### History
**`asks`** lists open asks, and closed ones for 30 days: the asker, the kind, the outcome, the channel,
and the answer. A free-text answer is the operator's own words. It stays in the router's state and is
never forwarded to a channel other than the one it came from.
## Who holds what
### The output seat's holder becomes the conversation's router
It holds `operator-channel` and gains asks:
- `ask` (create),
- `ask cancel`,
- `asks`,
- `answer` (called by intake holders, below),
- events `ask-opened`, `ask-answered`, `ask-closed`.
It **owns** every ask that authorises nothing.
An authorising ask is **owned by the controller** ([08](08-asks-that-authorise.md)). The router carries
it like any other, but its answer goes to the controller, which alone can perform.
### Where a channel sits: [03](03-open-questions.md) Q1, asked again
Q1 settled that **one seat speaks for the mesh** and that sources never learn channels. It assumed
each channel attaches by contribution. With many channels to come, and channels that answer, that is
the question to settle.
The mesh's precedents:
- A **seat** has one holder at its scope (ADR 0121, ADR 0126).
- A **node seat** has one holder per machine, and a verb's subject carries the machine (design 33 §4).
- A **bench** is a seat with several holders. The only one is `mesh-dns-resolver`: the same module,
one per machine. "Making another one is a decision, recorded" (ADR 0223).
- A **work queue** is shared by a seat's holders (ADR 0190).
- A **contribution** is content another module hands to a seat's holder (ADR 0210, ADR 0212).
The options:
- **a. Each channel contributes itself to the output seat** (Q1 a, to-be 45 §5).
- A contribution is content a holder places.
- A channel is running code: it holds a secret, keeps a connection, reads answers, fails on its own.
- Making it fit puts every channel's client back in the router. **Rejected.**
- **b. One seat per channel kind.** The router learns every seat; a new channel is a change to the
router. **Rejected.**
- **c. Channel modules found by a manifest field and called by module address.** Callers use seats,
never modules (ADR 0126). **Rejected.**
- **d. One monolithic notifier,** every channel built into the router. Shared secrets and failures, a
release per channel. **Rejected.**
- **e. A channel module per service, with its own approval or question path** (a "Telegram module"
that decides things). It locks the conversation to one service, and the next channel repeats it.
**Rejected.**
- **f. Kinded benches.** Two mesh seats, **`channel`** (out) and **`intake`** (in). Their holders are
different modules, each claiming a **kind** (`telegram`, `desktop`, `ntfy`, `matrix`, `mail`, …).
- One holder per kind; two claiming one kind is refused at registration.
- A verb's subject carries the kind, as a node seat's carries the machine:
`mesh.seat.channel.tool.send.<kind>`.
- A new channel is a new module claiming a new kind, with no change to the router.
- **Chosen.**
Option f needs a second bench, of a new sort (different modules, keyed by kind), which ADR 0223 says
must be decided. It also needs a claim that carries a kind and capabilities.
## The channel seat (out)
**`channel`**, mesh scope, a kinded bench.
### Served
- **`send`:** words, a priority, whether silent, an optional **ask block** (the kind, the options each
with an opaque token, the ask id) and an optional thread (the conversation handle, or the message
this replies to). Answers the channel's id for what it sent, or a refusal in words.
- **`edit`:** replace a sent message by its id, where `edit` is declared.
- **`standing`:** ready, not configured (naming what is missing, never a value), or failing (since
when, why); the last delivery; the declared capabilities.
### Emitted
- **`delivered`** and **`failed`**, the latter marked **permanent** or **transient** (defect D6 in
[04](04-telegram-as-the-first-holder.md)).
### Honoured
- The declared maximum length, by cutting and saying so (D1).
- Silence where declared (D4).
- An identical edit is a success (D6).
- No own secret in any error or event.
### The content rule
The content rule is the router's, applied before anything reaches a holder that does not declare
`private`.
## The intake seat (in)
**`intake`**, mesh scope, a kinded bench. A service that is read and written by one program (a
Telegram bot, [04](04-telegram-as-the-first-holder.md)) is held by one module claiming both seats under
one kind.
A holder turns what arrives into **one envelope**:
| Field | What it is |
|---|---|
| `id` | Unique, for deduplication. |
| `kind` | The holder's kind. |
| `what` | `message` (written first), `choice` (a button or a reaction), `reply` (written in an ask's thread), `mail`, `call` (a webhook), `seen` (activity, for the work context). |
| `sender` | The identity on that service, and whether the service authenticated it. |
| `operator` | Whether that identity is on the **controller's** list of the operator's identities. Filled from that list, never from the holder's own. |
| `conversation` | An opaque handle. Sending on it reaches the same chat, room or mail thread. |
| `in-reply-to` | The ask or message it answers, if any. |
| `payload` | The text, or the option's token. **No secrets:** a code for an authorising ask never travels in an envelope ([08](08-asks-that-authorise.md)). |
| `at` | When. |
**Answers go to the ask's owner by request and reply:**
- the router's `answer` for an ordinary ask;
- the controller's for an authorising one.
**Everything else is an event on the seat,** which consumers take by `what`:
- the router takes `seen` for the work context;
- an agent bridge takes `message` from the operator;
- a future mail rule takes `mail`.
**One gap to close:** the shared library cannot yet publish on a seat's event subjects (design 32 §1).
## The capability vocabulary
**Fixed and versioned:** `channel-capabilities/1`. A holder declares capabilities in its claim, and
the catalogue refuses a word outside the vocabulary. **Each capability has a contract test** the
holder's build runs and a **drill** its `standing` can run. One that fails its drill is reported and
withdrawn from routing until it passes.
The words are in three groups. The first two serve every conversation. The third exists only for
asks that authorise, and is defined in [08](08-asks-that-authorise.md).
### Delivering
| Capability | Promise | Test / drill |
|---|---|---|
| `deliver` | It arrives, or `failed` says why. | Against a test double; a live test message. |
| `reaches-away` | It reaches a phone away from the operator's machines. | Declared by kind; the operator acknowledges a drill. |
| `loud` | It can break through the phone's quiet hours. | The service's override is set for urgent. |
| `silent` | It can arrive without sound. | The service's silent flag is set. |
| `edit` | A sent message can be replaced in place. | Edit and read back, against a double. |
| `max-length:N` | Up to N characters arrive whole; longer is cut, and the cut is said. | N+1 characters give a cut message, not a failure. |
| `reaches-when-mesh-down` | Delivering needs neither the bus nor the control node. | Checked by the holder's placement and its send path. |
| `private` | The words stay on the operator's machines, or are end-to-end encrypted. | Declared by kind; reviewed. |
### Conversing
| Capability | Promise | Test / drill |
|---|---|---|
| `choice` | The operator can pick one offered option in one act, and the pick comes back. | A simulated tap gives a `choice` envelope with the option's token. |
| `reply` | The operator can answer in free text, and it comes back. | A simulated reply gives a `reply` envelope. |
| `threads` | An answer is tied to the message it answers. | A reply to message A carries A in `in-reply-to`. |
| `operator-first` | The operator can write to the mesh unprompted. | A simulated message gives a `message` envelope. |
### Trusting
`verified-sender`, `exact-render`, `code-factor` and `key-factor` are defined in
[08](08-asks-that-authorise.md). A channel without them still converses fully. It just cannot carry
an answer that performs an action.
## Agents in the conversation
An agent is a participant. It asks, and it receives.
- **An agent whose operator is at its own terminal** asks there, in the terminal. The seat is not
needed.
- **An agent working unattended** (in the background, on a schedule, or with the operator stepped
away) asks **through the seat**. The router puts the ask where the operator is now
([07](07-the-work-context-and-the-desk.md)): the desk if they are at it, Telegram if they are away
or talking through Telegram. The agent waits for, or polls, the answer.
- **An agent the operator talks to through Telegram** receives the operator's messages as intake
envelopes. It answers on the conversation handle. Its asks carry that handle, so they appear in the
same chat.
- **An agent's words reach the operator only as an asker's words,** and the operator's answer reaches
the agent only as the operator's. An agent relaying "the operator said yes" is not an answer to
anything. That is why an answer comes from a channel holder, never from the asker
([08](08-asks-that-authorise.md)).
## The watcher, in this shape
The watcher's watcher stays **outside** the seats, deliberately:
- it must speak when the bus and the control node are what failed;
- the seats live on the bus.
It is a minimal `deliver` + `reaches-when-mesh-down` sender with its own bot. It never reads, and never
asks. Its sibling outside the mesh is the dead-man service ([05](05-the-other-holders-on-the-same-axes.md)).
## From today to this shape
1. **Fix the first holder in place:** D1–D4 of [04](04-telegram-as-the-first-holder.md). No change of
shape.
2. **The operator configures Telegram** ([09](09-a-proposed-decision.md)). The mesh starts telling.
3. **The vocabulary and the kinded bench in the catalogue,** and seat events in the shared library.
4. **Split Telegram out** into its own module holding `channel` and `intake` under `telegram`. The
router keeps the desktop adapter as `channel/desktop` and `intake/desktop`.
5. **Asks in the router,** with buttons and replies on Telegram and actions on the desktop
([07](07-the-work-context-and-the-desk.md)). Agents can ask from here on.
6. **The work context** as the router's ordering ([07](07-the-work-context-and-the-desk.md)).
7. **Authorising asks in the controller** ([08](08-asks-that-authorise.md)).
8. **Operator-first messages,** and an agent bridge consuming them.
9. **Further holders as wanted:**
- Pushover for waking;
- Matrix once its push is measured;
- mail out for the digest, mail in as an intake.
The watcher changes only at step 1.
## What this revisits in [03](03-open-questions.md)
- **Q1:** channels attach as holders of kinded benches (f), not as contributions.
- **Q3:** the life of a message gains the life of an ask. `edit` and `silent` are declared, and decide
how a clearing is said (D2, D3).
- **Q4:** presence becomes the work context ([07](07-the-work-context-and-the-desk.md)).
- **Q7:** answering back is the conversation itself. Its authorising layer is
[08](08-asks-that-authorise.md).
- **Q8:** the content rule stays, applied by the router. Whether a `private` holder may be exempted
is left to graduation.
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
# 07 — The work context, and the desk
The operator, 2026-10-06:
- "If dunst can also show buttons, we could prefer to use desktop notifications instead of Telegram
for approval actions when working in a session."
- "The work context is an important factor when deciding the correct output channel."
[06](06-a-conversation-with-the-operator.md) decides **which channels may carry** a message or an ask:
those whose declared capabilities satisfy it. This document decides **which of those comes first**,
from where the operator is working. It also makes the desk a full participant in the conversation.
## The rule
> **A message or ask goes to the most direct channel in the operator's current context, among those
> whose capabilities already satisfy it. Unanswered in time, it escalates along a fixed chain.
> Context orders the candidates; it never adds one. Context never lowers the bar.**
The last sentence matters most for asks that authorise ([08](08-asks-that-authorise.md)). Being at the
desk never makes a click count as more than it proves.
## The signals
| Signal | Source | Read as |
|---|---|---|
| A graphical session unlocked, with input in the last 5 minutes, on machine M | The `node-lock-screen` seat's holder on M (the screen-lock module), whose tools already read the idle time and the lock state. Underneath: logind's `LockedHint` and `IdleSinceHint`. Proposed: an event on each change, not a poll. | **at the desk on M** |
| That session locked, or idle longer | the same | **not at the desk** |
| An agent asking from machine M | The ask's asker names its machine. An agent module's own "session active" event, when one exists. | **working with an agent on M**. It strengthens "at the desk on M"; alone it proves nothing. |
| A verified intake `message`, `reply` or `choice` in the last 15 minutes | The intake seat ([06](06-a-conversation-with-the-operator.md)) | **in a conversation** on that kind |
| An ask carrying a conversation handle | The ask | **that conversation**, whatever else is true |
| The hour, against quiet hours | The router's setting | **night**: only urgent wakes |
## The contexts, and where things go
"The away channel" is the operator's setting (Telegram, to begin with). "The loud holder" is an
optional second away holder for waking (Pushover, [05](05-the-other-holders-on-the-same-axes.md)).
| Context | An ask goes to | Urgent message | Warning | Unanswered or unacknowledged → |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **In a conversation through Telegram** (the ask carries its handle, or Telegram activity is newer than any desk input) | that chat, in the thread | that chat | that chat, silent | after 10 min (urgent) or 1 h: also the desk, if active |
| **At the desk on M** (with or without an agent there) | the desk on M, if it can carry the ask; otherwise the away channel, and the desk says where it went | the desk on M, and the away channel silently | the desk on M | after 5 min (urgent) or 30 min: the away channel, with sound |
| **Away** (no unlocked active session, no recent conversation) | the away channel | the away channel | the away channel, silent | after 15 min (urgent): the loud holder, if configured |
| **Night, away** | non-urgent asks wait for the morning; urgent as away | the away channel and the loud holder | the morning digest | as away |
| **The desk locks while an ask is shown there** | moves at once to the away channel | — | — | — |
- **Every copy of an ask stays valid until one answer wins.** The others are edited to say where it
was answered.
- **The context's channel cannot carry the ask** (a free-text ask at a desk without a prompt, or an
authorising ask the desk cannot prove): the next in the chain carries it, and the context's channel
says where it went.
- **Nothing can carry it:** the router says so, as a condition of its own.
### Presence stays in the mesh
- **Presence facts are events on the bus,** consumed by the router.
- **They are kept as current state only:** a key-value entry per machine and per intake kind,
overwritten, never a history.
- **They never appear in a message's words,** so they never reach a channel that is not `private`.
- **No module keeps them as a timeline of the operator's day.** A consumer that wants one is a
decision of its own.
## The desk as a participant
Read from the catalogue's main branch and the tools' current documentation, 2026-10-06.
### What exists
- **The `node-notifier` seat** is held on each graphical machine by the dunst module. Its `send` runs
`notify-send --print-id` with an urgency, an application name and an optional replace id. It
carries **no actions** today.
- **libnotify's `notify-send`** (0.8 and later) takes `--action=NAME=Label`, repeatable, and `--wait`.
It prints the chosen action's name when one is chosen, and nothing when the notification is closed.
Underneath, the notification server emits `ActionInvoked` with the notification's id and the
action's key.
- **dunst shows actions:**
- `do_action`, which the module binds to the **middle** click, invokes the default or only action;
- otherwise it opens the **context menu**, which in this mesh is the `node-launcher` seat's
dmenu-compatible menu;
- `dunstctl action` and `dunstctl context` do the same from a command line.
- **The `node-launcher` seat's `menu` verb** shows a list in the operator's session and answers the
chosen line. A dmenu-compatible menu also accepts typed text that is not a listed line, which makes
it a free-text prompt.
- **The graphical session is X11.**
### What it takes
- **`send` gains actions:** a list of (token, label).
- **It still answers at once.** A notification may be answered minutes later.
- **The holder listens for `ActionInvoked`** and emits the chosen token as an event on its node seat.
- **The router's desktop adapter,** which holds `channel/desktop` and `intake/desktop`, turns that
into a `choice` envelope.
- **For `text`, `number` and `date` asks,** the notification's single action opens the launcher's
prompt, and what is typed comes back as a `reply`.
### What the desk can declare
| Group | Capabilities |
|---|---|
| Delivering | `deliver`, `silent` (low urgency), `loud` (critical urgency stays until dismissed), `edit` (replace id), `private` |
| Conversing | `choice` (actions), `reply` (through the launcher's prompt), `threads` (the ask's id is carried) |
| Trusting | **not** `verified-sender`. `exact-render` yes. `code-factor` (a prompt) yes. `key-factor` yes where a security key is plugged in. See [08](08-asks-that-authorise.md). |
So the desk carries **every ordinary ask**: yes or no, one of, text, number, date and acknowledge.
It needs no account anywhere. An agent working unattended on the workstation asks a clarifying question,
and the operator, at the desk, answers it in the notification.
It carries an **authorising** ask only with a factor the controller verifies itself, because a click
on an X11 desk proves that someone was there, not that the operator clicked
([08](08-asks-that-authorise.md)).
## Sources
- `notify-send(1)`, `--action` and `--wait`: https://man.archlinux.org/man/notify-send.1.en
- Desktop notifications and actions: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Desktop_notifications
- dunst documentation (mouse actions, `do_action`, the context menu): https://dunst-project.org/documentation/
- logind's `LockedHint`, `IdleHint`, `IdleSinceHint`:
https://freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/org.freedesktop.login1.html
@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
# 08 — Asks that authorise
Most asks inform their asker and change nothing ([06](06-a-conversation-with-the-operator.md)). Some
answers **perform an action**: approving a retirement, confirming that a binding moves, deleting data.
This document is the layer those asks need on top of the conversation. It is the controller's checks,
the trust a channel must prove, and what a compromise can reach.
The operator, 2026-10-06:
- "Make sure I can approve and reject stuff via the Telegram channel."
- In a terminal session with an agent, having to open Telegram is acceptable.
- But when talking to an agent **through** Telegram, the operator cannot switch to a desktop session.
- At the desk, desktop buttons would be preferred ([07](07-the-work-context-and-the-desk.md)).
## Where this stands against what was decided
- To-be 45 §5 says: "No answering back in this form".
- ADR 0227 kept it open on purpose: "routing by presence, quiet hours, **answering back** and the
external dead-man service stay open in 028, whose graduation amends to-be 45."
- So this answers 028's Q7. It does not reverse ADR 0227.
## What there is to authorise
Read from the controller's main branch on 2026-10-06. The condition store marks conditions only a
person resolves (`resolver: operator`): from the start for retirement, clean-up and binding conditions,
and once a healer's budget is spent.
| Action | The verb today | Asked for by | Reversible | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approve the retirement set waiting | `retire approve <node> <provider> --why` | `retire-waiting` (urgent) | yes: asking for a consumer again re-enables it | approve |
| Reject it | `retire reject … --why` | `retire-waiting` | yes | approve |
| Approve a set rejected before | `retire approve …` | `retire-rejected` (warning) | yes | approve |
| Confirm that a binding moves, once its data is moved | `pin <node> <provision> <from> <module>` | `binding-kept` (urgent) | the pin, yes. The data, not by the mesh. | approve |
| End a stuck plan | `plans stop` / `close <id> --why` | `stalled`, `sent-not-reported` once escalated | no, but it destroys nothing | approve |
| Send a machine its declaration by hand | `push <node> --why` | `sent-not-reported` once escalated | n/a | approve |
| Reset a bus consumer's position | `broker consumer-reset --why` | `consumer-behind` once escalated | no: messages skipped or redelivered | approve (graduation to confirm) |
| Try a healer's repair once more | the healer's ordinary path | any escalation (H1–H5), `healers-braked` | as the repair is | approve |
| Silence a condition | `conditions silence <key> --for --why` | any | yes, it ends by itself (at most 7 days) | acknowledge |
| Delete one retired consumer's data | `cleanup delete <node> <provider> <consumer> --why` | `cleanup-waiting` (after 30 days) | **no** | destroy |
| Delete everything retired longer than N days | `cleanup delete --older-than N --confirm --why` | `cleanup-waiting` | **no** | destroy |
| Change the operator's identities, the away channel, or a factor's enrolment | (new) | — | yes, but it changes who may authorise | destroy |
The build queue verbs and `replay --register` are not offered as asks: no condition asks for them.
## Trust, as capabilities and proofs
The conversation's vocabulary ([06](06-a-conversation-with-the-operator.md)) gains four words used
only here:
| Capability | Promise | Test / drill |
|---|---|---|
| `verified-sender` | The holder proves the answer came from the operator's own account on that service, by the service's authentication, through a holder **no agent shares**: not on the operator's account, not on a machine where agents run as the operator. | A choice from an identity not on the list is dropped and reported. The holder's placement is checked. |
| `exact-render` | The ask is shown as the controller rendered it, by the holder itself. No asker or agent composes the words the operator authorises. | Rendered text equals the controller's, byte for byte, against a double. |
| `code-factor` | The holder can carry a code the operator types to the controller, by request and reply, and never judges it. | A code is never in an event, and is deleted from the conversation where the service allows. |
| `key-factor` | The holder can run a security key's assertion over the controller's challenge, and hand the controller the result. | The challenge is the controller's, and the signature is checked by the controller. |
From these, three **proofs** that the operator is the one answering:
- **P1, a verified sender:** a Telegram tap, through a holder on a machine no agent runs on.
- **P2, a code:** from the operator's authenticator, verified by the controller.
- **P3, a key touch bound to the ask:** the controller's challenge is a hash of the ask's id and the
state digest. A FIDO2 assertion with user presence (the key waits for a touch) is checked against the
operator's enrolled credential. It proves a physical touch for **this** ask and no other.
## Three tiers
| Tier | Required |
|---|---|
| **acknowledge** | `choice`, `exact-render`. Silencing is open to agents already, and announced; a proof adds nothing. |
| **approve** | `choice`, `exact-render`, and **one** proof (P1, P2 or P3). Single use, bound to the exact state shown, expiring when that state changes or after 24 h. |
| **destroy** | `choice`, `exact-render`, and **two** proofs, at least one of them P2 or P3. Valid 10 minutes after it is shown; at most one destroy answered per 10 minutes. |
| Where the operator answers | Proofs it offers | acknowledge | approve | destroy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Telegram | P1 (tap), P2 (code as a reply) | tap | tap | tap and code |
| the desk, with a security key | P3 (touch), P2 (code in a prompt) | click | click and touch | click, touch and code |
| the desk, without a key | P2 (code in a prompt) | click | click and code | not possible: carried by the away channel |
| an agent's terminal | none | none | none | none: an agent asks, it never answers |
| the console (a shell) | P2 (code) | — | break-glass: a code | none |
### The rule
1. **Every authorising verb declares its tier** in the controller's verb table.
2. **An authorising ask is offered only on a channel whose capabilities satisfy its tier.** An answer
arriving from any other channel is refused, and the refusal is said there.
3. **The operator's away channel must satisfy every tier.** The self-check verifies it. A setting
that would make a tier possible only at a desk is refused, unless the operator chose that for the
tier explicitly. While working through Telegram, everything can be completed in Telegram.
4. **The work context chooses among the channels that qualify; it never makes one qualify**
([07](07-the-work-context-and-the-desk.md)).
5. **No agent authorises.** An agent asks. It holds no verb that performs an authorising action. The
record names the agent that asked.
## Why the desk needs a factor
- **X11 does not isolate the clients of one display.** Any of them can inject input (the XTEST
extension, as `xdotool` does) and read keystrokes.
- **`dunstctl action` invokes a notification's action** for any program of the account.
- **The desktop holder runs as the operator's account,** whose files, the holder's bus credential
included, every agent on that account can read.
So a click at the desk, its `ActionInvoked` and the desktop holder's envelope can all be produced by
an agent. An unlocked session with recent input proves a person was there, not that the person
clicked. The desk declares no `verified-sender`. A factor the **controller** verifies gets around
that.
| Factor at the desk | Can an agent on the account fake it? | Judgement |
|---|---|---|
| **A security key's touch, bound to the ask** (P3) | No: the touch is physical, and the signature covers this ask's id and state. | **Preferred.** One click, one touch, no phone. Needs a key and an enrolment. |
| **A code typed into the launcher's prompt** (P2) | It cannot know the code. On X11 it can read keystrokes and race to use the code first, and each step's code is accepted once. | **Acceptable** without a key. Costs picking up the phone. The race is a residual risk until the session leaves X11. |
| **The screen's unlock or a fingerprint** | Yes: only the local holder sees the result. | **Rejected.** |
The desk would earn `verified-sender` only if agents ran under an account of their own, without the
operator's display, session bus or holders' credentials, on a compositor that isolates clients. That
is a question for the agent modules' placement. It is noted, not proposed.
## The controller holds authorising asks
Today a grant covers a whole verb (`seat:mesh-controller.retire` allows approving and listing alike).
A hand-act records `by` from the calling bus principal, which for a channel would be the module, not
the person. Both call for the controller to hold these asks itself.
- **The verb table gains a field.** The controller's verb definition (a name, a description, input and
output schemas) gains **`authorises`**: the tier, and the arguments that make up the exact state a
person must see (for `retire approve`, the set of consumers).
### Three verbs
- **`authorise request`:** anyone may call it, an agent or the router on a condition's behalf. It
carries the action (verb and exact arguments), why, and optionally a conversation handle.
- The controller renders the ask: what is asked, the exact state, who asks, what each option does.
- It stores it with an opaque id (10 random base32 characters), its expiry and a digest of the
state shown, and emits `ask-opened` with the controller as owner.
- The router carries it like any ask. **Nothing is performed.**
- **`authorise answer`:** only intake holders are granted it. It carries the id, the option, the
sender's identity, and the code or key assertion where the tier needs them. The controller checks,
and refuses at the first failure:
1. the ask is open and not expired;
2. the caller is the holder of an intake kind, by the controller's own seat records, never by the
request's claim;
3. that kind's declared capabilities, from the controller's records, satisfy the tier, and the
proofs present are enough;
4. a P1 answer: the sender is on the controller's list of the operator's identities for that kind;
5. a code: valid for the current or previous 30-second step, and unused;
6. a key assertion: it verifies against the enrolled credential, over this ask's challenge, with the
user-presence bit set;
7. the state **now** has the digest it had when shown. Otherwise the ask is void and a new one is
requested.
Then it performs the action as itself, records the hand-act, closes the ask with a compare-and-set
(so a second answer on another channel loses), and emits `ask-answered`.
- **`authorisations`:** open and recent authorising asks.
### The authorising verbs refuse to be called directly
`retire approve|reject`, `cleanup delete`, and `pin` while a `binding-kept` names it refuse a caller
unless the call comes through `authorise answer`, or carries a valid code as **break-glass** at the
console. Break-glass is recorded as such, and announced on every channel.
- `retire approve` must accept the set it approves (`expect`). Today it re-reads the set when it
runs, so "approve what you were shown" (ADR 0230) does not hold end to end.
- `conditions silence` stays callable. A silence an agent sets is said on the away channel, with its
why.
### The record
The hand-act gains:
- **`via`:** the kind and the holder;
- **`requested-by`:** the agent principal or the condition key;
- **`ask`:** the id;
- **`proofs`:** which of P1, P2 and P3 were present.
`by` reads "the operator, as <kind> identity <id>". Every copy of the ask is edited to the outcome
("approved by the operator on telegram at 14:02 UTC"), and its buttons are removed.
## Telegram, carrying them
- **Buttons.** `callback_data` is at most 64 bytes, so a button carries only `a1:<id>:<option>`.
Everything else is in the controller.
- **A tap** arrives as a `callback_query` with the tapping user's id and the chat. The holder:
1. drops it, and reports, unless both are the operator's;
2. calls `answerCallbackQuery` at once, because the phone shows a spinner until it does;
3. calls `authorise answer`;
4. edits the message to the outcome or the refusal.
- **A destroy ask** answers the tap with a `ForceReply` prompt for the code. The holder reads the
operator's reply, deletes it from the chat (bots may delete incoming messages in private chats), and
hands it to the controller by request and reply. It is never put in an event.
- **Long polling, not a webhook.**
- `getUpdates` needs no route into the mesh.
- A stolen token can steal updates, and a second reader shows as HTTP 409, but it cannot inject an
update.
- A webhook needs a public route, and a stolen token can redirect it.
- The offset is kept in the holder's state, and ids are single use anyway.
- **Placement.** The Telegram holder runs where no agent runs as the operator. Its own declaration of
`verified-sender` depends on it.
## Agents
- **In a terminal:**
1. The agent calls `authorise request`.
2. The router carries the ask to where the operator is ([07](07-the-work-context-and-the-desk.md)):
the desk, with a factor, or Telegram.
3. The agent sees `ask-answered`.
Nothing the agent says counts.
- **Through Telegram:** the request carries the conversation handle, so the ask appears in the same
chat, rendered by the holder, and the operator taps in place, destroy included.
## If something is compromised
| What is lost | What the attacker can do | What limits it |
|---|---|---|
| The bot token | Read what the bot is sent from then on. Steal taps (visible as 409). Send the operator fake messages. | It cannot call `authorise answer`. Revoke with BotFather's `/token`. |
| The operator's Telegram account, on a new device | Approve or acknowledge. | Telegram's two-step password. Every authorisation is announced on the other channels. Approve is reversible. Destroy needs a code. |
| The phone, unlocked | Everything, including destroy, if the authenticator is open on it. | An authenticator behind biometrics. One destroy per 10 minutes, announced. Backups (research 030). A setting turning destroy off for the away channel. |
| An agent on the operator's account | Click at the desk, read the desk's keystrokes, read the desktop holder's credential. | No tier accepts the desk without a code or a key touch the controller verifies. A code read off X11 is good for one step, and the race is said above. |
| A channel module, or its bus account | Forge P1 for approve or acknowledge. | It cannot forge P2 or P3. Destroy needs one of them. |
| Telegram itself | Read the words. In principle, forge a tap. | The content rule. Destroy needs P2 or P3, which Telegram never sees. |
**The factors' secrets are the controller's own.**
- The TOTP seed is made by the mesh. It is enrolled by showing its URI once, only to a terminal, and
never through a channel or an event.
- A security key is enrolled by registering its credential's public key.
- Re-enrolling either is a destroy ask.
## The other holders, for authorising
- **Matrix** can declare everything Telegram does: reactions, replies, a sender authenticated by the
mesh's own homeserver, codes. It is the self-hosted carrier once its push is measured.
- **ntfy:** an `http` action makes the phone call the mesh, with a credential inside the notification.
Nobody knows who tapped, and there is no reply. No tier.
- **Pushover:** acknowledgement, read back by polling a receipt. At most `acknowledge`.
- **Mail:** a reply can carry a code, but the sender is forgeable. No tier, except as break-glass.
## Sources
As in [04](04-telegram-as-the-first-holder.md) and [07](07-the-work-context-and-the-desk.md), and:
- Bot API `callback_data` (1–64 bytes), `answerCallbackQuery`, `ForceReply`, `deleteMessage`:
https://core.telegram.org/bots/api
- `answerCallbackQuery` is required even with no text: https://gramio.dev/telegram/methods/answercallbackquery
- X11 and its clients (input injection, keystroke reading):
https://hackindex.io/services/x11/exploitation/x11-session-hijacking and
https://www.semicomplete.com/projects/xdotool/
- `fido2-assert` (user presence, verifying an assertion):
https://developers.yubico.com/libfido2/Manuals/fido2-assert.html
- ntfy `http` actions: https://docs.ntfy.sh/publish/
- Pushover receipts: https://pushover.net/api
@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
# 09 — A proposed decision, and what the operator does now
This is the effort's reading as of 2026-10-06, written so that playbook 02 can turn it into a record
and amend to-be 45 §5. It is a proposal: nothing here is decided until it graduates.
## The recommendation, short
1. **The mesh holds a conversation with the operator over channels.** It sends messages and asks;
the operator answers or writes first. A message, an ask and an operator message are the three
things said ([06](06-a-conversation-with-the-operator.md)).
2. **Channels and intake are seats.** One kinded bench each, `channel` and `intake`. Each holder is a
module of its own, claiming a kind and declaring capabilities from a fixed, versioned vocabulary,
each with a contract test and a drill.
3. **Asks are general.** Yes or no, one of, text, number, date, acknowledge, each requiring its own
capabilities. They have timeouts, defaults, cancellation, batching and history. The answer returns
to the asker as an event, and an asker may wait.
4. **The output seat's holder is the router.** It chooses among the channels that satisfy a message or
ask, by **work context**: in a Telegram conversation, Telegram; at the desk, the desk; away, the
away channel. Unanswered, it escalates. **Context never lowers the bar** ([07](07-the-work-context-and-the-desk.md)).
5. **The desk is a full participant.** Notification actions and the launcher's prompt carry every
ordinary ask, with no account anywhere.
6. **Asks that authorise are a layer on top,** held by the controller. Three tiers (acknowledge,
approve, destroy), and three proofs the operator is answering (a verified Telegram sender, a code,
a security key's touch bound to the ask). The controller checks the channel's declared
capabilities from its own records and verifies codes and key assertions itself
([08](08-asks-that-authorise.md)).
7. **No agent authorises.** An agent asks; the operator answers where they are. On an X11 desk, where
an agent could click for them, only a code or a key touch counts. In a Telegram conversation, the
ask appears in that chat and is completed there, destroy included.
8. **Telegram is the first holder and the away channel.** It is free, on both phone platforms, needs
no server of the mesh's own, and is the only candidate that carries every tier
([04](04-telegram-as-the-first-holder.md), [05](05-the-other-holders-on-the-same-axes.md)).
9. **The watcher's watcher stays outside the seats,** with its own bot, on a machine that is not the
control node. A free outside dead-man service covers the rest. Pushover is the optional holder for
waking. Matrix is the self-hosted carrier once its push is measured.
10. **The built Telegram code needs D1–D4 fixed before it is configured**
([04](04-telegram-as-the-first-holder.md)).
## What the operator does
Minimal, in order. Steps 1–6 are possible today. The desk needs nothing from the operator: no account,
no bot.
1. **Make two bots.** In Telegram, open BotFather and run `/newbot` twice: one for the mesh's
conversation, one for the watcher. Keep each token out of agent sessions.
2. **Close them to groups:** `/setjoingroups` → Disable, for each bot.
3. **Press Start** in each bot's chat. A bot cannot write first.
4. **Turn on Telegram's two-step verification,** if it is not on.
5. **Find your chat id.** Until the linking verb exists, call `getUpdates` once, reading the token from
a file, and take `message.chat.id` from your `/start`. It is the same for both bots.
6. **Give the mesh the values,** through the controller, never on disk:
- accept the mesh bot's token as the output seat's holder's own secret `telegram-token`, and set
its `telegram-chat-id`;
- assign the watcher to a machine that is not the control node, accept the watcher bot's token,
and set its chat id;
- push both machines, and run each module's test verb.
7. **Later, once built:**
- make a free dead-man check, and give its ping address to the mesh;
- enrol an authenticator, at a plain terminal;
- optionally, enrol a security key, to approve at the desk with one touch.
## What would change in the code (proposal, not built)
- **Now, in the output seat's holder and the watcher:** D1 (cut at 4096 characters), D2 (a reopening
is a new message), D3 (a clearing reaches the newest message), D4 (`disable_notification` for
warnings and clearings), then D5–D10.
- **Catalogue:**
- a claim carries `kind` and `capabilities`;
- a kinded bench refuses two holders of one kind;
- the vocabulary `channel-capabilities/1` and its contract tests;
- the shared library publishes on a seat's event subjects.
- **Router:**
- asks (`ask`, `ask cancel`, `asks`, `answer`, and the events `ask-opened`, `ask-answered`,
`ask-closed`);
- the work context, from presence events;
- the escalation chain.
- **Desktop:** `node-notifier.send` gains actions, and the holder emits the chosen one. The
screen-lock holder emits lock and idle changes.
- **Controller:**
- `authorises` on the verb definition;
- `authorise request`, `authorise answer`, `authorisations`;
- `retire approve` takes `expect`;
- the authorising verbs refuse direct calls without a code;
- the hand-act gains `via`, `requested-by`, `ask` and `proofs`;
- the operator's identities, the TOTP seed and enrolled keys as its own;
- a self-check probe: the away channel satisfies every tier.
- **Modules:**
- a `telegram` module holding `channel` and `intake` (long polling, buttons, replies, `ForceReply`
codes, a linking verb with a one-time deep-link code), placed where no agent runs as the operator;
- an agent bridge for operator messages;
- the dead-man ping.
## The tables
### Ask kinds × what a channel needs
| Ask | deliver | choice | reply | threads | Trust (only if it authorises) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a message (no answer) | ✓ | | | | |
| acknowledge | ✓ | ✓ | | | tier acknowledge: `exact-render` |
| yes-no | ✓ | ✓ or | ✓ | ✓ | tier approve or destroy, if it authorises |
| one-of | ✓ | ✓ or | ✓ (a number) | ✓ | as above |
| text, number, date | ✓ | | ✓ | ✓ | never authorises |
### Authorising tiers × proofs
| Tier | Needs | Telegram | Desk with a key | Desk without a key |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| acknowledge | `choice`, `exact-render` | tap | click | click |
| approve | + one proof | tap (P1) | click + touch (P3) | click + code (P2) |
| destroy | + two proofs, one of them P2 or P3 | tap + code (P1 + P2) | click + touch + code (P3 + P2) | carried by Telegram |
### Surfaces × declared capabilities
✓ declared, ~ conditional, blank not.
| Surface | deliver | reaches-away | loud | silent | edit | choice | reply | threads | operator-first | verified-sender | exact-render | code-factor | key-factor | private | reaches-when-mesh-down |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| telegram | ✓ | ✓ | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ (placed apart from agents) | ✓ | ✓ | | | |
| desktop (dunst + launcher) | ✓ | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | | ✓ | ✓ | ~ (a key plugged in) | ✓ | |
| matrix (own server) | ✓ | ~ (push unmeasured) | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | ~ | |
| ntfy | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | ~ (http action) | | | | | ✓ | | | ~ | ~ (ntfy.sh) |
| pushover | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | ~ (acknowledge) | | | | ✓ | ✓ | | | | ✓ |
| mail (outside relay) | ✓ | ✓ | | ✓ | | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | ✓ | ~ | | | ✓ |
| an agent's terminal | — | | | | | | ~ (relayed) | | | | | | | | |
| the console | — | | | | | | | | | | ✓ (own output) | ✓ | | | |
| the watcher's sender | ✓ | ✓ | | | | | | | | | | | | | ✓ |
### Where things go, by context
The full table is in [07](07-the-work-context-and-the-desk.md). In one line each:
- **in a Telegram conversation:** that chat;
- **at the desk:** the desk, or the away channel when the desk cannot carry it;
- **away:** the away channel;
- **night:** urgent only;
- **unanswered:** the next in the chain;
- **the desk locks:** it moves away.
## The proposed record
> **Title.** The mesh holds a conversation with its operator over channels that are seats, chosen by
> capability and work context, and an answer that performs an action is authorised by the controller.
>
> **Context.** The output channel was built in its minimal form (ADR 0227, to-be 45 §5): one holder
> carrying the router, a Telegram client and a desktop adapter, and no answering back.
> - The operator expects many channels and many inputs.
> - The operator wants agents and modules to ask questions, not only for permission.
> - The operator wants the work context to choose the channel, and every authorisation completable on
> the away channel.
> - Today, actions that need a person are verbs any granted principal can call, agents included, and
> a hand-act records the calling principal, not the person.
>
> **Considered options.**
> 1. Channels as contributions to the output seat. A channel is running code with a secret and
> answers, not content a holder places.
> 2. One seat per channel kind. The router learns every seat.
> 3. Channel modules found by a manifest field. Callers use seats, never modules (ADR 0126).
> 4. One notifier with every channel built in. Shared failure, shared secrets, a release per channel.
> 5. A per-service module with its own approval or question path. Locks the conversation to one
> service.
> 6. **Kinded benches for out and in, a capability vocabulary, a router that holds the conversation
> and orders channels by work context, and an authorising layer held by the controller. Chosen.**
>
> For answers:
> - a webhook, or **long polling (chosen)**;
> - authorising actions called directly by the channel module, or **requested and answered through
> the controller (chosen)**;
> - trusting a desktop click, or **requiring a code or a key touch the controller verifies (chosen)**.
>
> **Decision.**
> - **The conversation.**
> - Two mesh seats are kinded benches: `channel` (send, edit, standing) and `intake` (one envelope
> per input).
> - Each holder is its own module, claims one kind, and declares capabilities from
> `channel-capabilities/1`, each with a contract test and a drill.
> - The output seat's holder routes messages and asks (yes-no, one-of, text, number, date,
> acknowledge) by required capability, then by work context, then by severity, escalating when
> unanswered. It says when nothing can carry something.
> - Asks have timeouts, defaults (never for an authorising ask), cancellation, a per-asker limit,
> batching and 30 days of history. Answers return to the asker as events.
> - Presence is current state on the bus, never a history, never in a message's words.
> - **Asks that authorise.**
> - The controller holds them: `authorise request` (anyone; never performs), `authorise answer`
> (intake holders only), `authorisations`.
> - It checks the caller's declared capabilities from its own records, the sender against its own
> list of the operator's identities, codes and key assertions itself, and the exact state's digest,
> single use and expiry.
> - Tiers acknowledge, approve and destroy require none, one and two proofs. The away channel must
> satisfy every tier, checked by the self-check, unless the operator chose otherwise for a tier.
> - No agent authorises. The authorising verbs refuse direct calls except as break-glass with a
> code.
> - The hand-act records `via`, `requested-by`, `ask` and `proofs`.
> - **First holders.**
> - Telegram is the first holder of both seats and the away channel, placed where no agent runs as
> the operator.
> - The desktop holds both for the desk.
> - The watcher's watcher stays outside the seats with its own bot, and an outside dead-man service
> is pinged by the self-check and the watcher.
>
> **Consequences.**
> - The output seat's holder loses its Telegram client to a module of its own and gains asks and the
> work context.
> - The catalogue gains `kind` and `capabilities` on a claim, and a second kind of bench.
> - `node-notifier.send` gains actions.
> - The controller's verb definition gains `authorises`, and `retire approve` takes the set it
> approves.
> - Agents' grants lose authorising verbs.
> - To-be 45 §5 is amended: the operator answers.
> - Telegram sees the words, held to the content rule, and never a factor's secret.
>
> **How it is checked.**
> - **Catalogue tests:**
> - an unknown capability is refused;
> - two holders of one kind are refused;
> - each declared capability's contract test runs in its holder's build.
> - **Router tests:**
> - an ask goes only to channels whose capabilities satisfy it;
> - context reorders but never adds a channel;
> - an authorising ask never defaults;
> - a cancelled ask's copies are edited;
> - a fourth open ask from one asker is refused.
> - **Controller tests,** one per refusal of `authorise answer`:
> - from a non-intake principal;
> - from a kind that does not meet the tier;
> - from an identity not on the list;
> - with too few proofs;
> - with a used code;
> - with a key assertion over another ask's challenge;
> - with a stale digest;
> - a second answer.
>
> Also: a direct `retire approve` without a code.
> - **Self-check probe:** the away channel meets every tier.
> - **Live drills:**
> - an agent's question answered at the desk;
> - the same with the desk locked, answered on the phone;
> - an approve and a destroy on a test condition, answered on the phone, with the hand-acts read.