Research only, following playbook 01. Research 028 is widened rather than a new effort opened: its Q1, Q4, Q7 and Q8 own the question, and ADR 0227 left answering back open here. The overview says why.
Documents, in reading order:
04: Telegram as the first holder. Making the bot, Bot API facts, what Telegram sees, failure modes, cost, and defects D1-D10 in the built Telegram code.
05: ntfy, Matrix, Pushover, Gotify, mail, Signal, SMS and an outside dead-man service, each judged as the away channel and as the watcher's path.
06: a conversation with the operator, the core model. It covers messages, asks (yes-no, one-of, text, number, date, acknowledge; with timeouts, defaults, cancellation, batching and history) and messages the operator writes first; the kinded benches channel and intake; the capability vocabulary with a contract test per capability; and agents as participants.
07: the work context and the desk. Routing by context with escalation; presence kept inside the mesh; desktop actions and the launcher's prompt as a full participant.
08: asks that authorise, a layer on top. The actions that need a person; trust capabilities; three proofs (a verified Telegram sender, a TOTP code, a security-key touch bound to the ask); acknowledge, approve and destroy tiers; the controller's authorise request / authorise answer; why a click on the X11 desk needs a factor; what a compromise exposes.
09: the recommendation, the operator's steps, the tables, and a proposed record ready for graduation.
Checks: records, index and cycle all pass. Not to be merged without a human review.
Research only, following playbook 01. Research 028 is widened rather than a new effort opened: its Q1, Q4, Q7 and Q8 own the question, and ADR 0227 left answering back open here. The overview says why.
Documents, in reading order:
- 04: Telegram as the first holder. Making the bot, Bot API facts, what Telegram sees, failure modes, cost, and defects D1-D10 in the built Telegram code.
- 05: ntfy, Matrix, Pushover, Gotify, mail, Signal, SMS and an outside dead-man service, each judged as the away channel and as the watcher's path.
- 06: a conversation with the operator, the core model. It covers messages, asks (yes-no, one-of, text, number, date, acknowledge; with timeouts, defaults, cancellation, batching and history) and messages the operator writes first; the kinded benches `channel` and `intake`; the capability vocabulary with a contract test per capability; and agents as participants.
- 07: the work context and the desk. Routing by context with escalation; presence kept inside the mesh; desktop actions and the launcher's prompt as a full participant.
- 08: asks that authorise, a layer on top. The actions that need a person; trust capabilities; three proofs (a verified Telegram sender, a TOTP code, a security-key touch bound to the ask); acknowledge, approve and destroy tiers; the controller's `authorise request` / `authorise answer`; why a click on the X11 desk needs a factor; what a compromise exposes.
- 09: the recommendation, the operator's steps, the tables, and a proposed record ready for graduation.
Checks: records, index and cycle all pass. Not to be merged without a human review.
The operator asked to approve and reject through Telegram, for a generic shape in which a
channel holds a seat, for input triggers, and for capabilities that decide which actions travel
where. Widen 028 rather than open a new effort, since its Q1, Q7 and Q8 own the question.
The operator widened the direction: asks need not be about permission, the work context picks
the channel, and desktop buttons should serve at the desk. Make the conversation the core model
and keep authorisation as a layer on top, with proofs a desk click alone cannot give.
mesh-admin
changed title from Research 028: channels and intake as seats, decisions from a channel, Telegram as first holder to Research 028: a conversation with the operator over channels that are seats; Telegram as first holder2026-10-06 14:24:39 +00:00
Deliverynovox/hq@e77ce351cdb9 — held since 2026-10-06T23:05:28Z
Held for a person: merged without a passing check: only a person decides that it goes on — mesh-delivery.release with why lets it go on.
Delivery plan — builds nothing: the change touches no module of the mesh's graph
Transitions
2026-10-06 23:05 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/hq#139 merged; its head was not heard by this owner, so it is made from the forge's word
2026-10-06 23:05 proposed → held (merged-unchecked): merged without a passing check — a verdict known with it is taken first: only a person decides that it goes on
The commit's note under refs/notes/mesh-plan keeps every transition: git log --notes=mesh-plan.
<!-- mesh-delivery:view -->
**Delivery** `novox/hq@e77ce351cdb9` — **held** since 2026-10-06T23:05:28Z
Held for a person: merged without a passing check: only a person decides that it goes on — `mesh-delivery.release` with why lets it go on.
**Delivery plan** — builds nothing: the change touches no module of the mesh's graph
**Transitions**
- 2026-10-06 23:05 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/hq#139 merged; its head was not heard by this owner, so it is made from the forge's word
- 2026-10-06 23:05 proposed → held (merged-unchecked): merged without a passing check — a verdict known with it is taken first: only a person decides that it goes on
The commit's note under `refs/notes/mesh-plan` keeps every transition: `git log --notes=mesh-plan`.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Research only, following playbook 01. Research 028 is widened rather than a new effort opened: its Q1, Q4, Q7 and Q8 own the question, and ADR 0227 left answering back open here. The overview says why.
Documents, in reading order:
channelandintake; the capability vocabulary with a contract test per capability; and agents as participants.authorise request/authorise answer; why a click on the X11 desk needs a factor; what a compromise exposes.Checks: records, index and cycle all pass. Not to be merged without a human review.
Research 028: channels and intake as seats, decisions from a channel, Telegram as first holderto Research 028: a conversation with the operator over channels that are seats; Telegram as first holderDelivery
novox/hq@e77ce351cdb9— held since 2026-10-06T23:05:28ZHeld for a person: merged without a passing check: only a person decides that it goes on —
mesh-delivery.releasewith why lets it go on.Delivery plan — builds nothing: the change touches no module of the mesh's graph
Transitions
The commit's note under
refs/notes/mesh-plankeeps every transition:git log --notes=mesh-plan.