Files
hq/02-DECISIONS/README.md
T
jschoubben 333356cff3 Order the records the way the system is learned
Jochen asked whether the order made sense. It did not -- it followed when
things happened to be decided, which after consolidation is fictional anyway
since record 5 alone folds decisions taken across a week.

Concretely wrong before: the domain statement sat at 8, after five engineering
rules; the constitution was scattered across 5, 12 and 17; the tiers landed at
15, 16, 21 and 22 with process records in between.

Now it walks: what the mesh is (1-3), its tiers from the bottom up (4-8), what
runs on them and how it gets there (9-10), how it is built (11-16), how it is
checked (17-18), how we work (19-23).

Two things made this safe rather than free. It is a permutation, not a
compaction, so the renames go through temporary names -- otherwise two files
want one slot and one is lost. And the reference rewrite is a single
simultaneous pass, because almost every number moved into a slot another number
was vacating; replacing one at a time would have cascaded and pointed things at
the wrong record while still resolving.

Verified: 284 [ADR NNNN](path) links across the repository, all with matching
text and target.

The ordering principle is now stated in 19 rather than left implicit -- the
repository already said "the numbering is the flow" about its folders, and
there was no reason for the records to be the exception.
2026-08-28 23:30:42 +02:00

68 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# 02-DECISIONS
Architecture decision records — the "why" trail behind the rules in
[`00-META`](../00-META/) and the specifications in [`03-DESIGN`](../03-DESIGN/).
**Numbered `02` because a decision precedes the design it authorises.** Research concludes,
the decision is recorded here, and only then is the design written. Following the folder
numbers walks the process in the order it happens.
One file per decision, numbered, never deleted. A superseded record has its `status:` changed
and gains a pointer to what replaced it — **its text is never edited**. The reasoning that was
rejected is the expensive half to rediscover.
The records run in the order the decisions were taken, oldest first.
**Every decision is a record.** There is no ledger and no index file — if a decision is worth
recording it is worth a record, and if it is not worth a record it is not recorded
([ADR 0019](0019-how-this-repository-works.md)). A "decision" small enough to be one line is
almost always a **rule**, and a rule belongs in
[`00-META/how-we-build.md`](../00-META/how-we-build.md), where it is enforced and keeps the
incident that earned it.
## Frontmatter
```yaml
---
status: proposed | accepted | superseded
date: YYYY-MM-DD # when the decision was taken, not when it was written down
deciders: name
reconstructed: true|false # true when the record was written after the fact from evidence
superseded-by: # 02-DECISIONS/NNNN-....md, when status is superseded
extends: # 02-DECISIONS/NNNN-....md, when this record widens an earlier one
---
```
## Body
```
# N. Title in plain language
## Context what was true, with evidence
## Considered Options numbered, each with why it was rejected
## Decision what was decided
## Consequences what follows, including what got harder
## References commits, pull requests, knowledge-base entries, prior art
```
State evidence, not assertion. *"Zero of 124 modules declare `brain` as a dependency"*
outranks *"the dependency rule is not followed"*.
## Reconstructed records
Records 0001–0014 were written on 2026-08-23, after the decisions they describe. Records 0015 onward were taken as records. Those
decisions were taken in implementation rather than in a document; the records state what was
decided and the evidence it was decided from, and each carries `reconstructed: true` and says
so in its first lines.
A reconstructed record is not a transcript. Where the deliberation is not recoverable, the
options section states what the alternatives were and why the chosen one won on the evidence
available — not a discussion that did not happen. Where a date is not establishable it says so
rather than guessing.
## Index
The index is **generated, not maintained** — run the `hq-status` skill, which reads the
frontmatter of every record. A hand-written index drifts from the folder it describes, and
this one had already done so after a single addition.