nox-mesh-host key makes the tunnel key, or reads the one made, and
prints its public half for the token to be issued for. enrol with a
token that carries a tunnel takes that key, refuses another, writes
mesh0 with the hub as its one peer and starts it, then reaches the bus
over it (novox/hq ADR 0169). Tokens without a tunnel enrol as before.
absent: true on a package has the host remove it through the machine's own
package manager when it is installed and leave alone a machine that never had
it; read back either way. Undeclaring a package still removes nothing. A
found firewall whose command is gone is recorded as removed, said once, and
asked nothing of.
The lab module needs the virtualisation daemon (novox/hq ADR 0172); the
capability is detected by asking the daemon about itself, not by finding
a client on disk.
Exactly the names declared reach the runtime, named in the spec so a change
recreates the container; a name that is not a capability's is refused and a
privileged container stays undeclarable. For a seat holder whose runtime
changes the machine's packet filter.
Every table and chain that refuses traffic is reported with whose it is:
the mesh's, the found firewall's, the container runtime's own, a ban, or
other — the runtime's user chain is other, which is where both predecessors
kept their rules, in the legacy filter on one machine and invisible to the
mesh. Adoption's threshold does not move; a converged machine's report
grows by its filters and its found firewall's state.
Convergence is a state the host keeps: a found firewall enabled again is
retired again and said; a reconcile that finds it inactive records that it
was found so, never that the mesh did it; a step skipped after a failed
apply is said. A retirement the mesh began and did not finish is finished.
Fixtures are rulesets captured from three machines of the first mesh.
The filter accepts what does not arrive on a link the machine names as
outward, and the host named only links carrying a default route. An
unplugged wired port was left unfiltered for whenever it was plugged in
(novox/hq issue 197). A link backed by a physical device is now named
whether or not it is up.
The host delivers its own successor as an archive whose target is a new
directory each version, and since mesh-host 63 the record keeps a resource's
former target for the next apply to remove. An archive has no removal (issue
162), so the first host that replaced itself under that rule refused its own
former version at the first step of every apply, and all four machines applied
nothing from then on. A former target nobody dropped is forgotten and said;
an archive the declaration dropped still refuses.
A container may name networks it also joins once created, for the per-machine
setting that keeps a found network while a neighbour still resolves it there:
joined after the run, part of the spec, refused when it cannot be joined.
A declaration may say which modules the mesh left out because a stored setting
cannot compose with its definition. Absence used to read as removal; a left-out
module's records are kept and said, and its holds are not released.
Genesis raises the bootstrap forge under the gitea module's container name, with
its image digest and its data directory mounted at /data, so the module holds it
by the found rule instead of raising a second forge beside it (issue 090). The
network is the one difference left for a take to say. Before this the forge had
no volume: its repositories were the container's, lost with it.
Every held thing carries what a take compares: for a found container its image and the image's date,
the networks it is on and the other containers on each, its mounts and published ports, beside the
declared image (and its date once pulled), ports and volumes, with the downgrade decided when both
dates are known; for a found file whether the declared content differs and how, as lines lost and
lines new. A resource whose target moved keeps the former target on record as an orphan, so the next
apply removes the container or file the host wrote under the old name (issue 097). Every apply reports
the strays: containers the mesh neither wrote nor holds.
The controller's own composition (mesh-controller internal/broker, 2026-10-01)
publishes memberships into the assignments stream after each push and
subscribes to its seat's tool subjects; the list the installer carries did
not say so, and a controller on it is refused on the first thing it tries:
"Permissions Violation for Publish to mesh.assignment.novox.builder" (hq #251),
which is why every build asked through the console was lost. The controller's
test that compares the two (TestTheInstallersFirstUserListIsWhatTheControllerWouldCompose,
run with this checkout beside it) named exactly these two subjects, and passes.
One capability per manager — uplink-networkmanager, uplink-systemd-networkd, uplink-dhcpcd — from
systemctl is-active, so the uplink seat's holder for a manager this machine does not run is refused
the way any missing capability is, naming it (issue 138). The apply that reports detects the profile
again and sends it, the same shape enrolment sends, so a machine that switched managers reaches the
mesh at its next push.
novox/hq 04-ISSUES/107. A declaration's only identity was the digest of
its bytes: a host could say "not the last" and could not say "older". On
the link, nothing refused an older one at all, and the drain picked the
last to arrive — wrong exactly when it mattered, a backlog drained out of
order or a broker that split a burst.
A declaration may now carry a sequence, one higher per send. A host
refuses one lower than what it kept, whole, and says why. The drain keeps
the highest sequence in a batch rather than the last to arrive.
Only when both sides claim an order. Absent reads as zero — "no ordering
claimed", not "first" — so a controller that sends none is still
understood and a host that kept one before it understood them compares
nothing. That is what lets hosts go first and the controller follow, which
is the order 087 says a new field needs.
novox/hq 04-ISSUES/163. The host asks after every apply whether a newer
host is delivered than the one running, and asked with the link-time
version stamp — which every delivered host carries as "development
build", because the version comes from where the binary sits now (0142).
So a delivered host never matched the newest delivered version, stood
aside on every push for ever, and because standing aside cancels the
report, the mesh never heard from it again.
Measured on two machines: each push produced "host <v> is delivered;
standing aside" for the version already running, then "applied, and could
not tell the mesh: reporting: context canceled". A machine restarting its
host on every push and reporting nothing, reading as healthy.
Asked with the running version now. Half of 0142 was applied to the
report and the known-good record and not here; this is the other half.
novox/hq ADR 0142, which decided this and was not implemented: "It is
unpacked into a directory named for its version, so it can read its own
version from its path. The stamp goes, and with it the need for a build to
know what it will be called."
The mesh's toolchain stamps no version, on purpose, so a delivered host
called itself "development build" and the mesh could not tell which host
any machine ran — which is the whole of what 087 added. A delivered host
lives at <libexec>/versions/<version>/<binary>, and that directory is the
answer.
A host placed by hand keeps its stamp, which is the honest answer for one
the mesh did not deliver, and is every machine until a delivery reaches
it. A binary sitting anywhere else is not read as a version at all.
The decision is split from the reading so a test can ask about a path
without being that binary.
novox/hq ADR 0141 and 04-ISSUES/142. A version was being delivered to a
machine and nothing started it: the launcher on these machines predates
the versions mechanism and runs the fixed binary path, so the delivery was
correct and inert.
Delivered as a FILE resource, not as part of an archive, and the
difference is the whole reason this is safe. A file is written atomically —
temp file in the same directory, then rename — so the running launcher
keeps the inode it was started from and the next start picks up the new
one. An archive writes in place with truncate, which would cut the file a
running shell is reading halfway through.
The manifest therefore carries a second copy of the script, and a test
refuses any difference between it and packaging/nox-mesh-host-launch.
Proven by drifting one and watching it fail. Two copies of a script is a
bad thing to accept, and the alternative was writing over a running
supervisor.
Together the two resources complete the loop: the version lands, the
running host stands aside because it sees one delivered, and the launcher
that starts next is the one that looks in versions/ and picks the newest
by arrival.
nox-mesh-host, not mesh-host. The command directory is cmd/mesh-host and
the launcher looks inside a delivered version for nox-mesh-host — the name
this is installed at and the name in its unit. The first delivery landed
the package's name, reported success, and would have been invisible.
novox/hq ADR 0141 and 04-ISSUES/142. The host half of the delivery has
been built and tested since 0141 and has never had a version to work on:
versions side by side, the newest runs, the running one stands aside
between reconciles, rollback picks a directory. This is the declaration
that gives it one.
One archive, unpacked to /usr/lib/nox-mesh-host/versions/${version}. The
version resolves to the artifact's digest, so an unchanged build lands at
the path it already had and re-composing a declaration moves nothing.
Not circular: the host applying this is a different version from the one
being written, and neither writes over the other — the kernel refuses to
truncate a running executable, which is the reason the path carries the
version rather than a link pointing at "current".
**The launcher is deliberately not delivered here.** The one on these
machines predates the versions mechanism and runs the fixed binary path,
so a delivered version is inert until it is replaced — and replacing it
from the mesh means writing over a running shell script, which sh reads
incrementally. That wants a designed swap rather than a file resource, and
it is the last piece rather than this one.
novox/hq 04-ISSUES/142 and ADR 0142. Nothing delivered the host because
nothing could compile it, and nothing could compile it partly because the
host was not a thing the mesh builds at all — it had no manifest.
One bundle in Go, for arch, built from cmd/mesh-host. A system is
required for a compiled artifact because a binary is pinned at link time
so a host refuses to touch a machine it was not built for (ADR 0005), and
`arch` is what all four of this mesh's machines report themselves to be.
Another system is another artifact and another build, which is what ADR
0142 means by one per target.
No resources yet. What places a version into a directory named for it
needs an archive resource whose path carries the version, and nothing
interpolates one — the second half of 0141's insight, and the next piece.
novox/hq 04-ISSUES/125. An adopted node keeps what it found until its
module is taken, which is correct and was recorded only in the node's own
state file. On the edge cut-over the mesh sent 346 resources, the journal
said it applied 330, and nothing anywhere said which sixteen or why —
reading it meant opening state.json by hand, and not reading it took every
public name on the machine down.
The line that reports the apply now carries it, grouped by module and
ordered by name, because the sentence an operator needs is "route-proxy is
assigned and not taken" and the module is the thing `take` acts on. An
apply that held nothing says nothing extra: a line that reports "0 held"
on every converged apply is a line that stops being read.
novox/hq 04-ISSUES/146, the layers behind the three already fixed.
A new membership says which bus it is for. Empty meant 'whatever the mesh runs
today' while two buses existed, and became a refusal the moment one did: an
enrolled node came up and reconnected for ever against its own record.
The enrolling client takes its inboxes in the space its user may listen in. A
JetStream publish waits for the stream's acknowledgement on an inbox the client
picks, and its default is one this user may not subscribe to — so the enrolment
failed with a permissions violation on a subject nobody had chosen.
And the enrolment publish carries a message id, so the client's own retry is
discarded by the stream rather than enrolling the machine twice. That one is
not finished: the duplicate survives it, and the issue says where the trail
stops.
novox/hq 04-ISSUES/146. Each was right while the mesh ran on the previous
broker, and nothing has raised a foundation since it changed.
The bus's certificate is made by the program that needs it rather than by
openssl inside the broker's image — the bus's image is Alpine with a shell and
no openssl, so the step exited 127 and no mesh could be raised. Self-signed as
before and on purpose; --user 0:0 because the volume is root's and the control
plane's image runs as nobody.
Enrolment no longer opens a raw TLS connection to check the pin: NATS speaks
its own protocol and upgrades afterwards, so the handshake met a plaintext
greeting. The client that presents the token carries the same pinned config
and verifies inside its own handshake, so the secret still leaves only after
the certificate is checked. The raw dial stays as what its tests prove, and is
no longer a path anything takes.
And the token says which bus it is for. Empty meant 'whatever the mesh runs
today' while two buses existed and became a refusal the moment one did.
It now stops at the bus's user list, which is the genesis half of 146.
The serving path passed nil where the apply writes its detail. Nil is silence, so
everything the apply says — a file held, a container replaced, the found firewall
retired — was visible when a person ran the one-shot command and discarded in the
way the host actually runs, which is always.
Measured: after a machine was converged and its found firewall was not retired,
what the host decided was unrecoverable, because it had said it to nobody. That is
why issue 143 has candidates instead of a cause.
say already reaches stdout and the unit sends that to the journal, so this needed
no new mechanism — only for the argument to be passed. Both paths now reach the
apply through one named helper, so a reader asking where the apply's output goes
finds one answer.
The test asserts the log is never nil and cannot catch the fault it was written
for, which is wiring; that is proved by a deployed host whose journal carries the
detail.
A reconcile is otherwise silent, and the condition deciding when it speaks asked
only what an adopted node reports: what it holds, and the firewall it found. A
converged node has neither, so it could speak only in reply to a declaration —
and the mesh composes no declaration for a node that has not said which links
face outside (ADR 0140). A machine waiting for a push that was waiting for the
machine.
Measured, not predicted: after the control plane learnt to read the links, the
control node recorded its own and the three converged machines sat silent while
their filters were refused.
The condition is now a named predicate, because as an inline expression nothing
could test it — which is why the gap shipped.
jschoubben
mesh-admin