mesh/merge-gate pass: the change touches no module of the mesh's graph
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed
A walk mesh-delivery never lets go waited for ever with nothing open; the
controller now says it itself (S16), and the delivery's own stalls are its
conditions too (D14, H2 through close).
A build registered before its turn is carried by the next send to its
machines, so a published delivery asks nothing until its walk starts; the
rows the build needed (appeared, adopted, held on no walk, held then go)
and Phase B's verbs-without-probe are now said.
mesh/merge-gate pass: the change touches no module of the mesh's graph
One owner for one commit's journey, so 'did my change go out' is answered by
one module instead of five records joined by hand; delivery groups make the
cross-repository order the mesh enforces instead of the person merging.
Turning the merge check on for every repository showed it asked the wrong questions: a
repository chose whether it was checked, the gate mapped a change onto modules its own
way, the shared-code rule rebuilt 103 modules for a root script, and nothing kept a
commit off the trunk from becoming a module's version. Records the operator's decisions,
narrows ADR 0237 decision 4, revises to-be 45 §9 and Phase 5 and to-be 30, closes issue
280's left-open, and gives this repository its own merge-check.sh.
An image is not byte-reproducible, so ADR 0236's no-move rule never held
for one; the rule now also reads a build's source. Progressive insight on
ADR 0236 says what the rule assumed and what stands.
The operator approved Phase 5. Decides what the design left open: the build seat runs the
merge check, the facts live in the artifact store, the merge gate composes the mesh as it is
and with the change and judges only what the change adds, a replay lives where its incident
is, and the controller's tests run a bus of their own at the mesh's release. A core issue now
resolves only with a replay or a stated reason, checked by cycle.py.
The release gate judges a module from outside (applied, no new condition,
tools answer); a container that restarts in a loop or a service that fails
its own work passes it. Investigate a health declaration in every manifest.
Planned bus upgrades and rotations after one leak raised healer-wanted,
because the exemption was keyed on two causes. Progressive insight: the
exemption is read from the verb table; the decisions stand.
The 103-module rebuild ADR 0236 put down to the build agent came from a file of the catalogue's
reference module, read as shared because its definition was not in the merge. Records the issue,
corrects ADR 0236's open question as a progressive insight (the tiering was right; the build agent
never widens a plan) and amends to-be 30's rule for what a merge changed.
The coordinator's review: at the switch to roll, every send would carry the old default's
backlog unjudged. Measured: 88 of the 103 rebuilt modules were byte-identical, and no
build waited on any machine.
Phase 4 of to-be 45, started by the operator: the core's health as probes, a gate on
every plan's first machine, the rollback there once per build, the witness's contract
with the host, the bus as a step a person starts, and — with those in place — rolling
out as the default, keeping record where a module says why. 47 pushes by hand in one
day are what it ends.
Record the single-sample flaw found across the probes and watchdogs, and
the summaries that carried addresses and paths past the operator channel's
content rule; amend to-be 45 §4 with the two-look rule and the summary rule.
The operator decided the two consumers that took a failed write must retry and never lose an event: record how (a thrown write, a spool that takes the last delivery and replays, idempotent writes, a bound that borrows max-deliveries), and why the module counts its own deliveries.
Resolves ADR 0233's flagged item (the bus's streams copied as live files) as
a progressive insight pointing here. The bus module's own account is granted
the snapshot API and nothing else; restore builds a new store beside the live
one for a person to swap in. To-be 43 gains the bus's section and its restore
steps; design 25 and to-be 45 point to it.
A refresh answered with an empty body was read as JSON, so the media server module's handler threw after scanning; each finished download was offered five times and raised a false max-deliveries. Records the one rule for taking an event, and where the fixes are.
Nothing large is walked; the first night's size on the home server is measured and stated, the
previews are left out, the platform database is dumped, and the bus's live copy is flagged.
The operator's direction after issue 273: what data a module keeps, how precious it is and how it
is protected is said once, in the manifest, and backups, sticky bindings, retirement on unassign
and the self-check's watch are derived from it. Amends to-be 18, 32, 43 and 45.
The operator found four gaps that would bite on first use: a lost phone
locked the mesh's only person out, an operator message had no addressee,
asks could not name the specifics they need, and the operator was a
holder's flag. Each is now a rule with its check and its build phase.
Research 028 graduates: the mesh needs to ask as well as tell, over
channels that are seats rather than code inside one notifier, and an
action a person must approve cannot rest on a desk click an agent can
forge. TOTP verified by the controller is the proof; a key stays optional.
Amends to-be 45 section 5 as ADR 0227 left it to.
The operator widened the direction: asks need not be about permission, the work context picks
the channel, and desktop buttons should serve at the desk. Make the conversation the core model
and keep authorisation as a layer on top, with proofs a desk click alone cannot give.
The operator asked to approve and reject through Telegram, for a generic shape in which a
channel holds a seat, for input triggers, and for capabilities that decide which actions travel
where. Widen 028 rather than open a new effort, since its Q1, Q7 and Q8 own the question.
Issue 258's seat rule, written for the resolver, re-bound a machine's database consumers to the store
holding the seat elsewhere, where each was made an empty database, and nothing said so. Record the
incident, limit 258's rule to provisions that keep nothing, and decide that a binding to data is
kept and moved only by a pin.
jochen
mesh-admin
jschoubben