mesh/check pass 0de30064156a on 7aedd28f01dc | unit 2667 run, 590 kept, 36 skipped | integration 2676 run, 633 kept, 29 skipped | over bound: unit (sl…
The applying path (frombus.Compose) composed with no culprit, so one module's
refusal came back as the whole node's: novox's apply would have refused all its
modules for de-spiegel's unset route names. composeEach is now the one rule
Compose and Answer both follow:
- a module whose stub changes the refusal is held (compose.Node.Held); in the
applying path a stand-in for a module placed here holds that module; only a
refusal of no single module refuses the node;
- a held module is composed from what runs of it (compose.Carried of its own
composition in Running) and carried in the node's own wherever that runs it,
folded or leaving the fold, so the node's own apply never removes it (issue
1945 by a new path) and what the others read of it is what runs;
- none of a held module's own composition is in what is applied;
- a module whose composition differs when the held ones are composed as stubs
is held too; the node's own differing refuses the node;
- since a held module is composed from its new manifest, what reads that
manifest is held with it: the providers of what it contributes to (the
proxy its routes) and, when it listens, the filter's holder.
Quick fix weighed: a culprit loop in Compose alone. Thorough, chosen: one
shared function, since the kind met twice (seed-8 shadow, now the apply), and
review rounds 1 and 2 found its leaks.
mesh/check pass 1618837ea9fe on 6097e4f3e040 | carried from mesh-catalog 25f615456423 | unit 2293 run, 3984 kept, 16 skipped | integration 2331 run, 4…
A node whose module proves a need of the machine missing (ace's /dev/net/tun, 2026-10-28) pulled
image asks and failed each one; judged ineligible, its capacity is 0 with the reason, as build hours
are, so the asks go to a node that can build them (issue 1126 note).
mesh/check failed: integration: github.com/novox/mesh-host/cmd/mesh-host.TestNatsANodeThePlacementNamesComposesAndAppliesItsOwn: the node did not comp…
delivery.OwnNeedName reads <module>.needs-<name> and the bare needs-<name>; OwnValuesDiffer and the node agent use it.
The fixtures carry the id shape captured from novox's shadow answer.
delivery.OwnValuesDiffer, ValuesDiffer and WithValuesDiffer read the shown bodies masked as another value; a candidate
answer carries values_differ. The node agent hands the vault those own secrets' running values through move-in's
replace_running, so no seat verb and no bus grant changes here.
Seals are reused and compared by slot (resource, field), never across resources;
one rule says which resolved config values are laid; a seat path that steps back
is owned by the seat it steps back for, whatever the seat order; a folded module
of an old-form build is composed from what runs of it; the operator export's file
is carried as it runs; a differing resource names its differing JSON paths, found
before its bodies are cut, and an answer is fitted to the node's key.
mesh/check pass 362a3f1378aa on 03da552cb331 | unit 2860 run, 1141 kept, 36 skipped | integration 2887 run, 1241 kept, 29 skipped | over bound: unit (…
ace and g14 answered 'nothing in this mesh provides artifact-store … assign
distribution to a node' while novox runs it: a module another node cannot run
in this composition (catalogue Resolution.Unhostable) offers nothing, silently.
The refusal now names each such module and what it lacks, and each node left
out. And the culprit search composed the whole mesh once per placed module for a
refusal no stub changes (ace's answer took 7m46s): only the modules the refusal
names are tried, at most 8.
novox's answer to seed #531 named 15 resources by id alone, so why each differed
was guessed. ModuleDiffers.Bodies keeps every differing resource with both
bodies, each value under a key a secret could be in masked (the same, another
seal of the same value, another value). The five old-form modules read
'removed' because the agent also lists them by module from the declaration kept
before the switch; they are judged inside the node's own. And the node's own
lacked bus-membership, which only the controller composes from its store: the
membership the node runs is carried, until the grants part hands it sealed.
The check of the seed's revert (mesh-catalog #526) failed on 'would stop
running node': the shadow answered a deleted placement as everything removed,
while the node keeps what runs. HaveNode.Composes and ComposesWhy say whether a
node applies its own compositions or the controller's; CandidateAnswer.Returns
answers a deleted placement, verdict same, naming nothing composed.
The seed's shadow answers named the first refusal only (ace: baserow's archive,
novox: de-spiegel), so each round showed one more. A build that cannot be read or
taken in, and a module the composition refuses, are now each composed as a stub
and named. A module folded into the node's own composition whose manifest names a
build (de-spiegel, nats, photos, systemd-resolved: haves naming a build-... id)
runs a build only the controller holds: it is composed as a stub and its
resources are carried as the node runs them.
frombus composed every module from the indexer's raw manifest: no moved module
was handed, so the node stood in for own secrets the vault leaves to the
provisioner (the seed's refusals on all four nodes), and a provider elsewhere
had no config values, so mailu's served domain refused shanks.
- takein: the controller's take-in of a done key (artifacts, launchers, the
templates archive's texts, Resolve) as one SDK rule; catalogue.Launchers holds
the launcher rule buildstep now delegates to.
- frombus: each module placed on the composing node, and each kept at another
build (Scope.KeptAt, a fingerprint), composes from its built manifest; another
node's modules give the keys their served values fill (Reader.Served).
- buscompose: Declared.Served and Principal.ServedReads grant every node the read
of exactly those keys of mesh-config_resolved.
- compose.ArtifactStoreAddress: the store as the node's composition routes to it.
mesh/check checking 05b678310366 on 56de5ba84010 | novox/mesh-sdk#107 in group fix/1126-fold
mesh-wireguard (built by nobody) and every module a node runs inside its own
composition (Node.InOwn, from frombus.InOwn of what it runs) were cut out as
skipped: every node's shadow answered differs to the placement seed, and a node
composing itself after it would drop their resources. compositions now folds
them in place, module taken off, filled paths with them, as mesh-controller's
compositionsOf does; a want naming a new-form build still moves one out.
jschoubben
mesh-tools